Published online September 30, 2005
PEDIATRICS Vol. 116 No. 4 October 2005, pp. e555-e558 (doi:10.1542/peds.2005-0454)
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maneyapanda, S. B.
Right arrow Articles by Venkatasubramanian, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maneyapanda, S. B.
Right arrow Articles by Venkatasubramanian, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Neurology & Psychiatry

ELECTRONIC ARTICLE

Relationship Between Significant Perinatal Events and Migraine Severity

Seetha B. Maneyapanda, BA* and Anuradha Venkatasubramanian, MD{ddagger}

* Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey
{ddagger} Division of Pediatric Neurology, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey


   ABSTRACT
TOP
 ABSTRACT
METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Objective. Nociceptive neuronal circuits are formed during embryonic and postnatal times, so insult during these periods may result in long-term alterations to pain circuitry via synaptic plasticity. One possible long-term result of plasticity is central hyperexcitability, which is suspected to be involved in chronic headache. This study aimed to establish whether there is an association between early pain experiences and the experience of migraines in later childhood.

Methods. In a retrospective study, we examined the charts of 280 pediatric migraineurs at the Division of Pediatric Neurology at Robert Wood Johnson Medical School and documented their perinatal history and migraine characteristics.

Results. Analysis revealed that there was a significant relationship between patients who had been in the NICU at birth and the type of pain medication prescribed when compared with patients who had not been in the NICU ({chi}2 test, {chi}22 = 23.304; N = 30250). Findings also suggested that pediatric migraine patients who had been in the NICU at birth had a significantly earlier age of onset of their migraines ({chi}2 ± SD = 7.83 ± 3.23; N = 30) when compared with patients who did not remain in the NICU ({chi}2 ± SD = 9.68 ± 3.57; N = 250; Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test, {chi}2 = 10.699).

Conclusion. On the basis of these findings, we speculate that pain experience as a neonate, through neuronal plasticity and resulting central hyperexcitability, can alter the later experience of pain. However, this observational study cannot validate these links. Other potential explanations that work either synergistically or alone include other forms of stimulation and greater parental vigilance that may occur when neonates spend time in the NICU. This study would prompt additional development of a larger prospective study to establish a link between early pain experience and subsequent pain syndromes and also future investigation into the treatment of pain in neonates as a preventive measure for avoiding long-lasting neuronal alterations.

Key Words: migraine headache • NICU • pain

Abbreviations: RWJMS, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School

Perinatal insult during neuronal development can have long-term impacts on nervous system circuitry through neuronal plasticity.1 Studies have explored the long-term effects of perinatal insult and stressors on the neuronal circuitry of children and suggested that early painful or stressful events can sensitize an individual to later pain or stress.2–4 Nociceptive neuronal circuits are formed during embryonic and postnatal times, when unnatural noxious stimuli are normally absent or rare, so stressful experiences, besides the natural stress of birth, during these periods may result in the long-term alteration of pain circuitry.5–9 One possible long-term result of plasticity is central hyperexcitability, which is suspected to be involved in chronic headache.4 This retrospective study investigated an association between chronic migraine headaches and significant perinatal history via neuroplasticity and its induced central hyperexcitability. Specifically, we examined whether there is an association between presence in the NICU and migraine severity in later life, which would be consistent with the theory of altered nociceptive neuronal circuitry resulting in central hyperexcitability.


   METHODS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Patients
The data for this study were attained from the charts of pediatric migraine patients at the division of Pediatric Neurology at Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, (RWJMS). Patients were recruited from the clinical database, FilemakerPro, in the division of Pediatric Neurology at RWJMS. Inclusion criteria were that the patient was between the ages of 5 and 21, had a diagnosis of migraine headaches based on International Headache Society criteria, had visited the division of Pediatric Neurology at RWJMS since 2001, and had a completed routine intake questionnaire in their chart. There were no criteria for specific inclusion or exclusion of any ethnic or racial population or on the basis of gender.

Chart Review
The study was a retrospective chart review. Perinatal history (eg, term delivery vs prematurity, cesarean section vs natural delivery vs instrumentation, neonatal intensive care vs normal nursery) was obtained from routine intake questionnaires that were already in the charts. We also documented characteristics of migraines (eg, family history, age of onset, frequency and severity before treatment, presence or absence of visual aura) through chart review.

