a Divisions of Pediatric Nephrology
c Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Chang Gung Children's Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan
b Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS. Patients who were suspected of having an upper urinary tract infection underwent a systematic scheme of ultrasonographic and computed tomographic (CT) evaluation for ALN diagnosis. Patients with positive CT findings were enrolled and randomly allocated with serial entry for either a total 2-week or a 3-week antibiotic treatment regimen. Antibiotics were changed from an intravenous form to an oral form 2 to 3 days after defervescence of fever. Follow-up clinical evaluations and urine-culture analyses were performed 3 to 7 days after cessation of antibiotic treatment. Patients with persistent infection or relapse were considered as treatment failures.
RESULTs. A total of 80 patients with ALN were enrolled. Forty-one patients were treated with a 2-week antimicrobial protocol, and the other 39 patients were treated with a 3-week course. Seven treatment failures, 1 persistent infection, and 6 infection relapses were identified, all of which were in the 2-week treatment group. Prolonged fever before admission and positive Escherichia coli growth (>105 colony-forming units per mL) in urine culture were noted as risk factors for treatment failure. All treatment failures were managed successfully with an additional 10-day antibiotic course.
CONCLUSION. A total of 3 weeks of intravenous and oral antibiotic therapy tailored to the pathogen noted in cultures should be the treatment of choice for pediatric patients with ALN.
Key Words: acute focal bacterial nephritis antibiotic treatment treatment failure efficacy evaluation CT scan
Abbreviations: UTIurinary tract infection ALNacute lobar nephronia APNacute pyelonephritis CTcomputed tomography VCUGvoiding cystourethrography cfucolony-forming unit(s) VURvesicoureteral reflux
The clinical severity of acute renal bacterial infection spans continuously from an uncomplicated lower urinary tract infection (UTI) to frank abscess formation.1 Among this suite of renal inflammatory diseases, acute lobar nephronia (ALN), also known as acute focal bacterial nephritis, has been diagnosed with ever-increasing frequency in patients, as a result of the advancement of noninvasive imaging-technique modalities.2 ALN presents as a localized nonliquefactive inflammatory renal bacterial infection, which typically involves 1 or more lobes.3,4 It has previously been indicated as a complicated form of acute renal infection, representing the progression of the inflammatory process of acute pyelonephritis (APN).5 ALN may also represent a relatively early stage of the development of renal abscess.6 The typical clinical presentations of ALN include fever, flank pain, leukocytosis, pyuria, and bacteriuria, which are similar to those with renal abscess or APN.1,3
Sonographically, ALN generally presents as severe nephromegaly or a poorly defined, irregularly margined focal mass with hyper-, iso-, or hypoechogenicity, depending on the temporal sequence of the lesions and the resolution of the disease.7,8 Although renal ultrasonography has been considered the best and most effective screening method, various false-positive and false-negative findings have been reported previously.1,9 Computed tomography (CT), instead, is currently recognized as the most sensitive and specific imaging modality for diagnosing ALN.1,2,4,7,10 CT images of the ALN-infected areas typically appear as wedge-shaped, poorly defined regions of decreased nephrogenic density after contrast medium administration1,4,7 and as mass-like hypodense lesions in the more severe form.11 CT, however, is costly and requires the sedation of a young patient. We recently developed a systematic imaging work-up scheme using ultrasonography screening followed by CT. With this scheme, not only the efficacy of CT performance but also the sensitivity of overall diagnosing of ALN seems to be improving.12
Treatment for patients with ALN generally requires intravenous and oral antibiotic medication as does treatment for uncomplicated APN.3,7,10 Surgical intervention is rarely needed for patients with ALN, except for those with concomitant urologic abnormalities, which may increase the risks for occurrence of acute bacterial infection.2 Although it has been suggested that the treatment duration for ALN needs to be at least the same as that for uncomplicated APN, recommendations for the duration of antibiotic treatment still remains somewhat inconclusive, and to the best of our knowledge, for neither condition has a rigorous therapeutic efficacy comparison of relevant medication been performed.7
In this study, we sought to determine the appropriate duration of effective antibiotic therapy for the treatment of pediatric patients with ALN. Patients who first presented with febrile UTI and who later received a diagnosis with positive CT findings of ALN were entered into this study for receiving either a 2- or 3-week intravenous and oral antibiotic-therapeutic program. The demographic data and clinical results of these patients are compared herein. In addition, the identification of any clinical or laboratory factors that are likely associated with treatment failure was also attempted.
| METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
All patients with ALN, randomly allocated with serial entry, received intravenous and oral antibiotic treatment for either a total of 3 weeks or a period of 2 weeks instead. Informed consent was obtained from the parents or closest house members of admitted patients with ALN about the treatment duration and follow-up plan before this study. Intravenous antibiotics were shifted to an oral form 2 to 3 days after defervescence of fever. The particular choice of antibiotics was made on the basis of the sensitivity findings of the initial urine culture. Follow-up urine cultures were checked 3 to 7 days after cessation of antibiotic treatment for all patients. Treatment failure was denoted by persistent infection or relapse.14 Persistent infection was indicated by a failure to eradicate the bacterial organism as evidenced by continued positive urine culture or the recurrence of clinical symptoms, such as fever, and flank pain during the treatment course. Relapse was defined as initial bacteriologic cure followed by the recurrence of symptoms and infection with the same organism (as determined by strain, biotype, or the same antibiotic sensitivity pattern) as was the case previously.
All medical records were checked by both pediatric nephrologists, and patient compliance was ensured by close follow-up. In addition, all patients were followed up monthly to assess their clinical symptoms, urine culture results, and renal size by ultrasonography until complete recovery had been achieved.
Statistical comparison of nonparametric continuous data among or between the different treatment subgroups was performed by 1-way analysis of variance followed by application of the Student's t test. For comparison of nominal data,
2 analysis or Fisher's exact test was performed where appropriate. Difference between test groups was considered to be statistically significant at P < .05.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
These 2 treatment groups had similar demographic data and clinical results (Table 1). Most of the patients had been febrile for
3 to 4 days, ranging from 1 day to 2 weeks or so, before admission. Once patients had been admitted, all responded well to the initial antibiotic treatment regimen, and the fever generally subsided within
1 week. Initial leukocyte count, leukocytosis proportion (percentage), and C-reactive protein values were statistically similar between these 2 treatment groups. CT scans indicated that 18 patients had left ALN, 12 had right ALN, and 11 had bilateral ALN in the 2-week treatment group. Corresponding figures for the 3-week treatment group were 16, 12, and 11 patients, respectively. The distribution of these ALN diagnoses was similar between the 2 treatment groups.
|
Sixty-nine patients with ALN, 40 from the 2-week treatment group and 29 from the 3-week treatment group, underwent VCUG evaluation. Sixteen (40%) patients in the 2-week treatment group and 11 (38%) in the 3-week treatment group had vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). Among the patients with VUR, a grade 3 or greater was noted in 8 and 9 patients, respectively, who were treated by the 2-week and the 3-week antibiotic courses. For patients who underwent VCUG, no difference regarding the presence of VUR in either frequency or severity was found between the 2 treatment groups.
Overall, treatment failure was noted in 7 patients in this study (8.8%; 95% confidence interval: 2.614.9%), all of whom had been treated by a 2-week antibiotic course (17.1%; 95% confidence interval: 5.628.6%). Statistical significance was noted in regard to treatment success rate between these 2 groups (P = .01). Among these patients with treatment failure, 1 demonstrated persistent infection during the treatment course, and 6 others were considered to have relapse by a positive E coli urine culture with the same antibiotic sensitivity profile as had been the case previously. One patient with relapse also presented with a high fever and another with a mild fever and a poor appetite at the time of follow-up examinations.
