a Departments of Pediatrics
b Preventive Medicine
c Office of Medical Center News and Public Affairs, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS. Children 6 to 59 months of age who presented to a large, academic pediatric continuity clinic or affiliated acute care clinic in the summer of 2004 were enrolled. A parental survey ascertained the influenza vaccination status of the child and family members during the 20032004 influenza season and factors that influenced their vaccination status. For children vaccinated in the clinic or health department, influenza vaccination dates were confirmed in a computerized medical chart or state immunization registry.
RESULTS. Of 256 enrolled children, 98 (38%) parents reported that their child had received the 20032004 influenza vaccine, and 64 (65%) had confirmed influenza vaccination dates. Unlike the previous influenza season in which confirmed influenza vaccination dates from a similar study population were distributed more evenly from October through December, most children (75%) with confirmed vaccination dates received the vaccine after the media coverage in mid-November. Influenza vaccinations per week increased dramatically after the media coverage began (2.4 vs 8.6 per week; t test: P < .001). In late November and December 2003, the influenza-related media coverage, which focused primarily on an early, severe influenza season, increased dramatically and explained 85% of the variation in influenza vaccinations. Multivariate analysis showed that recalling a physician recommendation (odds ratio [OR]: 6.8; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.319.7), having a family member who had received the influenza vaccine (OR: 9.5; 95% CI: 4.321.3), having a continuity clinic visit between October and January (OR: 4.5; 95% CI: 2.010.1), and having a high-risk medical condition (OR: 2.9; 95% CI: 1.17.8) strongly predicted the influenza vaccination status in the children.
CONCLUSION. Media coverage in conjunction with explicit physician recommendation for children and their contacts are key factors that are associated with influenza vaccination rates in children.
Key Words: influenza vaccine immunization children physician recommendation news media
Abbreviations: ORodds ratio CIconfidence interval
Influenza virus infects
15% to 20% of children each year and causes many pediatric hospitalizations and outpatient visits annually.1,2 Although influenza vaccine has been recommended for decades for high-risk children,3 influenza vaccine remains underutilized among high-risk children.47 For the 20022003 and 20032004 influenza seasons, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices added a new recommendation by encouraging influenza vaccine, when feasible, for all children aged 6 to 23 months.8,9 We showed previously that influenza vaccinations for healthy children 6 to 23 months of age increased from 1% to 17% concurrently with the 20022003 recommendation.10 The 20032004 influenza season was remarkable for substantial media coverage of an early, severe influenza season that began in mid-November.11 The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of influenza media coverage on the vaccination status of children 6 to 59 months of age.
| METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Questionnaire
After obtaining written, informed consent, a trained interviewer administered the questionnaire. The questionnaire, as previously reported, obtained demographic information, medical history, and the 20032004 influenza vaccination status of the child, parental reasons for the child's influenza vaccination status, and family influenza vaccination status for that season.10
A child was considered vaccinated if a parent reported that his or her child received at least 1 dose of influenza vaccine after September 1, 2003.10 To verify this report, all parents of vaccinated children were asked when the influenza vaccine was administered. A family member was considered vaccinated if a member of the household excluding the enrolled child was reported to have received the 20032004 influenza vaccine.10 Influenza vaccine arrived at the medical center on September 25, 2003, and was available for administration within 1 week.
