

* Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
Division of Epidemiology and Clinical Applications, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
DISC Coordinating Center, Maryland Medical Research Institute, Baltimore, Maryland
|| Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
¶ DISC Coordinating Center, Maryland Medical Research Institute, Baltimore, Maryland
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Objective. We set out to compare children's self-selected eating patterns and approaches to achieving adherence to the DISC fat-reduced diet intervention with children in the usual-care group.
Methods. An ancillary study was conducted to develop a detailed food-grouping system and report new analyses on dietary adherence to the recommended eating pattern. Every food in the nutrient database was ranked by its saturated-fat and cholesterol content and classified within its relevant food group as a "go" (less atherogenic) or "whoa" (more atherogenic) food.
Results. At baseline, go foods contributed
57% of total energy intake and 12.4% to 13.1% total fat energy intake in both groups. At 3 years, go foods contributed 67.4% and 13.7% of total and fat energy intake, respectively, in the intervention group versus 56.8% and 12.8% in the usual-care group. Differences between the 2 treatment groups were significant for changes in consumption of dairy foods, desserts, and fats/oils, with the intervention group reporting a 0.2- to 0.3-serving-per-day greater increase in go foods than the usual-care group. The intervention group also reported a 0.2- to 0.8-serving-per-day greater decrease in whoa foods than the usual-care group for breads/grains, dairy, fats/oils, meat/fish/poultry, snacks, and vegetables. Overall, snack foods, desserts, and pizza contributed approximately one third of total daily energy intake in both groups at 3 years.
Conclusions. Children in the intervention group reported consuming more servings per day of go grains, dairy, meats, and vegetable foods compared with children in the usual-care group, but intake of fruits and vegetables was low in both groups. Discovering that snacks, desserts, and pizza actively contribute so heavily to the diets of this age group, even among children who were part of this intervention, offers valuable insights regarding the need for more aggressive, innovative, and realistic approaches for additional dietary counseling.
Key Words: diet and lipids food-group analyses dietary adherence in children
Abbreviations: DISC, Dietary Intervention Study in Children LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol NCEP, National Cholesterol Education Program NCC, Nutrition Coordinating Center NHANES III, Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
The Dietary Intervention Study in Children (DISC) was a randomized, controlled trial originally designed to test a 3-year intervention that ultimately extended to an average of
7 years of intervention and data collection.13 The study was initiated in 1987 among 6 participating clinical centers and a coordinating center, with ongoing involvement of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute project office. The purpose of DISC was to determine, compared with a usual-care control group, the long-term efficacy and safety of a dietary intervention to reduce total fat, saturated fat, and cholesterol in prepubertal children with elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) who were 8 to 10 years old at baseline. DISC was initiated before the report of the Pediatric Panel of the National Cholesterol Education Program4 (NCEP), but the study's dietary recommendations approximately reflected what became the Step II diet of the NCEP, which recommends limits on saturated fat, total fat, and dietary cholesterol.
A variety of studies, including laboratory, clinical, pathologic, and epidemiologic, have established that the process of atherosclerosis begins in childhood.4 Elevated blood cholesterol levels signify increased risk, and diet is the cornerstone of treatment. DISC was the longest and largest (n = 663) randomized, controlled, dietary intervention study in children with elevated LDL-C levels. Previous publications from DISC have concentrated on the lipid results and nutrient adequacy.2,3,5,6 Assessment of dietary adherence to the DISC intervention by quantifying and comparing actual foods and food groups consumed within and between treatment groups offers the rare opportunity to document how children applied the reduced-fat criteria to their own daily intake. The foods selected by children in the intervention group illustrate their approach to following the recommended diet versus choices made by children in the usual-care group. These results can have practical implications for health care providers to predict problems with long-term adherence and to identify foods or food groups that may require special intervention approaches to achieve nutrient adequacy while reducing saturated fat, total fat, and cholesterol.
