 |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE |
a Departments of Pediatrics
b Neurology
d Diagnostic Imaging Epidemiology and Public Health
g Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
c Columbia College of Physicians and Surgeons and the New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York
e Department of Pediatrics, Brown Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island
f Departments of Pediatrics and Neurology, Maine Medical Center, Portland, Maine
 |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
 TOP ABSTRACT METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this work was to use functional magnetic resonance imaging to test the hypothesis that neonatal indomethacin treatment would differentially affect brain activation across genders in school-aged, prematurely born children during performance of a language task.
METHODS. Forty-seven prematurely born children (600–1250-g birth weight) and 24 matched term control subjects were evaluated using a functional magnetic resonance imaging passive language task and neurodevelopmental assessments that included the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-III and the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised. Neural activity was assessed during both phonologic and semantic processing in the functional magnetic resonance imaging protocol.
RESULTS. Neurodevelopmental assessments demonstrated significant differences in full-scale, verbal, and performance intelligence quotient, as well as Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test scores, between the preterm and term control subjects. Rates of perinatal complications did not differ significantly across preterm treatment groups, but male preterm subjects randomly assigned to saline tended to have lower Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised scores than did all of the other preterm groups. During phonological processing, a significant treatment-by-gender effect was demonstrated in 3 brain regions: the left inferior parietal lobule, the left inferior frontal gyrus (Broca's area), and the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.
CONCLUSIONS. These data demonstrate a differential effect of indomethacin administration early in postnatal life on the subsequent development of neural systems that subserve language functioning in these male and female preterm infants.
Key Words: functional magnetic resonance imaging • premature • indomethacin • neurodevelopmental outcome
Abbreviations: IVH—intraventricular hemorrhage • VLBW—very low birth weight • CNS—central nervous system • fMRI—functional magnetic resonance imaging • PPVT—Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test • IQ—intelligence quotient • FSIQ—full-scale intelligence quotient • VIQ—verbal intelligence quotient • PIQ—performance intelligence quotient • IPL—inferior parietal lobule • IFG—inferior frontal gyrus • DLPF—dorsolateral prefrontal cortex • BA—Brodmann’s area
Indomethacin, a well-known inhibitor of cyclooxygenase, both lowers the incidence and decreases the severity of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) in very low birth-weight (VLBW) preterm infants.1–4 In addition, indomethacin closes the patent ductus arteriosus, and it tends to increase survival in these infants, who often are critically ill. Because indomethacin has been shown in animal models and in preterm neonates both to decrease cerebral blood flow and to modulate vascular reactivity,5–8 the neurodevelopmental outcome of infants randomly assigned to early low-dose indomethacin has been studied intensively, although with inconclusive results.1,9,10 Our recent analysis of the children participating in the Multicenter Randomized Indomethacin IVH Prevention Trial demonstrated that indomethacin significantly decreased the incidence of IVH, prevented parenchymal hemorrhage, and was associated with higher verbal test scores at ages 3 to 8 years, although this protective effect of indomethacin on cognitive outcome seemed to be specific only to male subjects.10
Emerging experience with perinatal interventions suggests that follow-up data are needed for the thorough assessment of the safety of these treatments, and this is particularly true for the low birth-weight preterm infant population.11–13 In recent years, MRI has permitted a better understanding of the effects of preterm birth on the developing central nervous system (CNS), and abnormalities in regional brain volumes and in measures of white matter integrity have correlated significantly with measures of neurodevelopmental outcome.14–20 Thus, MRI strategies are particularly suited to examine the impact of injury and repair in the developing CNS.
In contrast, although functional MRI (fMRI) has been used to explore differences in cerebral functioning between term and preterm children at school age,21,22 the use of functional imaging strategies to assess the effects of therapy in the pediatric population is relatively new. Als et al23 used diffusion tensor imaging to document the effect of the Newborn Individualized Developmental Care and Assessment Program, a neonatal intervention for preterm infants beginning shortly after birth and continuing to 2 weeks after the obstetric due date, in VLBW preterm infants. Similarly, Shaywitz et al24 documented the long-term influence of a reading intervention on neural systems subserving this skill in school-aged children. Study children were randomly assigned to a specially designed reading intervention, community remediation, or no intervention and scanned immediately before random assignment at the completion of the intervention/no intervention period and 1 year thereafter to document the long-lasting effect of this reading program.
