Published online November 1, 2007
PEDIATRICS Vol. 120 No. 5 November 2007, pp. e1157-e1164 (doi:10.1542/peds.2007-0306)
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pinto, N. M.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pinto, N. M.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, M. S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Heart & Blood Vessels
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

ARTICLE

Obesity Is a Common Comorbidity in Children With Congenital and Acquired Heart Disease

Nelangi M. Pinto, MDa, Bradley S. Marino, MD, MPP, MSCEa, Gil Wernovsky, MDa, Sarah D. de Ferranti, MD, MPHb, Amy Z. Walsh, RNb, Meena Laronde, RNb, Kristen Hyland, BAa, Stanley O. Dunn, Jr, BAa and Meryl S. Cohen, MDa

a Division of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
b Department of Cardiology, Children's Hospital Boston, Boston, Massachusetts


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 STUDY LIMITATIONS
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
OBJECTIVES. Obesity may pose additional cardiovascular risk to children with acquired and congenital heart disease. Many children with heart disease are sedentary as a result of physician-, parent-, and/or self-imposed restrictions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the epidemic of obesity on children with heart disease.

PATIENTS AND METHODS. A cross-sectional review was performed of children evaluated in 2004 at 2 cardiology outpatient clinics. Differences in the prevalence of obese (BMI ≥ 95%) and overweight (BMI 85%–95%) children were compared with national data and healthy control subjects. Dictated letters were reviewed to determine whether obesity was discussed with referring practitioners.

RESULTS. Of 2921 patients assessed, 1523 had heart disease. Diagnostic subgroups included "mild" heart disease (n = 401), arrhythmia (n = 447), biventricular repair (n = 511), univentricular palliation (Fontan; n = 108), and heart transplantation (n = 56). More than 25% of the patients with heart disease were obese or overweight; the prevalence of obese and overweight children was significantly lower only in the Fontan group (15.9%). Pediatric cardiologists failed to document obesity or weight counseling in the majority of clinic letters.

CONCLUSIONS. Obesity is common in children with congenital and acquired heart disease. Pediatric cardiologists demonstrate inadequate communication regarding this problem to referring practitioners. Healthy-lifestyle counseling and routine exercise in children with heart disease may be underemphasized.


Key Words: obesity • pediatric • congenital heart disease • BMI

Abbreviations: NHANES—National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey • CHOP—Children's Hospital of Philadelphia • CHB—Children's Hospital Boston • EP—electrophysiology

Childhood obesity has increased dramatically in the last half century. The most recent data published by the Center for Disease Control's serial National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) indicates a 45% increase in the prevalence of obese children in the past decade.1 Childhood obesity has been shown to be a significant predictor of obesity in adulthood.2,3 Furthermore, childhood obesity is associated with systemic hypertension, type 2 diabetes, and endothelial dysfunction and is an independent predictor of coronary artery disease and premature death in adults.47 Obese adolescents exhibit changes in left ventricular mass related to an increased cardiac workload.8 Even with normal ventricular mass, overweight children exhibit subtle changes in diastolic function that may have implications for their future cardiovascular health.9

The impact of obesity on long-term cardiovascular health may be particularly important to children with preexisting congenital or acquired heart disease. Although much emphasis is placed on preventive medicine in adult cardiology, it is not often a focus of the pediatric cardiology outpatient visit despite recent guidelines on protecting future cardiovascular health in childhood.10 Children with congenital heart disease may have unique risk factors that contribute to the development of obesity. Children with certain types of heart disease may be at risk for failure to thrive in early infancy. Thus, practitioners have historically focused on encouraging weight gain, particularly in early childhood, when long-term eating habits begin to develop. Moreover, children with some forms of heart disease are commonly cautioned against certain types of physical activity. Recently, it has been shown that formal activity restriction in children with heart disease may be a predictor of the development of obesity.11

Very limited data exist about the prevalence of obesity in children with congenital and acquired heart disease. Because survival is now expected into adulthood for many of these patients,12 identifying the degree to which this additional cardiovascular risk factor exists within this population is likely to have important implications for long-term outcomes. The purpose of this study was to estimate the prevalence of obesity and overweight in children with heart disease, to assess the impact of obesity on systolic blood pressure measurement in this population, and to determine whether weight counseling was documented in referral correspondence to primary care physicians.


