PEDIATRICS Vol. 119 No. 3 March 2007, pp. e724-e732 (doi:10.1542/peds.2006-1649)
ARTICLE |
Bacterial Imprinting of the Neonatal Immune System: Lessons From Maternal Cells?
a Nestec, Nestlé Research Centre, Lausanne, Switzerland
b Unit for Ecology and Physiology of the Digestive Tract, National Institute for Agronomic Research, Jouy-en-Josas Cedex, France
 |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
 TOP ABSTRACT METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONCONCLUSIONSREFERENCES |
|---|
OBJECTIVE. We examined the presence of a natural bacterial inoculum in breast milk and its intracellular transport from the maternal intestine to the breast through the circulation.
METHODS. Breast milk and peripheral blood were collected aseptically from healthy donors at various times after delivery, and the presence of viable bacteria was determined through plating. Temporal temperature gradient gel electrophoresis was used to examine the bacterial ribosomal DNA content in milk cells, maternal peripheral blood mononuclear cells, and feces and in corresponding infant feces. Blood from nongravid nonlactating women served as control samples. Bacterial translocation to extraintestinal tissues was also evaluated in virgin, pregnant, and lactating mice.
RESULTS. Breast milk contained a low total concentration of microbes of <103 colony-forming units per mL. Temporal temperature gradient gel electrophoresis revealed that maternal blood and milk cells contained the genetic material of a greater biodiversity of enteric bacteria. Some bacterial signatures were common to infant feces and to samples of maternal origin. Bacterial translocation from the gut to mesenteric lymph nodes and mammary gland occurred during late pregnancy and lactation in mice.
CONCLUSIONS. Bacterial translocation is a unique physiologic event, which is increased during pregnancy and lactation in rodents. Human breast milk cells contain a limited number of viable bacteria but a range of bacterial DNA signatures, as also found in maternal peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Those peripheral blood mononuclear cells showed greater biodiversity than did peripheral blood mononuclear cells from control women. Taken together, our results suggest that intestinally derived bacterial components are transported to the lactating breast within mononuclear cells. We speculate that this programs the neonatal immune system to recognize specific bacterial molecular patterns and to respond appropriately to pathogens and commensal organisms.
Key Words: bacterial translocation • breast milk • immunity • maternal and child health • lactation
Abbreviations: MLN—mesenteric lymph node • rDNA—ribosomal DNA • TTGE—temporal temperature gradient gel electrophoresis • DC—dendritic cell • PBMC—peripheral blood mononuclear cell • PCR—polymerase chain reaction
Mucosal dendritic cells (DCs), via pattern recognition receptors such as Toll-like receptors, sample and respond to microbes, which bombard the intestinal mucosa continuously.1 Normally, this results in tolerance to the normal microbiota and protection against pathogenic attack. Successful simultaneous deployment of such divergent processes requires sophisticated control mechanisms, which are not expected of an inexperienced, neonatal, immune system. However, intestinal colonization and assembly of specific bacterial communities in the absence of adverse immune responses reflect robust regulatory mechanisms, which may already operate in utero. Moreover, differences between breastfed and formula-fed infants in intestinal bacterial colonization2 and susceptibility to disease3 suggest that additional regulation is acquired through breast milk.
There is accumulating evidence that bacteria are transmitted to the infant via milk.4 Most studies of the microbiologic features of milk have addressed the transmission of pathogens or contaminating commensal organisms in samples meant for milk banks.4 The majority of the latter arise from the mother’s skin or the infant’s mouth.4,5 However, certain species are suggested to colonize the neonatal intestine and to provide protection.6 The interesting observation that breast milk is not sterile, even when collected aseptically,7 raises the possibility that breast milk harbors a natural bacterial inoculum, which may influence neonatal colonization.
