ARTICLE |
a Medical Research Unit in Clinical Epidemiology of the Mexican Social Security Institute, Durango, Mexico
b Research Group on Diabetes and Chronic Illnesses, Durango, Mexico
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS. A total of 317 children and adolescents, 10 to 14 years of age with Tanner stage 1 or 2, were randomly selected from elementary and middle schools in Durango, northern Mexico, to participate in a cross-sectional, community-based study. Family history was ascertained by a direct, detailed medical examination that included anthropometric and laboratory measurements from both parents. We determined the prevalence of family history of type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure, obesity, hyperinsulinemia, and the adjusted odds ratio that computes the relationship between hyperinsulinemia and family history of type 2 diabetes.
RESULTS. Family history of type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure, and obesity was recognized in 30 (9.2%), 61 (18.7%), and 74 (22.7%) children and adolescents, respectively. Children and adolescents with positive family history showed higher systolic and diastolic blood pressure, were more obese, and exhibited significantly higher fasting insulin and triglycerides levels, as well as a higher homeostasis model analysis insulin resistance index, than children with negative family history. A total of 48 (15.1%) children and adolescents exhibited hyperinsulinemia, 35 (72.9%) with and 13 (27.1%) without family history. The odds ratio adjusted by gender, fat mass (kilograms and percent), waist circumference, BMI, and Tanner stage showed that family history of diabetes, but not high blood pressure and obesity, was independently related with hyperinsulinemia.
CONCLUSIONS. Among children and adolescents, family history of diabetes, but not high blood pressure and obesity, is independently associated with hyperinsulinemia.
Key Words: epidemiology diabetes mellitus family issues obesity
Abbreviations: FH-D—family history of type 2 diabetes HBP—high blood pressure FH-HBP—family history of high blood pressure FH-O—family history of obesity HDL-C—high-density lipoprotein cholesterol LDL-C—low-density lipoprotein cholesterol HOMA-IR—homeostasis model analysis insulin resistance CI—confidence interval IGT—impaired glucose tolerance OR—odds ratio
A growing body of evidence on the increase of obesity among youth1–4 shows that obese children and adolescents exhibit a clustering of risk factors for coronary heart disease5,6 and metabolic glucose disturbances.7,8 Insulin levels positively correlate with obesity, particularly with abdominal obesity or visceral fat9,10 and indices of insulin secretion and insulin action,11 such that hyperinsulinemia may help in evaluation for the risk for diabetes and cardiovascular disease in children.11,12
Interestingly, several studies in adults have shown that family history of type 2 diabetes (FH-D) is associated with hyperinsulinemia irrespective of obesity.13–15 Not all obese individuals show insulin resistance,16 and some nonobese subjects have decreased insulin sensitivity.17 These findings suggest that in addition to obesity, other factors, such as FH-D, could play an important role in the development of insulin resistance.18 However, studies reporting that family history is an important surrogate measure for estimating metabolic or cardiovascular risk in offspring have collected data about parental history by questionnaire, asking whether either or both parents had history of heart attack, diabetes, high blood pressure (HBP), or stroke,18–21 possibly introducing a significant source of bias.
In this study, we obtained data on parental history by direct, detailed medical examination and laboratory measurements from both parents and tested the hypothesis that FH-D is independently associated with fasting hyperinsulinemia in healthy children and adolescents.
| METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
All participants were required to be in good health. For this purpose, before their inclusion at study, both detailed medical history and complete physical examination were performed. Children and adolescents with diagnosis of acute or chronic illnesses, infections, renal or hepatic diseases, pr neoplasia or under medical treatment were not included. Tanner stage was determined22 by 1 pediatrician of the Medical Research Unit; only children at Tanner stage 1 or 2 were included.
Family history of high blood pressure (FH-HBP) and FH-D were ascertained by (a) direct detailed medical examination and laboratory measurements from both parents, and (b) verification of clinical records. Laboratory measurements included fasting glucose levels and an oral-glucose tolerance tests for parents with and without previous diagnosis of diabetes, according to the criterion of the American Diabetes Association.23 Blood pressure measurement technique and criterion for diagnosing hypertension using a mercury sphygmomanometer followed the recommended procedures from the Sixth Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure24; parents with previous diagnosis of hypertension taking antihypertensive drugs were considered hypertensive irrespective of their systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Family history of obesity (FH-O) was ascertained by direct measurements of weight, waist circumference, body fat mass, and percent body fat from both parents. Obesity in parents was defined as BMI
30 kg/m2.