Patient Categorization
We categorized our patients into 3 groups: patients with previous neonatal intensive care, other perinatal stressors, and no perinatal complications. Neonatal intensive care included patients who had remained in the NICU because of prematurity with low birth weight, respiratory problems, sepsis, high fevers, hypoglycemia, and certain blood dyscrasias requiring blood transfusions; suspected intracranial bleeding; surgical emergencies; and exposure to drugs in utero. The other group of perinatal stressor that did not require stays in the NICU included prematurity, cesarean sections, forceps used at delivery, prolonged hospital stays as a result of neonatal jaundice, pyloric stenosis, meconium aspiration, and readmissions for other reasons. All of those who had no indication of any perinatal complications were placed together in the third category.

Headache Severity
Documented medication was used as a measure of migraine severity. Migraine frequency and pain intensity would be considered when prescribing medication, so the type of medication would be an appropriate measure of severity.10 The medications were categorized into 3 levels. Level 1 included all over-the-counter pain medications such as acetaminophen or ibuprofen. Level 2 included prescription abortive medications such as triptans. Level 3 were daily, prophylactic medication of various kinds. All patients were 5 years or older when prescribed these medications.

Statistical Analysis
Statistical tests were conducted to compare the 3 categories of patients for differences in headache characteristics. Differences were assessed by {chi}2 analysis or Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Statistical analysis was conducted using StatView.


   RESULTS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
With the data obtained from the patient charts, statistical analysis was done in an attempt to answer several questions that would establish whether there was a correlation between perinatal experiences and migraine characteristics among our migraine patients. As specified in Methods, patients were divided into 3 categories: those who had spent time in the NICU, those who had experienced some other form of perinatal stress, and those who did not experience any perinatal complications. The reasoning was that those who were in the NICU were expected to have experienced more painful, invasive procedures, such as frequent heel sticks and venipuncture for blood collection, intubation, gavage tubes for feeding, placement and removal of electrodes for monitoring vital signs, surgery, and so forth, when compared with the other 2 groups. One would expect that other perinatal stressors might be more painful than no complications at all but that the pain would still be less than that of those who were in the NICU, so we first examined whether differences existed between those who had experienced some other form of perinatal stress and those who did not experience any perinatal complications. We found no significant differences between these 2 groups on any of the headache characteristics documented and therefore on subsequent analysis grouped these 2 groups, NOT NICU, in a comparison against the NICU group.

Medication
There was a significant relationship between patients who had been in the NICU at birth and level of pain medication compared with patients who had not been in the NICU ({chi}2 test, {chi}22 = 23.304; P < .0001; N = 30250; Fig 1) Overall heterogeneity is attributable to deviation from expectation in the relationship between patients who had been in the NICU and level 3 pain medications ({chi}2 test, {chi}22 = 14.769; P < .01). Thus, children who had been in the NICU at birth received a significantly higher level of pain medication than those who had not been in the NICU at birth.


Figure 1
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig 1. The percentage of each group, NICU or not NICU, that falls under each level of medication, 1 (over-the-counter), 2 (prescription abortive), or 3 (prophylactic), described under Methods.

 
Age of Onset
Pediatric migraine patients who had been in the NICU at birth had a significantly earlier age of onset of their migraines ({chi}2 ± SD = 7.83 ± 3.23; N = 30) when compared with patients who did not remain in the NICU ({chi}2 ± SD = 9.68 ± 3.57; N = 250; Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test, {chi}22 = 10.699; P < .01; Fig 2).


Figure 2
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig 2. Cumulative percentage of each group, NICU or not NICU, with increasing age. Age is grouped into 2-year categories.

 
Gender and Family History
Previous studies suggest that both gender and inheritance have an effect on migraines. It should be noted that childhood epidemiology is somewhat different from after puberty. Girls are affected more often than boys after puberty,11,12 and genetic predisposition to migraines is likely with a positive family history.13 Therefore, we examined whether either of these other predisposing characteristics was responsible for the effect of severity of headaches in patients who had been in NICU. Within the NICU group, there was no significant difference in the level of medication required ({chi}2 test) or the age of onset of migraines (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test) between the genders or between those with and without a positive family history. This establishes that the effects found in the NICU group cannot be attributed to these other predisposing factors and supports that they are likely attributable to the NICU experience.


