a Emma Children's Hospital, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
b International Antiviral Therapy Evaluation Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
c Academic Medical Center, Department of Human Retrovirology, Amsterdam, Netherlands
d Academic Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Tropical Medicine and AIDS, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS. HIV-1infected children who were naive to protease inhibitors were treated with a combination of nelfinavir and 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (stavudine and lamivudine) in an observational, prospective, single-center study. Virologic failure-free survival was assessed by Kaplan-Meier analyses. The increase in CD4+ T cells during follow-up was estimated with a generalized linear model incorporating repeated measurements.
RESULTS. Thirty-nine HIV-1infected children were included and followed for a median period of 227 weeks (interquartile range: 108275 weeks). The virologic failure-free survival rate was 74%, 66%, 58%, and 54% after 48, 96, 144, and 240 weeks, respectively. Children who experienced virologic failure in 48 weeks (or 96 weeks) were younger at baseline compared with the responders (0.8 vs 5.3 years). Eighteen children remained on the regimen for >5 years. All children, including the nonresponders, showed a sustained immunologic response. Grades 3 to 4 toxicity was observed in 2 patients only. Eleven developed clinically evident lipodystrophy.
CONCLUSION. Combination therapy can be used safely in infants and children over a long period. Young age is strongly associated with virologic failure. Although the virologic response declined, immunologic parameters and clinical improvement were sustained up to 7 years, at the expense of lipodystrophy.
Key Words: pediatric HIV HAART nelfinavir long-term effectiveness adverse effects growth
Abbreviations: HAARThighly active antiretroviral therapy PEACHPediatric Amsterdam Cohort on HIV NRTInucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor PIprotease inhibitor AZTazidothymidine ddIdideoxyinosine ddCdideoxycytidine NFVnelfinavir d4Tstavudine 3TClamivudine pVLplasma viral load LLQlower limit of quantification IQRinterquartile range
Since the Food and Drug Administration approval of nelfinavir, indinavir, and ritonavir for children in 1997, the first trials in a limited number of children showed virologic and immunologic improvement.13 Mortality, disease progression, and hospital admissions in HIV-infected children have declined substantially since the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), just as has been seen in adults.46 In adults, it was shown that most patients had changed their first regimen after 4 years of HAART because of virologic failure and the availability of alternative drug regimens. In adults, a continued increase in CD4+ T cell count was seen in patients who experienced sustained virologic suppression.7,8 However, one cannot extrapolate results in adults to children because of differences in immunity (eg, the immaturity of the immune system and larger thymic output); in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antiretroviral drugs in infants and children; and, most important, in formulation, availability of drugs, and strict adherence to therapy. Studies have shown that the age-adjusted CD4+ T-cell numbers increase in infants and children, especially in the more immunocompromised ones, even when failing in viral suppression.9 Despite reasonably good virologic response rates at 48 and 96 weeks of HAART, data from several pediatric studies have shown that the virologic response in children is less prominent compared with adults.1,3,914
Infants and children often start antiretroviral therapy at very young ages and have to use their medication lifelong. Hence, there is an urgent need for more long-term data on virologic, immunologic, and clinical response to HAART in children. The rationale for this study was to evaluate the long-term virologic; immunologic; and clinical, especially growth, effectiveness, and safety of a combination antiretroviral therapy that contains nelfinavir, lamivudine, and stavudine in children who were included in the Pediatric Amsterdam Cohort on HIV (PEACH).
| METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Between September 1997 and January 2005, a prospective, observational study was performed. Inclusion took place until January 2002. Until then, of the 48 children in follow-up, 39 children were included in the study using the NFV-containing treatment regimen. HIV-1infected children were eligible when they were aged 3 months to 18 years and had a plasma viral load (pVL) of >5000 copies per mL (mean of 2 measurements in <4 weeks) and/or CD4+ T cell counts <1750/µL for those who were younger than 1 year, <1000/µL for those who were between 1 and 2 years, <750/µL for those who were between 3 and 6 years, and <500/µL for those who were older than 6 years. Previous exposure to AZT, ddC, or ddI was allowed. There were no restrictions with regard to ethnicity, gender, route of HIV acquisition, or disease stage. Nine children were excluded because they did not meet the inclusion criteria. Five were immunologically stable and did not start any antiretroviral therapy. Four children in the cohort started another regimen during the inclusion period. The Medical Ethical Committee of our institute approved the protocol. Parents or caregivers gave written informed consent.
