ARTICLE |
a Preventive Medicine Residency Program, Career Development Division, Office of Workforce and Career Development, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
b Disease Outbreak and Control Division, Hawaii State Department of Health, Honolulu, Hawaii
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS. Immunization records were reviewed for children who were enrolled in all public and private school kindergarten programs in Hawaii in the 2002–2003 school year; immunization status at the time of the second birthday was determined. The main outcome variable was up-to-date status for the 4:3:1:3:3 vaccination series (4 doses of diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis, 3 doses of polio, 1 dose of measles-mumps-rubella, 3 doses of Haemophilus influenzae type b, and 3 doses of hepatitis B vaccines). Children's home addresses were geocoded to census tracts; coverage rates by tract were mapped, and sociodemographic data from Census 2000 files were used to identify factors that were associated with delays in immunization.
RESULTS. Records were obtained for 15275 of 15594 children registered in Hawaii kindergartens. Overall, 78% had completed their 4:3:1:3:3 series by their second birthday. Risk factors for delayed immunization included delayed immunization at 3 months of age, living in Maui County, living in a neighborhood where a low proportion of adults had postsecondary education, and living in a neighborhood where a high proportion of households spoke a language other than English at home. The majority (80%) of underimmunized children would have required only 1 additional visit to bring them up-to-date.
CONCLUSIONS. Retrospective review of kindergarten-entry immunization data revealed geographic areas with lower immunization coverage, and geocoding to census tracts identified associated sociodemographic risk factors. This is a practical method for state or city health departments to identify pockets of need and to direct resources appropriately.
Key Words: immunization rates preschool child child health services immunization programs
Abbreviations: NIS—National Immunization Survey USGS—United States Geological Survey DTP—diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccine MMR—measles-mumps-rubella vaccine Hib—Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine hepB— hepatitis B vaccine OR—odds ratio CI—confidence interval
Vaccines have been cited as 1 of the great public health successes of the 20th century,1 and vaccine coverage rates among young children are a key measure used to monitor disease-control programs. In summer 2002, a decrease in vaccination coverage among children who resided in Hawaii was identified through the National Immunization Survey (NIS).2,3 In response to this finding, the Hawaii State Department of Health decided to better characterize underimmunized children in the state by demography and risk factors.
Surveys to assess childhood immunization coverage are both challenging and expensive. Because only 3% to 5% of households include an eligible child (eg, aged 19–35 months), substantial numbers of households need to be contacted for each successful interview.4 Given the unreliability of parental recall for vaccination, follow-up with providers is also required.5 NIS staff conduct this follow-up and provide reliable estimates of coverage at the state level, but NIS has limited utility for assessing coverage for smaller geographic areas. Neither door-to-door nor random-digit-dialing telephone surveys were deemed feasible for this state-level assessment, and a comprehensive immunization registry is still under development in Hawaii.
We determined that a kindergarten retrospective assessment might provide the most useful information at an affordable cost in terms of time and resources.6,7 Reporting of individual student immunizations at school entry is legally mandated in Hawaii, and these data can be collected by school health aides and forwarded to the State Immunization Program. Because no sociodemographic data are collected on school immunization records, we geocoded children's residential addresses at school entry and mapped these to census tracts. Census tract–level data for multiple sociodemographic variables are publicly available.8 Using census tract–level data to evaluate the association of socioeconomic status to health has been widely advocated and used for health outcomes9–11 but has not been used before in evaluating childhood immunization coverage. We present an assessment of risk factors for underimmunization for the cohort of children who entered kindergarten in all Hawaii public and private schools in 2002, assessed retrospectively by determining vaccination status at 2 years of age and geocoding addresses to census tract data.
| METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Geocoding and Matching to Census Tracts
Residential addresses were assigned to census tracts by using a hierarchy of 3 processes: (1) geocoding and automatic matching to census tracts, (2) manual identification of locations and manual assignment of census tract, and (3) stratified probabilistic assignment of census tracts on the basis of zip code alone. Geocoding is a process that converts address information (street address, city name, and zip code) to a latitude and longitude coordinate by using standard reference data files of roads and block address ranges. We initially geocoded residential addresses from the school immunization records with ArcView 8.3 (ESRI, Redlands, CA) by using multiple reference data files, including 2000 Census Topically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing System, US Geological Service (USGS) roads (USGS 1983 Digital Line Graphs), and the Honolulu Land Information System (City and County of Honolulu 2005). The appropriate census tract was identified for each geocoded location.
Certain cases could not be automatically geocoded for multiple reasons (eg, provision of zip code only, a post office box only, an unlisted address in any of the reference data files). In these cases, 2 manual methods were used: zip code alone if the zip code fell entirely within a census tract or Internet searching of specific addresses by using Microsoft MapPoint (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA) and use of landmarks (eg, street or highway intersections) to identify which census tract included that address.
For records that could not be geocoded or manually assigned a census tract, we developed an algorithm to assign tracts on the basis of zip code (the zip code of the child's home where available or the zip code of the school when no residential address information was available). This was based on a weighted probabilistic assignment to census tract, with the weights proportional to the population sizes of census tracts that fall within a given zip code boundary. The terms "neighborhood" and "census tract" are used interchangeably in the remainder of this article.