Milk leukocytes are cells that have migrated from the gut- and bronchial-associated lymphoid tissue to lactating mammary glands via the lymphatic vessels and blood circulation.8,9 If some microbial species are indeed intrinsic to breast milk, then this cellular circuitry may explain how microbes are conveyed to the breast without any deleterious effect on maternal health. To address this, we examined the presence of bacteria in human milk, blood, and feces during lactation; in a second study, we examined bacterial translocation in nonpregnant, pregnant, and lactating mice.
|
METHODS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONCONCLUSIONSREFERENCES |
|---|
Human Milk, Blood, and Fecal Samples
Breast milk was collected from healthy lactating mothers who delivered at term. After rejection of
2 to 3 mL of foremilk, the breast was cleaned with antiseptic soap, rinsed with sterile distilled water, and dried with sterile gauze before aseptic collection with an electrical breast pump. As a control, a swab of the areola was taken before milk collection. Samples of whole milk were plated on de Man, Rogosa, and Sharpe medium containing cysteine, on Eugon tomato, Drigalski, or Shaedler Neo Vanco medium, or on blood agar (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) and were incubated aerobically or anaerobically at 37°C. Leukocytes were collected from the remaining milk through centrifugation and were suspended in sterile phosphate-buffered saline containing 1% gentamicin (10 minutes), to kill extracellular bacteria. Washed cells were then divided into aliquots and were used to make cytopreparations, were frozen in RPMI medium (Life Technologies, Basel, Switzerland) containing 10% dimethylsulfoxide and fetal calf serum for flow cytometric analysis, or were lysed with cold, sterile, distilled water passed through a sterile needle for plating on bacterial culture medium. Bacterial isolates were characterized on the basis of macroscopic and microscopic morphologic features, Gram staining, and culture characteristics. Approximately 10 mL of venous blood were collected from lactating women at different times after delivery or from 5 age-matched, nongravid, nonlactating women. The blood was centrifuged over Ficoll-Hypaque medium (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO), washed, and then processed as for milk cells. Maternal and infant fecal samples were collected in sterile tubes, divided into aliquots, and stored frozen at –80°C until required. Written consent was obtained from volunteers, and protocols were approved by our institutional review board and by the Swiss authorities.
Flow Cytometry
Myeloid and lymphoid DCs in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were examined by using the FACSCalibur system and DC-Kit from Becton Dickinson (Basel, Switzerland). In separate tubes, cells were labeled with fluorescein isothiocyanate-anti-CD11c and phycoerythrin-anti-CD14 (Becton Dickinson), according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Temporal Temperature Gradient Gel Electrophoresis
Total DNA was extracted from 200 mg of fecal samples and from milk cells and PBMCs as described previously for feces and biopsies, respectively,10 except that DNA precipitation of cells was performed overnight and the pellets were centrifuged (1 hour, 4°C). Isolated DNA was then used to amplify the V6–V8 regions of 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA), with primers U968-GC-F and L1392-R.10 The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) product size was 468 base pairs. Several dilutions of template DNA were made if the presence of PCR inhibitors was suspected. PCR amplification and temporal temperature gradient gel electrophoresis (TTGE) were performed as reported previously,10 and Gel Compar II software (Applied Maths, Kortrigk, Belgium) was used to compare TTGE profiles. A PCR amplicon mixture of 7 cloned rDNAs from different bacterial species was used as a migration marker. Some of the TTGE bands that comigrated in maternal and infant samples were excised from the gel and sequenced.
Cloning of 16S rDNA
DNA from cells and feces at 4 weeks after delivery were PCR amplified with primers U350-F and L1392-R. The PCR product size was 1080 base pairs. Ligation and cloning were in the pGEM-T vector system I (Promega, Madison, WI),11 except for milk cells, for which 10 PCRs were pooled to make a 16S rDNA library. Forty-eight clones per library were sequenced with the primers M13F and M13R and an equal portion of the SSU rDNA (Escherichia coli positions 350–1392, representing nearly the full-length gene). The sequences from this molecular inventory were longer than those excised from the TTGE gels.
Sequences were checked manually, and the contigs were made by using BioEdit software (Ibis Therapeutics, Carlsbad, CA). The sequences were submitted to GenBank, and the Blast and Megablast programs of the Ribosomal Database Project (East Lansing, MI) were used to identify close phylogenetic relatives. Sequences were tested for chimera structure by using the Ribosomal Database Project analysis service Check Chimera, as well as during manual inspection of alignment. Sequences were compared by using the Blast2sequences program (National Center for Biotechnology Information, Bethesda, MD).
Bacteria Localization in Milk and Blood Cells
After fixation in absolute ethanol, cytopreparations of human milk and blood cells were incubated for 5 minutes with 100 mg/mL acridine orange,12 washed extensively, mounted in fluorescent mounting medium (Dako Schwiez, Baar, Switzerland), and analyzed with epifluorescence microscopy.