Medication
Patients received d4T (1 mg/kg twice daily as oral solution or capsules) plus 3TC (4 mg/kg twice daily as liquid formulation or tablets) plus NFV (30 mg/kg 3 times daily or 45 mg/kg twice daily as pediatric formulation [50 mg of NFV per gram of powder or as tablets]).17 Children who were able to swallow capsules received the NFV tablets, and smaller children were using the NFV powder dissolved in water or milk or crunched tablets in some custard. Dosage adjustments were performed according to the weight of the children and, in case of NFV, consecutive plasma levels. It was recommended that the children take their regimen with food.
Protocol
At each visit, physical examination was performed, including weight, length, and head circumference measurements. The same 2 physicians clinically diagnosed lipodystrophy during the study. Independent scorings were made and were considered clinically evident when both agreed. Blood was drawn before; at 1 and 2 weeks; and 1, 2, and 3 months after initiation of HAART and every 3 to 4 months thereafter. At each visit, NFV levels were analyzed to adjust dosing when necessary.
Lymphocyte subsets were analyzed with the FACScan (Becton Dickinson Immunocytometry Systems, San Jose, CA). Age correction for CD4+ and CD8+ T cells was done by dividing the counts by the mean of an age-matched healthy control group.18
From 1997 to 2000, pVL was measured routinely using NucliSens HIV-1 QT (bioMérieux, Boxtel, Netherlands) with a lower limit of quantification (LLQ) of 400 copies per mL. From 2001 to 2005, pVL was measured using Versant HIV-1 bDNA 3.0 (Bayer, Mijdrecht, Netherlands) with an LLQ of 50 copies per mL (input 1 mL of plasma).
Virologic failure was defined as 2 consecutive pVL >1000 copies per mL after a pVL <400 copies per mL. Patients who never reached a pVL <400 copies per mL were defined as failing at the first measurement that was higher than the previous one after an initial decline in pVL (pVL nadir).
Adverse events were recorded during the study period and defined as any clinical sign or symptom or meaningful laboratory test abnormality that was possibly or probably related to the study medication, excluding HIV-related disorders. The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (Division of AIDS) toxicity table was used for grading severity of pediatric adverse events. Parents were asked for the presence of anamnestic adverse events at every visit.
We analyzed the growth of the children by means of the z scores (standard normal deviation) of height and length. These scores were calculated with the use of the Growth Analyser 2.0 software (Dutch Growth Foundation, Rotterdam, Netherlands) using Dutch reference values.
Statistics
The primary outcome measure was virologic failure-free survival, which was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Censoring was applied when the last patient visit or a switch to a simplified regimen occurred before virologic failure. The secondary outcome measures were factors that were associated with virologic failure, changes in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells over time, changes in growth parameters (weight, height) over time, and reported adverse events. The mean age-adjusted CD4+ and CD8+ T cells (age correction for CD4+ and CD8+ T cells was done by dividing the counts by the mean of an age-matched healthy control group18), and height and weight z scores were modeled using a mixed model that incorporated repeated measurements. This model handles missing data adequately by estimating the outcome given a specific covariate structure. The estimates of a specific level of the fixed effects were modeled using the "first order autoregressive" approach. Differences in these estimates between different levels of the variable were tested for significance using t statistics. Success or failure of treatment after 24 weeks was added to all models as a time-dependent variable.
