PEDIATRICS Vol. 117 No. 4 April 2006, pp. 1359-1371 (doi:10.1542/peds.2005-0994)
REVIEW ARTICLE |
Pediatric Sport-Related Concussion: A Review of the Clinical Management of an Oft-Neglected Population
a Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Children's Hospital, Denver, Colorado
b University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado
c Department of Pediatrics, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
d Center for Biobehavioral Health, Columbus Children's Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio
 |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
 TOP ABSTRACT DEFINITION AND EPIDEMIOLOGYCONCUSSION EFFECTSCONCUSSION IN THE YOUNG...CLINICAL MANAGEMENTCONCLUSIONSREFERENCES |
|---|
Athletic concussion is a growing focus of attention for pediatricians. Although numerous literature reviews and clinical guidelines are now available pertaining to athletic concussion, few have focused on the pediatric athlete in particular. Sport-related concussions occur relatively frequently in children and adolescents, and primary health care providers are often responsible for coordinating clinical management. Here we summarize the scientific literature pertinent to the care of young athletes. We examine how concussion affects younger and older athletes differently at biomechanical, pathophysiological, neurobehavioral, and contextual levels. We also discuss important issues in clinical management, including preparticipation assessment, concussion evaluation and recovery tracking, and when and how to return pediatric athletes to play sports. We also briefly cover non–sport-related interventions (eg, school support). With proper management, most children and adolescents sustaining a sport-related concussion can be expected to recover fully.
Key Words: concussion • mild traumatic brain injury • athletic injuries
Abbreviations: TBI—traumatic brain injury • mTBI—mild traumatic brain injury • PCS—postconcussive symptoms • CISG—Concussion in Sport Group • CSI—Concussion Symptom Inventory
Over the last 2 decades, sport-related concussion has received an increasing amount of popular and scientific attention. Because the athletic and financial stakes at the college and professional levels are incredibly high, the bulk of this attention has focused on the older competitive athlete. The sheer number of participants in youth and high school sports, however, makes the identification and management of pediatric sport-related concussion of major public health import. Nearly 60% of high school students in the United States participate in organized sports, with numbers growing annually and many more involved in the younger years.1–3 In gridiron football alone, 1.5 million athletes participate at the high school and more junior levels.4
|
DEFINITION AND EPIDEMIOLOGY |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTDEFINITION AND EPIDEMIOLOGYCONCUSSION EFFECTSCONCUSSION IN THE YOUNG...CLINICAL MANAGEMENTCONCLUSIONSREFERENCES |
|---|
A concussion is a type of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) that is caused by an impact or jolt to the head. The American Academy of Neurology straightforwardly defines concussion as a "trauma-induced alteration in mental status that may or may not involve a loss of consciousness."5
Each year >300000 sport-related mild-to-moderate TBIs occur in the United States.6 Nearly all athletic endeavors pose some risk of concussive injury. Among the more commonly played high school sports, football and ice hockey have the highest incidence of concussion, followed by soccer, wrestling, basketball, field hockey, baseball, softball, and volleyball.7, 8 In certain sports (eg, football, rugby), the risk of injury depends on the position played.8, 9 Higher rates of concussion are seen in games than practices, excepting possibly volleyball and cheerleading.8, 10 Solid concussion incidence data do not yet exist for pre–high school populations.
|
CONCUSSION EFFECTS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTDEFINITION AND EPIDEMIOLOGYCONCUSSION EFFECTSCONCUSSION IN THE YOUNG...CLINICAL MANAGEMENTCONCLUSIONSREFERENCES |
|---|
Clinically, immediate signs and symptoms of a sport-related concussion are similar in younger and older athletes and can include a change in playing ability, a vacant stare, fogginess, confusion, slowing, memory disturbance, loss of consciousness, increased emotionality, incoordination, headache, dizziness, and vomiting. Most children and teenagers recover fully from a single, uncomplicated mTBI.11–15 However, recovery takes time, and in the days, weeks, and even months after injury, a number of neurobehavioral problems can be seen, not unlike those commonly reported in adults.16 These postconcussive symptoms (PCS) are often heuristically divided into 3 general domains and can include any combination of the following problems:
- Somatic: headaches, fatigue and low energy, sleep disturbance, nausea, vision changes, tinnitus, dizziness, balance problems, sensitivity to light/noise
- Emotional/behavioral: lowered frustration tolerance, irritability, increased emotionality, depression, anxiety, clinginess, personality changes
- Cognitive: slowed thinking or response speed, mental fogginess, poor concentration, distractibility, trouble with learning and memory, disorganization, problem-solving difficulties
|
CONCUSSION IN THE YOUNG VERSUS OLDER ATHLETE |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTDEFINITION AND EPIDEMIOLOGYCONCUSSION EFFECTSCONCUSSION IN THE YOUNG...CLINICAL MANAGEMENTCONCLUSIONSREFERENCES |
|---|
Concussions in the pediatric and adult athlete differ. Children are not "little adults." They are actively developing organisms who respond differently, have different needs, and face different expectations after injury. An appreciation of these differences and their implications is crucial for providing optimal care to the young athlete after concussion.
Biomechanical Properties
The general biomechanics of concussion are complex but have been fairly well established for some time.17–19 More recently, sophisticated data from real-time accelerometers, video analysis, and dummy reconstruction models have been used to examine the biomechanics of sport-related concussion in particular.20–30 Across age groups, commonalities are apparent in the physical dynamics, because all concussions primarily involve rotational acceleration and/or deceleration forces that stress or strain the brain tissue, vasculature, and other neural elements.31, 32
Because the compositional and mechanical properties of the head and brain differ between developing and mature organisms, the specific effects of the applied forces will be age-dependent to a certain extent. Developmental factors such as brain water content, cerebral blood volume, level of myelination, skull geometry, and suture elasticity undoubtedly affect the biomechanics of concussive injury, although exactly how remains largely undetermined.33–36
Developmental properties of brains and skulls may also specifically influence the threshold necessary to produce injury.37 Experimental data suggest that the smaller size of immature brains could require increased force to produce actual cerebral injury,38 an idea supported by a recent study finding that skull fracture is associated with greater risk of intracranial injury in adults than children.39 Hence, as McCrory et al40 highlight, young children may require increased force when compared with adults to become symptomatic after head injury, although physiologic and neurobehavioral data reviewed in the next sections suggest that once actual injury occurs, the immature brain is likely to respond less well overall.
The immature musculoskeletal systems that characterize young athletes can also be expected to influence injury dynamics. For a concussion to occur, mechanical energy not only needs to be of sufficient mass and acceleration, it also needs to be absorbed directly by the head.41 Because children have less well-developed neck and shoulder musculature than adults, they will not be as able to transfer energy directed at the head throughout the body, increasing their risk of concussive injury in certain circumstances. On the other hand, given younger athletes' diminished size and strength, lower force/mass ratios will characterize their collisions, leading to decreased injury rates in most situations.42, 43
Pathophysiological Response
The brain's pathophysiological response to concussion has been described in detail by using animal models.44, 45 Changes after concussion include abrupt neuronal depolarization, release of excitatory neurotransmitters, ionic shifts, altered glucose metabolism and cerebral blood flow, and impaired axonal function. Research on more severe brain injury suggests that this pathophysiological cascade is likely to differ in the developing organism. The incidence of brain swelling and cerebral edema after moderate-to-severe brain injuries, for example, is higher in children than in adults.46
Clinical evidence also suggests that physiologic responses are age-dependent after mTBI. Most prominently, age-based differences are seen in "second-impact syndrome," which, as commonly described, results from a second blow to the head while a youth is still symptomatic from a previous concussion.47, 48 Disruption to autoregulation of the brain's blood supply is thought to underlie second-impact syndrome, the symptoms of which may include vascular engorgement, diffuse cerebral swelling, increased intracranial pressure, brain herniation, and ultimately coma and death.49 Although controversy continues about whether the second impact actually plays a role in triggering the neurologic consequences,50, 51 agreement exists that diffuse cerebral swelling or malignant cerebral edema does occur in very rare cases after mTBI and that immaturity of the brain is a clear risk factor.52–55
Neurobehavioral Outcome
Traditionally, young age at the time of brain injury has been thought to have protective benefits; the "Kennard principle" holds that the young brain's plasticity would allow for more recovery after insult.56 However, a growing literature, including studies of more severe TBI, strongly indicates that the immature brain is more vulnerable, not more plastic, to diffuse injury.57–67 Several hypotheses have been put forth to help explain this increased vulnerability: skills not yet well established at the time of insult could be more susceptible to disruption than well-established ones; the brain systems responsible for skill acquisition could be affected directly by diffuse injury; functional recovery may be restricted by the injured child's smaller repertoire of existing skills; and an injury to the immature brain could interfere neurobiologically with the intricate sequence of chemical and anatomic events necessary for normal development.44, 68–70
Initial studies of sport-related concussion have indeed suggested that recovery may be less positive in younger athletes, at least from a cognitive perspective. Field et al71 compared recovery after concussion in high school and college football and soccer players. Despite the higher incidence of premorbid concussions among the college athletes, high school athletes displayed more protracted recovery rates as measured by neuropsychological testing.