Fetal Liver Tyrosine Kinase-3 Ligand
Fetal liver tyrosine kinase-3 ligand in human serum (one-half dilution) was assayed with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, according to the manufacturer’s instructions (R&D Systems, Epalinges, Switzerland). The detection limit of the assay was 10 pg/mL.
Mice
Conventional virgin and pregnant/lactating C57/BL6 mice (Charles River Laboratories, L’Arbresle, France) were killed (n = 10 per group) at 5 to 6 days before parturition or at 1 to 2 days, 3 to 4 days, or 14 to 15 days after parturition. Samples of blood, intestinal contents, mesenteric lymph nodes (MLNs), spleen, liver, and mammary gland were collected aseptically for microbiologic analysis, fixed in Bouin’s fixative before being mounted in paraffin blocks, and/or mounted in OCT medium and frozen in liquid nitrogen. The experimental procedure was approved by our institutional review board and by the Swiss authorities.
Bacteria in Mouse Tissue
Microorganisms were observed in tissue by using Gram stain. For microbiologic analysis, samples of mouse tissue were homogenized, suspended in sterile phosphate-buffered saline, plated onto blood agar (bioMérieux), and incubated aerobically or anaerobically at 37°C.
Statistical Analyses
The proportions of pregnant and lactating animals with viable bacteria in their tissue were compared with that of control animals by using Fisher’s exact test. The median percentages of DC populations in the blood of lactating and control women were compared by using the Mann-Whitney test. TTGE profiles were compared by using Gel Compar II software (Applied Maths). Similarity coefficients (Pearson correlation method) were then calculated for each pair of profiles, yielding a similarity matrix. A dendrogram was constructed from this matrix by using an unweighted pair group method using arithmetic averages algorithm.
|
RESULTS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONCONCLUSIONSREFERENCES |
|---|
Bacterial Signatures Are Transferred From Mother to Infant Through Breast Milk
Skin swabs, made after cleaning the breast with antiseptic soap, did not yield viable bacteria. Aseptically collected breast milk contained a total concentration of <103 colony-forming units of bacteria per mL, composed of Lactobacillus, Streptococcus, Enterococcus, Peptostreptococcus, Staphylococcus, Corynebacterium, and/or occasionally Escherichia spp. We next used TTGE to examine bacterial rDNA contents in milk cells and maternal PBMCs during lactation, and we compared the contents with those in maternal and infant fecal samples.
Maternal fecal samples gave classic TTGE profiles that were specific for each individual and of greater biodiversity than those of infant feces (Fig 1A). Although milk cells had a less complex microbiota than maternal feces, TTGE revealed a greater biodiversity than observed previously with plating. Figure 1A shows one mother-infant couple analyzed over weeks 1 to 4 after delivery. Similar TTGE profiles were observed for 6 other mother-infant pairs (data not shown). Interestingly, some bacterial signatures (Fig 1A, arrows) were common in infant feces and in several samples of maternal origin. With excision from the gel and sequencing, the lowest of these milk bands, which was especially intense in infant feces and comigrated in maternal feces and blood, was identified as Bifidobacterium longum on the basis of 369 nucleotides. The presence of B longum was also confirmed in the milk and infant feces of 3 other mother-infant couples (data not shown). One mother also had B longum DNA in her blood cells (Fig 1A), whereas another had the same species in her blood and in her feces. Sequencing of another band common to milk and infant feces identified DNA from Streptococcus thermophilus/salivarius.
|
Next, PCR products of milk cells were used to prepare rDNA libraries. Besides the species identified previously, sequencing of the clones revealed the presence of Bacteroides, Clostridium, and Eubacterium among a total of up to15 genera. Whereas the DNA from staphylococcal and streptococcal species were found in the milk cells of all mothers, DNA from clostridia and lactobacilli were found in the cells of 4 and 3 mothers, respectively. The presence of other genera was specific for each individual. The absence of milk cell genera in the PCR control samples shows that these bacterial DNA were not attributable to laboratory contamination. Lactose-degrading, lactic acid-producing bacteria together with Staphylococcus species were the most represented genera in infant feces. Of 23 sequences corresponding to bifidobacteria, 17 were related to B longum, 5 to Bifidobacterium bifidum, and 1 to Bifidobacterium infantis. Two identical rDNA sequences (99% identity of 1117 base pairs), corresponding to S thermophilus and Staphylococcus epidermidis, were identified in the milk cell clones and in the infant’s feces.