   DISCUSSION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Our analysis shows that patients who remained in the NICU had both an earlier age of onset of their migraines and a significantly higher likelihood of being treated with a stronger, prophylactic, daily medication when compared with the other patients of this study. These results are consistent with previous observations that early painful experiences alter the developing nociceptive pathway via synaptic plasticity, which ultimately leads to a modified pain pathway that is capable of altering long-term pain experiences.4,8 Insult during embryonic and postnatal times in the form of needle pricks has been found to alter pain circuitry and subsequent pain response in rat pups for the long term.4,14 Additional evidence from studies on rats and rhesus monkeys indicates that a stressful perinatal event can have long-term effects on hippocampal development and stress behavior.9,15–17 Apart from the multitude of animal models, recent work on humans has provided evidence for developmental plasticity in the neonatal brain and suggests that painful experience in human neonates may alter neuronal and synaptic organization in the long term.4,18 Although these previous studies provide evidence for the long-term impact of early pain experience, the direction of the alteration has been conflicting. Some have found that early painful experiences lead to increased pain sensitivity in childhood, whereas others have found decreased pain sensitivity.4 This study falls in line with clinical studies that have found accentuated pain responses to vaccination in children who have had unanesthetized circumcisions1 and instrumental delivery,19 suggesting central hyperexcitability. It also agrees with other observational studies on prematurely born adolescents who have been found to have lower tenderness thresholds and more tender points than full-term matches, suggesting that they may be more prone to developing pain syndromes.20

Research has revealed that the synapse, which is the main site of communication between neurons, is the key substrate for these activity-induced changes.21 Long-term alterations in the structure and function of synapses, long-term synaptic plasticity, are crucial to the fine-tuning of the developing nervous system and to the storing and processing of the mature nervous system.21 The "use it or lose it" process of nociceptive development refers to the process in which synaptic connections are strengthened when pre- and postsynaptic activity is correlated and are otherwise weakened and eliminated. The mechanisms that elicit hyperexcitability have been categorized as 3 distinct forms: activation, modulation, and modification.22 Activation refers to the autosensitization of nociceptor terminals and wind-up of dorsal horn neurons. Modulation is the process of heterosensitization of peripheral terminal nociceptors and the central sensitization of nociceptive synaptic transmission. Modifications of the presensory neurons and pain transmission neurons are "long-lasting alterations in the expression of transmitters/receptors/ion channels or in the structure, connectivity, and survival of neuron, such that the system is grossly modified, distorting its normal stimulus-response characteristics."22 It is believed that the resulting central hyperexcitability is considered the core phenomenon in patients with chronic pain.23

Migraines are believed to be caused by neuronal events in nerve and chemical signals that cause these vessels to dilate or constrict. When these blood vessels expand and contract, the resulting changes in pressure produce pain.24 The process results in trigeminal sensitization as well as inflammation with subsequent release of neuromediators and peptides.25 Because these synapses of nociceptive pathways are established and strengthened early in the NICU patients,2 the pain pathways are prepared and wired so that pain may develop sooner and stronger in severity.

Although our findings are consistent with the claim that pain experience as a neonate, through neuronal plasticity and resulting central hyperexcitability, can alter the later experience of chronic pain, this observational study cannot validate these links. Potential explanations that work either synergistically or alone include other forms of stimulation and greater parental vigilance that may occur when neonates spend time in the NICU. Although it cannot be controlled for, the group who remained in the NICU may be more susceptible to vulnerable child syndrome, whereby the parents believe that their child is more vulnerable to illness or injury than the typical child.26 These parents may also be more sensitive to their child’s illnesses and be more likely to seek treatment.

Additional limitations include the lack of detailed data such as length of stay in the NICU and number of procedures performed, which could possibly affect the severity of future migraines. Furthermore, other factors that are known to be accepted risks for future migraines, such as intracranial bleeds and central nervous system infections in childhood regardless of NICU stay, were present; 1 patient in the NICU had intracranial bleeding, and 5 had sepsis. However, sizes of these subsets were too small for analysis. Results from this study suggest that more detailed research should examine factors such as length of stay, reasons for stay, and procedure performed and examine subsets of children with problems that are known possibly to induce future migraines, such as intracranial bleeds or central nervous system infections, while recognizing that childhood epidemiology is somewhat different from after puberty.

We have not found evidence of the suggested theory but provide it as an explanation for our findings. The implications of this study would prompt additional investigation into the assessment and treatment of pain in neonates as a preventive measure for avoiding long-lasting neuronal alterations. We hope that this study will be used to develop a larger, prospective study to establish a link between early pain experience and subsequent pain syndromes, as well as allow grounds for the follow-up of NICU patients and additional investigation into disease mechanisms.


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We express our gratitude to B. Rosemary Grant for guidance, support, and instruction throughout every step of this study. It would not have been possible without her inspiration and efforts. We are also grateful for the permission granted by the Institutional Review Board of Robert Wood Johnson Medical School and for the cooperation and assistance of the Division of Pediatric Neurology at Robert Wood Johnson Medical School.


   FOOTNOTES
 
Accepted May 6, 2005.