    PATIENTS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 STUDY LIMITATIONS
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Charts from outpatient cardiology clinic visits at 2 centers, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) and Children's Hospital Boston (CHB), for the calendar year 2004 were reviewed. All of the patients aged 6 to 19 years at the time of their visit were candidates for inclusion (the same age group highlighted by the National Center for Health Statistics from the 1999–2002 NHANES).2 Exclusion criteria included factors independently associated with obesity or failure to thrive, such as a known genetic syndrome, mechanical support (such as a tracheostomy or gastrostomy tube), a diagnosis of protein-losing enteropathy, or referral specifically for hyperlipidemia or obesity. Systematic selection of patients was achieved by sampling every third patient by date of visit at CHOP and by sampling every third patient by alphabetized last name at CHB. Patients with multiple visits during the year had only their most recent clinic visit included.

Cardiology outpatient letters are the equivalent of clinic notes at CHOP and CHB. Data collected from cardiology outpatient letters included gender, age at visit, weight, height, heart rate, blood pressure, primary cardiac diagnosis, type of surgical or catheter intervention if performed, and documentation of discussion of weight. Documented blood pressure data were 1-time measurements obtained with either a Dinamap automated blood pressure monitor or by manual sphygmomanometer at the time of the clinic visit. Patients were grouped into 5 diagnostic heart disease categories: (1) "mild heart disease" that has not been treated with either surgical or catheter intervention (eg, mild valvar disease, hemodynamically insignificant septal defects, or Kawasaki's disease); (2) primary rhythm disturbances in patients with structurally normal hearts (electrophysiology [EP]); (3) congenital heart disease with surgical and/or catheter-directed intervention culminating in a biventricular circulation (biventricular repair); (4) complex congenital heart disease (typically a univentricular heart) resulting in Fontan palliation (Fontan); and (5) cardiac transplantation. "Clinic control subjects" were healthy patients referred to the 2 outpatient clinics and discharged with a diagnosis of no heart disease (eg, chest pain, palpitations, or functional murmurs).

BMI was calculated from weight and height data and then plotted on Centers for Disease Control and Prevention BMI curves to determine age- and gender-appropriate percentiles. For the purposes of this study, "obese" was defined as BMI ≥95th percentile and "overweight" was defined as BMI in the 85th to 95th percentile.13 Blood pressure measurements were similarly converted to percentiles that were standardized for age, gender, and height.14

Statistical Analysis
Descriptive data were expressed as means with SDs (normally distributed continuous variables), as medians and ranges (nonnormally distributed continuous data), or as proportions (categorical and dichotomous variables). Continuous variables were evaluated for central tendency and variability with the Shapiro-Francia test. Systolic blood pressure percentiles were graphed by box-and-whisker plots. Diastolic blood pressure data were not analyzed, because they are inherently unreliable by automated measurement.

The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare differences in age and BMI between control subjects and patients with heart disease. Fisher's exact test was used to compare dichotomous variables, including gender, the presence of obesity and heart disease, diagnostic categories, and documentation of weight counseling. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was also used to determine whether there was any difference in age or blood pressure percentile based on overweight category.

