Published online December 1, 2005
PEDIATRICS
Vol. 116
No. 6
December 2005, pp.
1613-1614
(doi:10.1542/peds.2005-1914)
Evidence Does Not Support American Academy of Pediatrics Recommendation for Routine Imaging After a First Urinary Tract Infection
Thomas B. Newman, MD, MPH
Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Pediatrics,
University of California,
San Francisco, CA 94143
To the Editor.
Cohen et al1 recently reported on adherence to American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) guidelines for imaging after urinary tract infections in the Washington State Medicaid program in 19992000. They found that less than one third of children with urinary tract infections diagnosed in the first year after birth received the recommended imaging and that children treated as outpatients were less likely to receive such imaging. They concluded that, "given the trend toward increased outpatient management of urinary tract infections, increased attention to outpatient imaging may be warranted."
However, if something is not worth doing, it is not worth doing well.2 The AAP recommendation that young children be imaged with ultrasound and voiding cystourethrography after a first febrile urinary tract infection was based on evidence that was generously labeled as "fair" at the time. In response to a letter questioning the basis for these recommendations,3 Roberts et al of the AAP guideline committee acknowledged that the AAP Executive Board had similar concerns and that the imaging recommendation was "based more on Subcommittee consensus than on evidence."4 More recently, Roberts indicated that the imaging recommendations should be reconsidered.5
It would be a shame if, as the evidence for routine ultrasonography and voiding cystourethrography is being increasingly questioned,610 the prestige of the authors of this article led clinicians to perceive more, rather than less, need to adhere to the AAP's 1999 imaging recommendations. The lack of adherence reported by Cohen et al is more a cause for celebration than concern.
REFERENCES
- Cohen AL, Rivara FP, Davis R, Christakis DA. Compliance with guidelines for the medical care of first urinary tract infections in infants: a population-based study.
Pediatrics. 2005;115
:1474
1478[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Newman TB. If it's not worth doing, it's not worth doing well [letter].
Pediatrics. 2005;115
:196[Free Full Text]
- Seidman D. Urinary tract infection guidelines questioned [letter].
Pediatrics. 2000;105
:464
- Roberts KB, Hellerstein S, Downs SM. Urinary tract infections guidelines questioned [letter].
Pediatrics. 2000;105
:466
467
- Roberts KB. Urinary tract infection treatment and evaluation: update.
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2004;23
:1163
1164[Medline]
- Wheeler DM, Vimalachandra D, Hodson EM, Roy LP, Smith GH, Craig JC. Interventions for primary vesicoureteric reflux.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(3):CD001532
- Zamir G, Sakran W, Horowitz Y, Koren A, Miron D. Urinary tract infection: is there a need for routine renal ultrasonography?
Arch Dis Child. 2004;89
:466
468[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Craig JC, Irwig LM, Knight JF, Roy LP. Does treatment of vesicoureteric reflux in childhood prevent end-stage renal disease attributable to reflux nephropathy?
Pediatrics. 2000;105
:1236
1241[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Blumenthal I. Vesicoureteric reflux in children: where next?
Lancet. 2005;365
:570
571[ISI][Medline]
- Hoberman A, Charron M, Hickey RW, Baskin M, Kearney DH, Wald ER. Imaging studies after a first febrile urinary tract infection in young children.
N Engl J Med. 2003;348
:195
202[Abstract/Free Full Text]
PEDIATRICS (ISSN 1098-4275). ©2005 by the American Academy of Pediatrics