PBMCs contained a restricted variety of bacterial rDNA sequences (Fig 1, A and B). Bacterial signals were present in cells of both lactating and nongravid nonlactating women, but the complexity of bacterial signatures was greater in the former (Fig 1B). Furthermore, although profiles for control women were similar, those for lactating women were specific for each individual. Acridine orange staining of milk and blood cytopreparations identified bacterial bodies in association with mononuclear cells (Fig 1C).
DC Subsets Are Diminished in the Circulation of Lactating Women
The distribution of DC phenotypes in the PBMCs of lactating and nonlactating women was examined by using a commercial kit and flow cytometry. The frequencies of differentiated lymphoid DC (lineage–CD14–HLA-DR+CD11c–CD123+) and myeloid DC (lineage–CD14–HLA-DR+CD11c+CD123–) phenotypes tended to be lower in the circulation of lactating women during the first month after delivery than in that of control subjects (data not shown). This difference reached statistical significance for lymphoid DCs at 1 week after delivery (P = .02) and for myeloid DCs at 3 and 4 weeks after delivery (P = .01 and P = .02, respectively). The numbers of CD14+CD11c+ potential DC precursors were significantly lower throughout the first month after delivery (Fig 2).
|
4 weeks after delivery and from age-matched, nonlactating women (n = 5). Percentages of cells at different times in lactation were compared with those of control subjects by using the Mann-Whitney test.Increased Bacterial Translocation Occurs in Pregnant and Lactating Mice
Next, bacterial translocation to extraintestinal tissues was examined in conventional nonpregnant, pregnant, and lactating mice. Whereas 10% of control animals had positive MLN cultures, 70% of pregnant animals had bacteria in their MLNs (Fig 3A). Within 24 hours after delivery, fewer animals had positive MLN cultures but 80% of mice had viable bacteria in their mammary tissue. Although this value decreased to 50% by 3 to 4 days after delivery, it was still significantly different from that of control mice (P < .005). Both aerobic and anaerobic species translocated, and their numbers subsided gradually over time (Fig 3B).
|
During lactation, bacteria were observed histologically in the subepithelial dome and interfollicular regions of Peyer’s patches (Fig 3C, left), in the lamina propria of the small bowel, and associated with cells in the glandular tissue of the mammary gland (Fig 3C, right). The Peyer’s patches of pregnant and lactating mice were macroscopically larger than those of control animals and had a more prominent subepithelial dome and more dilated draining lymphatic vessels, containing mononuclear cells (Fig 4).
|
|
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONCONCLUSIONSREFERENCES |
|---|
Aseptically collected breast milk contained a total concentration of microbes of <103 colony-forming units per mL, including Lactobacillus, Streptococcus, Enterococcus, Peptostreptococcus, Staphylococcus, and/or Corynebacterium, with occasional Escherichia spp. This is less than the concentrations recently reported for breast milk6 and may reflect elimination of organisms residing in the ducts or on the areola of the breast.7 Therefore, the findings may give a better indication of bacteria that are intrinsic to milk. It is recognized that, despite every precaution, some of these isolates may still arise from contamination. Several studies have shown a similarity between the microflora of breast milk and that of the nipple and areola.4 The organisms most often in common were staphylococcal and streptococcal species. Increases in the number of staphylococci, streptococci, and Lactobacillus acidophilus species after feeding suggest that the infant’s mouth is another potential source of bacteria.5 Furthermore, a study reported that some strains of Lactobacillus gasseri and Enterococcus faecium in milk were identical to those in swabs of the areola and in oral swabs from the infant.6 It might be argued that such sources of bacteria are also biologically relevant to neonates. Indeed, Staphylococcus species of the skin are common constituents of the early neonatal microbiota.13 However, a bacterial presence in all of the milk samples we examined suggests that a discrete microbiota may exist naturally in breast milk. This prompted a subsequent investigation regarding its origin.