Obesity and overweight proportions for the total cohort, each center, the heart disease group, and individual diagnostic categories were obtained from contingency tables. The prevalence of obesity and overweight were compared against the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention NHANES control data,1 cohort patients without heart disease who were treated as internal control subjects, and between the 2 centers using the 2-sample test of binomial proportions. This test was also used to compare weight counseling between centers.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 STUDY LIMITATIONS
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
After selection, 2921 patients met criteria for this study. Study population characteristics are described in Table 1. There was no difference in age or gender between the clinic control subjects and patients with heart disease. Table 2 describes the breakdown of patients at each center. Patients without heart disease (clinic control subjects: n = 1398 [47.9%]) made up the largest percentage of the study population, both in total and at each center. A significantly higher percentage of patients with mild heart disease and biventricular repair were selected from CHB, whereas more EP patients were selected from CHOP. Table 3 describes patients with heart disease from both centers. There was no difference in age between the patients with heart disease who were obese and overweight and those with a normal BMI.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1 Study-Cohort Characteristics

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2 Clinic Population According to Diagnostic Category

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 3 Selected Variables According to BMI Category for Patients With Heart Disease

 
The overall prevalence of obesity in the total cohort was 15.2%, and combined obesity and overweight was 29.1%. This was not different from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention NHANES national prevalence data for children aged 6 to 19 years of 16% obese and 31% either obese or overweight (Fig 1A). 1 Healthy patients without heart disease (clinic control subjects) were no different in their prevalence of obesity and overweight than those in the NHANES population, suggesting that the 2 outpatient control populations were representative of these national data. Patients with any type of heart disease (combined assessment of mild heart disease, biventricular repair, Fontan, EP, and transplant groups) had a lower prevalence of obese (13.8%) and combined obese and overweight patients (26.2%) than the healthy clinic controls (P = .032 and P < .001, respectively). When patients with heart disease were divided into diagnostic categories, transplant, EP, and mild heart disease groups had a similar prevalence of obesity and overweight as the healthy control population (Fig 1B). Patients with palliated congenital heart disease, both biventricular repair and Fontan, had a lower prevalence of obesity and overweight (Fig 1B). Although the prevalence was statistically lower than in the healthy control patients, 23.9% of patients with a biventricular repair and 15.9% of Fontan patients were obese or overweight. Healthy control patients from CHB had a statistically lower prevalence of obesity than those seen at CHOP, but the prevalence of obesity in children with heart disease was similar at both centers. In addition, there was no difference in the prevalence of overweight between the centers in either the healthy control or heart disease patients.


Figure 1
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 1 Prevalence of obesity and overweight. A, Prevalence of national data (from NHANES 1999–2002) compared with the clinic cohort and patients with heart disease (HD). The heart-disease group includes all patients who had mild heart disease, EP, biventricular repair (2V), univentricular palliation, and transplant (see text for details). a P < .03 when compared with control patients. B, Prevalence of national data and clinic controls against categories of heart disease. b P < .01 for comparisons with national data and controls. The P values not given were all not significant.

 
Figure 2 compares the systolic blood pressure percentiles for normal weight, overweight, and obese patients (unadjusted for medication use). For those with any form of heart disease, the systolic blood pressure percentile was significantly higher in the obese and overweight groups compared with those with normal BMI (P < .001). This trend was also shown in the healthy clinic control subjects.


Figure 2
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 2 Systolic blood pressure (SBP) percentiles according to BMI class. A, For patients with heart disease, systolic blood pressure percentile was increasingly higher in obese and overweight patients when compared with those with normal BMI. B, This difference was also seen in clinic controls. These figures were unadjusted for medication use. P < .001 for each comparison of overweight and obese against normal-BMI patients.

 
Discussion of weight, as documented by clinic letters, occurred in only 13.3% of obese patients and 8.7% of overweight patients who were followed for acquired and congenital heart disease. There was no statistically significant difference between the frequency of documented weight discussion between CHOP and CHB.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 STUDY LIMITATIONS
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Similar to the alarming trend of obesity in otherwise healthy children, our study shows that there is a disturbingly high prevalence of obesity and overweight in children with the additional risk factors of congenital or acquired heart disease. More than one quarter of children with heart disease are obese or overweight.