Where subgroups of patients are compared, the differences between groups were evaluated using the Fisher's exact test for categorical data and the Kruskal Wallis test for continuous data. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS for Windows version 11.5 (SPSS, Chicago, IL). A 2-sided P < .05 was considered statistically significant.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Virology
At baseline, the median pVL for the whole group was 4.9 log10 copies per mL (IQR: 4.45.4 log10 copies per mL). There was no significant difference between the naive and pretreated patient groups. The median time to reach undetectable pVL was 7.6 weeks (IQR: 2.212.6 weeks).
Of the patients for whom therapy failed or study medication was discontinued at any time during the follow-up of 240 weeks (n = 29), 7 never had a pVL below the LLQ. These were young (median age: 0.7 years; IQR: 0.31.0 years). Of the remaining 32 children (median age: 5.3 years; IQR: 3.09.4 years) in this observational cohort, 22 showed a rebound of their pVL after having had a period of viral suppression below the LLQ. Eight of 22 patients whose pVL had become undetectable during treatment but were subsequently failing did so in the first year of therapy (Table 2). Children who experienced virologic failure at 48 and 96 weeks on HAART after an initial period of successful virologic suppression were younger at the start of HAART compared with those without virologic failure (median: 0.8 vs 5.3 years at 48 weeks [P = .003] and 1.0 vs 4.8 years at 96 weeks [P = .098]; Fig 1).
|
|
Immunology
At baseline, the median CD4+ T cell count for the total study population was 470/µL (IQR: 140850/µL) and adjusted for age (0.33; IQR: 0.080.51). In relative terms, to the total number of lymphocytes, the CD4+ T cell percentage was 17% (IQR: 1123%). The baseline CD4+ T cell percentage was significantly lower in children who were pretreated (15%) compared with children who had not received previous antiretroviral medication (20%). The median CD8+ T-cell counts for the total study population was 1230/µL (IQR: 7501980/µL) and adjusted for age (1.2; IQR: 0.81.9).
The median age-adjusted CD4+ T-cell counts demonstrated an increase in the first 48 weeks of treatment (Fig 2A), which was similar for the children who had a virologic failure and those who had not (P = .95; Fig 2A, insert). The age-adjusted absolute CD8+ T-cell counts and the CD8+ T-cell percentage demonstrated a slight but nonsignificant decrease in the total study population as well as in the subgroups on the basis of virologic response (Fig 2B).
|
Growth and Development
Growth parameters are shown in Fig 3. The median height-for-age z score at baseline for the total study population was 1.08 (IQR: 2.26 to 0.58), and the median weight-for-height z score was 0.28 (IQR: 0.99 to 0.48). There were no statistically significant differences between naive and pretreated children at baseline.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
5 years) and 5 after 336 weeks (
7 years). The virologic failure-free survival rate at 5 years of follow-up was 54%. All children showed an adequate increase in CD4 cells, regardless of virologic failure. The frequency of reported grades 3 to 4 adverse events was low. After start of HAART, the growth of these children slowly but progressively improved.
The reported virologic response rate did not differ from other studies in children.912,1922 Studies on NFV in combination with 2 NRTIs have shown viral response rates (intention-to-treat) of 69% at <400 copies per mL and 44% at <50 copies per mL and, when combined with an additional nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor,
80% at <400 copies per mL and 63% at <50 copies per mL after 48 weeks, respectively.10,11,22 Our study population is small (n = 39), but the follow-up of this cohort using NFV-containing HAART is over an extended period of time
Children with virologic failure at 48 and 96 weeks were younger at the start of HAART. The relation between virologic failure and age at start of HAART was reported earlier by Walker et al.13 One explanation could be that younger children were initially dosed for NFV according to the manufacturer's instructions, which turned out to be too low.17,23,24 However, drug levels in these young children were not very low to absent, and recent data from the 2NN study group (the regimen contains 2 nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors) in adults suggest that drug levels in therapy-adherent patients have a poor sensitivity to predict virologic failure.25 This may hold true for pediatric cohorts as well. A recent analysis indeed demonstrated early viral decay rates in HIV-infected children starting with HAART with a median of 2.1 days (IQR: 1.83.0 days), similar to adults.26 Importantly, there was no difference in baseline pVL between the treatment-naive and pretreated children. This makes a biological basis for the relation between age and virologic failure unlikely and makes nonadherence probable as an explanation for virologic failure at very early age.