Measurements
Weight and height were measured between 8:00 AM and 9:00 AM, with children in standing position, wearing light clothing, and without shoes. BMI was calculated as weight (in kilograms) divided by height (in meters) squared. Waist circumference was measured to the nearest centimeter with a flexible steel tape measure. The following anatomic landmarks were used: laterally, midway between the lowest portion of the rib cage and iliac crest, and anteriorly midway between the xiphoid process of the sternum and the umbilicus.25 All measurements were taken by pediatricians from the Medical Research Unit. The intra- and interassay variation coefficients were 1.1 and 1.7%, respectively.
Blood pressure measurements were taken using a mercury sphygmomanometer, with the children seated and their arms bared and supported at heart level, after at least 5 minutes of rest, and using an appropriate cuff size.24 An average of 3 readings separated by 2 minutes was used.
Assays
A venous whole blood sample was collected after 8 to 10 hours of fasting and 2-hour postload glucose (1.75 mg of glucose per kilogram of body weight). Total cholesterol and triglycerides were enzymatically measured (Data Pro Plus random access clinical analyzer, Waltham, MA). The high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) fraction was obtained after precipitation by phosphotungstic reagent. The intra- and interassay coefficients of variation were 1.7% and 2.8% for total cholesterol, 1.7% and 3.1% for triglycerides, and 1.3% and 2.6% for HDL-C. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) was calculated using the Friedewald formula. Serum glucose was measured using the glucose-oxidase method; the intraassay and interassay coefficients of variation were 1.1% and 1.5%, respectively. Insulin levels were measured by microparticle enzyme immunoassay (Abbot Axsym System, Bedford, MA), with intra- and interassay variation coefficients of 4.5 and 6.9, respectively.
Definitions
Obesity was defined by BMI
95th percentile, overweight by BMI between the 85th and 95th percentiles, and normal weight by BMI <85th percentile. BMI cutoff values used were age- and gender-specific according to the childhood international BMI cutoff charts.26 High blood pressure (HBP) was defined as systolic and diastolic blood pressure
95th percentile for age and gender.
The cutoff values for abnormal serum lipid levels were based on the National Cholesterol Education Program Pediatric Panel Report.27 Hypertriglyceridemia, hypercholesterolemia, low HDL-C, and high LDL-C were defined by serum concentrations of triglycerides
150 mg/dL, total cholesterol
170 mg/dL, HDL-C
35 mg/dL, and LDL-C
110 mg/dL.
Hyperinsulinemia was defined on the basis of fasting serum insulin levels
85th percentile, which was previously determined in an independent cohort of 748 children and adolescents from our community. The cutoff value for hyperinsulinemia corresponds to 16 µIU/mL for this stratum of age (M.R.-M. and F.G.-R., unpublished data, 2005). The cutoff value for normal fasting glucose was 100 mg/dL.
The homeostasis model analysis insulin resistance (HOMA-IR = fasting glucose mmol/L x fasting insulin µIU/mL/22.5) index was used for estimating insulin action.28
Statistical Analysis
Numerical values are reported as mean ± SD. For bivariate analysis, the unpaired Student's t test (Mann-Whitney U test) or
2 test was used. P value for trend was used for estimating differences between multiple groups. Correlation analysis was performed using the Pearson test (Spearman test).
Multivariate logistic regression adjusted by gender, fat mass, waist circumference, age, and Tanner stage was used to compute the relationship between FH-D, FH-HBP, and FH-O (independent variables) and the presence of hyperinsulinemia (dependent variable). A 95% confidence interval (CI) was considered. Data were analyzed by using SPSS 12.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Girls were significantly younger than boys (11.6 ± 1.4 vs 12.1 ± 1.5 years; P = .009), whereas other variables such as weight (50.1 ± 15.8 vs 49.5 ± 13.2 kg; P = .721), waist circumference (74.4 ± 14.1 vs 71.9 ± 11.8 cm; P = .793), and BMI (21.1 ± 4.9 vs 21.3 ± 4.3 kg/m2; P = .09) did not show significant statistical differences between girls and boys.
Anthropometric and laboratory characteristics of parents are shown in Table 1. As was expected, because children's parents with positive family history had diabetes, hypertension, and/or obesity, they showed higher glucose levels and blood pressure, and were more obese than children's parents in the control group. There was a significant positive correlation between the BMI of the parents and their offspring (r = 0.255, P < .001 and r = 0.196, P < .05, for the groups with and without family history, respectively), but none between other anthropometric and biochemical measurements.
|
|
Stratified by BMI, hyperinsulinemia was identified in 6 (3.2%) normal-weight, 7 (12.1%) overweight, and 35 (47.9%) obese children and adolescents; among them, all the normal-weight and overweight but only 22 (62.8%) obese children had positive family history. Moreover, irrespective of obesity, hyperinsulinemic children showed higher blood pressure, unfavorable lipid profiles, and higher glucose levels (Table 3).
|
|
Forty-five (14.2%) children and adolescents exhibited dyslipidemia, 32 (26.9%) and 13 (6.6%) in the groups with and without family history. Among children with dyslipidemia and positive family history, 56.3% (18/32) were not obese. Twenty-seven (55.1%) of 49 children with IGT exhibited dyslipidemia; among them, 22 (44.9%) of 49 in the group had positive family history.
