SPECIAL ARTICLE |
Infant Botulism Treatment and Prevention Program, California Department of Health Services, Richmond, California
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: infant botulism botulism immune globulin BabyBIG botulinum toxin botulism orphan drugs orphan diseases drug development
Abbreviations: FDAUS Food and Drug Administration BIGBotulism Immune Globulin BIG-IVBotulism Immune Globulin Intravenous (Human) CDHSCalifornia Department of Health Services INDinvestigational new drug OOPDOffice of Orphan Products Development IRBinstitutional review board CDCCenters for Disease Control and Prevention
Infant botulism is the intestinal toxemia form of human botulism that occurs when swallowed spores of Clostridium botulinum (or, rarely, Clostridium butyricum or Clostridium baratii) germinate, temporarily colonize the large intestine, and produce botulinum toxin in it. Botulinum toxin blocks neuromuscular transmission, and the illness usually presents as weakness and hypotonia of bulbar and skeletal musculature. Seven toxin types (A through G) of botulinum toxin exist that are distinguished from each other by the inability of neutralizing antitoxin against 1 toxin type to neutralize any of the other 6 types. Almost all infant botulism in the United States results from either botulinum toxin type A or B.
| ORPHAN DISEASES AND ORPHAN DRUGS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
80 to 110 children in the United States each year and thereby qualifies as an orphan disease, which, by definition, is an illness or condition that affects fewer than 200000 persons in the United States.1 This definition was chosen in part because this disease prevalence had historically provided insufficient market incentives to stimulate development of new therapeutics by the pharmaceutical industry.2 However,
6000 such orphan diseases are believed to exist that collectively affect
25 million US residents.3 Thus, the large population of patients with orphan disease (
8% of the US population) who had been left without medicines constituted a major societal lapse and public health problem that was remedied partially by passage of the Orphan Drug Act in 1982. The act (Pub L No. 97-414, as amended) enabled the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to support pivotal (phase III) clinical trials, as this requirement had been identified as the major obstacle to licensure of potential products for orphan diseases. The act also provided financial incentives (research credits and a period of market exclusivity) to orphan-drug sponsors. From 1995 to 2005, Congress provided between $11.3 and $14.4 million annually to the FDA for pivotal orphan-drug and -device trials.4 In the 22 years 19832005, a total of 256 orphan drugs and devices have been licensed, in contrast to fewer than 10 in the 10 years preceding 1982.2 The Orphan Drug Act also authorized academic, governmental, and other not-for-profit institutions to sponsor the development of orphan drugs. | THE PRODUCT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
15 IU of anti-A and
4 IU of anti-B neutralizing antibody per 50 mg. BIG-IV was evaluated for safety and efficacy in a randomized, controlled pivotal trial in California in 19921997 and in a subsequent nationwide open-label study in 19982003. The primary efficacy end point of the pivotal trial was a significant reduction of mean hospital stay, while the safety evaluation was a comparison of the occurrence of adverse events in the treatment and placebo (commercial normal human immune globulin) arms of the study.
In brief, in the pivotal statewide clinical trial, treatment with BIG-IV shortened the mean hospital stay from 5.7 to 2.6 weeks (P < .001) and reduced mean hospital charges by $88600 (2004 dollars) per patient (P < .001). The mean duration of intensive care was shortened by 3.2 weeks (P < .001), mean duration of mechanical ventilation was reduced by 2.6 weeks (P = .01), and mean duration of tube or intravenous feeding was shortened by 6.4 weeks (P < .001). All these primary and secondary outcome measures were also reduced significantly when stratified by toxin type (A or B) of illness. There were no serious adverse events attributable to treatment. In the nationwide open-label study, the mean hospital stay was further reduced to 2.2 weeks, and early treatment with BIG-IV shortened hospital stay significantly more than did later treatment.5 Since introduction of BIG-IV, its use to treat patients with infant botulism has resulted thus far in more than 30 years of avoided hospital stay and more than $50 million (2005 dollars) of avoided hospital costs.
| CHRONOLOGY |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The request of the CDHS in 1982 for a small amount of the IND Army BIG with which to treat patients with infant botulism was fulfilled some years later after passage of the 1986 Federal Technology Transfer Act provided the Army with needed authority to make its research products available to the civilian sector. The now-available Army product enabled the CDHS in December 1988 to apply to the FDA Office of Orphan Products Development (OOPD) for funds with which to carry out a pivotal clinical trial of BIG for the treatment of infant botulism. At the time, California was the only locale in the world that could conduct such a trial because its high endemic incidence of this rare disease provided an adequate number of patients and its established state health department infant botulism program provided disease expertise and statewide laboratory diagnostic services. The OOPD officially designated BIG an orphan drug in early 1989.
With OOPD approval of its randomized, placebo-controlled, double-masked, pivotal clinical trial design and funding application, the CDHS proceeded to organize the study by recruiting participating physicians and hospitals and obtaining institutional review board (IRB) approval from each one. California's large size, together with the rarity of the disease and the unpredictability of its occurrence, necessitated recruitment of all hospitals that had treated at least 1 patient with infant botulism in the previous 5 years. Organizational efforts, arranging hospital and local investigator participation, and obtaining the needed 59 hospital IRB approvals took
1 year to complete. IRB approval times for the identical protocol ranged from 2.5 weeks to 10.5 months.
