COMMENTARY |
Department of Pediatrics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Rainbow Babies & Children's Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio
Abbreviations: GER, gastroesophageal reflux
Preterm infants are exposed to a host of therapeutic agents, and drug therapy for presumed gastroesophageal reflux (GER) ranks high on any list. It was documented recently that 25% of all extremely low birth weight (<1 kg) infants are discharged on promotility and/or antacid therapy.1 The most common indications for these drugs comprise feeding intolerance and recurrent episodes of apnea/bradycardia/desaturation.2 Unfortunately, there is little evidence to support this widely practiced approach. The article by López-Alonso et al3 (in this month's issue of Pediatrics Electronic Pages) provides revealing new data to help us characterize GER in preterm infants.
Traditionally, GER has been quantified by measurement of esophageal pH. However, because frequent feeds in infants neutralize stomach contents, this measure is potentially unreliable. Intraluminal impedance, as used by López-Alonso et al, is pH-independent and measures reflux from retrograde flow of a liquid (or air) bolus as it passes from the stomach through the esophagus toward the oropharynx.3 When combined measurements are made, one would anticipate the incidence of impedance-based reflux to exceed acid reflux,4 and, in fact, only 25% of reflux events were strongly acidic (as defined by an esophageal pH < 4). Surprisingly, the esophageal mucosa was only exposed to refluxate 1% of the time (on the basis of impedance data), whereas the esophagus was exposed to acid
5% of the time, as anticipated from previous studies.5 This is almost certainly because esophageal impedance rapidly normalizes after a bolus of refluxate, whereas pH stays low for a much longer time. The pathophysiologic relevance of these discordant results, which were based on measurement techniques, still needs to be determined.
Another point of interest is that in these preterm infants, all of whom were fed exclusively via nasogastric tube, reflux events tended to be relatively more common during feeding than nonfeeding periods, an observation that could not be revealed by pH monitoring because of neutralization of gastric contents. Data such as these are needed if we are to develop greater understanding of the pathophysiologic consequences of GER.
Where do we go from here? Several studies have failed to document a temporal relationship between apnea of prematurity and acid-based GER.68 Using the current impedance-based technology, Peter et al9 also failed to document a clear relationship between apnea and reflux. Therefore, pharmacologic management of GER should not play a prominent role in the management of episodic apnea/bradycardia/desaturation in preterm infants.10,11 However, other end points, such as growth and nutritional outcome, as well as increased airway reactivity, may benefit from pharmacologic approaches, especially in preterm infants at risk for neurodevelopmental or cardiorespiratory compromise. Unfortunately, the authors of a recent meta-analysis of antireflux strategies suggested that available data from randomized, clinical trials are largely inadequate and inconclusive.12 The Cochrane database indicates that metoclopramide reduces reflux symptoms but may increase adverse effects.13 In fact, there has been inadequate emphasis on potential long-term complications of such therapy. Incorporation into future trials of data derived from impedance, as well as pH-based, techniques for the diagnosis of GER should contribute greatly to future knowledge in this area.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Address correspondence to Richard J. Martin, MD, Rainbow Babies & Children's Hospital, Division of Neonatology, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44106-6010. E-mail: rxm6{at}case.edu
The authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.
Opinions expressed in these commentaries are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the American Academy of Pediatrics or its Committees.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||