Published online September 1, 2006
PEDIATRICS Vol. 118 No. 3 September 2006, pp. 865-873 (doi:10.1542/10.1542/peds.2006-0492)
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (36)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Grijalva, C. G.
Right arrow Articles by Griffin, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Grijalva, C. G.
Right arrow Articles by Griffin, M. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Infectious Disease & Immunity
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

ARTICLE

National Impact of Universal Childhood Immunization With Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine on Outpatient Medical Care Visits in the United States

Carlos G. Grijalva, MD, MPHa, Katherine A. Poehling, MD, MPHb, J. Pekka Nuorti, MD, DScc, Yuwei Zhu, MD, MSd, Stacey W. Martin, MScc, Kathryn M. Edwards, MDb and Marie R. Griffin, MD, MPHa,e,f

a Departments of Preventive Medicine
b Pediatrics
d Biostatistics
e Medicine
f Center For Education and Research on Therapeutics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee
c Bacterial Vaccine-Preventable Diseases Branch, National Immunization Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia


   ABSTRACT
TOP
 ABSTRACT
METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 APPENDIX: ICD-9-CM DIAGNOSIS...
 REFERENCES
 
BACKGROUND. Since introduction of the heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in the United States in 2000, rates of invasive pneumococcal disease have declined. However, the national impact of heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine on pneumonia and otitis media remains unknown.

OBJECTIVES. We compared national rates of outpatient visits for pneumonia and otitis media in children before and after heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine introduction.

METHODS. Rates of ambulatory visits for pneumococcal and nonspecific pneumonia, otitis media, and other acute respiratory infections were compared before (1994–1999) and after (2002–2003) heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine introduction using the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey and the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. To evaluate vaccine effects while accounting for temporal variability, ratios of pneumococcal-related disease rates in children <2 years old (vaccine target population) and in children 3 to 6 years old (not routinely vaccinated) were evaluated using a Poisson regression analysis. For children <2 years old, the differences between observed and expected rates were the estimated vaccine effects.

RESULTS. After the introduction of heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, otitis media visit rates declined by 20% in children aged <2 years. This decline represented 246 fewer otitis media visits per 1000 children aged <2 years annually. There were no significant decreases in outpatient visit rates for pneumonia or other acute respiratory infections for children aged <2 years.

CONCLUSIONS. After heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine introduction, national rates of otitis media visits declined significantly in children <2 years old. Persistence of this trend will produce a significant reduction of the otitis media burden and further enhance the cost-effectiveness of heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine.

Key Words: pneumococcal conjugate vaccine • otitis media • pneumonia

Abbreviations: PCV7—heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine • NAMCS—National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey • NHAMCS—National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey • ICD-9-CM—International Classification of Diseases, Clinical Modification, Ninth Revision • ARI—acute respiratory infection • RR—rate ratio • CI—confidence interval

Streptococcus pneumoniae is an important cause of pneumonia and otitis media in children in the United States.1–6 Although the precise incidence of pneumococcal pneumonia is difficult to ascertain, because routine diagnostic tests are insufficiently specific and sensitive,1 S pneumoniae likely accounts for 24% to 33% of pneumonias in ambulatory settings.6–8 Children <5 years of age have the highest incidence of pneumonia,4,5,9 and pneumonia and influenza combined represent the leading infectious cause of mortality in children aged 1 to 4 years in the United States.10 Worldwide, ~1.9 million annual childhood deaths are attributed to pneumonia.11,12

Otitis media, the most common cause of sick visits in preschool-aged children in the United States, accounts for an estimated 24.5 million clinic visits and $2 billion to $5.3 billion in annual treatment costs.13–20 By the age of 3 years, 83% of children will have experienced ≥1 episode of otitis media. Because otitis media is the most common reason for antibiotic prescriptions among US children,19–21 it is an important contributor to antibiotic resistance.22 S pneumoniae accounts for 30% to 55% of otitis media episodes.3,18,23

In 2000, a heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7) was licensed in the United States and recommended for use in all children <2 years of age.1,24 Results from randomized, controlled clinical trials showed significant reductions in rates of invasive disease, pneumonia, and otitis media in fully vaccinated children.11,16,23,25–29 Post-PCV7 licensure studies have shown significant decreases in the rates of invasive pneumococcal disease, with the largest reductions in rates observed in children <2 years of age.30–32 These reductions have occurred despite vaccine shortages and before full implementation of recommendations for universal vaccination.