Contextual Expectations
The contextual or environmental demands faced by children and adults differ as well. Adults have already learned and mastered much of the knowledge and many of the skills they need to function successfully in everyday settings. In contrast, children are continually expected to acquire new information and skills, especially during the school months. Thus, they are often expected to use a set of neurobehavioral skills that are vulnerable to mTBI, such as the ability to focus and sustain attention, rapidly process information, and hold information in mind while generating a response.16, 72, 73 As a result, clinical management of pediatric concussion requires an understanding of the contextual demands that children face across development74 to allow for the provision of suitable assistance.
Another obvious contextual divergence between children and adults in the management of concussion is that the individuals involved in decision-making and care will differ. Children have parents or guardians who are legally responsible for their medical decisions. Moreover, contrary to the older competitive athlete, the pediatric athlete's clinical management will most often be directed by a primary care practitioner rather than a team physician. The vast majority of young athletes also attend school and thus have access to a variety of concerned professionals outside the family and sports arena who can be recruited to help ensure appropriate monitoring and support postconcussion if adequate knowledge of the educational system is available.
|
CLINICAL MANAGEMENT |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTDEFINITION AND EPIDEMIOLOGYCONCUSSION EFFECTSCONCUSSION IN THE YOUNG...CLINICAL MANAGEMENTCONCLUSIONSREFERENCES |
|---|
Although most athletes will recover within the first hours, days, or weeks after a concussion, no 2 injuries will be exactly alike. Regardless of age, the specific symptom pattern will depend on innumerable injury, personal, and contextual factors (eg, severity and location of injury forces, genetic make-up, gender, learning and previous injury history, psychiatric status). Therefore, clinical care needs to be individualized and matched to the particular person and his or her own unique circumstances to ensure that medical, cognitive, emotional, social, athletic, school, and family issues are all addressed adequately.
No comprehensive management guidelines and conspicuously few research studies have been published that focus specifically on sport-related concussion in the pediatric population. To date, however, >20 different published expert guidelines geared toward managing athletic concussion more generally have appeared, including those from Robert C. Cantu, MD,75, 76 the Colorado Medical Society,77 the American Academy of Neurology,5 and the recently convened Concussion in Sport Group (CISG).78, 79 In addition, many clinically oriented literature reviews,80–84 several relevant books,85–87 and a number of journal issues88–90 have been devoted entirely to concussion. The American Academy of Pediatrics has also published a practice parameter for the general management of minor closed head injury in children91 and has endorsed the sport-specific, but not child-specific, guidelines generated by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine Concussion Workshop Group.92
All of these publications can clearly help direct the clinical care of the young athlete. What follows is a summary of much of the current consensus for managing the concussed athlete at any age, with special attention devoted to the young athlete in particular. Table 1 provides an overview of a number of the relevant clinical management areas.
|
Preparticipation Assessment and Prevention
Before participation in organized sports, medical examination is frequently mandated and certainly advisable.93, 94 For the pediatric athlete, the influential role that parents play dictates that they need to be active participants as well. Because no proven medical treatment exists for mTBI once it occurs, a central goal of the preseason contact should be concussion prevention. In this regard, a number of general and sport-specific resources are available to the pediatric clinician that describe techniques, training procedures, rules, and equipment aimed at preventing concussive injuries. Table 2 highlights several of these resources, which should be considered credible but not necessarily empirically supported.
|
Another essential ingredient of the preparticipation medical examination is providing education to help guide the accurate recognition of concussions. Many athletes still do not recognize or report concussive injuries.95, 96 In this context, it is worth stating (again and again!) to every player, parent, and athletic staff member that loss of consciousness is not the only indication that an athlete has suffered a concussion. In fact, most sports participants who sustain concussions never lose consciousness.97 Furthermore, loss of consciousness in isolation can be a relatively poor predictor of neurobehavioral outcome.98–100
Physicians should also highlight the rationale and need for immediate reporting of concussion. Because many teenagers have a sense of invulnerability,101 they will especially benefit from a personalized, thought-provoking message explaining the reasons that keeping quiet about a concussion and "toughing it out" are wrongheaded.
In addition, preparticipation medical contact should incorporate a history taken with both parent and child, delineating the number of prior concussions, timing and severity of each, and duration and intensity of any resulting symptoms. Simply asking about previous concussions is insufficient, because underreporting is common without a structured symptom-based assessment.102 For the sake of comparison if a concussion occurs during the season, preinjury data should be collected regarding the athlete's typical level of "postconcussive" symptoms (headaches, nausea, etc). McCrory103 offers a convenient clinical baseline assessment form to facilitate the documentation of this information.
Acute or On-site Evaluation
Acute management of any athlete who has sustained a head injury begins with the ABCs of first aid: ensuring that airway, breathing, and circulation are intact.92 Although quite rare, concussive blows can be associated with serious pathology including cervical spinal injury, skull fracture, and all 4 types of intracranial hemorrhage (ie, epidural, subdural, intracerebral, and subarachnoid).42, 104 Exclusion of these medical emergencies is paramount during the on-field assessment, for which various guidelines are available.105–107 Specific concussion-severity markers also need to be considered. Because informal mental status testing (eg, Where are you? What day is it?) has not been found to be very sensitive to concussions, standardized field-based cognitive screening is necessary.108 A number of tools have been designed for this task, including the commonly used Standardized Assessment of Concussion, which is a brief, well-validated instrument that can be administered on the sideline in 
5 minutes and has published normative data for junior high and older athletes.109
Subsequent Medical Evaluation
During postconcussion medical follow-up, the primary health care provider needs to update the injury history and carefully examine the athlete for indications of intracranial injury. Strength, sensation, coordination, reflexes, and "soft" neurologic signs all should be evaluated.110 After mTBI, the exact conditions warranting neuroimaging are controversial and continue to be debated.111–114 Cantu115 practically recommends neuroimaging in the context of loss of consciousness for greater than a few seconds, prolonged impairment of conscious state, mental status deterioration, dramatic worsening of headache, focal neurologic deficit, seizure activity, or persistence or worsening of PCS over time.
Mild TBI does not consistently result in abnormalities on either structural neuroimaging116, 117 or neurologic examination118, 119; thus, the pediatric clinician should be mindful that objective medical data will often be lacking. It is important to note that when balance concerns are apparent, formal postural-stability testing could contribute additional information to the physical examination. Such testing has shown promise as a means to more objectively evaluate the balance deficits that are seen soon after injury in certain athletes.120
Because objective medical evidence is often lacking postconcussion, systematic review of symptoms as reported by both the athlete and parent is an indispensable part of any follow-up medical contact. Although no published measures focus exclusively on the pediatric population, multiple PCS checklists and scales have been developed to assist with this undertaking.121–123 The Concussion Symptom Inventory (CSI) is a recently developed empirically based PCS measure that could be readily used by the primary care provider. The Concussion Symptom Index (see Table 3) was derived from >16000 high school and college athletes and includes normative data from >600 athletes with concussion. PCS are not unusual among individuals without concussion.124 Consequently, all reports of PCS need to be interpreted in view of the overall clinical evaluation, using preinjury data when available. The crux of the PCS postinjury investigation is change in an individual's functioning, not the presence or absence of any particular symptoms, because no pathognomonic profile of PCS exists and each athlete's presentation will differ to some extent.
|
Neuropsychological Evaluation
For both pediatric and adult populations, conventional neuropsychological assessment is a well-established, recommended methodology for evaluating individuals who have sustained neurologic injury or who have neurodevelopmental problems.125–127 Neuropsychological assessment can objectively identify cognitive, psychosocial, and achievement difficulties and assist with differential diagnosis and clinical management. In the sports arena, however, the general use of comprehensive neuropsychological evaluations is impractical, because traditional testing takes multiple hours to complete and is priced accordingly.