We used an fMRI-based task of passive language comprehension to test the hypothesis that indomethacin would differentially affect neural processes that subserve language function in male and female prematurely born children. Based on the pattern of cognitive test scores in our study cohort, which demonstrated a protective effect for boys randomly assigned to early indomethacin,25 we hypothesized that patterns of brain activation in these preterm boys randomly assigned to indomethacin would be more similar to those of term control boys than to patterns of brain activity in the preterm saline group. Because IVH has been shown to be associated with prolonged decreases in cerebral blood flow, increased rates of periventricular leukomalacia, and more frequent low-pressure ventriculomegaly26–28 and because our finding of improved test scores in boys randomly assigned to indomethacin was independent of IVH status,10 we tested our a priori hypothesis only in subjects who had no evidence of IVH in the newborn period.
|
METHODS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
Subjects and Their Assessment
The preterm cohort consisted of children enrolled in the follow-up component of the Multicenter Randomized Indomethacin IVH Prevention Trial at Yale University School of Medicine and Brown University, based on geographic proximity to New Haven, CT. All of the subjects were examined with cranial echoencephalography between 5 and 11 hours of age. As shown in Table 1, those 334 with no evidence of IVH were admitted to the trial to test the primary hypothesis that indomethacin would prevent IVH in this patient population; 279 (84%) had no IVH at postnatal day 5.2 Of these 279, 249 survived (89%), 209 (84%) of the 249 survivors were evaluated at 8 years old corrected age, and 194 lived within 200 miles of the Yale MRI Research Facility.
|
The 24 term control children, aged 7 to 9 years, were recruited from the local communities of the study children as described previously.29 Controls were additionally group-matched with the preterm subjects by age (±1 year), gender (male/female), maternal education (less than high school/high school graduate), and minority status (yes/no).
Neurodevelopmental Assessments
Assessments were performed at 8 years of age by testers blinded to the child's randomization status in the IVH prevention study. As described previously, the following tests were administered: (1) the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Third Edition, is an individually administered norm-referenced instrument for assessing the intellectual function of children ages 6 years 10 months through 16 years 11 months30; and (2) the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (PPVT)-Revised is a multiple-choice test that measures receptive vocabulary development and listening vocabulary in a format that requires no verbal response.31 The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Third Edition, generates full-scale intelligence quotient ([IQ] FSIQ), verbal IQ (VIQ), and performance IQ (PIQ) scores. The reading recognition, reading comprehension, and mathematics subtests of the Peabody Individualized Achievement Test-Revised were also administered to all of the study and term control subjects.32
Demographic data obtained from the parent or caregiver included information on household composition; languages spoken in the home; educational level of the biological, adoptive, or foster parent; school placement of the child; resource use; and need for medications. A standard neurologic examination was performed by a pediatric neurologist or developmental pediatrician at each site and included determinations of height, weight, occipitofrontal head circumference, visual field testing, pupillary function, eye movements, and facial strength. Tone, strength, reflexes, and cerebellar function were also assessed. A determination of normal, suspect, or abnormal neurologic status was made. Subjects with abnormal or suspect assessments were examined for the presence of microcephaly, spastic diplegia, hemiplegia, or quadriplegia.
fMRI Paradigms
Cognitive-behavioral tasks used in the fMRI subtraction paradigms were selected to help identify brain regions involved in the phonologic or semantic processing of spoken language. Because of the young age of the children and their wide range of cognitive functioning, we selected an age-appropriate, relatively simple cognitive task to perform in the scanner, a passive auditory listening task in which the children listened to 3 varying stimulus presentations of a pleasant children's story.
Stimulus 1
This was an audiotape of a young woman reading The Ugly Duckling in a pleasant voice. The story was presented in its entirety during the scanning session composed of 6 segments, each 35 seconds long.