The impact of obesity on other pediatric patient populations with chronic diseases, such as cystic fibrosis, end-stage renal disease, and acute myeloid leukemia, has been reported previously.1517 To our knowledge, there are no previous large studies that look at the scope of obesity in pediatric patients with heart disease from multiple geographic regions. The current study, including >1500 patients with acquired or congenital heart disease, allowed for comparison among different categories of pediatric heart disease. The prevalence rates of obesity were similar across all of these groups, with the exception of patients with the most complex heart disease who have undergone the Fontan procedure. This is not surprising, because patients with univentricular hearts often have chronic, long-term issues, including heart failure and failure to thrive.18

Although the health risks associated with obesity in the general pediatric population are well established,19,20 the truly long-term outcomes for pediatric patients with heart disease await longer follow-up. Life span for children with congenital heart disease is less than normal.21,22 Congenital and acquired coronary disease and underlying vascular abnormalities in childhood are likely to be exacerbated by obesity, which is independently associated with endothelial dysfunction and hypertension.20,23 In particular, certain populations, such as those with congenital abnormalities of coronary blood flow,24,25 acquired abnormalities, such as graft vasculopathy after cardiac transplantation26 or Kawasaki disease,27 or those who have had surgical manipulation of the coronary arteries (eg, the arterial switch or Ross operations),28,29 have been shown to have abnormalities in coronary function in later childhood and may be at increased risk for atherosclerosis as adults. This risk may also be exacerbated in children with previous repair of coarctation of the aorta where impairment of endothelial function and increased carotid intimal thickness have been identified.30 Although the long-term impact of superimposed obesity on congenital and acquired heart disease remains unknown, it is likely to increase morbidity and mortality as it does in adults with heart disease.31,32

Previous studies have detailed relationships among blood pressure, hypertension, and obesity.23 A recent study of a primary pediatric outpatient population found that obese and overweight children had higher systolic and diastolic blood pressures than normal-weight patients.33 Our study found that obese and overweight patients with heart disease were significantly more likely to have increased systolic blood pressure percentiles during 1-time measurement in the outpatient setting. Although this study was not designed to evaluate hypertension in this population, the trend toward higher blood pressure in obese patients raises concern. In children with congenital heart disease, hypertension may not only impact their long-term cardiovascular health but may also have more immediate implications for their underlying disease (such as valvar and ventricular dysfunction). Given the severity of univentricular heart disease, obesity and overweight (in 15.9% of the Fontan group) in this high-risk population are likely to have a negative impact secondary to the risks associated with increased afterload and ventricular mass.

Despite a significant proportion of children who are obese and overweight in both outpatient practices, cardiovascular practitioners at both centers failed to document obesity and/or weight counseling in >85% of these patients with heart disease. Although it is unknown whether such a discussion took place during the visit itself, lack of documentation to the referring physician in the clinic letter and/or note suggests that communication regarding the problem of obesity in association with heart disease did not occur with the primary practitioner. As specialists, pediatric cardiologists tend to focus their clinic visit on the primary reason for referral. In addition, they may believe that their patients and parents will not be receptive to weight counseling at their "heart" clinic visit. Pediatric cardiologists have historically focused on adequacy of repair and/or progression of congenital or acquired heart disease. As in adult medicine, awareness and discussion of weight control, exercise, and other lifestyle issues must become an important part of the evaluation of obese children with heart disease in the cardiology outpatient setting. Weight may be one of the few modifiable risk factors for children with heart disease.