Thus, in the 1980s, a model of abbreviated "baseline" neuropsychological testing was introduced specifically for athletic purposes.80 The model calls for preinjury or baseline neurocognitive testing lasting 30 minutes, followed by postinjury comparison testing for athletes who sustain concussions during the season. The model has been popularized recently as the most sensitive means of documenting the neurocognitive effects of concussion and is now used by a number of professional, collegiate, and high school programs.78, 122, 128 The typical baseline battery originally consisted of paper-and-pencil instruments. More recently, computerized tests have been increasingly used, because they are thought to have a number of potential advantages over paper-and-pencil measures.129 Three computerized programs are now available commercially: the Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT Applications, Inc, Pittsburgh, PA), Concussion Resolution Index (Headminder, Inc, New York, NY), and CogSport (Cogstate Ltd, Victoria, Australia). The Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics is a computerized program available free of charge through work sponsored by the US government.
In theory, baseline neuropsychological testing could provide incremental information to assist in decisions about return to play, because cognitive and somatic problems are not perfectly correlated after concussion and standardized testing may be more objective than merely asking an athlete if he or she is still experiencing cognitive problems.130–132 Nonetheless, the baseline model has a number of methodologic and statistical problems that are not resolved yet.133, 134 Moreover, a recent comprehensive review of the psychometric properties of the commonly used paper-and-pencil and computerized measures raises serious questions about whether the instruments are well validated enough to support their applied clinical use at this time.135 Sufficient data regarding the reliability, validity, and clinical utility of the neuropsychological instruments within the baseline model are still lacking.
Multiple studies have actually shown that neuropsychological testing can be sensitive to the acute neurocognitive effects of sport-related concussion,98, 99, 132, 136–149 a fact that has likely led various experts and groups (eg, the CISG, National Athletic Trainers' Association) to endorse the use of baseline neuropsychological testing when making return-to-play decisions in certain situations.79, 106 However, no identified prospective, controlled study has shown that athletes display neurocognitive impairment after symptoms have resolved as measured by a simple PCS checklist. In fact, methodologically rigorous studies have failed to detect differences on neuropsychological testing 1 to 2 weeks postinjury, a finding corroborated by a recent meta-analysis that evaluated the neuropsychological impact of athletic concussion in 21 studies.150 These data need careful consideration when examining the empirical merit of postinjury neuropsychological testing across populations, because such testing does not add value to return-to-play decisions when athletes are still symptomatic.79 If symptoms are being reported, no expert guideline would allow a return to play, and thus neuropsychological testing is unnecessary in this situation (at least for the purpose of the return-to-play decision).
Because of these statistical and methodologic issues, Randolph et al135 argue that the clinical implementation of baseline neuropsychological testing remains premature. Although we recognize that this conclusion contrasts with the position taken by a number of other authorities in the field, we agree that sound scientific data have yet to justify the financial costs, time, and energy needed to implement baseline neuropsychological testing for pediatric athletes or demonstrate that such testing actually leads to a reduction in the risks associated with returning young athletes to play. Until these data become available, neuropsychological testing within the baseline model should be considered an investigational methodology for pediatric athletes, certainly worthy of ongoing research but not yet ready for general clinical use in making individual decisions regarding return to play.
Despite the current limitations of neuropsychological assessment for the specific decision about return to play, experts agree that such testing does have a role in evaluating and managing certain athletes postinjury. For instance, athletes who have sustained multiple concussions or whose recovery is not progressing in a typical fashion (ie, symptom clearance within 1–2 weeks) could benefit from a thorough neuropsychological evaluation. This type of assessment can help to document impairment and identify factors that could be contributing to lingering difficulties. Because most pediatric athletes are expected to meet the cognitive demands of school soon after injury, neuropsychological evaluation in this population has the additional benefit of being able to identify cognitive deficits and assist in the development of appropriate educational management plans regardless of decisions about return to play.
When to Return to Play
When to return an athlete to play after a concussion has been the subject of much discussion and controversy, although authors agree that the decision should be approached with due caution. Justification for this caution has commonly reflected 2 ideas: that repeated concussions have cumulative effects and that they result in increased vulnerability to additional injury. Both ideas are gathering empirical support. Recent clinical studies have demonstrated a cumulative neurocognitive, somatic, and neurophysiologic effect of repeated concussion151–155 (but see also work by Guskiewicz156 and Macciocchi et al157). Experiments with animals are consistent with the possibility of cumulative effects158–161 and suggest that the hippocampus could be particularly vulnerable to repeated mild injury.162 Athletes who have sustained previous concussions have also been found to be 3 to 6 times more vulnerable to future injury, perhaps in part secondary to a premature return to play.154, 163
In the pediatric athlete, a number of additional reasons exist to suggest that the return-to-play decision should be made with ample care. First, we do not yet have a clear understanding of how repeated brain insult could change neurobiological or neurobehavioral development over the long run. Second, the risk-benefit analysis in younger athletes is often considerably different from that in adults, weighted much more heavily toward potential loss or future functional disruption as opposed to immediate gain from returning to competition. Third, although extremely rare, second-impact syndrome has been documented almost exclusively in immature brains, suggesting that the young athlete is at heightened risk for the potentially catastrophic consequences that have been reported after repeated injury.
For all athletes, the existing guidelines regarding return to play have undeniably helped increase awareness and systematize the management of concussive injury. Nevertheless, at present, none of the guidelines have gained sufficient scientific support to become the universally accepted "gold standard."164 The number and inevitable divergence of the existing guidelines make the need for consensus opinion especially pressing. In this regard, a panel of international sports concussion experts (referred to as the CISG) has been convened twice, in 2001 in Vienna78 and in 2004 in Prague.79 Based on available data, the group has agreed that no athlete should return to play while still symptomatic from a concussion physically, cognitively, or behaviorally. Experts agree that the earliest an athlete should return is when:
- no signs or symptoms of any kind are apparent at rest or during exertion;
- neurologic examination is normal; and
- neuroimaging is unremarkable when performed.
We have no reason to suspect that pediatric athletes should be managed differently, with the only possible exception being the need for even more conservatism. One example of this more conservative approach would be to always remove the young athlete from the day's competition after a concussion and not allow return to play until cleared medically, regardless of initial injury severity. This recommendation would differ from many current guidelines, which allow for return to play during the same competition if the athlete is asymptomatic after 15 to 20 minutes. In contrast to the professional athlete for whom this might be appropriate,165 research suggests that such rapid return is likely too liberal for the younger athlete. Lovell et al137, 148 have found that high school athletes sustaining grade I or mild "ding" injuries, who are generally free of obvious symptoms on the field, display an evolving symptom complex that can last for days postinjury.
For multiple reasons, in the context of pediatric concussion return-to-play decisions, we should abide by the adage "when in doubt, sit them out!"
How to Return to Play
How to return an athlete to play has also been considered by the CISG.78, 79 Because of possible symptom aggravation with increased levels of exertion,166 the group consensus is that an athlete should return to play in a gradual, stepwise fashion rather than in a more abrupt manner (ie, out 1 day, return to play the next). Once an athlete is judged free of all symptoms at rest, the group recommends a progression through a sequence of steps, with the athlete needing to remain symptom-free without medication throughout each step before proceeding and returning to play.
- Light aerobic activity (eg, walking, stationary bike)
- Sport-specific activities and training (eg, running in soccer, skating in hockey)
- Noncontact training drills
- Full-contact practice training after medical clearance
- Game play
The Special Case of Retirement
When physicians should recommend seasonal or lifetime retirement to an athlete is an area especially devoid of empirical data, although several authors have highlighted important points to consider.167–169 This issue has not been addressed specifically with reference to the pediatric athlete, but again a conservative approach is inarguably appropriate, and both parents and youth need to be actively engaged in the decision-making process.