| STUDY DESIGN |
|---|
|
|
|---|
DISC was designed originally to test a 3-year intervention but followed the participants until the age of 17 years, on average, with continuing, albeit diminished-intensity intervention. The eligibility criteria, baseline characteristics, study design, intervention, and results have been described in detail elsewhere.13 Briefly, eligibility for the DISC trial required LDL-C levels from the 80th to <98th percentile based on age-gender distributions from the Lipid Research Clinics. Eligible ages were
8 to 10 years at the first screening with no evidence of pubertal development based on Tanner staging criteria. Exclusion criteria included systolic blood pressure of
125 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure (phase 4) of
80 mm Hg, documented at both the second screening and baseline visits. The primary efficacy and safety outcome measures were serum LDL-C, height, and serum ferritin.
Recommended Diet
The DISC study was designed to lower blood cholesterol by focusing on reducing dietary total fat, saturated fat, and cholesterol while increasing fiber, fruits, and vegetables.1,7,8 In addition, interventionists presented nutrition education aimed at helping children meet all nutrient needs. Children and parents were advised to substitute low-fat or nonfat foods for full-fat versions of meat/fish/poultry and dairy foods. The DISC dietary recommendations were similar to the NCEP Step II diet.4 The recommended intake of total fat was 28% of energy, with <8% from saturated fat, up to 9% from polyunsaturated fat, and <75 mg/4200 kJ of cholesterol, not to exceed 150 mg per day (Table 1). Foods high in saturated fat were primary targets for intervention and were designated collectively as "whoa" foods, whereas lower-fat/cholesterol alternatives, including fruits and vegetables, were "go" foods.7 The DISC was conducted before the establishment of the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act. Thus, the use of food labels alone as a criterion for choosing appropriate foods was not possible. The DISC nutritionists created the "DISC dictionary," which listed every food in the Nutrition Coordinating Center (NCC) nutrient database as a go or whoa food according to its cholesterol/saturated-fat content.9
|
|
|
Dietary Assessment
Dietary intake was measured by using 3 nonconsecutive 24-hour dietary recalls, including 1 weekend day, collected from the children at each key time point. Parents served as reinforcements and provided additional details as needed.2,3,8,11
The DISC dietary-assessment methods were tested and validated and are described in detail elsewhere.8,11 Briefly, the initial dietary recall was collected by specially trained, NCC-certified DISC nutritionists through a face-to-face interview with the child and then verified by the parent at the clinic, with 2 subsequent telephone recalls within 2 weeks of that visit. Because baseline data collections preceded availability of electronic methods, for consistency all dietary data obtained from the recalls were handwritten on standardized NCC forms. Multipass methods were in place with each nutritionist reviewing the recalls at least 3 times and then cross checking with another trained nutritionist locally before shipping the edited recalls for centralized coding at NCC. Nutrient analyses were performed by NCC using mainframe database version 20 at the University of Minnesota (Minneapolis, MN). A mean of 3 days of dietary recalls was calculated per individual. For purposes of quality control, 10% of the recalls were tape-recorded and reentered by another local nutritionist.
Nutrient analyses, reported elsewhere, confirmed overall adequacy and adherence to the DISC nutrient-specific goals,2,3,6 but food-based changes in DISC participants have not been presented previously. For this ancillary study, food-group analyses were performed by using dietary recalls for the intervention and usual-care groups collected at the baseline and 36-month visits. For purposes of standardization across recalls and across time, all recalls were evaluated line by line by an NCC-trained, certified, registered dietitian (N.G.) to identify serving sizes, recipe modification, and food-group designation for all reported foods for children in both groups. To our knowledge, DISC is the first study with the ability to quantify serving sizes, reconstruct recipes, and analyze food-group information prospectively from multiple recalls (>10000 total) during 7 years of follow-up to capture the self-selected approaches taken by children of this age to comply with the reduced dietary fat and cholesterol recommendations.