Pediatric cardiologists are frequently asked to provide recommendations for physical activity restriction in their patients with congenital and acquired heart disease or potentially life-threatening arrhythmias. These recommendations are extrapolated from published guidelines for competitive athletics in children with heart disease.34 In a retrospective study reviewing patients over a median of 8 years, Stefan et al11 reported that activity restriction in children with congenital heart disease was associated with the development of obesity. Even children who were of healthy weight at baseline had a higher risk of becoming obese over time if their activity was restricted. Physical activity limitation is a risk factor unique to children with heart disease. Importantly, physical activity restrictions in children with heart disease are not solely determined by practitioner recommendations. Indeed, these limitations may sometimes be initiated by parents or be self-imposed.35 Children with heart disease are often sedentary even when not limited by their physiology.3537 Massin et al37 reported recently that children who had undergone the arterial switch operation were much less likely than their peers to participate in moderate or vigorous activity even when no restrictions had been placed by their cardiologists. Decreased activity may lead to deconditioning, decreased exercise capacity, and lower quality of life. A sedentary lifestyle associated with congenital heart disease is known to carry into adulthood and predict increased morbidity and mortality in this population.38 Several recent studies have shown the benefits of physical training programs in both adults and children with congenital heart disease.39,40 Practitioners may need to refocus counseling during outpatient visits, providing careful instructions for appropriate and safe exercise regimens with regard to the underlying condition, in addition to more traditional counseling regarding exercise restrictions. Given the fact that patients with acquired and congenital heart disease have not escaped the epidemic of obesity, it is especially important for practitioners to adapt current activity guidelines from the American Heart Association10 and Bethesda conference34 for this purpose.


    STUDY LIMITATIONS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 STUDY LIMITATIONS
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Although the overall study population was quite large, small numbers in the transplant subgroup resulted in limited power to compare this group with the control subjects. Data collection was limited to children's hospitals in Boston and Philadelphia and may not account for regional differences in obesity rates in other areas in the United States. In fact, control patients from CHB had slightly lower prevalence of overweight and obesity than those from CHOP, suggesting a slight difference in the underlying rate of pediatric obesity between the 2 cities. The data are also subject to the referral biases of each center. Data on race and its impact on the prevalence of obesity were not collected as part of this study.

It should be emphasized that data were limited to the information contained in the dictated clinic letters and notes. Therefore, we were unable to assess whether obesity and weight counseling may have occurred during the office visit without documentation. Important contributing data, such as parental weight and patient activity levels, were not collected in this retrospective study, because this information was not consistently found in the clinic letters. In addition, we were only able to evaluate 1 comorbidity of obesity, blood pressure, from the data collected. In this population, the impact of the underlying heart disease on blood pressure may have been a confounder to its relationship to weight. All of the measurements used for analysis were obtained at only 1 point in time. This is especially important with regard to potential variability associated with blood pressure measurements in an outpatient office setting. Medications that might affect the outcome variables (eg, antihypertensive medication and steroids) were also not assessed in this analysis.


    CONCLUSIONS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 STUDY LIMITATIONS
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Obesity is a common significant additional risk factor for long-term cardiovascular disability in children with congenital and acquired heart disease, a population that is already at increased risk of shortened life expectancy. Although this study has important implications for the practice of outpatient pediatric cardiology, additional investigation is required to identify both common and potentially unique contributors to this problem, such as formal or perceived exercise restriction. Additional study is also required to truly understand the impact of overweight on the long-term outcome and cardiovascular health of children with underlying heart disease. Appropriate interventions for obese pediatric cardiac patients need to be developed. Given the known benefits of normal weight and exercise participation, advising against inactivity, obesity, and other unhealthy lifestyle choices and communicating these concerns to the referring physician should be important parts of the pediatric cardiologist's care of children with cardiac disease.


    FOOTNOTES
 
Accepted Apr 16, 2007.

Address correspondence to Meryl S. Cohen, MD, Division of Cardiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 2nd Floor, Main Building, 34th Street and Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104. E-mail: cohenm{at}email.chop.edu

The authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 STUDY LIMITATIONS
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Hedley AA, Ogden CL, Johnson CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, Flegal KM. Prevalence of overweight and obesity among US children, adolescents, and adults, 1999–2002. JAMA. 2004;291 :2847 –2850[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Serdula MK, Ivery D, Coates RJ, Freedman DS, Williamson DF, Byers T. Do obese children become obese adults? A review of the literature. Prev Med. 1993;22 :167 –177[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  3. Freedman DS, Khan LK, Serdula MK, Dietz WH, Srinivasan SR, Berenson GS. The relation of childhood BMI to adult adiposity: the Bogalusa Heart Study. Pediatrics. 2005;115 :22 –27[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Tounian P, Aggoun Y, Dubern B, et al. Presence of increased stiffness of the common carotid artery and endothelial dysfunction in severely obese children: a prospective study. Lancet. 2001;358 :1400 –1404[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  5. Berenson GS, Pickoff AS. Preventive cardiology and its potential influence on the early natural history of adult heart diseases: the Bogalusa Heart Study and the Heart Smart Program. Am J Med Sci. 1995;310(suppl 1) :S133 –S138
  6. Hauser M, Bengel F, Kuehn A, et al. Myocardial blood flow and coronary flow reserve in children with "normal" epicardial coronary arteries after the onset of Kawasaki disease assessed by positron emission tomography. Pediatr Cardiol. 2004;25 :108 –112[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  7. Freedman DS, Dietz WH, Srinivasan SR, Berenson GS. The relation of overweight to cardiovascular risk factors among children and adolescents: the Bogalusa Heart Study. Pediatrics. 1999;103 :1175 –1182[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Chinali M, de Simone G, Roman MJ, et al. Impact of obesity on cardiac geometry and function in a population of adolescents: the Strong Heart Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47 :2267 –2273[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Mehta SK, Holliday C, Hayduk L, Wiersma L, Richards N, Younoszai A. Comparison of myocardial function in children with body mass indexes >/=25 versus those <25 kg/m2. Am J Cardiol. 2004;93 :1567 –1569[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  10. Williams CL, Hayman LL, Daniels SR, et al. Cardiovascular health in childhood: a statement for health professionals from the Committee on Atherosclerosis, Hypertension, and Obesity in the Young (AHOY) of the Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, American Heart Association. Circulation. 2002;106 :143 –160[Free Full Text]
  11. Stefan MA, Hopman WM, Smythe JF. Effect of activity restriction owing to heart disease on obesity. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005;159 :477 –481[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Boneva RS, Botto LD, Moore CA, Yang Q, Correa A, Erickson JD. Mortality associated with congenital heart defects in the United States: trends and racial disparities, 1979–1997. Circulation. 2001;103 :2376 –2381[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Himes JH, Dietz WH. Guidelines for overweight in adolescent preventive services: recommendations from an expert committee. The Expert Committee on Clinical Guidelines for Overweight in Adolescent Preventive Services. Am J Clin Nutr. 1994;59 :307 –316[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on High Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents. The fourth report on the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure in children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 2004;114 (2 suppl 4th report):555–576
  15. Dupuis A, Hamilton D, Cole DE, Corey M. Cystic fibrosis birth rates in Canada: a decreasing trend since the onset of genetic testing. J Pediatr. 2005;147 :312 –315[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  16. Omoloja A, Stolfi A, Mitsnefes M. Pediatric obesity at renal transplantation: a single center experience. Pediatr Transplant. 2005;9 :770 –772[Web of Science][Medline]
  17. Lange BJ, Gerbing RB, Feusner J, et al. Mortality in overweight and underweight children with acute myeloid leukemia. JAMA. 2005;293 :203 –211[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Cohen MI, Bush DM, Ferry RJ Jr, et al. Somatic growth failure after the Fontan operation. Cardiol Young. 2000;10 :447 –457[Web of Science][Medline]
  19. Gidding SS, Nehgme R, Heise C, Muscar C, Linton A, Hassink S. Severe obesity associated with cardiovascular deconditioning, high prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors, diabetes mellitus/hyperinsulinemia, and respiratory compromise. J Pediatr. 2004;144 :766 –769[Web of Science][Medline]