We considered that mononuclear phagocytes destined for the mammary gland capture components of the luminal microbiota before their departure from the gut and transfer them to the suckling infant through breast milk. In a first instance, we used TTGE to examine bacterial rDNA content in milk cells and maternal PBMCs and feces during lactation and then examined corresponding infant feces to address transfer of maternal bacteria through milk. Maternal feces yielded classic TTGE profiles that were specific for each mother and of greater biodiversity than those of infant feces. Although milk cells had a less-complex microbiota, TTGE revealed a greater biodiversity than the 2 or 3 genera observed through plating and included genera corresponding to dominant autochthonous ileal and colonic organisms. These results confirmed the expected uptake of bacteria at these tissue sites and suggested that nonculturable bacteria or the DNA from dead bacteria may also be present intracellularly.
Interestingly, PBMCs contained a restricted variety of bacterial rDNA sequences that was more extensive during lactation. No viable bacteria were isolated. The reason for this is unknown, but perhaps the few, bacterially laden cells are diluted in the circulation. Alternatively, bacteria may be dead/quiescent because of intracellular antimicrobial effects.
Migration of bacteria within intestinally derived cells to the breast is supported by the observation that some rDNA bands were common to maternal feces, blood, and milk. Furthermore, because certain of these bands comigrated with those in infant feces, they may represent microbes transferred to the infant through the milk. Indeed, rDNA sequences corresponding to S thermophilus, S epidermidis, and B longum were identified in the milk cells and in the infant’s feces. These 3 species were also detected in other milk samples and infant fecal samples. Moreover, B longum was detected in maternal blood and fecal samples.
Because we were aware that PCR amplification might have led inadvertently to false-positive results, we confirmed microscopically whether bacteria were associated with maternal cells. Unlike sepsis, in which translocating bacteria are associated with polymorphonuclear cells,12 bacterial bodies were associated with a limited number (<0.1%) of milk and blood mononuclear cells. However, the possibility that bacterial components are also associated with polymorphonuclear cells cannot be excluded.
The observation that microbial components pass into the circulation of healthy individuals, albeit within an intracellular compartment, is potentially controversial and challenges the dogma that translocation of such material occurs only during sepsis. To verify such a phenomenon, we extended our study to conventional nonpregnant, pregnant, and lactating mice.
Although confined bacterial translocation to the MLNs was seen in control mice, heightened translocation to MLNs in the perinatal period was followed by colonization of the mammary gland in the immediate postpartum period. From this study, we cannot say whether additional "waves" of bacterial translocation occur earlier in pregnancy or later in lactation. Nevertheless, the increased translocation did not seem to be induced solely by parturition. Colonization of the breast coincided with an increased number of positive blood cultures and occasional translocation to the spleen and liver (data not shown). In contrast to pathologic conditions in which translocating microbes are mainly Gram-negative, penetrating species in pregnant and lactating mice included Streptococcus, Lactobacillus, and Bifidobacterium, whose numbers subsided gradually over time.
During lactation, bacteria were observed in the lamina propria of the small bowel and in the subepithelial dome and interfollicular regions of the Peyer’s patches. Therefore, M cell-mediated uptake toward DCs in the Peyer’s patch, direct sampling of luminal bacteria by dendrites of lamina propria DCs, and/or a low-level, physiologic leakiness of the epithelium may occur.14 In healthy animals, a very limited number of bacteria cross the intestinal epithelium, evade uptake and killing by intestinal macrophages, and remain viable after phagocytosis by DCs.15 Bacterially loaded DCs then migrate to the MLNs, where they initiate protective immune responses.15 The more-prominent Peyer’s patches observed in pregnant and lactating animals, with mononuclear cell exit through dilated lymphatic vessels, indirectly suggest that DCs may be implicated in the transport of intestinal microbial components to the breast, through the circuit used for induction of tolerance to soluble antigen.16 Certainly, breast milk has a high proportion of phagocytes, which are also ineffective at killing ingested microbes.17 Work demonstrating that CD14+ milk mononuclear cells, which are normally considered to be macrophages, also express HLA-DR, CD86, CD83, and DC-specific intercellular adhesion molecule-3-grabbing nonintegrin suggests that these cells are partially differentiated DCs.18 Moreover, because tissue macrophages are nonmigrating resident cells, milk DC-like cells derived from the maternal circulation are the most likely vehicles for intestinally derived microbial components. Therefore, we speculated that such cellular populations would be modulated during lactation. Indeed, we found that the frequencies of DC phenotypes and of CD14+CD11c+ intermediate DC-like cells were lower in the circulation during lactation. These findings agree with those of a study showing reduced numbers of circulating DC subsets in late pregnancy19 and may reflect cellular trafficking toward the breast or intestine. We detected fetal liver tyrosine kinase-3 ligand, a stimulator of DC differentiation and mobilization,20 in serum samples of 3 of 9 mothers (range: 13.9–71.7 pg/mL) and in 1 of 5 control samples.