Because the incidence of pneumococcal pneumonia and otitis media is much higher than invasive disease, PCV7 might have a more profound impact on the epidemiology and health care costs associated with these noninvasive pneumococcal-related diseases than those seen with invasive diseases. Furthermore, cost-effectiveness evaluations of immunization programs are more sensitive to estimates of PCV7 effects on pneumonia and otitis media rates than those of invasive diseases.33,34 However, initial cost-effectiveness evaluations of PCV7 did not consider vaccine indirect effects,33,35 and nationally representative data on the impact of PCV7 in decreasing pneumonia and otitis media are limited.16,18,31,33

Six years after the introduction of PCV7, we evaluated the potential impact of routine PCV7 immunization on visit rates for 2 common pneumococcal-related diseases, pneumonia and otitis media, in the US outpatient setting through the analysis of 2 National Health Care Surveys.


   METHODS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 APPENDIX: ICD-9-CM DIAGNOSIS...
 REFERENCES
 
We analyzed data collected by the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) and the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) from 1994 to 2003. These surveys provide standardized and detailed data on outpatient diagnoses and treatments annually without any personal identifiers.36–39 Up to 3 medical diagnoses per visit are coded in NAMCS and NHAMCS, using the International Classification of Diseases, Clinical Modification, Ninth Revision (ICD-9-CM). To account for this multiplicity, 3 mutually exclusive diagnosis groups were created using a prespecified hierarchy: pneumococcal pneumonia and nonspecific pneumonias, otitis media, and other acute respiratory infections (ARIs) (see Appendix for specific diagnosis codes). Some sampled visits represented new episodes and others follow-up visits. For the years 2001–2003, which included visit encounter type information, the proportion of pneumonia visits that were classified as follow-up visits ranged from 24% to 59% for children aged <2 years. Similarly, the proportion of otitis media and other respiratory infection visits classified as follow-up visits ranged from 19% to 23% and from 14% to 18%, respectively.

The NAMCS gathers data on a nationally representative sample of visits to office-based physicians who are primarily engaged in direct patient care. Each physician is randomly assigned to a 1-week reporting period. During this period, physicians or office staff record patient demographics, symptoms, procedures, diagnoses, and prescribed medications for a systematic random sample of visits.40 We included all visits to general or family medicine physicians, internists, pediatricians, and related specialties (Appendix). During the study period, physician participation rates in NAMCS ranged from 63% to 73%, and the unweighted item nonresponse rates were typically ≤5%.

The NHAMCS collects data on a nationally representative sample of visits to hospital-based emergency departments and outpatient clinics. Hospital staff record patient demographics, symptoms, procedures, diagnoses, prescribed medications, and hospital characteristics for a systematic random sample of patient visits during a randomly assigned 4-week reporting period.41 Because NHAMCS did not include a register of medical specialties, we included all visits to emergency departments and general medicine and pediatric outpatient clinics. The rates of participation in NHAMCS ranged from 85% to 97% for emergency departments and from 73% to 95% for outpatient clinics, whereas the unweighted item nonresponse rates were typically ≤5%.39

This study was approved by the institutional review boards of Vanderbilt University Medical Center and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

As recommended by the National Center for Health Statistics, to obtain robust estimates, data from individual years were combined in pairs, and all of the reported estimates were based on >30 unweighted observations and relative SEs <30%.39 The study years were divided into a pre-PCV7 (1994–1995, 1996–1997, and 1998–1999), a transition (2000–2001), and a post-PCV7 (2002–2003) period. Denominators for rate calculations were the annual age-specific population estimates obtained from the US Census Bureau.42 For each 2-year period, the population was calculated by averaging the population on July 1 of the encompassing calendar years.

Because the protective effect of PCV7 against invasive pneumococcal diseases has been consistently observed among children aged <2 years who are the target of primary vaccination, we sought to determine whether pneumonia and otitis media rates decreased in children <2 years old relative to those aged 3 to 6 years.11,25,27,30–32 Children 3 to 6 years of age were less likely to receive PCV7 during the study period and, hence, were included as the reference group to account for temporal variability in visit rates for the study outcomes. Although variations in severity of winter viruses and secular trends in the diagnosis of otitis media and pneumonia could affect disease rates, we assumed that children in both study age groups would be similarly affected. Thus, rate ratios (RRs) of visits for the younger compared with the older age group should remain constant in the absence of vaccination. A decrease in the observed visit rate in children <2 years of age relative to the rate in those 3–6 years of age would be manifest as a decrease in the RRs after PCV7 licensure.31 Of note, any protective "herd" effect of the vaccine in older children43 would lead to an underestimation of the vaccine effect.