As highlighted above, contraindications to return to play include ongoing symptoms, abnormalities on neurologic examination, or positive neuroimaging findings. Clear evidence of impairment on neuropsychological testing may indicate ongoing cognitive problems and thus could support a recommendation for retirement as well. Other potential reasons to consider disqualification include evidence of an increasingly prolonged recovery course after successive injuries and less force being needed to cause concussions or lasting symptoms.167 Even without evidence of cumulative injury or ongoing symptoms, most expert guidelines recommend disqualification for athletes who sustain multiple concussions in 1 season, a recommendation that is without clear scientific validation169 but has intuitive appeal when dealing with the developing brain of a young athlete. If retirement or seasonal disqualification is deliberated but ultimately deemed inappropriate, consideration could still be given to recommending other options that would lessen the young athlete's risk of concussion, including changing sports, positions, or style of play (eg, changing from football to baseball, from quarterback to punter, from aggressive to more cautious skiing).
Non–Sport-Specific Considerations
To truly ensure optimal recovery after concussion in children and teens, clinicians need to be broadminded and consider not only the sport-specific plan but also the interventions and supports needed outside the athletic arena. As stated earlier, the outcome of most uncomplicated pediatric concussions is quite positive. However, parents, school personnel, and athletic staff need to know what symptoms to look out for and adjust expectations accordingly when ongoing problems are apparent. The simple act of providing education about commonly seen symptoms is known to reduce the negative effects associated with pediatric mTBI.170 Thus, one appropriate intervention involves giving families and school personnel relevant information such as the free Centers for Disease Control and Prevention concussion fact booklet (available at www.cdc.gov/ncipc/tbi).
Similar to other aspects of concussion care, managing the transition back to school will depend on the individual circumstances of each athlete. If specialized educational help is deemed necessary, it can be obtained in 3 ways within the school system: (1) informal accommodations; (2) Section 504 plans (a civil rights entitlement to ensure nondiscrimination of students with disabilities); and (3) Individualized Education Programs (a tailored educational plan obtained through the special education system).
A few informal accommodations and modifications in the first days or weeks after injury will suffice for many symptomatic athletes as they go back to school. The smaller minority with lasting or severe problems are apt to benefit from more formal intervention, for which a Section 504 plan is often appropriate. After mTBI, few children will need an Individualized Education Program, although federal law dictates that special education services should be made available if the injury resulted in difficulties that negatively impact the ability to make appropriate educational progress.171
Parents and primary care providers should alert educational personnel to the injury, potential consequences, and need for close monitoring. In addition, they should ensure that children are not rushed back too quickly after concussion to avoid undue fatigue and frustration. Children with concussion may need to make the transition back to school gradually. At the same time, keeping a child home from school without sufficient cause also entails risks. Thus, each case requires prudent consideration. Additional recommendations for managing the school transition after mTBI are available.172–174 Clinically, we have found the strategies listed in Table 4 to be helpful. In some cases, neuropsychological evaluation can also assist with detailing the specific symptom and cognitive profile for a student who has suffered a concussion and can help to ensure that suitable supports are provided at school and that appropriate education and guidance is provided to families and educators.
|
From a medical perspective, most postconcussive problems will resolve relatively quickly without treatment. For those that do not, many therapeutic options are available to the treating clinician, including pharmacologic intervention.175–178 However, aside from psychological studies that support the benefits of early education, reassurance, and positive coping, little pertinent intervention research has been conducted.179, 180 Thus, the clinician is faced with the need to examine the child who has been injured systematically and to treat symptomatically using methods that have been demonstrated to be effective largely in nonconcussed populations. Of course, all medical problems require ongoing evaluation, not only to rule out more serious pathology but also because certain symptoms can occur or persist that suggest a secondary or unrelated problem that will need additional assessment (eg, depression, anxiety, family dysfunction, learning disability, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder).
In general, the pediatric practitioner should expect a positive outcome after concussion (ie, the norm for children and teenagers is not a lasting "postconcussion syndrome"). When the outcome is less positive, the pediatrician should consider referrals to specialists in neuropsychology, neurology, rehabilitation, sports medicine, pain management, education, and behavioral health, all of whom could be useful in identifying and treating injury- and non–injury-related factors that may be interfering with recovery.
|
CONCLUSIONS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTDEFINITION AND EPIDEMIOLOGYCONCUSSION EFFECTSCONCUSSION IN THE YOUNG...CLINICAL MANAGEMENTCONCLUSIONSREFERENCES |
|---|
The sport-related concussion story for the adult competitive athlete has been unfolding with impressive rapidity in recent years, driven by a remarkable amount of work by numerous groups of researchers around the globe. Conversely, thus far, little work has focused on the young athlete. As a result, the pediatric sport-related concussion story remains largely untold. Nevertheless, drawing from extant research and expert opinion, today's pediatric health care provider has much more information available to inform clinical management than was the case even a few years back.
We know that concussions will occur relatively frequently among children and adolescents and that younger athletes may respond more poorly to such injuries, in very rare cases catastrophically so. Given the substantial individual variation in responses to concussions, most experts would now agree that the initial "grade" of a concussion is less important than the systematic tracking of each athlete's recovery course over time. Because accurate neurobiological markers do not exist yet, the most sophisticated way to track recovery at present is through serial physical examination and standardized behavioral instrumentation (eg, PCS rating scales). Although neuropsychological testing could potentially contribute to tracking recovery from concussion, at present the empirical evidence is not sufficient to support its routine clinical use for return-to-play decision-making within a baseline model. However, neuropsychological evaluation is recommended for athletes who have sustained multiple injuries or whose recovery is not proceeding as expected, because such testing can help to document impairment, identify factors interfering with progress, and facilitate the development of appropriate management plans. Consensus opinion continues to affirm that no athlete should return to play while he or she is symptomatic. Until data convincingly suggest otherwise, this directive should certainly apply to the young athlete, for whom a conservative approach to management should be the rule when making decisions about return to play. Finally, we know that proven medical treatments for concussion have not been established and that misinformation and underreporting of concussion still pervade athletics. Primary care providers working with the pediatric population are uniquely positioned in this regard: by devoting sufficient time and attention early in an athlete's career, they can help cultivate a lifelong appreciation for concussion prevention and promote the wherewithal to accurately recognize and swiftly report such injury.
|
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We gratefully acknowledge Christopher Randolph, PhD, James Kelly, MD, Donald Gerber, PsyD, and Gerald Clayton, PhD, for general guidance and assistance in reviewing a draft of this manuscript.
|
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Accepted Sep 6, 2005.
Address correspondence to Michael W. Kirkwood, PhD, Children's Hospital Concussion Program, B285, 1056 E 19th Ave, Denver, CO 80218. E-mail: kirkwood.michael{at}tchden.org
The authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.
|
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTDEFINITION AND EPIDEMIOLOGYCONCUSSION EFFECTSCONCUSSION IN THE YOUNG...CLINICAL MANAGEMENTCONCLUSIONSREFERENCES |
|---|
1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Physical activity levels among children aged 9–13 years: United States, 2002. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2003;52 :785 –788[Medline]
2. Grunbaum JA, Kann L, Kinchen S, et al. Youth risk behavior surveillance: United States, 2003 [published corrections appear in MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2004;53(24):536; MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2005;54(24):608]. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2004;53(2):1–96
3. National Federation of State High School Associations. NFHS 2003-04 High School Athletics Participation Survey. Indianapolis, IN: National Federation of State High School Associations; 2004
4. Mueller FO, Diehl JL. Annual Survey of Football Injury Research. Chapel Hill, NC: National Center for Catastrophic Sport Injury Research, University of North Carolina; 2004
5. Practice parameter: the management of concussion in sports (summary statement). Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee.
Neurology. 1997;48
:581
–585
6. Sosin DM, Sniezek JE, Thurman DJ. Incidence of mild and moderate brain injury in the United States, 1991. Brain Inj. 1996;10 :47 –54[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
7. Koh JO, Cassidy JD, Watkinson EJ. Incidence of concussion in contact sports: a systematic review of the evidence. Brain Inj. 2003;17 :901 –917[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
8. Powell JW, Barber-Foss KD. Traumatic brain injury in high school athletes.
JAMA. 1999;282
:958
–963
9. Gissane C, Jennings DC, Cumine AJ, Stephenson SE, White JA. Differences in the incidence of injury between rugby league forwards and backs. Aust J Sci Med Sport. 1997;29 :91 –94[Medline]
10. Schulz MR, Marshall SW, Mueller FO, et al. Incidence and risk factors for concussion in high school athletes, North Carolina, 1996–1999.