Stimulus 2
This was the same story but with all phonemes of the story randomized in time. Phonemic randomization was intended to destroy the linguistic structure that made semantic comprehension possible. The story was read by the same woman, and the randomization was intended to contain the same acoustic spectral frequencies, phonemes, prosody, and duration as the original story. Comparing images acquired during stimulus 1 with those acquired during stimulus 2 was used to identify the differential brain activity needed to process the semantic components of the story.
Stimulus 3
A recording of the story was then low-passed filtered so that phonemes could not be discerned. Retaining the same prosody and duration as stimulus 1 and stimulus 2, it was devoid of phonemic content. Comparing imaging acquired as the children listened to stimulus 3 with images acquired as they listed to stimulus 2 was used to identify the differential brain activity associated with phonologic processing of the story. A staff member attended each child during the scan to ensure that the child remained alert, attended to the task, and held still.
Stimulus Presentation
Audiotaped stimuli were delivered through headphones. Portions of the 3 stimuli were presented sequentially in an alternating sequence. Each was presented as 2 separate segments in each of 3 experiment runs as described previously.22
Children were instructed to listen to the story closely and to try to understand and remember what they were hearing. They were told that they would not be able to understand some portions of what they heard. To assess their comprehension of the intelligible portions of the story, they were asked 10 multiple-choice questions about the content of the story after the scan.
Image Acquisition
Head positioning in the magnet was standardized using the canthomeatal line. A T1-weighted sagittal localizing scan was used to position the axial images. In all of the subjects, 10 oblique axial slices were acquired to correspond with 10 axial sections of the Talairach coordinate system oriented parallel to the anterior commissure-posterior commissure line. The slices were positioned with 2 slices below, 7 slices above, and 1 slice containing the anterior commissure-posterior commissure line. Slice thickness was a constant 7 mm, and the skip between slices varied between 0.5 and 2 mm to maintain a strict correspondence with the Talairach coordinate system across the axial slices.
Images were acquired on a GE Signa 1.5-T scanner equipped with echoplanar imaging hardware (GE LX 1.5 Tesla System, Waukesha, WI). The functional images were obtained with a gradient echo, echo planar imaging pulse sequence having a repetition time of 2060 milliseconds, echo time of 45 milliseconds, flip angle of 60°, 1 excitation per image, 20- x 40-cm field of view, and 64 x 128 matrix, providing a 3.1- x 3.1-mm in-plane resolution. During each run, 102 echoplanar images were acquired in each slice, providing 306 images per experiment and 102 images for each stimulus type. High-resolution, T1-weighted anatomic scans for volumetric measurements were acquired using a sagittal spoiled gradient recall sequence (repetition time of 24 milliseconds, echo time of 5 milliseconds, 45° flip, frequency encoding superior/inferior, no wrap, 256 x 192 matrix, field of view of 30 cm, 2 excitations, slice thickness of 1.2 mm, and 124 contiguous slices).
Image Processing
Images were motion corrected using SPM99 (www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/) for 6 translation and rotation directions. Subjects with motion trajectories >0.5 pixels were eliminated. Percentage of signal change for both contrasts of interest were calculated for each subject using a general linear model with a canonical hemodynamic response function time locked to the onset of the story conditions. Each subject's three-dimensional high-resolution volume scan was registered to a common reference brain space, and the regression coefficients from the general linear model were transformed to this common space for between-subject and between-group analyses.33
Statistical Analyses
The preterm subjects were divided into 4 groups for analyses: indomethacin boys, indomethacin girls, saline boys, and saline girls. Comparisons were also made between the total preterm group and the term controls.
Demographic, neurologic, and cognitive data were analyzed using standard 
2 analyses for categorical data and nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum tests for continuous-valued data. To maintain control over false-positives that may arise from simultaneous testing of multiple factors across all brain voxels, whole-brain voxel-wise statistical testing was conducted first, and regions identified from the whole-brain analysis were submitted to more detailed mixed-effects modeling in SAS (SAS Institute, Cary, NC), as described below. To generate maps of average signal change across all of the subjects in each task, percentage of signal change values from all of the subjects were entered into a voxel-wise 1-sample t test. Monte-Carlo simulations were conducted to estimate a cluster-size threshold adequate for ensuring that the likelihood of a false-positive activation under the null hypothesis remained below P < .05.34 A voxel-wise threshold of P < .01 and a minimum cluster size of 71 voxels met this criterion.