Table 2 lists the clinical characteristics of these 7 patients as compared with those who were treated successfully with the 2-week antibiotic course. Proportionally more girls may be noted in the failure group than in the nonfailure group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P = .21). The patients whose 2-week antibiotic treatment failed presented with a more pronounced fever duration before admission (6.00 ± 5.54 vs 3.47 ± 2.16 days; P = .04), and they were more likely to have E coli infection (>105 cfu/mL; 100% [7 of 7] vs 52.9% [18 of 34]; P = .03). The distribution of ALN foci, VCUG characteristics, and other clinical results revealed no difference between the failure and nonfailure groups.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To the best of our knowledge, we found only 17 pediatric ALN reports2,47,9,10,13,1523 in the English-language literature. The treatment methods adopted for the total of 70 pediatric patients with ALN as reported in these studies, if they were mentioned, all consisted of antimicrobial-therapy regimens but of varying duration. Additional surgical procedures have been reported to correct the associated conditions such as high-grade VUR2 but not for ALN itself. Mixed treatment outcomes were reported for pediatric cases of ALN in these studies; some patients recovered from this severe inflammatory process, whereas others led to frank abscess formation. In general, a total of 2 to 3 weeks of antimicrobial therapy tailored to the urinary pathogen is recommended for patients with ALN.2,4,7,8,10 By contrast, uncomplicated APN was likely to be managed with a 10- to 14-day course of antibiotic treatment.24
Most of our patients with ALN presented with nonspecific findings of fever and flank or abdominal pain. Pyuria, leukocytosis, and elevated C-reactive protein also usually were found. Some patients presented only with fever and had minimal symptoms such as vague flank discomfort, malaise, or even no urinary symptoms and, rarely, a few patients may have no pyuria and negative urine cultures. Clinical or laboratory differential diagnosis of ALN from APN and renal abscess may not be possible; however, CT scanning seems to be the most sensitive and specific means of diagnosing ALN.1,2,4,7,10 ALN is not a rare condition. It is probably an underdiagnosed disease entity. The characteristic appearance of a focal mass in the kidney with poorly defined margins is the hallmark of the ultrasonographic findings for ALN.2,7,8,10 Unfortunately, however, the sensitivity of this ultrasonographic characteristic for ALN diagnosis is probably not satisfactory,12 and it is likely that such a notion results in the CT underdiagnosis of ALN; thus, very few reports of pediatric ALN seem to have been published in the literature.
Herein, we have proposed a systematic imaging evaluation scheme for patients with febrile UTI, the scheme being a combination of renal ultrasonography and CT scanning, for ALN detection even in the relative early stages of the condition.12 Among the 30 patients with ALN in the 2004 retrospective study reported by Cheng et al,12 all were treated successfully with a 3-week pathogen-sensitive antibiotic protocol. This finding intrigues us and encourages us to evaluate further, prospectively, as in this study, the relative efficacy of a 3-week antibiotic-therapy protocol for ALN as compared with the 2-week therapy commonly used for APN, although, reportedly, ALN is a more severe parenchymal inflammatory disease than APN.5 In addition, to the best of our knowledge, the current study is the largest series of pediatric ALN reported on to date, and the results of our study highlight the optimal treatment duration and the specific risk factors associated with treatment failure.
Among the 80 patients in this study, E coli was the most common pathogen cultured from the patient urine samples (59 of 61), which is consistent with the results of previous studies.2,4,5,7,8 It is interesting that the proportion (percentage) of E coli cultured in cases of ALN seems to be much greater than the corresponding figure reported for first-time UTIs.25 Bacteremia has been reported for approximately one third of the patients in the smaller ALN group studies,3,9 but it was only rarely noted in the 2 larger pediatric ALN series.2,10 The incidence of bacteremia in our study was low: only 4 (5%) of the study's 80 patients proved to have bacteremia.
None of our patients revealed any evidence of underlying diseases such as diabetes or immunodeficiency; neither did any feature structural abnormality of the urinary tract system, such as neurogenic bladder, or upper or lower urinary tract obstruction apart from VUR. Reflux was noted in
40% of the children with ALN in this study, a figure comparable to that in several previous studies.2,4,10 This frequency of VUR among patients with ALN is close to that in children with UTI26; thus, VUR may not be a necessary prerequisite for the development of ALN.
From our results, all patients who had ALN and received the 3-week antibiotic course were treated successfully, whereas 7 treatment failures (17.1% of treated patients) were noted in the 2-week treatment group. This observation suggests that the 2-week antibiotic treatment, usually scheduled for APN, may not be appropriate for the treatment of ALN. Patients whose 2-week treatment modality failed were more likely to have prolonged fever before admission and to reveal positive E coli infection (>105 cfu/mL). The longer febrile history before admission may suggest that these patients may be prone to develop a more severe disease state than their counterparts and that, by necessity, a longer antibiotic treatment course will be needed for such individuals. Indeed, these treatment failures all were dealt with successfully by an additional 10-day antimicrobial-therapy regimen. The association between positive E coli infection (>105 cfu/mL) leading to ALN and 2-week treatment failure seems to be worth additional investigating. Whether host factors or the virulence of E coli relates to ALN and plays a role leading to treatment failure remains uncertain currently, and this remains an issue that should be clarified.
| CONCLUSIONS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Address correspondence to Yong-Kwei Tsau, MD, Department of Pediatrics, National Taiwan University Hospital, No. 7, Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei 10016, Taiwan. E-mail: tsau07{at}ha.mc.ntu.edu.tw
The authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||