Am J Epidemiol. 2004;160
:937
–944
11. Carroll LJ, Cassidy JD, Peloso PM, et al. Prognosis for mild traumatic brain injury: results of the WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. J Rehabil Med. 2004;(43 suppl):84–105
12. Satz P, Zaucha K, McCleary C, Light R, Asarnow R, Becker D. Mild head injury in children and adolescents: a review of studies (1970–1995). Psychol Bull. 1997;122 :107 –131[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
13. Satz P. Mild head injury in children and adolescents. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2001;10 :106 –109[CrossRef]
14. Thompson MD, Irby JW Jr. Recovery from mild head injury in pediatric populations. Semin Pediatr Neurol. 2003;10 :130 –139[Medline]
15. Yeates KO, Taylor HG. Neurobehavioural outcomes of mild head injury in children and adolescents. Pediatr Rehabil. 2005;8 :5 –16[CrossRef][Medline]
16. Mittenberg W, Wittner MS, Miller LJ. Postconcussion syndrome occurs in children. Neuropsychology. 1997;11 :447 –452[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
17. Goldsmith W. Biomechanics of head injury. In: Fung YC, Perrone N, Anliker M, eds. Biomechanics: Its Foundation and Objectives. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1970:585–634
18. Denny-Brown D, Russell WR. Experimental cerebral concussion.
Brain. 1941;64
:93
–164
19. Ommaya AK, Gennarelli TA. Cerebral concussion and traumatic unconsciousness: correlation of experimental and clinical observations of blunt head injuries.
Brain. 1974;97
:633
–654
20. Pellman EJ, Viano DC, Tucker AM, Casson IR, Waeckerle JF. Concussion in professional football: reconstruction of game impacts and injuries. Neurosurgery. 2003;53 :799 –812; discussion 812–814[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
21. Pellman EJ, Viano DC, Tucker AM, Casson IR; Committee on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury, National Football League. Concussion in professional football: location and direction of helmet impacts: part 2. Neurosurgery. 2003;53 :1328 –1340; discussion 1340–1341[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
22. Viano DC, Pellman EJ. Concussion in professional football: biomechanics of the striking player—part 8. Neurosurgery. 2005;56 :266 –280[CrossRef][Medline]
23. Shewchenko N, Withnall C, Keown M, Gittens R, Dvorak J. Heading in football. Part 1: development of biomechanical methods to investigate head response. Br J Sports Med. 2005;39 (suppl 1):i10–i25
24. Shewchenko N, Withnall C, Keown M, Gittens R, Dvorak J. Heading in football. Part 2: biomechanics of ball heading and head response. Br J Sports Med. 2005;39(suppl 1) :i26 –i32
25. Shewchenko N, Withnall C, Keown M, Gittens R, Dvorak J. Heading in football. Part 3: effect of ball properties on head response. Br J Sports Med. 2005;39(suppl 1) :i33 –i39
26. Withnall C, Shewchenko N, Gittens R, Dvorak J. Biomechanical investigation of head impacts in football. Br J Sports Med. 2005;39(suppl 1) :i49 –i57
27. McIntosh AS, McCrory P, Comerford J. The dynamics of concussive head impacts in rugby and Australian rules football. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32 :1980 –1984[CrossRef][Medline]
28. Koh JO, Watkinson EJ, Yoon YJ. Video analysis of head blows leading to concussion in competition Taekwondo. Brain Inj. 2004;18 :1287 –1296[Medline]
29. Duma SM, Manoogian SJ, Bussone WR, et al. Analysis of real-time head accelerations in collegiate football players. Clin J Sport Med. 2005;15 :3 –8[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
30. Naunheim RS, Standeven J, Richter C, Lewis LM. Comparison of impact data in hockey, football, and soccer. J Trauma. 2000;48 :938 –941[Web of Science][Medline]
31. McCrory P, Johnston KM, Mohtadi NG, Meeuwisse W. Evidence-based review of sport-related concussion: basic science. Clin J Sport Med. 2001;11 :160 –165[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
32. Barth JT, Freeman JR, Broshek DK, Varney RN. Acceleration-deceleration sport-related concussion: the gravity of it all. J Athl Train. 2001;36 :253 –256[Web of Science][Medline]
33. Bauer R, Fritz H. Pathophysiology of traumatic injury in the developing brain: an introduction and short update. Exp Toxicol Pathol. 2004;56 :65 –73[Medline]
34. Gefen A, Gefen N, Zhu Q, Raghupathi R, Margulies SS. Age-dependent changes in material properties of the brain and braincase of the rat. J Neurotrauma. 2003;20 :1163 –1177[CrossRef][Medline]
35. Prins ML, Hovda DA. Developing experimental models to address traumatic brain injury in children. J Neurotrauma. 2003;20 :123 –137[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
36. Thibault KL, Margulies SS. Age-dependent material properties of the porcine cerebrum: effect on pediatric inertial head injury criteria. J Biomech. 1998;31 :1119 –1126[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
37. Goldsmith W, Plunkett J. A biomechanical analysis of the causes of traumatic brain injury in infants and children. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2004;25 :89 –100[Medline]
38. Ommaya AK, Goldsmith W, Thibault L. Biomechanics and neuropathology of adult and paediatric head injury. Br J Neurosurg. 2002;16 :220 –242[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
39. Munoz-Sanchez MA, Murillo-Cabezas F, Cayuela A, et al. The significance of skull fracture in mild head trauma differs between children and adults. Childs Nerv Syst. 2005;21 :128 –132[Medline]
40. McCrory P, Collie A, Anderson V, Davis G. Can we manage sport related concussion in children the same as in adults?
Br J Sports Med. 2004;38
:516
–519
41. Shaw NA. The neurophysiology of concussion. Prog Neurobiol. 2002;67 :281 –344[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
42. Proctor MR, Cantu RC. Head and neck injuries in young athletes. Clin Sports Med. 2000;19 :693 –715[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
43. Webbe FM, Barth JT. Short-term and long-term outcome of athletic closed head injuries. Clin Sports Med. 2003;22 :577 –592[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
44. Giza CC, Hovda DA. The neurometabolic cascade of concussion. J Athl Train. 2001;36 :228 –235[Web of Science][Medline]
45. Hovda DA, Lee SM, Smith ML, et al. The neurochemical and metabolic cascade following brain injury: moving from animal models to man. J Neurotrauma. 1995;12 :903 –906[Web of Science][Medline]
46. Aldrich EF, Eisenberg HM, Saydjari C, et al. Diffuse brain swelling in severely head-injured children: a report from the NIH Traumatic Coma Data Bank. J Neurosurg. 1992;76 :450 –454[Web of Science][Medline]
47. Kelly JP, Nichols JS, Filley CM, Lillehei KO, Rubinstein D, Kleinschmidt-DeMasters BK. Concussion in sports: guidelines for the prevention of catastrophic outcome.
JAMA. 1991;266
:2867
–2869
48. Saunders RL, Harbaugh RE. The second impact in catastrophic contact-sports head trauma.
JAMA. 1984;252
:538
–539
49. Cantu RC. Second-impact syndrome. Clin Sports Med. 1998;17 :37 –44[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
50. Cassidy JD, Carroll LJ, Peloso PM, et al. Incidence, risk factors and prevention of mild traumatic brain injury: results of the WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. J Rehabil Med. 2004:(43 suppl):28–60
51. McCrory P. Does second impact syndrome exist? Clin J Sport Med. 2001;11 :144 –149[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
52. Bruce DA. Delayed deterioration of consciousness after trivial head injury in childhood. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984;289 :715 –716
53. McCrory PR, Berkovic SF. Second impact syndrome.
Neurology. 1998;50
:677
–683
54. Schnitker MT. A syndrome of cerebral concussion in children. J Pediatr. 1949;35 :557 –560[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
