LETTER TO THE EDITOR |
James G. H. Dinulos, MD
Department of Pediatrics (Dermatology)
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center/Dartmouth Medical School
Lebanon, NH 03756
To the Editor.—
We read with interest the excellent case series by Ravin et al,1 who examined one of the many manifestations of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection. The 3 cases were excellent examples of isolated mucositis occurring in association with M pneumoniae infection. In their article, and a recent similar report of isolated mucositis,2 the label of "atypical Stevens-Johnson syndrome" was applied to patients who developed the typical mucous membrane changes seen in Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) but lacked cutaneous lesions. According to any of the classification systems of SJS, beginning with the original Stevens and Johnson3 description and up to the recent Bastuji-Garin et al4 criteria, diagnosis of SJS requires skin involvement. Clarity of terminology is important not only for communication between providers but also for setting therapeutic expectations. The addition of "atypical" in front of a known syndrome or disease makes complete sense when the recognition of atypical features and early diagnosis makes sense for early treatment (eg, adding "atypical" to Kawasaki disease for children with an incomplete clinical presentation). Alerting clinicians to atypical presentations should lead to early diagnosis and treatment. Unlike atypical Kawasaki disease, children with Mycoplasma-induced mucositis (or atypical SJS, as some refer to this condition) do not progress to having skin-barrier compromise and seem to have a better prognosis than patients with SJS.5
We believe that mucous membrane–limited disease resulting from M pneumoniae infection, considered within the spectrum of disease that encompasses bullous erythema multiforme and SJS, should not be referred to as atypical SJS. All 3 conditions can be caused by M pneumoniae infections, but bullous erythema multiforme and isolated mucositis have much better prognoses.5 Nonetheless, children with isolated mucositis must be monitored closely for skin signs that indicate progression to frank SJS. The widespread blistering seen in SJS may not be apparent for several days after mucous membrane changes. Ravin et al1 stated that making the diagnosis of SJS without skin findings was "clinically challenging." We could not agree more completely and suggest that lack of fit for SJS may be solved by considering isolated mucositis as a separate, yet associated, diagnosis for this distinct mucous membrane manifestation of M pneumoniae infection.
REFERENCES
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||