Transfer of bacteria through milk may be a means by which maternal microbes colonize the neonatal gut.4,6 Such a mechanism may provide a colonization advantage to bacteria of the mother’s intestinal microbiota at a time when the low bacterial diversity in the neonatal intestine is permissive to colonization. In the present study, sequence homology between some strains in infant feces and milk suggests that this may indeed occur. However, we observed fewer viable organisms than reported previously6 and, although a greater biodiversity of bacterial DNA was evident in milk cells, not all of those DNA bands comigrated with bands in the infant’s feces. Clearly, there are more efficient routes through which maternal organisms colonize the neonatal gut. We speculate that this phenomenon represents an education of the neonatal immune system by maternally derived bacterial molecular motifs.
Neonatal immune cells must learn to differentiate between self-antigens, dietary antigens, commensal organisms, and potential pathogens. We showed previously that human milk contains soluble pattern recognition receptors for bacterial motifs and that these may mediate different responses to Gram-negative and Gram-positive organisms and may modulate how neonatal cells perceive and respond to bacterial components.21–23 In animal models, uptake of maternal leukocytes into neonatal tissues occurs during gestation and lactation.24 Perhaps prolonged penetration of inconspicuous bacterial molecular patterns, via maternal DCs during pregnancy and lactation, induces tolerogenic responses that are analogous to those for self-antigens. Interestingly, osteoprotegerin, a DC survival factor that may also be important for maintaining immune tolerance,25 demonstrates elevated levels in serum during pregnancy and lactation26 and is present in significant quantities in human breast milk.27
Elevated translocation of bacteria or their components in the mother should certainly have some bearing on her immune status and may explain the physiologic activation of innate immunity that occurs during pregnancy.28,29 Interestingly, bacterial DNA stimulates innate immunity in pregnant mice, improves maternal survival rates, and prevents pathogen transmission to the fetus.30
Our observations suggest a novel form of mother-infant communication, but they also highlight a potentially new mechanism of immune regulation in healthy individuals. As shown previously,31,32 the blood of normal healthy subjects contains bacterial components. Some DNA may arise from human or microbial contamination. However, the greater number of bacterial DNA signatures in the PBMCs of healthy lactating women suggests that components of certain bacterial species are inherent to circulating cells. It is tempting to speculate that this represents an evolutionary strategy of immune surveillance and that such bacterial imprinting maintains tolerance to specific bacterial species and alerts distant anatomic sites of changes in local lymphoid tissues.
|
CONCLUSIONS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONCONCLUSIONSREFERENCES |
|---|
Our study shows that human breast milk cells contain a limited number of viable bacteria and bacterial DNA that might have been transported from the mother’s intestine to the mammary gland through an endogenous cellular route. An animal study suggests that this process begins in late pregnancy. The results suggest a novel form of mother-infant communication. However, additional studies are necessary to identify the underlying mechanisms of this heightened bacterial translocation and to elucidate the consequences of this phenomenon for pregnant and lactating women and for instruction of the neonatal immune system.
|
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Fabrizio Arigoni for help in bacterial DNA sequencing; Brigitte Schlosser, Nicole Kusy, Isabelle Rochat, Kim Y. Saudan, Dominique de Maleprade, Angèle Boenzli-Bruand, Paulette Lecoultre, and José-Luis Sánchez for technical assistance; Sylviane Oguey, Anny Blondel, and Ruth Brauen for volunteer recruitment and sample collection; and Christine Cherbut, Stephanie Blum, and Irène Corthésy-Malnoë for scientific discussions and review of the manuscript.
|
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Accepted Sep 25, 2006.
Address correspondence to Anne Donnet-Hughes, PhD, Nestec, Nestlé Research Centre, Vers-chez-les-Blanc, 1000 Lausanne 26, Switzerland. E-mail: anne.donnet{at}rdls.nestle.com
Financial Disclosure: Drs Benyacoub, Schiffrin, and Donnet-Hughes, Mr Serrant, and Ms Segura-Roggero were employees of Nestec.