  20. Woo KS, Chook P, Yu CW, et al. Overweight in children is associated with arterial endothelial dysfunction and intima-media thickening. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2004;28 :852 –857[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  21. Nieminen HP, Jokinen EV, Sairanen HI. Late results of pediatric cardiac surgery in Finland: a population-based study with 96% follow-up. Circulation. 2001;104 :570 –575[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Oechslin EN, Harrison DA, Connelly MS, Webb GD, Siu SC. Mode of death in adults with congenital heart disease. Am J Cardiol. 2000;86 :1111 –1116[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  23. Sorof J, Daniels S. Obesity hypertension in children: a problem of epidemic proportions. Hypertension. 2002;40 :441 –447[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Hauser M, Bengel FM, Kuhn A, et al. Myocardial perfusion and coronary flow reserve assessed by positron emission tomography in patients after Fontan-like operations. Pediatr Cardiol. 2003;24 :386 –392[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  25. Giglia TM, Mandell VS, Connor AR, Mayer JE Jr, Lock JE. Diagnosis and management of right ventricle-dependent coronary circulation in pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum. Circulation. 1992;86 :1516 –1528[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Mahle WT, Vincent RN, Kanter KR. Cardiac retransplantation in childhood: analysis of data from the United Network for Organ Sharing. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;130 :542 –546[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Suzuki A, Kamiya T, Kuwahara N, et al. Coronary arterial lesions of Kawasaki disease: cardiac catheterization findings of 1100 cases. Pediatr Cardiol. 1986;7 :3 –9[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  28. Bengel FM, Hauser M, Duvernoy CS, et al. Myocardial blood flow and coronary flow reserve late after anatomical correction of transposition of the great arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32 :1955 –1961[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Hauser M, Bengel FM, Kuhn A, et al. Myocardial blood flow and flow reserve after coronary reimplantation in patients after arterial switch and Ross operation. Circulation. 2001;103 :1875 –1880[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Meyer AA, Joharchi MS, Kundt G, Schuff-Werner P, Steinhoff G, Kienast W. Predicting the risk of early atherosclerotic disease development in children after repair of aortic coarctation. Eur Heart J. 2005;26 :617 –622[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Romero-Corral A, Montori VM, Somers VK, et al. Association of bodyweight with total mortality and with cardiovascular events in coronary artery disease: a systematic review of cohort studies. Lancet. 2006;368 :666 –678[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Gurm HS, Whitlow PL, Kip KE. The impact of body mass index on short- and long-term outcomes inpatients undergoing coronary revascularization. Insights from the bypass angioplasty revascularization investigation (BARI). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39 :834 –840[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Falkner B, Gidding SS, Ramirez-Garnica G, Wiltrout SA, West D, Rappaport EB. The relationship of body mass index and blood pressure in primary care pediatric patients. J Pediatr. 2006;148 :195 –200[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  34. Maron BJ, Douglas PS, Graham TP, Nishimura RA, Thompson PD. Task Force 1: preparticipation screening and diagnosis of cardiovascular disease in athletes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45 :1322 –1326[Free Full Text]
  35. Wray J, Sensky T. How does the intervention of cardiac surgery affect the self-perception of children with congenital heart disease? Child Care Health Dev. 1998;24 :57 –72[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  36. Lunt D, Briffa T, Briffa NK, Ramsay J. Physical activity levels of adolescents with congenital heart disease. Aust J Physiother. 2003;49 :43 –50[Web of Science][Medline]
  37. Massin MM, Hovels-Gurich HH, Gerard P, Seghaye MC. Physical activity patterns of children after neonatal arterial switch operation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;81 :665 –670[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Diller GP, Dimopoulos K, Okonko D, et al. Exercise intolerance in adult congenital heart disease: comparative severity, correlates, and prognostic implication. Circulation. 2005;112 :828 –835[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Therrien J, Fredriksen P, Walker M, Granton J, Reid GJ, Webb G. A pilot study of exercise training in adult patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot. Can J Cardiol. 2003;19 :685 –689[Web of Science][Medline]
  40. Rhodes J, Curran TJ, Camil L, et al. Impact of cardiac rehabilitation on the exercise function of children with serious congenital heart disease. Pediatrics. 2005;116 :1339 –1345[Abstract/Free Full Text]

PEDIATRICS (ISSN 1098-4275). ©2007 by the American Academy of Pediatrics

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pinto, N. M.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pinto, N. M.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, M. S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Heart & Blood Vessels
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?