PEDIATRICS Vol. 116 No. 6 December 2005, pp. 1610-1611 (doi:10.1542/10.1542/peds.2005-2295)
Donor Milk: Down but Not Out: In Reply
Richard J. Schanler, MDDivision of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine,
Schneider Children's Hospital at North Shore,
North Shore University Hospital,
Manhasset, NY 11030
Chantal Lau, PhD
Nancy M. Hurst, MSN
Elliot O'Brian Smith, PhD
Baylor College of Medicine,
Department of Pediatrics,
Houston, TX 77030
We thank Dr Wight for her comments regarding our article. Please note that necrotizing enterocolitis was not an outcome by itself; we used necrotizing enterocolitis and/or late-onset sepsis, as we and others have reported previously.1,2 Because our study objective was to determine an appropriate substitute if no mother's own milk was available, we did not study a pure "donor milk" group. All infants received some of their mother's own milk before any of the substitute milks. We do not recommend giving up on donor milk, but for the extremely premature infant population, we could find no immediate benefit from it.
REFERENCES
- Schanler RJ, Shulman RJ, Lau C. Feeding strategies for premature infants: beneficial outcomes of feeding fortified human milk versus preterm formula.
Pediatrics. 1999;103
:1150
1157
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Lucas A, Fewtrell MS, Morley R, et al. Randomized outcome trial of human milk fortification and developmental outcome in preterm infants.
Am J Clin Nutr. 1996;64
:142
151
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
PEDIATRICS (ISSN 1098-4275). ©2005 by the American Academy of Pediatrics
Related articles in Pediatrics:
- Donor Milk: Down but Not Out
- Nancy E. Wight
Pediatrics 2005 116: 1610.[Extract] [Full Text]
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||