Demographic information and medical history of the child were obtained by parental report. Race was characterized as white, black, or Hispanic/other. When a parent identified the child as biracial, the child was classified in the nonwhite group. The 6- to 23-month and 24- to 59-month age groups were determined by the age of the child on December 31, 2003.10 Parents were asked if their child had a high-risk medical condition as listed in the 2003 Red Book.10,12
To identify factors that influenced the influenza vaccination status of children, all parents were asked if a physician recommended the vaccine for their child. On the basis of pilot studies and our previous work, we generated a list of the most commonly stated reasons that parents cite for vaccinating or not vaccinating their child.10 The choice "other" was available to all parents; all comments and other reasons were recorded verbatim. We have found these responses to be internally consistent, have face validity to pediatricians and parents, and high interrater reliability (
= 0.85; SE: 0.05). Parents of vaccinated and unvaccinated children could cite multiple reasons for their decision. For unvaccinated children the choices included lack of knowledge, concern about adverse effects, availability of vaccine, lack of a physician recommendation, inconvenience, and other. For vaccinated children the choices included protection of a family member, good experience with the vaccine, previous influenza infection, information from the media or a friend, physician recommendation, and other.
Medical Chart
Using a computerized medical chart, the number of continuity clinic and acute care visits for each patient from October 1, 2003, to January 31, 2004, were recorded. For children who were vaccinated in the clinic or health department, influenza vaccination dates were confirmed in the computerized medical chart or Tennessee State Immunization Registry. For children already enrolled after the previous 20022003 influenza season, we reconfirmed the influenza vaccination dates in the same databases. All data were entered without personal identifiers.
Media Coverage
To quantitate the media coverage about influenza infection or influenza vaccine, the total number of placements involving medical center personnel by week with the title including "influenza" or "flu" is compiled by the Office of Medical Center News and Public Affairs by using 4 standard media sources: LexisNexis, CustomScoop, Google News, and NewsPowerOnLine. Internal review has revealed that this methodology captures 90% to 95% of all local health news and 80% of local and national influenza-related news. The placements include all media stories from national and local newspapers, wire service stories, radio, national network and cable television, local television, national magazines, and Internet news outlets. We evaluated all influenza-related media placements from October through December 2002 and in 2003 for comparison. This methodology had face validity to media experts, influenza experts, and pediatricians and good interrater reliability when we evaluated 3 randomly selected weeks (
= 0.75; SE: 0.08).
Statistical Analysis
All data were double entered into Access 2002 (Microsoft, Redwood, WA) to verify the accuracy of data entry. The primary outcome, influenza vaccination status in 20032004, and all variables except for race were coded as dichotomous variables. Demographic information and the proportion of vaccinated children by high-risk condition, age group, family-member vaccination status, and continuity clinic visit between October and January were evaluated by using 2-sided,
2, or Fisher's exact tests. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by using univariate and multivariate logistic regression to determine which factors identified a priori predicted a child's influenza vaccination status. We evaluated the model for interactions between age group and physician recommendation, high-risk condition and age group, high-risk condition and physician recommendation, and family member being vaccinated and high-risk condition. The only statistically significant interaction was between age group and physician recommendation, which was included in the final model. For children with confirmed influenza vaccination dates in 2002 and in 2003, we performed a Pearson's correlation between the total number of media placements per week on influenza vaccines, influenza infection, or vaccine shortage and the number of influenza vaccinations per week. Results were reported as r2, which was the variation in influenza vaccinations explained by the media placements by topic. All statistical analyses were performed by using Stata 8.1 (Stata Corp, College Station, TX).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
To determine if media coverage explained the variation in pediatric influenza vaccinations, we performed a correlation of the number of media placements by topic to the number of vaccinations by week. In 2003, the media placements about influenza vaccine and influenza infection explained 7% and 85% of the variation in influenza vaccinations by week, respectively (Fig 1). It is interesting to note that the decline in influenza vaccinations per week in December coincided with the media placements about influenza vaccine shortages, which were experienced locally. In contrast, influenza vaccine stories in 2002 explained 25% of the variation in influenza vaccinations by week, and only 2 articles focused on influenza infections (Fig 2).
Some parents (17%) of vaccinated children cited >1 reason that contributed to that vaccination status. The most common reasons were physician recommendation (60%), media coverage or recommendation of a friend (26%), and desire to avoid influenza illness in their child (21%). Only 10% of the parents reported that past experience with influenza, positive experience with influenza vaccine, or desire to protect a family member were contributing reasons.