A Poisson regression model with 1 time term interaction was fit for each specific diagnosis group to obtain period RRs and variance estimates while accounting for the complex survey sampling design. The offset term in the models was represented by the population estimates calculated by specific time periods and age groups. Population estimates were distributed according to the aggregated weight factor for the surveys.44 The ratio of estimated RRs was used to assess changes over time periods. A negative binomial regression model for survey data using the same variables showed similar estimates suggesting no overdispersion. To quantify the potential effect of PCV7, expected visit rates for children aged <2 years in the transition (2000–2001) and post-PCV7 period (2002–2003) were calculated by multiplying the observed rates in children aged 3 to 6 years for those periods by the RR estimated from the pre-PCV7 period (1994–1999). Differences between calculated expected rates and the observed rates estimated the vaccine effect. The percentage change in rates was calculated, dividing the rate difference by the expected rate and multiplying by 100. The 95% confidence interval (CI) for the expected rate was computed using the delta method, which accounted for variances in both the RR and observed rates.45


   RESULTS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
DISCUSSION
 APPENDIX: ICD-9-CM DIAGNOSIS...
 REFERENCES
 
During the pre-PCV7 period, average annual rates of otitis media visits declined from 1415 to 1072 visits per 1000 children aged <2 years and from 439 to 293 per 1000 children 3 to 6 years of age. The similar trends in these rates were reflected by a stable RR during the pre-PCV7 period (Fig 1). During the post-PCV7 period, we observed a significant decline in the RR as compared with the pre-PCV7 period (P = .014; Table 1), indicating a significant reduction in the rate of otitis media among children <2 years of age as compared with those aged 3 to 6 years. We observed an estimated increase of 119 (95% CI: –97 to 335) visits per 1000 children during the transition period and a significant decrease of 246 (95% CI: 25 to 466) otitis media visits per 1000 children <2 years old during the post-PCV7 period (Fig 2). Compared with the pre-PCV7 period, the rate of otitis media visits in children <2 years old increased 12% (95% CI: –10% to 35%) during the transition period and then decreased significantly, with a 20% (95% CI: 2% to 38%) decline in the post-PCV7 period (Fig 3).


Figure 1
View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 1 Rates and RRs of pneumococcal and nonspecific pneumonia (top), otitis media (middle), and other ARI (bottom) visits in children <2 years and 3 to 6 years old in the US ambulatory settings, before and after the introduction of the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine. a Significant decline as compared to the pre-PCV7 period.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 1 Comparison of RRs by Study Period and Outcome

 

Figure 2
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 2 Differences in rates of pneumococcal and nonspecific pneumonia, otitis media, and other ARI visits in children <2 years old after the introduction of PCV7: US ambulatory settings.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 3 Percentage change in rates of pneumococcal and nonspecific pneumonia, otitis media, and other ARI visits in children <2 years old after the introduction of PCV7: US ambulatory settings.

 
Throughout the study period, children aged <2 years had an average of 74 to 92 combined pneumococcal and nonspecific pneumonia visits per 1000 children annually. Visit rates for children aged 3 to 6 years were consistently lower with 35 to 52 visits per 1000 children per year. The RRs for children <2 years old as compared with those 3 to 6 years of age trended upward during the pre-PCV7 period and downward after the PCV7 introduction (Fig 1). Nevertheless, the RR in the post-PCV7 period was not significantly different from the RR during the pre-PCV7 period (Table 1).

Using the pre-PCV7 average RR and observed visit rates in children 3 to 6 years to calculate expected rates in children aged < 2 years, 14 (95% CI: –50 to 77) and 35 (95% CI: –26 to 96) fewer pneumonia visits than expected per 1000 children <2 years old were observed during the transition and the post-PCV7 periods (Fig 2). However, the declines of 15% (95% CI: –53% to 83%) and 31% (95% CI: –23% to 85%) in pneumonia visit rates during the transition and post-PCV7 periods (Fig 3), respectively, were not statistically significant.