Dr Perez’s current affiliation is Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo en Criotecnología de Alimentos-Cátedra de Microbiología, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata, Argentina.
Dr Schiffrin’s current affiliation is Nestlé Nutrition, Nestec, Vevey, Switzerland.
|
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONCONCLUSIONSREFERENCES |
|---|
1. Stagg AJ, Hart AL, Knight SC, Kamm MA. The dendritic cell: its role in intestinal inflammation and relationship with gut bacteria. Gut. 2003;52 :1522 –1529
2. Falk PG, Hooper LV, Midtvedt T, Gordon JI. Creating and maintaining the gastrointestinal ecosystem: what we know and need to know from gnotobiology.
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1998;62
:1157
–1170
3. Wright AL, Bauer M, Naylor A, Sutcliffe E, Clark L. Increasing breastfeeding rates to reduce infant illness at the community level.
Pediatrics. 1998;101
:837
–844
4. Moughan PJ, Birtles MJ, Cranwell PD, Smith WC, Pedraza M. The piglet as a model animal for studying aspects of digestion and absorption in milk-fed human infants: nutritional triggers for health and disease. World Rev Nutr Diet. 1992;67 :40 –113[Medline]
5. Gavin A, Ostovar K. Microbiological characterization of human milk. J Food Protec. 1977;40 :614 –616
6. Martín R, Langa S, Reviriego C, et al. Human milk is a source of lactic acid bacteria for the infant gut. J Pediatr. 2003;143 :754 –758[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
7. West PA, Hewitt JH, Murphy OM. The influence of methods of collection and storage on the bacteriology of human milk. J Appl Bacteriol. 1979;46 :269 –277[Medline]
8. Roux ME, McWilliams M, Phillips-Quagliata JM, Weisz-Carrington P, Lamm ME. Origin of IgA secretory plasma cells in the mammary gland.
J Exp Med. 1977;146
:1311
–1322
9. Goldman AS, Goldblum RM. Transfer of maternal leukocytes to the infant by human milk. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1997;222 :205 –213[Web of Science][Medline]
10. Lepage P, Seksik P, Sutren M, et al. Biodiversity of the mucosa-associated microbiota is stable along the distal digestive tract in healthy individuals and patients with IBD. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2005;11 :473 –480[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
11. Mangin I, Bonnet R, Seksik P, et al. Molecular inventory of faecal microflora in patients with Crohn’s disease. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2004;50 :25 –36[Medline]
12. Kite P, Millar MR, Gorham P, Congdon P. Comparison of five tests used in diagnosis of neonatal bacteraemia.
Arch Dis Child. 1988;63
:639
–643
13. Lindberg E, Nowrouzian F, Alderberth I, Wold AE. Long-time persistence of superantigen-producing Staphylococcus aureus strains in the intestinal microflora of healthy infants. Pediatr Res. 2000;48 :741 –747[Web of Science][Medline]
14. Uhlig HH, Powrie F. Dendritic cells and the intestinal bacteria flora: a role for localized mucosal immune responses. J Clin Invest. 2003;112 :648 –651[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
15. MacPherson AJ, Uhr T. Induction of protective IgA by intestinal dendritic cells carrying commensal bacteria.
Science. 2004;303
:1662
–1665
16. Macpherson AJ, Smith K. Mesenteric lymph nodes at the center of immune anatomy.
J Exp Med. 2006;203
:497
–500
17. Ho PC, Lawton JW. Human colostral cells: phagocytosis and killing of E coli and C albicans. J Pediatr. 1978;93 :910 –915[Web of Science][Medline]
18. Ichikawa M, Sugita M, Takahashi M, et al. Breast milk macrophages spontaneously produce granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and differentiate into dendritic cells in the presence of exogenous interleukin-4 alone. Immunology. 2003;108 :189 –195[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
19. Ueda Y, Hagihara M, Okamoto A, et al. Frequencies of dendritic cells (myeloid DC and plasmacytoid DC) and their ratio reduced in pregnant women: comparison with umbilical cord blood and normal healthy adults. Hum Immunol. 2003;64 :1144 –1151[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
20. Maraskovsky E, Brasel K, Teepe M, et al. Dramatic increase in the numbers of functionally mature dendritic cells in Flt3 ligand-treated mice: multiple dendritic cell subpopulations identified.