Address correspondence to Anuradha Venkatasubramanian, MD, 8 Stonelea Dr, West Windsor, NJ 08550. E-mail: venkatasubramanian{at}email.chop.edu

No conflict of interest declared.


   REFERENCES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Taddio A, Katz J, Ilersich AL, Koren G. Effect of neonatal circumcision on pain response during subsequent routine vaccination. Lancet. 1997;349 :599 –603[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  2. Fitzgerald M, Walker S. The role of activity in developmental pain pathways. In: Dostovsky JO, Carr DB, Koltzenburg M, eds. Proceedings of the 10th World Congress on Pain. Vol. 24. Seattle, WA: IASP Press; 2003:185–196
  3. Granau R. Early pain in preterm infants. A model of long-term effects. Clin Perinatol. 2002;29 :373 –394[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  4. Lidow MS. Long-term effects of neonatal pain on nociceptive systems. Pain. 2002;99 :377 –383[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  5. Anand KJ. Can adverse neonatal experience alter brain development and subsequent behavior? Biol Neonate. 2000;77 :69 –82[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  6. Anand KJ. Clinical importance of pain and stress in preterm neonates. Biol Neonate. 1998;73 :1 –9[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  7. Anand KJ. Effects of perinatal pain and stress. Prog Brain Res. 2000;122 :117 –129[ISI][Medline]
  8. Anand KJS. Pain, plasticity, and premature birth: a prescription for permanent suffering? Nat Med. 2000;6 :971 –973[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  9. Henry C, Kabbaj M, Simon H, Le Moal M, Maccari S. Prenatal stress increases the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis response in young and adult rats. J Endocrinol. 1994;6 :341 –345
  10. Graf WD, Riback PS. Pharmacologic treatment of recurrent pediatric headaches. Pediatr Ann. 1995;24 :477 –484[Medline]
  11. Weitzel KW, Strickland JM, Smith KM, Goode JV. Gender-specific issues in the treatment of migraine. J Gend Specif Med. 2001;4 :64[Medline]
  12. Lipton R. Epidemiology of migraine. The diagnosis of migraine. American Association for the Study of Headache. Headache Profile. 1999;1 :4
  13. Baloh RW. Genes and migraines. Drugs Today. 2004;40 :577 –588[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Ruda M, Ling Q, Hohmann A, Peng Y, Tachinbana T. Altered nociceptive neuronal circuits after neonatal peripheral inflammation. Science. 2000;289 :628 –631[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Meaney MJ, Aitken DH. The effects of early postnatal handling on hippocampal glucocorticoid receptor concentrations: temporal parameters. Brain Res. 1985;354 :301 –304[Medline]
  16. Schneider ML, Coe CL, Lubach GR. Endocrine activation mimics the adverse effects of prenatal stress on neuromotor development of the infant primate. Dev Psychobiol. 1992;25 :427 –439[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  17. Uno H, Lohmiller L, Thieme C, et al. Brain damage induced by prenatal exposure to dexamethasone in fetal rhesus macaques I Hippocampus. Brain Res Dev Brain Res. 1990;53 :157 –167[Medline]
  18. Jensen TS. Recent advances in pain research: implications for chronic headache. Cephalalgia. 2001;21 :765 –769[Medline]
  19. Taylor A, Fisk NM, Glover V. Mode of delivery and subsequent stress response. Lancet. 2000;355 :120[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  20. Buskila D, Neumann L, Zmora E, Feldman M, Bolotin A, Press J. Pain sensitivity in prematurely born adolescents. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003;157 :1079 –1082[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. DiAntonio A. Translating activity into plasticity. Nature. 2000;405 :1011 –1012[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Woolf C, Salter M. Neuronal plasticity: increasing the gain in pain. Science. 2000;288 :1765 –1768[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Petersen-Felix S. Neuroplasticity—an important factor in acute and chronic pain. Swiss Med Wkly. 2002;132 :273 –278[Medline]
  24. Cady R. Pathophysiology of migraine. American Association for the Study of Headache. Headache Profiles. 1999;1 :6
  25. Welch, KMA. Contemporary concepts of migraine pathogenesis. Neurology. 2003;61 :2 –8
  26. Estroff DB, Yando R, Burke K, Snyder D. Perceptions of preschoolers’ vulnerability by mothers who had delivered preterm. J Pediatr Psychol. 1994;19 :709 –721[Abstract/Free Full Text]
PEDIATRICS (ISSN 1098-4275). ©2005 by the American Academy of Pediatrics




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maneyapanda, S. B.
Right arrow Articles by Venkatasubramanian, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maneyapanda, S. B.
Right arrow Articles by Venkatasubramanian, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Neurology & Psychiatry