The primary analysis, a voxel-wise analysis of variance program (part of AFNI software, http://afni.nimh.nih.gov/afni/) was used to identify regions of the brain exhibiting a significant gender x treatment interaction in each task (semantic and phonologic). For each region identified by this analysis, the percentage of signal changes in each task were averaged across the voxels comprising the activation cluster in each subject. Average values for each significant region, task, and subject were then submitted to a mixed-effects model in SAS for the purposes of adjusting for gender and behavioral and demographic covariates. We conducted significance tests and estimated adjusted means for each subject group to characterize the nature of the interaction in each region. Because the semantic and phonologic task subtractions are not directly comparable in a single model, they were analyzed separately.
|
RESULTS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|
Hypothesis Testing
A whole-brain voxel-wise analysis of variance was used to identify brain regions exhibiting a significant gender-by-treatment interaction effect, testing the preliminary hypothesis of a differential effect of indomethacin treatment between boys and girls. Average signal change levels extracted from regions so identified were submitted to a mixed-effects model, controlling for both VIQ and age at the time of MRI scan. Pairwise comparisons were used to evaluate the hypothesis that male preterm subjects randomly assigned to receive indomethacin would be more likely to have patterns of brain activation similar to term control boys than male preterm subjects randomly assigned to saline and that such an effect would not be present in girls. Statistical modeling was performed separately for phonologic and semantic tasks.
On the basis of the voxel-wise whole-brain analysis of variance analysis, no significant gender-by-treatment interactions were noted in fMRI analyses of the semantic contrast. In contrast, 3 regions were identified showing a significant treatment-by-gender effect in the phonologic contrast. These include the left inferior parietal lobule ([IPL] BA 40), the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), or Broca's area (BA 44) and the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex ([DLPF] BA 46; peak voxel P = .0002, .0011, and .0002, respectively). These regions are shown in Fig 2.
|
|
|
Finally, for the right DLPF, a similar pattern of actions was found: preterm boys randomly assigned to indomethacin differed significantly from preterm boys randomly assigned to saline (P = .007) but not from term control boys (P = .26), as shown in Fig 3C. As expected to confirm our hypothesis testing, preterm boys randomly assigned to saline were significantly different from term control boys (P = .001). Furthermore, there were no significant differences for any of the comparisons among the female groups in the right DLPF (preterm indomethacin girls versus preterm saline girls, P = .07; preterm indomethacin girls versus term control girls, P = .82; preterm girls randomly assigned to saline versus term control girls, P = .082).
|
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
The regions of differential effect, the left IPL, IFG, and right DLPF, have all been implicated in the phonologic processing of language. The IPL is the classical locus of phonological encoding, as evidenced by a vast number of lesion and human imaging studies (reviewed by Eckert35 and Heim36). Often less appreciated, however, is that BA 44 in the left IFG, or Broca's region, although widely regarded as the locus of expressive language functioning, also participates in phonological processing. For auditory tasks, activation of this region has been attributed to the recoding of acoustic phonetic information into its corresponding articulatory gestures, and Burton37 has shown that the region of peak activation during auditory phonologic tasks tends to be situated in the superior and posterior aspects of Broca's area (BA 44), thus providing a plausible explanation for this finding. More recent studies by Burton et al38 have shown stronger increases in activation of BA 44 in response to pseudowords, such as those found in stimulus 2 of our paradigm, when compared with either words or sequences. In addition, BA 44 has been shown to coactivate with the left IPL (BA 40) near the supramarginal gyrus during controlled use of phonologic processing.39 Moreover, in addition to BA 44, phonologic tasks have been shown to activate several other portions of the right frontal cortex, including DLPF (BA 46), particularly during pseudoword tasks such as the 1 used to engage phonological processing systems here. These prefrontal regions are believed to subserve the general working memory functions needed for decoding processes within other brain regions.40,41
In contrast, although randomization to early indomethacin was associated with negative blood oxygen level-dependent signal in the left IPL and left IFG, we noted no consistent treatment effect for the female preterm study children. These data are consistent with the cognitive and language testing results, which show no significant differences between preterm girls randomly assigned to indomethacin and preterm girls randomly assigned to saline placebo (data not shown).