J Exp Med. 1996;184
:1953
–1962
21. Labeta MO, Vidal K, Nores JE, et al. Innate recognition of bacteria in human milk is mediated by a milk-derived highly expressed pattern recognition receptor, soluble CD14.
J Exp Med. 2000;191
:1807
–1812
22. Vidal K, Donnet-Hughes A, Granato D. Lipoteichoic acids from Lactobacillus johnsonii strain La1 and Lactobacillus acidophilus strain La10 antagonize the responsiveness of human intestinal epithelial HT29 cells to lipopolysaccharide and Gram-negative bacteria.
Infect Immun. 2002;70
:2057
–2064
23. LeBouder E, Rey-Nores JE, Rushmere NK, et al. Soluble forms of Toll-like receptor (TLR)2 capable of modulating TLR2 signaling are present in human plasma and breast milk.
J Immunol. 2003;171
:6680
–6689
24. Zhou L, Yoshimura Y, Huang Y, et al. Two independent pathways of maternal cell transmission to offspring: through placenta during pregnancy and by breast-feeding after birth. Immunology. 2000;101 :570 –580[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
25. Walsh MC, Choi Y. Biology of the TRANCE axis. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2003;14 :251 –263[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
26. Uemura H, Yasui T, Kiyokawa M, et al. Serum osteoprotegerin/osteoclastogenesis-inhibitory factor during pregnancy and lactation and the relationship with calcium-regulating hormones and bone turnover markers. J Endocrinol. 2002;174 :353 –359[Abstract]
27. Vidal K, van den Broek P, Lorget F, Donnet-Hughes A. Osteoprotegerin in human milk: a potential role in the regulation of bone metabolism and immune development. Pediatr Res. 2004;55 :1001 –1008[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
28. Sacks GP, Redman CW, Sargent IL. Monocytes are primed to produce the Th1 type cytokine IL-12 in normal human pregnancy: an intracellular flow cytometric analysis of peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Clin Exp Immunol. 2003;131 :490 –497[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
29. Naccasha N, Gervasi MT, Chaiworapongsa T, et al. Phenotypic and metabolic characteristics of monocytes and granulocytes in normal pregnancy and maternal infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185 :1118 –1123[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
30. Ito S, Ishii KJ, Shirota H, Klinman DM. CpG oligodeoxynucleotides improve the survival of pregnant and fetal mice following Listeria monocytogenes infection.
Infect Immun. 2004;72
:3543
–3548
31. Nikkari S, McLaughlin IJ, Bi W, Dodge DE, Relman DA. Does blood of healthy subjects contain bacterial ribosomal DNA?
J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39
:1956
–1959
32. McLaughlin RW, Vali H, Lau PC, et al. Are there naturally occurring pleomorphic bacteria in the blood of healthy humans?
J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40
:4771
–4775
PEDIATRICS (ISSN 1098-4275). ©2007 by the American Academy of Pediatrics
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Facebook 
Reddit 
Technorati 
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  R. Martin, E. Jimenez, H. Heilig, L. Fernandez, M. L. Marin, E. G. Zoetendal, and J. M. Rodriguez Isolation of Bifidobacteria from Breast Milk and Assessment of the Bifidobacterial Population by PCR-Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis and Quantitative Real-Time PCR Appl. Envir. Microbiol., February 15, 2009; 75(4): 965 - 969. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. M'Rabet, A. P. Vos, G. Boehm, and J. Garssen Breast-Feeding and Its Role in Early Development of the Immune System in Infants: Consequences for Health Later in Life J. Nutr., September 1, 2008; 138(9): 1782S - 1790S. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Jimenez, L. Fernandez, A. Maldonado, R. Martin, M. Olivares, J. Xaus, and J. M. Rodriguez Oral Administration of Lactobacillus Strains Isolated from Breast Milk as an Alternative for the Treatment of Infectious Mastitis during Lactation Appl. Envir. Microbiol., August 1, 2008; 74(15): 4650 - 4655. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. L. Patel, P. P. Meier, and J. L. Engstrom The Evidence for Use of Human Milk in Very Low-birthweight Preterm Infants NeoReviews, November 1, 2007; 8(11): e459 - e466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