55. Snoek JW, Minderhoud JM, Wilmink JT. Delayed deterioration following mild head injury in children.
Brain. 1984;107
:15
–36
56. Kennard MA. Age and other factors in motor recovery from precentral lesions in monkeys.
Am J Physiol. 1936;115
:138
–146
57. Anderson V, Moore C. Age at injury as a predictor of outcome following pediatric head injury: a longitudinal perspective. Child Neuropsychol. 1995;1 :187 –202
58. Anderson VA, Morse SA, Klug G, et al. Predicting recovery from head injury in young children: a prospective analysis. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1997;3 :568 –580[Medline]
59. Anderson V, Catroppa C, Morse S, Haritou F, Rosenfeld J. Recovery of intellectual ability following traumatic brain injury in childhood: impact of injury severity and age at injury. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2000;32 :282 –290[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
60. Barnes MA, Dennis M, Wilkinson M. Reading after closed head injury in childhood: effects on accuracy, fluency, and comprehension. Dev Neuropsychol. 1999;15 :1 –24[CrossRef]
61. Brink JD, Garrett AL, Hale WR, Nickel VL, Woo-Sam J. Recovery of motor and intellectual function in children sustaining severe head injuries. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1970;12 :565 –571[Web of Science][Medline]
62. Brookshire BL, Chapman SB, Song J, Levin HS. Cognitive and linguistic correlates of children's discourse after closed head injury: a three-year follow-up. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2000;6 :741 –751[Medline]
63. Duval J, Dumont M, Braun CM, Montour-Proulx I. Recovery of intellectual function after a brain injury: a comparison of longitudinal and cross-sectional approaches. Brain Cogn. 2002;48 :337 –342[Medline]
64. Ewing-Cobbs L, Miner ME, Fletcher JM, Levin H. Intellectual, language, and motor sequelae following closed head injury in infants and preschoolers.
J Pediatr Psychol. 1989;14
:531
–547
65. Ewing-Cobbs L, Fletcher JM, Levin HS, Francis DJ, Davidson K, Miner ME. Longitudinal neuropsychological outcome in infants and preschoolers with traumatic brain injury. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1997;3 :581 –591[Medline]
66. Kriel RL, Krach LE, Panser LA. Closed head injury: comparison of children younger and older than 6 years of age. Pediatr Neurol. 1989;5 :296 –300[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
67. Levin HS, Song J, Ewing-Cobbs L, Chapman SB, Mendelsohn D. Word fluency in relation to severity of closed head injury, associated frontal brain lesions, and age at injury in children. Neuropsychologia. 2001;39 :122 –131[CrossRef][Medline]
68. Ewing-Cobbs L, Barnes MA, Fletcher JM. Early brain injury in children: development and reorganization of cognitive function. Dev Neuropsychol. 2003;24 :669 –704[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
69. Levin HS. Neuroplasticity following non-penetrating traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2003;17 :665 –674[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
70. Taylor HG, Alden J. Age-related differences in outcomes following childhood brain insults: an introduction and overview. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1997;3 :555 –567[Medline]
71. Field M, Collins MW, Lovell MR, Maroon J. Does age play a role in recovery from sports-related concussion? A comparison of high school and collegiate athletes. J Pediatr. 2003;142 :546 –553[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
72. Fay GC, Jaffe KM, Polissar NL, et al. Mild pediatric traumatic brain injury: a cohort study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74 :895 –901[Web of Science][Medline]
73. Yeates KO, Luria J, Bartkowski H, Rusin J, Martin L, Bigler ED. Postconcussive symptoms in children with mild closed head injuries. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1999;14 :337 –350[Web of Science][Medline]
74. Holmes JM. Natural histories in learning disabilities: neuropsychological difference/environmental demand. In: Ceci SJ, ed. Handbook of Cognitive, Social, and Neuropsychological Aspects of Learning Disabilities. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1987
75. Cantu RC. Guidelines for return to contact sports after a cerebral concussion. Phys Sportsmed. 1986;14 :75 –83[Web of Science]
76. Cantu RC. Posttraumatic retrograde and anterograde amnesia: pathophysiology and implications in grading and safe return to play. J Athl Train. 2001;36 :244 –248[Web of Science][Medline]
77. Report of the Sports Medicine Committee: guidelines for the management of concussion in sports (revised). Paper presented at: Colorado Medical Society; May 1991; Denver, Co
78. Aubry M, Cantu R, Dvorak J, et al. Summary and agreement statement of the First International Conference on Concussion in Sport, Vienna 2001. Recommendations for the improvement of safety and health of athletes who may suffer concussive injuries.
Br J Sports Med. 2002;36
:6
–10
79. McCrory P, Johnston K, Meeuwisse W, et al. Summary and agreement statement of the 2nd International Conference on Concussion in Sport, Prague 2004. Clin J Sport Med. 2005;15 :48 –55[CrossRef][Medline]
80. Barth JT, Alves WM, Ryan TV, Macciocchi SN, Rimel RW, Jane JA. Mild head injury in sports. In: Levin HS, Eisenberg HM, Benton A, eds. Mild Head Injury. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 1989:257–275
81. Collins MW, Hawn KL. The clinical management of sports concussion. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2002;1 :12 –22[Medline]
82. Johnston KM, McCrory P, Mohtadi NG, Meeuwisse W. Evidence-based review of sport-related concussion: clinical science. Clin J Sport Med. 2001;11 :150 –159[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
83. Kelly JP, Rosenberg JH. Diagnosis and management of concussion in sports.
Neurology. 1997;48
:575
–580
84. Lovell M, Collins M, Bradley J. Return to play following sports-related concussion. Clin Sports Med. 2004;23 :421 –441, ix[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
85. Cantu RC, ed. Neurologic Athletic Head and Spine Injury. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 2000
86. Lovell MR, Echemendia RJ, Barth JT, Collins MW, eds. Traumatic Brain Injury in Sports: An International Perspective. Lisse, Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger; 2004
87. Bailes JE, Lovell MR, Maroon JC, eds. Sports-Related Concussion. St Louis, MO: Quality Medical Publishers; 1999
88. J Athl Train. 2001;36 :225–341
89. Clin J Sport Med. 2001;11 :132–202
90. Appl Neuropsychol. 2003;10 :1–55
91. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Quality Improvement; American Academy of Family Physicians, Commission on Clinical Policies and Research. The management of minor closed head injury in children.
Pediatrics. 1999;104
:1407
–1415
92. Wojtys EM, Hovda D, Landry G, et al. Current concepts: concussion in sports.
Am J Sports Med. 1999;27
:676
–687
93. Smith DM, Kovan JR, Rich BSE, Tanner SM. Preparticipation Physical Evaluation. 2nd ed. Minneapolis, MN: The Physician and Sportmedicine (McGraw-Hill Healthcare); 1997
94. Wingfield K, Matheson GO, Meeuwisse WH. Preparticipation evaluation: an evidence-based review. Clin J Sport Med. 2004;14 :109 –122[CrossRef][Medline]
95. Kaut KP, DePompei R, Kerr J, Congeni J. Reports of head injury and symptom knowledge among college athletes: implications for assessment and educational intervention. Clin J Sport Med. 2003;13 :213 –221[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
96. McCrea M, Hammeke T, Olsen G, Leo P, Guskiewicz K. Unreported concussion in high school football players: implications for prevention. Clin J Sport Med. 2004;14 :13 –17[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
97. Guskiewicz KM, Weaver NL, Padua DA, Garrett WE Jr. Epidemiology of concussion in collegiate and high school football players.