During the study period, rates of other ARIs ranged from 1074 to 1195 per 1000 for children <2 years of age. In children aged 3 to 6 years of age, average annual rates of other ARIs ranged from 521 to 595 per 1000 children. No significant variations in these rates were observed during the post-PCV7 period, and RRs were similar to those observed during the pre-PCV7 period (Fig 1). After PCV7 was licensed, rates of other ARIs in children <2 years old had an initial increase of 10% (95% CI: –10% to 30%) and then a decrease of 6% (95% CI: –10% to 22%; Fig 3). These fluctuations were not statistically significant (Table 1).


   DISCUSSION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
APPENDIX: ICD-9-CM DIAGNOSIS...
 REFERENCES
 
Randomized, controlled trials and observational studies have provided convincing support for the effectiveness of PCV7 in preventing invasive pneumococcal diseases in young children.11,25,27,28,30–32 However, the national impact of the PCV7 vaccination program on noninvasive pneumococcal-related diseases has not been assessed. Our study demonstrates a 20% decline in rates of otitis media visits in children aged <2 years after the introduction of PCV7 in the United States. Given the large societal and health care burden of otitis media, our findings suggest a positive national impact of the PCV7 vaccination program.

The significant decline in rates of otitis media in our study exceeded the effects reported in the randomized clinical trials.16,23,25,29,46 Although vaccine effectiveness in open populations has been reported to be greater than initially observed in controlled trials because of herd immunity,18,33,47,48 the magnitude of the decline that we observed was striking. However, using administrative databases and a similar ecological approach, Poehling et al31 reported similar findings with an overall 6% and 20% reduction in the rates of otitis media visits in children <2 years old during the post-PCV7 period in Tennessee Medicaid and New York private insurance populations, respectively.

In addition to herd immunity, several other factors may have influenced the observed trends in otitis media rates; these include more stringent diagnostic criteria for otitis media, lower rates of sick visits to health care providers, or lower diagnostic rates for otitis media when care is sought.49,50 However, the observed decline in rates of otitis media visits before the introduction of PCV7 affected both age groups similarly.31,50 Although influenza vaccine may prevent otitis media51 and vaccination for young children was first encouraged (when feasible) in 2002,52 the median national vaccine coverage remained <9% during the study period,53,54 and there was a mismatch between vaccine and circulating strains during the 2003–2004 influenza season.55 Interestingly, no significant changes in otitis media rates were observed during the transition period. This may be because the peak of otitis media incidence occurs between 6 and 18 months of age, and the impact of the vaccine may not be evident until children attain this age. In the Kaiser clinical trial, PCV7 was most effective against otitis media between ages 15 and 18 months shortly after a booster dose (12.2%; 95% CI: 8.2% to 16.0%), and the vaccine was more effective against the outcome "frequent otitis media" than a first episode of otitis media.26,29 Antibody titers required to protect against invasive pneumococcal diseases seem to be lower than those required to protect against otitis media,56 and the administration of a PCV7 booster dose (recommended by age 12–15 months1,24) could also contribute by reducing nasopharyngeal colonization by pneumococcal serotypes included in PCV7.48

The previously reported efficacy of PCV7 in preventing pneumonia in clinical trials varied depending on the definition of pneumonia. Clinical trial data consistently suggest a protective effect against radiologically confirmed pneumonia,11,26,28 however, the protection has been less impressive against simply clinically diagnosed cases.11,26,28 Clinically diagnosed pneumonia in these efficacy trials was comparable to our case definition, which was based on a coded diagnosis of pneumonia in the outpatient setting. Although our study did not detect decreases in pneumonia outpatient visits, the assessment of the full impact on pneumonia will require evaluation of pneumonia hospitalizations.

We performed an ecological study to evaluate the national impact of the PCV7 vaccination program on common noninvasive pneumococcal-related diseases. Ecological studies are considered the design of choice to evaluate the impact of policies when it is possible to rule out or control for secular trends. Because the policy impact is evaluated regardless of individual vaccination status, ecological studies can avoid selection bias.57 This assessment of outpatient medical care used publicly available national surveys that have been extensively reviewed and provide estimates with a reasonable degree of accuracy. By combining emergency department, office-based, and hospital-based clinic records, the entire spectrum of outpatient care was covered.