Designation of Food Groups
During the development phase of the DISC intervention, every food in the NCC database was ranked for its go or whoa status on the basis of saturated-fat and cholesterol content.12 Foods with lower saturated-fat and cholesterol content were ranked as "go," and those foods considered more atherogenic were classified as "whoa." To achieve nutrient adequacy for growing children, higher saturated-fat tolerance was allotted for the meat/fish/poultry group (5 g per 3-oz serving) and the dairy group (3 g per serving), whereas for fruits/vegetables and breads/grains less saturated fat was tolerated (0.75 g per serving), because these foods are typically devoid of fats.8,9 For this report, to relate food-group intake to the goals of the dietary intervention, an NCC-trained and certified nutritionist (N.G.) reviewed every recall to assign each food to a food group as defined by the wedge (Fig 1). In addition to the food-group wedges originally presented in the DISC intervention Go-Guide, pizza was added as its own food group for these analyses because of its popularity. Because the DISC intervention emphasized the importance of modifying recipes to include more go ingredients, each recipe was also identified in the recalls and categorized according to an appropriate food group as defined by the wedge. Standardized adult-based serving sizes were designated for every food to more accurately compare changes between baseline and 36 months.
Although the majority of foods consumed by the DISC participants was categorized into 1 wedge, there were 114 foods that belonged in at least 2 wedges, such as sandwiches, soups, pasta dishes, and other mixed dishes. For example, beef vegetable stew was considered part of the meat/fish/poultry wedge but also part of the vegetable wedge. For each of these 114 foods, a determination was made as to which wedges the food belonged and also what percentages should be applied to those wedges. For example, for a serving of the beef vegetable stew, we assigned two thirds of the serving to the meat/fish/poultry wedge and one third of the serving to the vegetable wedge. Some foods fit in as many as 4 wedges on the DISC Go-Guide (eg, a Big Mac). The amount of kilojoules per serving for each of these foods was subsequently assigned by the same certified nutritionist
Statistical Analysis
Means and SDs were calculated for the baseline characteristics. All 3-day food recalls were averaged for each child in the study. The number of servings of each go and whoa food consumed by each individual was calculated for each food group (go and whoa). The mean number of servings, mean kilojoules as a percentage of the total energy consumed (% kJ), and mean fat kilojoules as a percentage of total energy consumed (% fat) were calculated for each food group for the baseline and 3-year visits.
The changes in servings within food groups from the baseline visit to the 3-year visit were calculated. t tests were performed to compare treatment effect.
The go and whoa groups were combined for each food group to indicate overall dietary pattern. Also combined into 1 category were the desserts, snack foods, and pizza food groups to examine foods particularly popular with children. The mean number of servings, mean kilojoules as a percentage of the total energy consumed (% kJ), and mean fat kilojoules as a percentage of total energy consumed (% fat) were calculated for the baseline and 3-year visits for these combined food groups.
General linear models were used to assess the association between servings of the food groups and LDL-C or BMI. All models were adjusted for treatment group and computed separately for each gender. We separated the models by gender because of gender differences in BMI and LDL-C. In models for which pubertal stage was statistically significant, pubertal stage was included as a covariable.
All analyses were performed by using SAS 9.0 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
43%, and go foods contributed
57% of total intake at baseline (Table 4). Across all food groups, go breads/grains contributed the most kilojoules and whoa meat/fish/poultry the most fat kilojoules. Energy intake from go pizza contributed an average of 6% to 8% of total energy, and whoa pizza contributed an additional 9% to 10% of total intake at baseline. No differences were observed between treatment groups at baseline in any food group except go pizza, which showed a greater number of servings and more total kilojoules and fat kilojoules as a percentage of total intake (P = .03, .02, and .007, respectively) in the usual-care compared with the intervention group.
|
|
32% and 34.5% kJ and 8.1% and 10.0% fat at 3 years in the intervention and usual-care groups, respectively.