Definition of Variables
Children were considered up-to-date for immunization at 2 years of age when they had received 4 doses of diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and pertussis vaccine (DTP or DTaP; henceforth referred to as DTP), 3 doses of poliovirus (polio) vaccine, 1 dose of measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine, 3 doses of Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine (Hib), and 3 doses of hepatitis B vaccine (hepB). This is referred to as the 4:3:1:3:3 vaccine series. When <3 doses of Hib had been administered but at least 1 dose had been administered after 15 months of age, the child was also considered to be up-to-date for Hib. For 3 large private schools that did not collect information about Hib vaccinations on the school record (because it was not legally required), children were considered up-to-date when they had the remaining elements of the 4:3:1:3:3 series complete (ie, DTP, polio, MMR, and hepB). Analyses were repeated, excluding children from these schools with no statistically significant difference in findings. Children with documented religious exemptions, accounting for <1% of all records, were excluded from the data set. Children with a medical exemption for a specific vaccine (<0.1% of records) were treated as up-to-date for that vaccine.
Although varicella vaccine was recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices for this cohort at the time when they were infants,12 the vaccine was relatively new and was not included in the assessment of up-to-date coverage. Sociodemographic variables for census tracts reflected characteristics of the entire population of the tract, not simply households with kindergartners. We examined census data on median household income, rural versus urban status, racial makeup of tracts, languages spoken at home, and level of education. The median household income variable was defined by quartile; all other census tract variables were dichotomized as either high (
25% of the tract population with a given characteristic) or low (<25% of the tract population with a given characteristic). Up-to-date coverage results are also shown by type of school later attended, defined as either public or private school, which may be a rough proxy indicator of household socioeconomic status. However, because schooling decisions reflect a range of noneconomic factors as well, this variable was not included in the main contingency analysis.
We assumed that no limit existed for the number of vaccines that might have been administered at any given encounter in calculating the number of visits required to bring a child up-to-date (ie, up to 5 different vaccines could be administered but no more than 1 dose of a given series). Because only 1 dose of Hib is required after 15 months of age, children with <3 doses and none after 15 months of age were considered to need only 1 additional dose to catch up.
Statistical Methods
Data were analyzed by using SAS 8.02 (SAS Institute, Inc, Cary, NC). Contingency table analysis based on
2 statistics was used to investigate the associations between different factors and being up-to-date for the 4:3:1:3:3 series at the time of the second birthday. For selected parameters, >1 variable was assessed. For example, household economic status by census tract was considered by both median household income quartile and proportion of households living in poverty; education levels were considered by both the proportion of adults (
18 years) with a bachelor's degree or higher and the proportion of adults with less than a high school diploma. When the multivariable model was developed, only the variable more strongly associated with up-to-date status for each parameter was included in the model. Multivariable analysis was based on generalized mixed-effects models, considering the multilevel structure of the data (individual level and census tract level). Models with interaction terms were considered. Multiple second-order interactions were statistically significant, but their effects were inconsequential in practice. Therefore, only the main-effects model is considered in this article.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A total of 12478 (82%) records were geocoded by using ArcView and Streetmap (www.streetmap.com/) or USGS Roads; 680 (4%) were manually geocoded to a census tract on the basis of a street or post office box address, 1112 (7%) were assigned a tract on the basis of the zip code of the home address, and 1012 (7%) were assigned a tract on the basis of the zip code of the school address.
Overall, 78% of children were up-to-date for the 4:3:1:3:3 series by their second birthday and 87% by their third birthday (Table 1). Coverage at 2 years of age ranged from 84% for DTP to 96% for Hib. Varicella vaccine had been administered to 69% of children aged 2 years and 79% of children aged 3 years.
|
|
|
|
Among the 3421 children with incomplete immunizations at 2 years of age, the majority (80%) would have needed only 1 additional visit to be up-to-date, 9% would have required 2 visits, 8% would have required 3 visits, and 4% would have required 4 visits. A total of 98% of children were up-to-date by the time of school entry.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The strong predictive value of immunization delays during the first 3 months of life has been documented in other studies.14–16 Among our study population, children who had not yet received their first DTP, Hib, and hepB vaccinations by 3 months of age composed 17% of the population but accounted for 77% of all children who were not up-to-date by 2 years of age. Although identifying children at risk on the basis of sociodemographic factors can be challenging for individual providers, immunization history during the first 3 months is easily viewed in a patient chart, and a delay can be flagged as a risk factor for the duration of that child's preschool years. Vaccine providers and other providers who view immunization records (eg, staff of the Women, Infants, and Children program) should be encouraged to identify these children throughout their early years, flag their records, and provide additional support and reminders to ensure that they receive age-appropriate vaccinations.
The variation in coverage by county identified by our study is consistent with subjective impressions of health department staff. Anecdotal information suggests that Maui's lower immunization rates might be explained, in part, by greater participation in alternative medicine practices and higher levels of skepticism among parents about immunization benefits.