Several limitations of our study must be considered. For our ascertainment of noninvasive pneumococcal-related diseases, we relied on clinical diagnoses made by the physician. Radiologic information supporting the diagnosis of pneumonia was limited, and no distinction between clinical and radiologically confirmed pneumonias was made. Moreover, the survey data did not allow the distinction between initial and follow-up visits over the entire study period. The inclusion of follow-up visits may partially explain why the estimated pneumonia rates in our study were consistently higher than those reported previously. However, inclusion of all visits provides a reliable assessment of the overall outpatient health care use because of these pneumococcal-related conditions before and after the introduction of PCV7.4,5,9,58 Finally, these data excluded federally operated facilities and did not record information on consultations conducted over the telephone.

During the first years of licensure, there were documented vaccine shortages, delaying the distribution and administration of the vaccine. Thus, the vaccine effect observed may have been less than would have been seen with full implementation of the PCV7 vaccine recommendations. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommended concentrating the vaccination efforts on infants and deferring vaccination for children >2 years of age, except for those at increased risk for pneumococcal diseases. However, the effect of this recommendation remains unknown.59,60 The National Immunization Survey estimated that by the end of the study period, 68.1% ± 1% of US children aged between 19 and 35 months had received ≥3 doses of PCV7, with considerable variability in uptake by state.61

Our results suggest a significant protective effect of the PCV7 vaccination program in the US outpatient setting with a substantial decline in otitis media visit rates. Given the remarkably high incidence of otitis media in children, its close association with the emergence of antibiotic resistance, and its huge economic burden, the persistence of the observed decline should herald a major change in the epidemiology of this disease and in our current clinical practice.


   APPENDIX: ICD-9-CM DIAGNOSIS CODES AND NAMCS PHYSICIAN SPECIALTIES INCLUDED IN THE ANALYSIS.
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 APPENDIX: ICD-9-CM DIAGNOSIS...
REFERENCES
 
ICD-9-CM Diagnosis Codes
Pneumonia and nonspecific pneumonias codes included 481, 482.9, 485, and 486.

Otitis media codes included 381, 381.0, 381.00, 381.01, 381.02, 381.03, 381.04, 381.05, 381.06, 381.1, 381.10, 381.19, 381.2, 381.20, 381.29, 381.3, 381.4, 381.5, 381.50, 381.51, 381.52, 381.6, 381.60, 381.61, 381.62, 381.63, 381.7, 381.8, 381.81, 381.89, 381.9, 382, 382.0, 382.00, 382.01, 382.02, 382.1, 382.2, 382.3, 382.4, and 382.9.

Other ARI codes included: 482, 482.0, 482.1, 482.2, 482.3, 482.30, 482.31, 482.32, 482.39, 482.4 482.40, 482.41, 482.49, 482.8, 482.81, 482.82, 482.83, 482.84, 482.89, 480, 480.0, 480.1, 480.2, 480.3, 480.8, 480.9, 487, 487.0, 487.1, 487.8, 466.1, 466.11, 466.19, 493.01, 493.02, 493.11, 493.12, 493.21, 493.22, 493.91, 493.92, 461, 461.0, 461.1, 461.2, 461.3, 461.8, 461.9, 466, 466.0, 491.21, 460, 462, 465.0, 463, 478.9, 493, 493.0, 493.00, 490, 464, 464.0, 464.00, 464.01, 464.1, 464.10, 464.11, 464.2, 464.20, 464.21, 464.3, 464.30, 464.31, 464.4, 464.50, 464.51, 465, 465.0, 465.8, 465.9, 483, 483.0, 483.1, 483.8, 484, 484.1, 484.3, 484.5, 484.6, 484.7, and 484.8.

NAMCS Physician Specialties

  • General practice
  • Family practice
  • Family practice, geriatric medicine
  • Sports medicine (family practice)
  • General practice
  • Internal medicine
  • Internal medicine
  • Pediatrics
  • Adolescent medicine
  • Critical care pediatrics
  • Developmental-behavioral pediatrics
  • Internal medicine/pediatrics
  • Neurodevelopmental disabilities
  • Neonatal-perinatal medicine
  • Pediatrics
  • Pediatric allergy
  • Pediatric cardiology
  • Pediatric endocrinology
  • Pediatric infectious diseases
  • Pediatric pulmonology
  • Medical toxicology
  • Pediatric emergency medicine
  • Pediatric gastroenterology
  • Pediatric hematology/oncology
  • Pediatric nephrology
  • Pediatric rheumatology
  • Sports medicine
  • Other specialties
  • Allergy and immunology
  • Adolescent medicine (internal medicine)
  • Critical care medicine
  • Diabetes
  • Emergency medicine
  • Endocrinology
  • Sports medicine (emergency medicine)
  • Medical toxicology (emergency medicine)
  • Gastroenterology
  • General preventive medicine
  • Hematology
  • Hepatology
  • Hematology/oncology
  • Infectious diseases
  • Immunology
  • Sports medicine (internal medicine),
  • Nephrology
  • Medical oncology pulmonary critical care medicine
  • Pediatric emergency medicine (emergency medicine)
  • Public health
  • Public health/general preventive medicine
  • Pulmonary diseases