|
| ASSOCIATIONS WITH LDL-C AND BMI |
|---|
|
|
|---|
For boys, desserts, snack foods, and pizza combined showed positive associations with both LDL-C and BMI. There was a significant positive association between servings of whoa desserts, snack foods, and pizza (ß = 1.87; P = .01) and a borderline association for the combined (go plus whoa) desserts/snack foods/pizza food group (ß = .84; P = .06) with LDL-C. BMI models also showed a positive association with whoa desserts/snack foods/pizza (ß = .10; P = .04) and the combined desserts/snacks/pizza (ß = .15; P = .001). Also for boys, consumption of breads/grains showed a negative association with BMI (go breads/grains [ß = .11; P = .02] and combined go and whoa dairy [ß = .16; P = .01]). For girls, servings of dairy foods showed a negative association with BMI (go dairy foods [ß = .25; P = .02] and combined go and whoa dairy [ß = .20; P = .04]). No significant associations between food groups and LDL-C were observed among the girls.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The DISC trial was the first long-term randomized trial of preadolescent children with elevated blood cholesterol levels to test the efficacy and safety of a fat-reduced dietary intervention on LDL-C, growth, and iron status. Adequate nutrient intake was a major goal, and intervention focused on balanced dietary intake across all food groups, preferably choosing the go-food alternatives from all the food groups. Children and parents were encouraged to switch from high total fat and saturated-fat sources of dairy, meat, and grain foods to low total and saturated-fat sources rather than omitting these food groups altogether. Children in the usual-care group reported increased intake of whoa breads/grains, whoa meat/fish/poultry, and whoa pizza at 3 years, whereas children in the intervention group decreased all these foods except pizza. At 3 years, compared with the usual-care group, the intervention group reported significantly reduced intake of whoa foods in the breads/grains, dairy, fats/oils, meat/fish/poultry, snacks, and vegetable food groups. The greatest changes in go-food intake between the intervention and usual-care groups occurred in the dairy, desserts, and fats/oils groups (Fig 2A).
The DISC intervention targeted LDL-C lowering. Based on these analyses, it seems that the combined intake of snacks, desserts, and pizza may be positively related to LDL-C and BMI in this population, but these associations need additional study. It is also worth noting the apparent gender-related differences in these associations. For girls, dairy intake was inversely associated with BMI, but no other food group was associated with either BMI or LDL-C. For boys, both go grains and combined go plus whoa dairy were inversely associated with these risk factors. Additional data are needed to confirm these findings.
National Eating-Pattern Changes
A brief summary of the secular trends helps to place the DISC data in context. Nationally, favorable changes in macronutrient composition in children have occurred since 1973.13 Total fat intake has decreased from 38% of total intake in 1973 to
33% in 2000.14 Despite decreased fat intake, total intake has remained relatively constant,13 and the prevalence of overweight and obesity in adolescents has increased dramatically during the past decade.1517 Increased sedentary behavior is considered a major contributing factor,18 but shifts in dietary patterns may further exacerbate the weight-gain phenomenon.17,19
According to Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) data, caloric beverages alone contribute 20% to 24% of total energy intake, and soft drinks provide 8% of total energy intake in adolescents.14 Likewise, snacking has increased and currently contributes 1883 to 2510 J (25%) of daily energy intake per day in children nationally.19 Longitudinal data over 2 decades from the Bogalusa Heart Study20 also reported a reduced percentage of fat intake, but total intake remained the same. Reduced intake of breakfast, fewer dinner meals eaten at home, reduced total eating episodes, and the reduced time span of eating episodes were also reported.
The DISC data are in accordance with some of these findings but also show that combined intakes of snacks, desserts, and pizza accounted for approximately one third of the total daily intake for this sample of adolescents from 6 geographic locations in the United States. The energy density of these snack foods has also increased over the past decade, up from 5.67 to 6.47 kJ/g,17 thereby further contributing to increased risk of weight gain in this age group. Although the exact causes of this phenomenon are not known, these shifts in snacking behavior may be a consequence of fewer meals eaten at home and/or less access to home-prepared foods, as well as exposure to parents, siblings, or other role models who likewise engage in suboptimal snacking behavior.21
Increased exposure to television food commercials that heavily emphasize snacks, desserts, and beverages specially targeting children may trigger eating these empty-calorie foods.22,23 Watching television while eating meals and snacks may further condition cues for children to eat these foods even when they are not hungry.24 Recent data report that watching television and consuming soft drinks were positively associated with obesity in 11- to 13-year-old children.25 Although DISC did not specifically assess snacking during television viewing, our data document substantial intake of empty-calorie foods. Sedentary behavior in both groups was also quite high.26 Conversely, higher physical activity was associated with lower LDL-C.26
DISC Nutrition Education Influences Food Quality
These DISC food-group analyses demonstrate that nutritious substitutions were made by the intervention group rather than eliminating or avoiding recommended food groups. For example, although milk-drinking behavior is notoriously low nationally and decreases over time among adolescents, DISC intervention seems to have helped children select and maintain intake of lower-fat and/or nonfat versions of dairy and other animal-protein foods over time.