Identification of census tracts with lower immunization coverage allows public health staff to target their efforts both geographically and on the basis of sociodemographic risk factors. Poverty and low income are associated with poor health outcomes, including childhood immunization status.17,18 The Vaccines for Children program ensures that poor, uninsured, and (in some states) underinsured families do not have to pay directly for vaccines, but barriers are often associated with low socioeconomic status beyond direct costs. Lack of knowledge of vaccine schedules, transportation difficulties, clinic hours and waiting times, and challenges in navigating the logistics of the health care system all can make children in low-income families less likely to be immunized on time.
Although race and ethnicity have been documented in multiple studies to be associated with vaccination status, this has usually been examined in terms of white, black, and Hispanic groups.19,20 Hawaii's unique racial/ethnic mix makes findings from other parts of the United States less applicable to our setting. For certain health indicators in Hawaii (eg, life expectancy, infant survival), Asians have the highest measures and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islanders the lowest.21 This was true for infant immunization coverage in this study as well but only in the univariate analysis. After adjusting for household income, we determined that living in a neighborhood with a high proportion of Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islanders was significantly associated with higher immunization rates at 2 years of age. This is important because it indicates that economic disparities might be the primary cause of poor health-measure rates among Native Hawaiians/Pacific Islanders. We encourage other investigators to control for possible economic confounding when examining determinants of health among these populations.
Our study also found that children from neighborhoods with high concentrations of foreign-born individuals were no less likely to be up-to-date for their primary series; however, children from neighborhoods where high numbers of households spoke a language other than English at home were at risk. This suggests that language barriers or health care access barriers associated with more recent immigration might be an obstacle for families to vaccinating their children on schedule.
Our experience with this kindergarten retrospective assessment of vaccination status might be useful to other states that seek more geographically detailed data than are available from extant sources. Although a rich source of data for national trends and state-level coverage estimates, the NIS does not allow assessment of limited geographic areas within a state and allows only limited assessment of sociodemographic characteristics in the public use data files because of confidentiality safeguards. In the absence of a good sampling frame to identify a representative sample of children aged 2 years, random-digit telephone dialing and household surveys to identify these children are prohibitively expensive and too labor-intensive for many state health departments to undertake. Immunization registries do not yet provide complete enough information in most areas of the country to permit surveillance of population coverage rates.22 We were able to complete our assessment using minimal resources beyond existing health department staff time (contracted data entry clerks for 6 person-months).
Retrospective assessments of the immunization status of children entering school were supported by federal funds and conducted throughout the United States for 1990–1994.5 This type of assessment was simple and inexpensive and allowed coverage levels to be assessed for local areas.6 Two main disadvantages led to the phasing out of federal support: they provided coverage-level estimates for 3 to 4 years before data collection, and the accuracy of school immunization records was uncertain. In particular, certain areas reported that to save time, school staff would record only immunizations that were necessary for school entry rather than each vaccine received; therefore, certain vaccinations received before 2 years of age might not be documented on school records if the child otherwise qualified to enter school.5
For Hawaii, concerns about the quality of school vaccination records have been minimized by training school health staff and conducting a standardized record audit among a sample of schools each year. A more serious limitation of using school records to assess retrospectively the immunization status of children aged 2 years was the lack of sociodemographic information on the school immunization records. No information that reflects socioeconomic status, race, immigration status, or health insurance status is collected, limiting our ability to identify risk factors for underimmunization and target populations for programmatic interventions. However, we determined that using residential addresses geocoded to census tracts allowed us to examine a spectrum of social, demographic, economic, and racial factors at the neighborhood level as contributors to underimmunization.
Our study had a number of limitations. Immunization records were taken from school records and not verified with providers, and these records were collected to verify up-to-date status at school entry, not at 2 years of age. Therefore, inaccuracies might exist in the dates of immunizations or the documentation of immunizations that were not required for school entry. In particular, the strong association of up-to-date status at 3 months of age with up-to-date status at 2 years of age could be partially attributable to missing documentation of early doses that were actually received. Another potential limitation is that the child's current residential address was used to link to census tract data. Approximately 14% of Hawaii's households move each year (64% of these within the same county),23 so for some families, the residential address at kindergarten entry is different from that at 2 years of age. Our use of the census tract data requires the assumption that the majority of the families who moved did so from 1 neighborhood to another that was similar in terms of socioeconomic status, racial/ethnic, and immigrant composition. We were unable to evaluate the effect on underimmunization of health insurance status, health care provider characteristics, or barriers in the health care delivery system. These factors have been identified as having important associations with underimmunization and should be considered when interventions to improve immunization coverage are implemented.14,15,24–26
| CONCLUSIONS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Address correspondence to Sara J. Whitehead, MD, MPH, Thailand MOPH, US CDC Collaboration, DDC7 Building, 4th Floor, Ministry of Public Health Soi 4, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand. E-mail:svw7{at}cdc.gov
The authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.
The findings and conclusions of this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||