Am J Sports Med. 2000;28
:643
–650
98. Collins MW, Iverson GL, Lovell MR, McKeag DB, Norwig J, Maroon J. On-field predictors of neuropsychological and symptom deficit following sports-related concussion. Clin J Sport Med. 2003;13 :222 –229[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
99. Erlanger D, Kaushik T, Cantu R, et al. Symptom-based assessment of the severity of a concussion. J Neurosurg. 2003;98 :477 –484[Web of Science][Medline]
100. Lovell MR, Iverson GL, Collins MW, McKeag D, Maroon JC. Does loss of consciousness predict neuropsychological decrements after concussion? Clin J Sport Med. 1999;9 :193 –198[Web of Science][Medline]
101. Elkind D. Egocentrism in adolescence. Child Dev. 1967;38 :1025 –1034[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
102. Labotz M, Martin MR, Kimura IF, Hetzler RK, Nichols AW. A comparison of a preparticipation evaluation history form and a symptom-based concussion survey in the identification of previous head injury in collegiate athletes. Clin J Sport Med. 2005;15 :73 –78[Medline]
103. McCrory P. Preparticipation assessment for head injury. Clin J Sport Med. 2004;14 :139 –144[CrossRef][Medline]
104. Bailes JE, Hudson V. Classification of sport-related head trauma: a spectrum of mild to severe injury. J Athl Train. 2001;36 :236 –243[Medline]
105. Oliaro S, Anderson S, Hooker D. Management of cerebral concussion in sports: the athletic trainer's perspective. J Athl Train. 2001;36 :257 –262[Medline]
106. Guskiewicz KM, Bruce SL, Cantu RC, et al. National Athletic Trainers' Association position statement: management of sport-related concussion. J Athl Train. 2004;39 :280 –297[Web of Science][Medline]
107. Cantu RC, Bailes JE, Wilberger JE Jr. Guidelines for return to contact or collision sport after a cervical spine injury. Clin Sports Med. 1998;17 :137 –146[CrossRef][Medline]
108. McCrea M. Standardized mental status assessment of sports concussion. Clin J Sport Med. 2001;11 :176 –181[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
109. McCrea M, Kelly J, Randolph C. Standardized Assessment of Concussion (SAC): Manual for Administration, Scoring, and Interpretation. 2nd ed. Waukesha, WI: CNS Inc; 2000
110. Kelly JP. Concussion in sports and recreation. Semin Neurol. 2000;20 :165 –171[CrossRef][Medline]
111. Blostein P, Jones SJ. Identification and evaluation of patients with mild traumatic brain injury: results of a national survey of level I trauma centers. J Trauma. 2003;55 :450 –453[Web of Science][Medline]
112. Borg J, Holm L, Cassidy JD, et al. Diagnostic procedures in mild traumatic brain injury: results of the WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. J Rehabil Med. 2004;(43 suppl):61–75
113. Palchak MJ, Holmes JF, Vance CW, et al. Does an isolated history of loss of consciousness or amnesia predict brain injuries in children after blunt head trauma? Pediatrics. 2004;113 (6). Available at: www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/113/6/e507
114. Simon B, Letourneau P, Vitorino E, McCall J. Pediatric minor head trauma: indications for computed tomographic scanning revisited. J Trauma. 2001;51 :231 –237; discussion 237–238[Web of Science][Medline]
115. Cantu RC. Work-up of the athlete with concussion. Am J Med Sports. 2002;4 :152 –154
116. Bigler ED, Orrison WW. Neuroimaging in sports-related brain injury. In: Lovell MR, Echemendia RJ, Barth JT, Collins MW, eds. Traumatic Brain Injury in Sports: An International Perspective. Lisse, Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger; 2004:71 –94
117. Johnston KM, Ptito A, Chankowsky J, Chen JK. New frontiers in diagnostic imaging in concussive head injury. Clin J Sport Med. 2001;11 :166 –175[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
118. Stein SC, Spettell C, Young G, Ross SE. Limitations of neurological assessment in mild head injury. Brain Inj. 1993;7 :425 –430[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
119. Vilke GM, Chan TC, Guss DA. Use of a complete neurological examination to screen for significant intracranial abnormalities in minor head injury. Am J Emerg Med. 2000;18 :159 –163[Medline]
120. Guskiewicz KM. Postural stability assessment following concussion: one piece of the puzzle. Clin J Sport Med. 2001;11 :182 –189[CrossRef][Medline]
121. Piland SG, Motl RW, Ferrara MS, Peterson CL. Evidence for the factorial and construct validity of a self-report concussion symptoms scale. J Athl Train. 2003;38 :104 –112[Medline]
122. Lovell MR, Collins MW. Neuropsychological assessment of the college football player. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1998;13 :9 –26[Web of Science][Medline]
123. King NS, Crawford S, Wenden FJ, Moss NE, Wade DT. The Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire: a measure of symptoms commonly experienced after head injury and its reliability. J Neurol. 1995;242 :587 –592[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
124. Iverson GL, Lange RT. Examination of "postconcussion-like" symptoms in a healthy sample. Appl Neuropsychol. 2003;10 :137 –144[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
125. Baron IS. Neuropsychological Evaluation of the Child. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2004
126. Assessment: neuropsychological testing of adults. Considerations for neurologists. Report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology.
Neurology. 1996;47
:592
–599
127. Meyer GJ, Finn SE, Eyde LD, et al. Psychological testing and psychological assessment: a review of evidence and issues. Am Psychol. 2001;56 :128 –165[CrossRef][Medline]
128. Randolph C. Implementation of neuropsychological testing models for the high school, collegiate, and professional sport settings. J Athl Train. 2001;36 :288 –296[Medline]
129. Podell K. Computerized assessment of sports-related brain injury. In: Lovell MR, Echemendia RJ, Barth JT, Collins MW, eds. Traumatic Brain Injury: An International Perspective. Lisse, Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger; 2004:375–396
130. Echemendia RJ, Cantu RC. Return to play following sports-related mild traumatic brain injury: the role for neuropsychology. Appl Neuropsychol. 2003;10 :48 –55[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
131. Lovell MR. The relevance of neuropsychologic testing for sports-related head injuries. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2002;1 :7 –11[Medline]
132. Bleiberg J, Cernich AN, Cameron K, et al. Duration of cognitive impairment after sports concussion. Neurosurgery. 2004;54 :1073 –1078; discussion 1078–1080[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
133. Barr WB. Methodologic issues in neuropsychological testing. J Athl Train. 2001;36 :297 –302[Medline]
134. Barr WB. Neuropsychological testing of high school athletes: preliminary norms and test-retest indices. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2003;18 :91 –101[CrossRef][Medline]
135. Randolph C, McCrea M, Barr WB. Is neuropsychological testing useful in the management of sport-related concussion? J Athl Train. 2005;40 :139 –152[Web of Science][Medline]
136. Bruce JM, Echemendia RJ. Delayed-onset deficits in verbal encoding strategies among patients with mild traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychology. 2003;17 :622 –629[Medline]
137. Lovell MR, Collins MW, Iverson GL, Johnston KM, Bradley JP. Grade 1 or "ding" concussions in high school athletes.
Am J Sports Med. 2004;32
:47
–54
138. Macciocchi SN, Barth JT, Alves W, Rimel RW, Jane JA. Neuropsychological functioning and recovery after mild head injury in collegiate athletes. Neurosurgery. 1996;39 :510 –514[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
139. McCrea M, Guskiewicz KM, Marshall SW, et al. Acute effects and recovery time following concussion in collegiate football players: the NCAA Concussion Study.
JAMA. 2003;290
:2556
–2563
140. Pellman EJ, Lovell MR, Viano DC, Casson IR, Tucker AM. Concussion in professional football: neuropsychological testing—part 6. Neurosurgery. 2004;55 :1290 –1303; discussion 1303–1305[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
141. Echemendia RJ, Putukian M, Mackin RS, Julian L, Shoss N. Neuropsychological test performance prior to and following sports-related mild traumatic brain injury. Clin J Sport Med. 2001;11 :23 –31[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
142. Hinton-Bayre AD, Geffen G, McFarland K. Mild head injury and speed of information processing: a prospective study of professional rugby league players. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1997;19 :275 –289[Medline]
143. Hinton-Bayre AD, Geffen GM, Geffen LB, McFarland KA, Friis P. Concussion in contact sports: reliable change indices of impairment and recovery. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1999;21 :70 –86[Web of Science][Medline]
144. Iverson GL, Lovell MR, Collins MW. Interpreting change on ImPACT following sport concussion. Clin Neuropsychol. 2003;17 :460 –467[Web of Science][Medline]
145. Makdissi M, Collie A, Maruff P, et al. Computerised cognitive assessment of concussed Australian Rules footballers.
Br J Sports Med. 2001;35
:354
–360
146. Warden DL, Bleiberg J, Cameron KL, et al. Persistent prolongation of simple reaction time in sports concussion.
Neurology. 2001;57
:524
–526
147. Erlanger D, Saliba E, Barth J, Almquist J, Webright W, Freeman J. Monitoring resolution of postconcussion symptoms in athletes: preliminary results of a Web-based neuropsychological test protocol. J Athl Train. 2001;36 :280 –287[Web of Science][Medline]
148. Lovell MR, Collins MW, Iverson GL, et al. Recovery from mild concussion in high school athletes. J Neurosurg. 2003;98 :296 –301[Web of Science][Medline]
149. Collins MW, Grindel SH, Lovell MR, et al. Relationship between concussion and neuropsychological performance in college football players.