In August 1990, as the pivotal-trial organizational efforts neared completion, Iraq invaded Kuwait. In consequence, the US Army redirected its entire supply of BIG to anticipated military needs in the Persian Gulf. Although the CDHS and the California pediatric community were ready to begin the pivotal clinical trial, there was no product to evaluate.
This setback was overcome by creating a new product that the FDA formally named Botulism Immune Globulin Intravenous (Human) (BIG-IV). Because of its ongoing botulism research and diagnostic activities, the CDHS had in 1990 a relatively large number of individuals who had been immunized for occupational safety with a still-investigational (after 30 years) botulinum toxoid product that was distributed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). These people, together with others similarly immunized, volunteered to donate their immune plasma so that the antibotulinum toxin antibodies in it could be used to make the new BIG-IV to replace the Army's diverted product. The FDA Orphan Drug Office provided supplementary funding for collection of plasma, and a licensed manufacturer of human immune globulin products (the Massachusetts Public Health Biologic Laboratories) fractionated the immune plasma into BIG-IV lot 1 at no charge because the prospect of a public service orphan drug harmonized with its institutional activities and goals. Approvals from the IRBs of the 59 participating hospitals then had to be obtained to substitute BIG-IV lot 1 for the original Army BIG product.
The pivotal clinical trial of BIG-IV finally opened for patient enrollment in February 1992. Five years later, the planned 120th patient with laboratory-confirmed infant botulism was entered into the study. In the interim, at the urging of parents of patients with infant botulism, the California legislature and governor had approved a measure that aligned the CDHS activities with the requirements of the federal Orphan Drug Act. The unanimously passed legislation provided for ongoing production and national distribution of BIG-IV as a not-for-profit, self-supporting state activity if the pivotal clinical trial demonstrated safety and efficacy of the product.
In May 1997, after obtaining the advance approval of FDA statisticians and regulators with whom the study statisticians had previously and privately reviewed the results, a semipublic data-unveiling meeting was held in Berkeley, California. At this meeting, the study investigators and representatives of the FDA, the CDC, CHDS administrative leadership, parents of patients, donors of BIG-IV source plasma, and interested colleagues all learned for the first time that the pivotal clinical trial had succeeded in meeting its primary and secondary end points. A few days later, the FDA authorized open-label distribution of BIG-IV in California under compassionate use and emergency IND status because hospital IRB approval of the product already existed here.
In June 1998, while licensure efforts continued, the FDA authorized nationwide open-label distribution of BIG-IV under treatment IND status because the pivotal clinical trial had been completed and the product treated a life-threatening condition for which no alternative therapy existed.10 Open-label treatment IND distribution of BIG-IV enabled confirmation and extension of the safety and efficacy results of the pivotal clinical trial with a much larger number of treated patients; such follow-up confirmation was later recommended generally for orphan-drug studies.11 Open-label treatment IND distribution also permitted limited ($1.8 million [2005 dollars]) recovery of the prelicensure CDHS developmental expenses for BIG-IV that are specified in federal regulations as not to exceed "the costs of manufacture, research, development and handling of the investigational drug."12 The FDA recently proposed new regulations that further limit cost recovery for investigational drugs.13
A principal remaining licensure requirement was the production of a second lot of BIG-IV, an
3-year endeavor that was completed in 2000. Because plasma donors were then being boosted with the investigational (ie, unlicensed) botulinum toxoid for nonoccupational safety reasons, additional IRB (CDHS and CDC) and FDA approvals were required. Later in 2000, the CDHS and the FDA met for prelicensure application discussions, and in 2001 the CDHS submitted the biologics license application for BIG-IV as a preapproved "fast-track" submission. In June 2002, the FDA returned a comprehensive review of the biologics license application that conveyed additional licensure requirements, to which the CDHS was able to respond in April 2003. The responses were satisfactory, and exactly 6 months later on October 23, 2003, in accord with fast-track procedures, the FDA licensed BIG-IV to the CDHS as BabyBIG for the treatment of infant botulism types A and B.
| COMPARATIVE COSTS AND REGULATORY APPROVAL TIMES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The mean time from initiation of clinical testing to licensure for the 24 products analyzed by the Tufts Center was 14.0 years (a duration that includes the "interphase" times between phase IIII studies and submission of the license application14). The equivalent interval for BIG-IV was 11.7 years. Total development time for BIG-IV from submission of the study protocol and initial funding application to licensure was 14.8 years.
Recent calls for improvement in the drug-approval process reflect in part the shortcomings of the present pathway in expeditiously providing new medicines, particularly new molecular entities, to patients.16,17 This deficiency is highlighted by the fact that in the mean interval between the start of clinical testing and new product licensure (14.0 years14), Marco Polo in the 13th century could have traveled over land and sea from Venice, Italy, to Beijing, China, and back to Venice approximately twice (2 x 7.8 years). Other comparative multiples of noteworthy feats of exploration and discovery accomplished under similarly arduous circumstances during the ensuing 700 years are substantially higher (Table 1).
|
| CONCLUSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
I thank Marlene Haffner and the late William Silverman for many years of wise counsel and support and Robert Schechter for exceptional contributions to the success of the clinical trials of BIG-IV.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The author has indicated he has no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.
This work was presented in part at the Scientific Symposium of the 25th reunion class, Harvard Medical School; June 5, 1997; Boston, MA.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
360aa et seq
312.34
312.7(d)(3)This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Koepke, J. Sobel, and S. S. Arnon Global Occurrence of Infant Botulism, 1976-2006 Pediatrics, July 1, 2008; 122(1): e73 - e82. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||