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This research study was funded in part by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention New Vaccine Surveillance Network Cooperative Agreement U38/CCU417958 and an Association of Teachers of Preventive Medicine and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Cooperative Agreement (TS-0825). Dr Poehling is supported by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Generalist Physician Faculty Scholar Program.


   FOOTNOTES
 
Accepted Apr 19, 2006.

Address correspondence to Marie R. Griffin, MD, MPH, Department of Preventive Medicine, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, A-1110 Medical Center North, 1161 21st Ave, Nashville, TN 37232-2637. E-mail: marie.griffin{at}vanderbilt.edu

Dr Nuorti and Ms Martin's current address is National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333

The authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.


   REFERENCES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 APPENDIX: ICD-9-CM DIAGNOSIS...
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. Preventing pneumococcal disease among infants and young children. Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep. 2000;49(RR-9) :1 –35
  2. Catterall JR. Streptococcus pneumoniae. Thorax. 1999;54 :929 –937[Free Full Text]
  3. Bluestone CD, Stephenson JS, Martin LM. Ten-year review of otitis media pathogens. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1992;11(8 suppl) :S7 –S11
  4. McIntosh K. Community-acquired pneumonia in children. N Engl J Med. 2002;346 :429 –437[Free Full Text]
  5. Farha T, Thomson AH. The burden of pneumonia in children in the developed world. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2005;6 :76 –82[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Wubbel L, Muniz L, Ahmed A, et al. Etiology and treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in ambulatory children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1999;18 :98 –104[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  7. Heiskanen-Kosma T, Korppi M, Jokinen C, et al. Etiology of childhood pneumonia: serologic results of a prospective, population-based study. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1998;17 :986 –991[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  8. Lichenstein R, Suggs AH, Campbell J. Pediatric pneumonia. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2003;21 :437 –451[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  9. Murphy TF, Henderson FW, Clyde WA Jr, et al. Pneumonia: an eleven-year study in a pediatric practice. Am J Epidemiol. 1981;113 :12 –21[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Anderson RN, Smith BL. Deaths: leading causes for 2002. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2005;53(17) :1 –89
  11. Cutts FT, Zaman SM, Enwere G, et al. Efficacy of nine-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine against pneumonia and invasive pneumococcal disease in the Gambia: randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;365 :1139 –1146[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  12. Williams BG, Gouws E, Boschi-Pinto C, et al. Estimates of world-wide distribution of child deaths from acute respiratory infections. Lancet Infect Dis. 2002;2 :25 –32[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  13. Kaplan B, Wandstrat TL, Cunningham JR. Overall cost in the treatment of otitis media. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1997;16(2 suppl) :S9 –S11
  14. Schappert SM. Office visits for otitis media: United States, 1975–90. Adv Data. 1992;214 :1 –19[Medline]
  15. Gates GA. Cost-effectiveness considerations in otitis media treatment. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996;114 :525 –530[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  16. Straetemans M, Sanders EA, Veenhoven RH, et al. Pneumococcal vaccines for preventing otitis media. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(1) :CD001480[Medline]
  17. Rosenfeld JA, Clarity G. Acute otitis media in children. Prim Care. 1996;23 :677 –686[Web of Science][Medline]
  18. Dagan R. The potential effect of widespread use of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines on the practice of pediatric otolaryngology: the case of acute otitis media. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;12 :488 –494[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Dowell SF, Marcy SM, Phillips WR, et al. Otitis media: principles of judicious use of antimicrobial agents. Pediatrics. 1998;101 :165 –171[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. American Academy of Pediatrics, Subcommittee on Management of Acute Otitis Media. Diagnosis and management of acute otitis media. Pediatrics. 2004;113 :1451 –1465[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Auinger P, Lanphear BP, Kalkwarf HJ, et al. Trends in otitis media among children in the United States. Pediatrics. 2003;112 :514 –520[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Dowell SF, Marcy SM, Phillips WR, et al. Principles of judicious use of antimicrobial agents for pediatric upper respiratory tract infections. Pediatrics. 1998;101 :163 –165[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Eskola J, Kilpi T, Palmu A, et al. Efficacy of a pneumococcal conjugate vaccine against acute otitis media. N Engl J Med. 2001;344 :403 –409[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Infectious Diseases. Policy statement: recommendations for the prevention of pneumococcal infections, including the use of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (Prevnar), pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine, and antibiotic prophylaxis. Pediatrics. 2000;106 :362 –366[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Black S, Shinefield H, Fireman B, et al. Efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in children. Northern California Kaiser Permanente Vaccine Study Center Group. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2000;19 :187 –195[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  26. Black SB, Shinefield HR, Ling S, et al. Effectiveness of heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in children younger than five years of age for prevention of pneumonia. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2002;21 :810 –815[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  27. Lucero MG, Dulalia VE, Parreno RN, et al. Pneumococcal conjugate vaccines for preventing vaccine-type invasive pneumococcal disease and pneumonia with consolidation on x-ray in children under two years of age. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(4) :CD004977[Medline]