Fasting serum insulin levels correlated with FH-D (r = 0.336; P < .05), fat mass (r = 0.572; P < .001), and waist circumference (r = 0.553; P < .001).
The odds ratio (OR), adjusted by fat mass, waist circumference, BMI, gender, and Tanner stage, that computes the relationship between family history and hyperinsulinemia are shown in Table 5. FH-D, but not FH-HBP or FH-O, was independently associated with elevated fasting insulin levels.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In addition, the present study also demonstrates that youth with FH-D have significantly higher insulin resistance than children who do not have family history; this finding agrees with previous reports that showed that FH-D is independently and negatively associated to insulin sensitivity.31,32 Both hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance contribute to development of type 2 diabetes, but discussion about which is the earliest metabolic alteration associated with the FH-D currently is in progress. Whether hyperinsulinemia is an early compensation for decreased insulin sensitivity or it is a primary defect in the offspring of subjects with type 2 diabetes needs to be adequately addressed.
Because obesity in childhood has significantly increased in recent years2–4,33 and it is strongly associated with insulin resistance,32 the main public health policies are focused on screening obese children and adolescents. However, our data show that hyperinsulinemia and its related adverse lipid profile also are strongly associated with FH-D and can be found among normal-weight children, supporting the statement that screening for cardiovascular and metabolic risk factors in childhood should not be restricted solely to obese children.34 Taking into account that FH-D is associated with earliest metabolic alterations, we postulate that FH-D also should be a criterion for screening apparently healthy, young populations.34
Moreover, our results show that normal-weight, overweight, and obese children and adolescents with hyperinsulinemia exhibited similar metabolic abnormalities and higher blood pressure values, supporting the finding that, in addition to obesity, other critical factors are related to development of hyperinsulinemia and dyslipidemia in childhood. Our results agree with the report by Cruz et al,17 which showed that fat mass is not related to features of metabolic syndrome.
Forty-nine children (15.4%) were found to have IGT. Previous studies in obese children reported a prevalence of IGT that varies from 4.5% to 28%.8,35,36 In children and adolescents with marked obesity, the prevalence of IGT raises 21%,36 whereas in overweight Latino children with FH-D it raises 28%.8 In our study, overall prevalence of IGT was significantly lower than that reported by Sinha et al,36 differences that could be explained by different age and adiposity of the targeted population. However, among children and adolescents with FH-D, prevalence of IGT in our study population was similar (22.7% vs 28%) to that reported by Goran et al.8 Moreover, similar to reports by Goran et al,8 our data show that IGT in the offspring of subjects with type 2 diabetes is not related to obesity, whereas among children and adolescents who do not have FH-D, prevalence of IGT is closely related to the presence of obesity.
Several limitations of this study deserve to be mentioned. First, coinheritance of insulin resistance and its comorbidities are age dependent; thus, taking into account the average age of parents (38.3 ± 5.6 years) in this study, it is likely that some of them, currently healthy, will get diabetes, obesity, or HBP in the future. This confounding variable may exert a potential source of bias, but because it is not possible to control this limitation in cross-sectional design studies, follow-up research will be required. Second, we did not measure the customary diet. Thus, we are not certain about the role of caloric and lipid ingestion on the risk for development of hyperinsulinemia and dyslipidemia. Interestingly, obesity in the parents was strongly correlated with obesity in the offspring, which could reflect inheritable susceptibility and/or environmental influences related with parental feeding practices. However, taking into account that even some normal-weight children and adolescents exhibited an unfavorable lipid profile and high serum insulin levels, this limitation exerts a slight influence on our conclusions.
Finally, to minimize the well-known pubertal effect on insulin levels and the adiposity rebound, a marker for generalized growth acceleration and fat hyperplasia that may be a critical period in childhood for development of obesity,37 only children and adolescents with Tanner stage 1 or 2, and 10 to 14 years of age, were included.
| CONCLUSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Address correspondence to Fernando Guerrero-Romero, MD, PhD, FACP, Siqueiros 225 esq./Castañeda, 34000 Durango, Durango, Mexico. E-mail: guerrero_romero{at}hotmail.com
The authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. A. Matyka Type 2 diabetes in childhood: epidemiological and clinical aspects Br. Med. Bull., June 1, 2008; 86(1): 59 - 75. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||