Immune reconstitution occurred irrespective of virologic response, indicating that HIV-1infected children have a greater capacity to sustain lymphocyte numbers compared with adults, even in the presence of virologic failure. Studies in adults have demonstrated that restoration of functional immunity correlated with increases in the number of naive T cells, reflecting a critical role of the thymus.27 Because of an intact thymus, children have a greater capacity to restore immunity as indicated by their rapid CD4+ T-cell recovery on initiation of HAART.28,29
At baseline, there was no significant difference in growth-related parameters (height for age, weight for age, and weight for height) between naive and pretreated children. Whereas Chantry et al30 demonstrated the short-term beneficial effect of NRTIs on height, weight, and head circumference, in our cohort, the pretreated children had not profited in this respect from the previous use of antiretroviral therapy. In the first year on HAART, there was a remarkable increase in weight-for-height z score.
With respect to toxicity, only 2 patients had to stop the study medication because of adverse events (diabetes and high cholesterol). However, long-term follow-up demonstrated a high prevalence of lipodystrophy, especially in children with longer use of the study medication, as was recently reported in children by Sanchez Torres et al31 as well. We already observed clinically evident lipodystrophy in 8 of the 11 children after 4 years of therapy only. Although more objective measures for body composition and lipodystrophy are warranted, the rapid increase in weight-for-height z scores within 24 weeks makes an early development of lipodystrophy unlikely and suggests possible drug-related effects at a different level. Additional studies have to investigate whether an altered metabolism or energy expenditure may explain our finding in pediatric patients, as recently suggested by a study of PIs on protein catabolism.32,33 HIV infection may interfere with sexual maturation and the onset of puberty.34 This could influence especially the growth velocity. However, in our cohort, the median age at start of HAART was 4.7 years (IQR: 1.18.8 years); leaving out the oldest quartile from the analysis, similar growth parameters were obtained (data not shown). Although the contribution of d4T to the development of lipodystrophy is not yet clearly proved, we have to consider that the combined use of d4T and NFV may have played an important role in the high prevalence of lipodystrophy in our cohort.
HIV itself and endocrinologic and immunologic factors in combination with social environment all may contribute to the growth-related phenomenon.31,3436 No relevant alteration in endocrinologic parameters was found in previous studies.35
Protease-containing regimens have demonstrated a more profound effect on growth, especially in children who reached undetectable pVL and in those with advanced disease at baseline.3740 Growth was independent of virologic success in our cohort.
| CONCLUSIONS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Given the high virologic failure rate at young age observed in our cohort and the high prevalence of lipodystrophy, one should address questions about adherence, long-term exposure to HAART, and adverse effects when considering early initiation of HAART in children. Once treatment has been decided on, it needs to be investigated whether there is a role for directly observed therapy to improve and guarantee both adherence and virologic success.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We are grateful to the patients and their parents or caregivers for willingness to participate in the study. We gratefully acknowledge Mrs M. Godfried and Mrs J. Nellen for contributions to the treatment of these patients' parents and support adherence programs when possible. We also thank Mr P. van Trotsenburg, Mrs S. Crabben, and Professor H. Sauerwein for helpful suggestions and comments; Mr A. Huitema for interpretation of antiretroviral drug levels; and Mrs A. van der Plas and Mrs E. le Poole for longstanding support in patient care.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Address correspondence to Henriëtte J. Scherpbier, MD, Emma Children's Hospital, Academic Medical Center, G8-205, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands. E-mail: h.j.scherpbier{at}amc.uva.nl
The authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||