These DISC results document that snacks, desserts, and pizza collectively accounted for approximately one third of the daily energy intake of these children. Without proper guidance, such an eating pattern, left unchecked, could lead to possible displacement of dairy foods, fruits, vegetables, and whole grains from the diet. A snack/dessert-laden diet is typically high in refined carbohydrate, salt, sucrose/fructose, and hydrogenated shortening (an ingredient especially predominant in crackers, cookies, chips, snack cakes, etc) and is associated with high trans fatty acid intake and kilojoules and imposes a high glycemic load. Such an eating pattern is associated with obesity, elevated LDL-C, and insulin resistance27 and foreshadows development of metabolic syndrome and type II diabetes.2831 Metabolic syndrome has a current estimated prevalence of >30% among adults >50 years old and 4% of adolescents.32,33 Targeted emphasis on fruits, vegetables, nonfat dairy, and whole-grain foods as snack foods could potentially help to improve both the nutritional quality and energy balance of children's dietary intake21 and perhaps prevent the development of these cardiovascular disease risk factors.
Healthy Eating Index
In 1995, after DISC's completion, the US Department of Agriculture's Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion developed the Healthy Eating Index as a way to assess the dietary status of Americans. The Healthy Eating Index includes 10 components that relate to a healthy diet. Components 1 through 5 measure adherence to the Food Guide Pyramid, and components 6 through 10 relate to total fat, saturated fat, cholesterol, sodium, and overall variety.34 Children <11 years old had better diets than other subgroups in the population.
According to NHANES III results, children 7 to 10 years old ranked lowest on their intake of fruits and vegetables (3.9 and 5.0 on a scale of 10, respectively) but scored highest in meeting grain intakes (8 on a scale of 10).35 Nationally, intake of fruits and milk was lower among both girls and boys (1114 years old), and vegetable intake was lower and meat higher among boys compared with 7- to 10-year-olds in the NHANES III sample.35 In contrast, the DISC intervention group reported increased go dairy and decreased whoa dairy, increased go fats/oils and decreased whoa fats/oils, and decreased whoa vegetables (French fries) but no change in fruit intake compared with the usual-care group. Thus, DISC dietary intervention seems to have improved the diet quality as well as quantity in this age group.
Implications
DISC food-group analyses permit a rare opportunity to evaluate adherence to specific foods and food groups recommended in the intervention group. Compared with the usual-care group, those in the intervention group increased their relative intake of recommended go foods in all food groups except fruit. Conversely, they decreased their intake of whoa foods in all groups except pizza. Specific food groups, especially dairy (girls and boys) and grains (boys only), were negatively associated with BMI, and desserts, snack foods, and pizza (boys only) were positively associated with LDL-C. Future interventions should target greater use of fruits as snacks and desserts and as part of the meal. Greater access to lower-fat, whole-grain, and/or vegetarian-style pizza in this age group could also improve overall dietary quality and help reduce total dietary fat, saturated-fat, and cholesterol intake while increasing dietary fiber as well. Whether increased intake of dairy products could further facilitate weight control in boys and girls requires additional investigation.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Address correspondence to Linda Van Horn, PhD, RD, Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 680 N Lake Shore Dr, 1102, Chicago, IL 606114402. E-mail: lvanhorn{at}northwetern.edu
No conflict of interest declared.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||