Some parents (19%) of unvaccinated children cited >1 reason that contributed to their decision not to vaccinate. The reasons included lack of perceived need (39%), lack of knowledge about influenza vaccine for children (27%), concern about adverse effects (22%), lack of physician recommendation (20%), and difficulty in obtaining influenza vaccine (11%), with several children having influenza disease before they could be vaccinated. The reasons were similar for children 6 to 23 months of age or those with a high-risk medical condition (targeted population) and for healthy children 24 to 59 months of age.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Similar proportions (41%) of children 6 to 23 months of age were vaccinated regardless of high-risk medical condition. In contrast, children 24 to 59 months old with a high-risk medical condition (66%) were more than twice as likely to receive the influenza vaccine compared with those without high-risk medical conditions (29%). Although it is unclear why the proportions differed for children who were 6 to 23 months of age and for high-risk children who were 24 to 59 months of age, older children may have had more experience with influenza infections or more opportunities for physician recommendations.
There are several potential limitations to this study. To minimize selection bias when multiple eligible children presented to the clinic, we approached the eligible child who most recently checked in at the clinic and enrolled 95% of them. To minimize interviewer bias, the interviewer was trained to administer and record responses to a standardized questionnaire and record all comments verbatim. Misclassification is possible for influenza vaccination status for the child and family members that was determined by parental report. However, misclassification seems less likely, because self-reported influenza vaccination status has been validated in adults.14 Many, but not all, influenza vaccinations were confirmed by chart review or in the state immunization registry. In this predominantly Medicaid practice (90%), income and parental education levels were not collected. Another limitation was that the study was conducted at 1 academic center. Because the number and content of media placements changed dramatically after mid-November, we cannot differentiate the impact of volume of coverage from content. Furthermore, it is possible that the media coverage was associated with more parents seeking influenza vaccine, with physicians recommending influenza vaccine more frequently, with parents being more receptive to influenza vaccine recommendations by physicians, or any combination of these factors. Although we cannot distinguish among these possibilities, the impact of the media on influenza vaccination rates is important and complements the data presented by Kempe et al15 from private practice clinics in Denver, Colorado.
Similar to previous studies, physician recommendation and having a vaccinated family member strongly predicted influenza vaccination in children.10,16 Unlike our previous study, children with high-risk medical conditions and those with an OctoberJanuary continuity clinic visit had an increased likelihood of influenza vaccination. Recalling a physician recommendation, having a vaccinated family member, and having a continuity clinic visit from October through January were stronger predictors of a child's influenza vaccination status than having a high-risk medical condition. Despite this increase in influenza vaccinations during a year with substantial media attention, we, like Jones et al,17 found that many persons had a medical encounter with a missed opportunity.
These data suggest that media coverage in conjunction with explicit physician recommendation for children and their contacts are key factors that may help physicians improve influenza vaccination rates in children. Scheduling continuity clinic visits between October and January and vaccinating at all visits, not just well-child visits, may be beneficial also.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This study was made possible by the generous cooperation and assistance of many people including Robin McClendon, Shannon Dyer, and the entire clinic staff under the leadership of Gregory Plemmons, MD, and Rebecca Swan, MD. We appreciate the contributions of the reviewers, whose comments and suggestions led to significant improvements in this manuscript. We also thank all of the parents of the young children who so willingly shared their perspectives.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Address correspondence to K.A. Poehling, MD, MPH, AA-0216 Medical Center North, Nashville, TN 37232-2504. E-mail: katherine.poehling{at}vanderbilt.edu
The authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. F. Daley, L. A. Crane, V. Chandramouli, B. L. Beaty, J. Barrow, N. Allred, S. Berman, and A. Kempe Misperceptions About Influenza Vaccination Among Parents of Healthy Young Children Clinical Pediatrics, June 1, 2007; 46(5): 408 - 417. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||