  28. Klugman KP, Madhi SA, Huebner RE, et al. A trial of a 9-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in children with and those without HIV infection. N Engl J Med. 2003;349 :1341 –1348[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Fireman B, Black SB, Shinefield HR, et al. Impact of the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine on otitis media. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2003;22 :10 –16[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  30. Whitney CG, Farley MM, Hadler J, et al. Decline in invasive pneumococcal disease after the introduction of protein-polysaccharide conjugate vaccine. N Engl J Med. 2003;348 :1737 –1746[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Poehling KA, Lafleur BJ, Szilagyi PG, et al. Population-based impact of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in young children. Pediatrics. 2004;114 :755 –761[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Ramani RR, Hall WN, Boulton M, et al. Impact of PCV7 on invasive pneumococcal disease among children younger than 5 years: a population-based study. Am J Public Health. 2004;94 :958 –959[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Lieu TA, Ray GT, Black SB, et al. Projected cost-effectiveness of pneumococcal conjugate vaccination of healthy infants and young children. JAMA. 2000;283 :1460 –1468[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Melegaro A, Edmunds WJ. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pneumococcal conjugate vaccination in England and Wales. Vaccine. 2004;22 :4203 –4214[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  35. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Direct and indirect effects of routine vaccination of children with 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine on incidence of invasive pneumococcal disease: United States, 1998–2003. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2005;54 :893 –897[Medline]
  36. Woodwell DA, Cherry DK. National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2002 summary. Adv Data. 2004;346 :1 –44[Medline]
  37. McCaig LF, Burt CW. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2002 emergency department summary. Adv Data. 2004;340 :1 –34[Medline]
  38. Hing E, Middleton K. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2001 outpatient department summary. Adv Data. 2003;338 :1 –26[Medline]
  39. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics. Ambulatory health care data. Available at: www.cdc.gov/nchs/about/major/ahcd/ahcd1.htm. Accessed August 3, 2005
  40. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics. Ambulatory health care data. Available at: www.cdc.gov/nchs/about/major/ahcd/namcsdes.htm. Accessed August 2, 2005
  41. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics. Ambulatory health care data. Available at: www.cdc.gov/nchs/about/major/ahcd/nhamcsds.htm. Accessed August 2, 2005
  42. United States Census Bureau. Population estimates datasets. Available at: www.census.gov/popest/datasets.html. Accessed August 23, 2005
  43. Stephens DS, Zughaier SM, Whitney CG, et al. Incidence of macrolide resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae after introduction of the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine: population-based assessment. Lancet. 2005;365 :855 –863[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  44. Thompson WW, Shay DK, Weintraub E, et al. Influenza-associated hospitalizations in the United States. JAMA. 2004;292 :1333 –1340[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Casella G, Berger RL. Statistical Inference. 2nd ed. Duxbury, CA: Duxbury Press; 2002
  46. Kilpi T, Ahman H, Jokinen J, et al. Protective efficacy of a second pneumococcal conjugate vaccine against pneumococcal acute otitis media in infants and children: randomized, controlled trial of a 7-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide-meningococcal outer membrane protein complex conjugate vaccine in 1666 children. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;37 :1155 –1164[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  47. Halloran ME, Haber M, Longini IM Jr, et al. Direct and indirect effects in vaccine efficacy and effectiveness. Am J Epidemiol. 1991;133 :323 –331[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Ghaffar F, Barton T, Lozano J, et al. Effect of the 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine on nasopharyngeal colonization by Streptococcus pneumoniae in the first 2 years of life. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39 :930 –938[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  49. McCaig LF, Besser RE, Hughes JM. Trends in antimicrobial prescribing rates for children and adolescents. JAMA. 2002;287 :3096 –3102[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Finkelstein JA, Stille C, Nordin J, et al. Reduction in antibiotic use among US children, 1996–2000. Pediatrics. 2003;112 :620 –627[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Harper SA, Fukuda K, Uyeki TM et al. Prevention and control of influenza. Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) [published correction appears in MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2005;54:750]. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2005;54(RR-8) :1 –40
  52. Bridges CB, Fukuda K, Uyeki TM, et al. Prevention and control of influenza. Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep. 2002;51(RR-3) :1 –31
  53. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Childhood influenza-vaccination coverage: United States, 2002–03 influenza season. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2004;53 :863 –866[Medline]
  54. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Childhood influenza vaccination coverage: United States, 2003–04 influenza season. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2006;55 : 100–103[Medline]
  55. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Update: influenza activity—United States and worldwide, 2003–04 season, and composition of the 2004–05 influenza vaccine. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2004;53 :547 –552[Medline]
  56. Jokinen JT, Ahman H, Kilpi TM, et al. Concentration of antipneumococcal antibodies as a serological correlate of protection: an application to acute otitis media. J Infect Dis. 2004;190 :545 –550[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  57. Ray WA. Policy and program analysis using administrative databases. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127 :712 –718[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  58. Jokinen C, Heiskanen L, Juvonen H, et al. Incidence of community-acquired pneumonia in the population of four municipalities in eastern Finland. Am J Epidemiol. 1993;137 :977 –988[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  59. Stokley S, Santoli JM, Willis B, et al. Impact of vaccine shortages on immunization programs and providers. Am J Prev Med. 2004;26 :15 –21[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  60. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Decreased availability of Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2001;50 :783 –784
  61. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National, state, and urban area vaccination coverage among children aged 19–35 months: United States, 2004. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2005;54 :718 –724
PEDIATRICS (ISSN 1098-4275). ©2006 by the American Academy of Pediatrics