JAMA. 1999;282
:964
–970
150. Belanger HG, Vanderploeg RD. The neuropsychological impact of sports-related concussion: a meta-analysis. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2005;11 :345 –357[Web of Science][Medline]
151. Bruce JM, Echemendia RJ. Concussion history predicts self-reported symptoms before and following a concussive event.
Neurology. 2004;63
:1516
–1518
152. Collins MW, Lovell MR, Iverson GL, Cantu RC, Maroon JC, Field M. Cumulative effects of concussion in high school athletes. Neurosurgery. 2002;51 :1175 –1179; discussion 180–181[Web of Science][Medline]
153. Gaetz M, Goodman D, Weinberg H. Electrophysiological evidence for the cumulative effects of concussion. Brain Inj. 2000;14 :1077 –1088[CrossRef][Medline]
154. Guskiewicz KM, McCrea M, Marshall SW, et al. Cumulative effects associated with recurrent concussion in collegiate football players: the NCAA Concussion Study.
JAMA. 2003;290
:2549
–2555
155. Iverson GL, Gaetz M, Lovell MR, Collins MW. Cumulative effects of concussion in amateur athletes. Brain Inj. 2004;18 :433 –443[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
156. Guskiewicz KM, Marshall SW, Broglio Sp, et al. No evidence of impaired neurocognitive performance in collegiate soccer players. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30 :157–162
157. Macciocchi SN, Barth JT, Littlefield L, Cantu RC. Multiple concussions and neuropsychological functioning in collegiate football players. J Athl Train. 2001;36 :303 –306[Web of Science][Medline]
158. DeFord SM, Wilson MS, Rice AC, et al. Repeated mild brain injuries result in cognitive impairment in B6C3F1 mice. J Neurotrauma. 2002;19 :427 –438[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
159. DeRoss AL, Adams JE, Vane DW, Russell SJ, Terella AM, Wald SL. Multiple head injuries in rats: effects on behavior. J Trauma. 2002;52 :708 –714[Medline]
160. Laurer HL, Bareyre FM, Lee VM, et al. Mild head injury increasing the brain's vulnerability to a second concussive impact. J Neurosurg. 2001;95 :859 –870[Web of Science][Medline]
161. Longhi L, Saatman KE, Fujimoto S, et al. Temporal window of vulnerability to repetitive experimental concussive brain injury. Neurosurgery. 2005;56 :364 –374[Medline]
162. Slemmer JE, Matser EJ, De Zeeuw CI, Weber JT. Repeated mild injury causes cumulative damage to hippocampal cells.
Brain. 2002;125
:2699
–2709
163. Zemper ED. Two-year prospective study of relative risk of a second cerebral concussion. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;82 :653 –659[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
164. Peloso PM, Carroll LJ, Cassidy JD, et al. Critical evaluation of the existing guidelines on mild traumatic brain injury. J Rehabil Med. 2004;(43 suppl) :106 –112
165. Pellman EJ, Viano DC, Casson IR, Arfken C, Feuer H. Concussion in professional football: players returning to the same game—part 7. Neurosurgery. 2005;56 :79 –90; discussion 90–92[Web of Science][Medline]
166. Johnston KM, Lassonde M, Ptito A. A contemporary neurosurgical approach to sport-related head injury: the McGill concussion protocol. J Am Coll Surg. 2001;192 :515 –524[CrossRef][Medline]
167. Cantu RC. Recurrent athletic head injury: risks and when to retire. Clin Sports Med. 2003;22 :593 –603[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
168. Echemendia RJ, Cantu RC. Return to play following cerebral brain injury. In: Lovell MR, Echemendia RJ, Barth JT, Collins MW, eds. Traumatic Brain Injury in Sports: An International Perspective. Lisse, Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger; 2004:479–498
169. McCrory P. When to retire after concussion?
Br J Sports Med. 2001;35
:380
–382
170. Ponsford J, Willmott C, Rothwell A, et al. Impact of early intervention on outcome after mild traumatic brain injury in children.
Pediatrics. 2001;108
:1297
–1303
171. Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, Pub L No. 108–446
172. Lash M, Savage R, DePompei R. Back to School After a Mild Brain Injury or Concussion. Wake Forest, NC: Lash and Associates; 1998
173. Shurtleff HA, Massagli TL, Hays RM, Ross B, Sprunk-Greenfield H. Screening children and adolescents with mild or moderate traumatic brain injury to assist school reentry. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1995;10 :64 –79
174. Ylvisaker M, Feeney T, Mullins K. School reentry following mild traumatic brain injury: a proposed hospital-to-school protocol. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1995;10 :42 –49
175. McCrory P. New treatments for concussion: the next millennium beckons. Clin J Sport Med. 2001;11 :190 –193[Medline]
176. Zasler N. Medical aspects. In: Raskin SA, Mateer CA, eds. Neuropsychological Management of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2000:23–38
177. Varney NR, Roberts RJ, eds. Evaluation and Treatment of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1999
178. Rizzo M, Tranel D, eds. Head Injury and Postconcussive Syndrome. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone; 1996
179. Mittenberg W, Canyock EM, Condit D, Patton C. Treatment of post-concussion syndrome following mild head injury. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2001;23 :829 –836[Web of Science][Medline]
180. Borg J, Holm L, Peloso PM, et al. Non-surgical intervention and cost for mild traumatic brain injury: results of the WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. J Rehabil Med. 2004;(43 suppl) :76 –83
PEDIATRICS (ISSN 1098-4275). ©2006 by the American Academy of Pediatrics
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Facebook 
Reddit 
Technorati 
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  C. A. DeMatteo, S. E. Hanna, W. J. Mahoney, R. D. Hollenberg, L. A. Scott, M. C. Law, A. Newman, C.-Y. A. Lin, and L. Xu "My Child Doesn't Have a Brain Injury, He Only Has a Concussion" Pediatrics, February 1, 2010; 125(2): 327 - 334. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. K. Piebes, M. Gourley, and T. C. Valovich McLeod Caring for Student-Athletes Following a Concussion The Journal of School Nursing, August 1, 2009; 25(4): 270 - 281. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S Alla, S J Sullivan, L Hale, and P McCrory Self-report scales/checklists for the measurement of concussion symptoms: a systematic review Br. J. Sports Med., May 1, 2009; 43(Suppl_1): i3 - i12. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G A Gioia, J C Schneider, C G Vaughan, and P K Isquith Which symptom assessments and approaches are uniquely appropriate for paediatric concussion? Br. J. Sports Med., May 1, 2009; 43(Suppl_1): i13 - i22. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G A Davis, G L Iverson, K M Guskiewicz, A Ptito, and K M Johnston Contributions of neuroimaging, balance testing, electrophysiology and blood markers to the assessment of sport-related concussion Br. J. Sports Med., May 1, 2009; 43(Suppl_1): i36 - i45. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L Purcell What are the most appropriate return-to-play guidelines for concussed child athletes? Br. J. Sports Med., May 1, 2009; 43(Suppl_1): i51 - i55. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P McCrory, W Meeuwisse, K Johnston, J Dvorak, M Aubry, M Molloy, and R Cantu Consensus Statement on Concussion in Sport: the 3rd International Conference on Concussion in Sport held in Zurich, November 2008 Br. J. Sports Med., May 1, 2009; 43(Suppl_1): i76 - i84. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Keightley, C. T. Duggan, N. Reed, J. McAuliffe, T. Taha, B. Faught, M. McPherson, J. Baker, and W. Montelpare Paediatric sports-related mild traumatic brain injury BMJ Case Reports, April 14, 2009; 2009(apr07_2): bcr0620080148 - bcr0620080148. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. P. Meehan III and R. G. Bachur Sport-Related Concussion Pediatrics, January 1, 2009; 123(1): 114 - 123. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J Yang, G Phillips, H Xiang, V Allareddy, E Heiden, and C Peek-Asa Hospitalisations for sport-related concussions in US children aged 5 to 18 years during 2000-2004 Br. J. Sports Med., August 1, 2008; 42(8): 664 - 669. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. Purcell and J. Carson Sport-Related Concussion in Pediatric Athletes Clinical Pediatrics, March 1, 2008; 47(2): 106 - 113. [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