The spectrum of actions of indomethacin in the developing brain remains largely unknown. Whereas earlier studies emphasized the effects of this agent on cerebral blood flow and vascular reactivity,5,6 more recent investigations have demonstrated the ability of indomethacin to suppress mediators of CNS inflammation, including prostaglandin E2 and interleukin 1ß; inhibit activation of the transcription factor nuclear factor-
B; and act as a direct ligand of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-
(for review see Townsend and Pratico42).
Furthermore, increasing evidence suggests the presence of inborn gender differences in the response to injury of the developing CNS,13 and numerous studies have shown that these differences are attributable to intrinsic properties of individual cells.43–47 Male and female neurons exhibit differential gene expression even in the absence of hormonal influences, and there seems to be an innate gender-based proclivity of the response to cytotoxicity and apoptotic pathways in both neurons and developing oligodendroglial cells.43–47 It is noteworthy, therefore, that both white matter injury and IVH are more common in preterm boys than in preterm girls.48
As with other studies of functional imaging, limitations of our study include sample size and selection bias within the study group. All of the study children were invited to participate, and our sample size is consistent with or greater than sample sizes of other fMRI studies of children at this age.24,49 None of the children with usable fMRI data were excluded from our analyses, and we do not wish to imply that the subjects studied reflect the full cohort of children without IVH at the Brown and Yale sites of our clinical trial. Finally, using data from the Trial of Indomethacin Prophylaxis in the Preterms Study cohort, Ohlsson et al13 have reported recently both a strong negative effect of indomethacin in female preterm infants, as well as a weaker positive one in male subjects. The Trial of Indomethacin Prophylaxis in the Preterms Study differed significantly from our study, however. Because early ultrasounds were not required for study admission, both subjects with early onset IVH (within the first 6 postnatal hours) and those with no IVH were enrolled; furthermore, indomethacin was administered within the first 6 postnatal hours, a time interval during which indomethacin may have significant impact on renal blood flow and mesenteric vascular stability. First ultrasounds were done at 5 to 8 days of life.50
The present data use functional imaging strategies to suggest a possible long-term influence of a neonatal intervention on the developing CNS in this population of children. We have previously reported indomethacin-by-gender interactions influencing the rates of IVH and cognitive performance in school-aged children. The current study extends this work by identifying language processes that indomethacin may uniquely affect and by demonstrating brain regions that may serve as targets for the effects of indomethacin in the brains of prematurely born boys. The biological mechanisms of indomethacin and its effect on corticogenesis remain to be explored.51–55
|
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Dr Deborah Hirtz for her scientific expertise, Marjorene Ainley for follow-up coordination, Lisa Perry and Victoria Watson for neurodevelopmental testing, and Hedy Sarofin and Terry Hicky for their technical assistance.
|
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Address correspondence to Laura R. Ment, MD, Department of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT 06520. E-mail: laura.ment{at}yale.edu
The authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.
|
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  R. T. Constable, L. R. Ment, B. R. Vohr, S. R. Kesler, R. K. Fulbright, C. Lacadie, S. Delancy, K. H. Katz, K. C. Schneider, R. J. Schafer, et al. Prematurely Born Children Demonstrate White Matter Microstructural Differences at 12 Years of Age, Relative to Term Control Subjects: An Investigation of Group and Gender Effects Pediatrics, February 1, 2008; 121(2): 306 - 316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. Fransson, B. Skiold, S. Horsch, A. Nordell, M. Blennow, H. Lagercrantz, and U. Aden Resting-state networks in the infant brain PNAS, September 25, 2007; 104(39): 15531 - 15536. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
||
|
||
Home | My Pediatrics | Journal Information | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscriptions & Services | Contact Us Click here for faster international access © 2006 American Academy of Pediatrics. All rights reserved. |
||
|
||