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
C. J. Harrison, C. Woods, G. Stout, B. Martin, and R. Selvarangan
Susceptibilities of Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, including serotype 19A, and Moraxella catarrhalis paediatric isolates from 2005 to 2007 to commonly used antibiotics
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., March 1, 2009; 63(3): 511 - 519.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
J. Ongkasuwan, T. A. Valdez, K. G. Hulten, E. O. Mason Jr, and S. L. Kaplan
Pneumococcal Mastoiditis in Children and the Emergence of Multidrug-Resistant Serotype 19A Isolates
Pediatrics, July 1, 2008; 122(1): 34 - 39.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
F. Zhou, A. Shefer, Y. Kong, and J. P. Nuorti
Trends in Acute Otitis Media-Related Health Care Utilization by Privately Insured Young Children in the United States, 1997-2004
Pediatrics, February 1, 2008; 121(2): 253 - 260.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
F. Zhou, M. H. Kyaw, A. Shefer, C. A. Winston, and J. P. Nuorti
Health Care Utilization for Pneumonia in Young Children After Routine Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine Use in the United States
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, December 1, 2007; 161(12): 1162 - 1168.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JAMAHome page
M. E. Pichichero and J. R. Casey
Emergence of a Multiresistant Serotype 19A Pneumococcal Strain Not Included in the 7-Valent Conjugate Vaccine as an Otopathogen in Children
JAMA, October 17, 2007; 298(15): 1772 - 1778.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
K. A. Poehling, P. G. Szilagyi, C. G. Grijalva, S. W. Martin, B. LaFleur, E. Mitchel, R. D. Barth, J. P. Nuorti, and M. R. Griffin
Reduction of Frequent Otitis Media and Pressure-Equalizing Tube Insertions in Children After Introduction of Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine
Pediatrics, April 1, 2007; 119(4): 707 - 715.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (36)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Grijalva, C. G.
Right arrow Articles by Griffin, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Grijalva, C. G.
Right arrow Articles by Griffin, M. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Infectious Disease & Immunity
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?