Erratum for Shattuck, Pediatrics 117 (4) 1028-1037.
Published online August 1, 2006
PEDIATRICS Vol. 118 No. 2 August 2006, pp. 852a (doi:10.1542/peds.2006-1720)
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

ERRATUM

Shattuck PT. The Contribution of Diagnostic Substitution to the Growing Administrative Prevalence of Autism in US Special Education. PEDIATRICS 2006;117:1028–1037.

Errors appeared in the article by Shattuck titled "The Contribution of Diagnostic Substitution to the Growing Administrative Prevalence of Autism in US Special Education" that was published in the April 2006 issue of Pediatrics (doi:10.1542/peds.2005-1516). On page 1029, lines 8 through 11 in the first paragraph, the author wrote: "In the California Developmental Disabilities Service system, the number of clients with an autism diagnosis as a percentage of all clients rose from 4.9% to 9.4% during the 1994–2003 period.1" It should have read as follows: "In the California Developmental Disabilities Service system, the number of clients with an autism diagnosis as a percentage of all clients rose from 4.9% to 9.4% during the 1987–1998 period.1"

On page 1031, the last sentence of the first paragraph of the Results section, the author wrote: "Of the 2, the higher prevalence estimate from New Jersey was closest to other recent epidemiological surveys yielding estimates of 61.3 per 100038 and 57.9 per 1000.39" It should have read as follows: "Of the 2, the higher prevalence estimate from New Jersey was closest to other recent epidemiological surveys yielding estimates of 6.26 per 100038 and 5.87 per 1000.39"

On page 1037, Reference number 39 reads: Baird G, Charman T, Baron-Cohen S, et al. A screening instrument for autism at 18 months of age: A 6-year follow-up study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2000;39:694–702.

Reference 39 should be: Chakrabarti S, Fombonne E. Pervasive developmental disorders in preschool children: Confirmation of high prevalence. Am J Psychiatry. 2005;162:1133–1141.


PEDIATRICS (ISSN 1098-4275). ©2006 by the American Academy of Pediatrics

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?