Published online November 1, 2004
PEDIATRICS Vol. 114 No. 5 November 2004, pp. 1333-1335 (doi:10.1542/peds.2004-0638)
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rosenfeld, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rosenfeld, R. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Infectious Disease & Immunity

COMMENTARY

Otitis, Antibiotics, and the Greater Good

Richard M. Rosenfeld, MD, MPH

Department of Otolaryngology, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center and the Long Island College Hospital, Brooklyn, NY 11201

Abbreviations: AOM, acute otitis media

A major paradigm shift lies at the core of the new clinical practice guideline for acute otitis media (AOM),1 ie, the option of allowing selected children to fight an ear infection on their own before the initiation of antibiotic treatment. These children initially receive analgesics, with antibiotics being reserved for those whose conditions worsen or fail to improve within 48 to 72 hours. Although new to many US physicians, the observation option for AOM is an official policy in the Netherlands, Sweden, and now New York State.2 By offering the observation option, the new guideline changes the central AOM management decision from which antibiotic should be given3 to whether an antibiotic should be given at all.4

The paradigm shift is needed because 5.2 million AOM episodes each year5 are treated with antibiotics in the United States, although most would resolve spontaneously. Stated simply, this volume of antibiotic use for largely self-limiting infections does not serve the greater good. Antibiotics are therapeutic agents that affect society, not just individuals.6 Each course of therapy creates selective pressure for resistant bacteria in the child's nasopharynx, which spread readily among families, schools, and child care centers. These organisms, and those they create with resistance genes in transferrable plasmids, may cause fatal infections among healthy or immunocompromised individuals.7 The number of resistant bacterial pathogens throughout the world continues to increase each year.8,9

More than 100 antibiotics have been introduced in the past 60 years, increasing the annual production of broad-spectrum antibiotics in the United States from 0.5 to 50.0 million pounds.6 Unfortunately, bacteria have a staggering evolutionary advantage over antibiotics and the human beings who produce them; as the oldest known inhabitants of the planet, bacteria have been present for 3.5 billion years of the earth's 4.5 billion-year history, compared with 200 000 years for human beings and 60 years for antibiotics.7 Moreover, bacteria are ubiquitous, saturating every square millimeter of soil and representing 5% of our body weights (~100 000 billion bacteria per person).6,7 Antibiotics have stimulated unparalleled evolutionary changes in bacteria, which until recently were not evolving faster than other living beings.

The societal consequences of antibiotic use must be balanced against the natural history of untreated AOM and the effects of therapy on individual outcomes. Placebo treatment of AOM relieved pain, fever, or both within 24 hours for 61% of children with AOM (95% confidence interval: 50–72%) in randomized trials, which increased to 80% (95% confidence interval: 69–90%) after 2 to 3 days.10 Initial antibiotic therapy for uncomplicated AOM has no effect on outcomes within 24 hours but increases absolute rates of clinical resolution by at most 12% at 2 to 7 days.5,11 Therefore, ~8 children must receive antibiotics to improve the condition for 1 additional child at 7 days, compared with results from the natural history alone. The effects of antibiotics on bacteriologic end points are greater,12 but the clinical relevance is unclear, because ~60% to 80% of children with persistent bacteria in their middle ears after 4 to 6 days exhibit clinical improvement or resolution.13

The resolution rates noted above were based on high-quality, albeit imperfect, evidence. Nine randomized, controlled trials1422 between 1968 and 2000 assessed the clinical efficacy of antimicrobial treatment of AOM. All except 1 study15 were placebo-controlled and blinded. Diagnoses of AOM were based on otoscopic plus clinical findings in 4 trials,14,15,20,22 and 5 studies confirmed diagnoses with tympanometry21 or otolaryngology referrals.1619 Children <2 years of age were explicitly excluded from 3 trials,17,18,20 and 1 trial20 excluded cases of AOM with severe associated symptoms. Because of the limitations noted, recommendations regarding child suitability for the observation option are based on child age, illness severity, diagnostic certainty, and certainty of follow-up monitoring.4

Initially withholding antibiotics from (mostly older) children with AOM did not increase suppurative complications in randomized trials.5,11 Whether restrictive antibiotic use increases acute mastoiditis at the population level is unresolved, but the potential increase is only 2 cases per 100 000 children per year and must be weighed against the potential adverse effects.23 Risks of antibiotic use include allergic reactions, gastrointestinal upset, accelerated bacterial resistance, and unfavorable changes in nasopharyngeal bacterial flora.2427 Antibiotics not only may fail to eradicate the organisms but also may induce middle-ear effusion superinfection with resistant pneumococci from the nasopharynx.28 Moreover, antibiotic prescribing has a "medicalizing" effect, increasing revisit rates and the likelihood of seeking medical care for future illness.29

Optimal antibiotic prescribing for AOM, regardless of whether observation is used, mandates efforts to improve diagnostic certainty. Even the most well-trained diagnosticians find no pathogens with tympanocentesis for ~30% of children with suspected bacterial AOM.30,31 The prevalence of bacterial AOM is likely lower in the 9 trials cited above and in daily clinical practice, because of uncertainties introduced by viral pathogens, difficulties in diagnosing middle-ear effusion, and vague otalgia symptoms among very young children. Uncertainty can be reduced but not eliminated with pneumatic otoscopy for primary diagnosis, with tympanometry as an adjunctive measure. By including diagnostic uncertainty in the management paradigm, the observation option allows clinicians to prioritize their antibiotic prescribing.32 This in no way is meant to encourage or condone sloppy diagnosis.

Initial observation of AOM without antibiotics is presented as an option, and not a recommendation, primarily for children ≥2 years of age with nonsevere symptoms or an uncertain AOM diagnosis. Clinicians who are uncomfortable with this approach are free to follow the old paradigm. The new paradigm, however, could reduce antibiotic use among eligible children by ~65%.3335 Families benefit from less antibiotic-related diarrhea, vomiting, skin rashes, and allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis.36 Society benefits from the greater good of reduced antibiotic resistance and sustained drug efficacy for children with serious bacterial illnesses. The disadvantage would be slightly longer mean symptom durations (~3 vs 2 days)20,22,34 for some children who are initially observed, which could be managed successfully with analgesics or initiation of antibiotics when needed.

Greater use of the observation option for AOM was highlighted as the next major frontier in appropriate antibiotic prescribing at a recent conference sponsored by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.37 Earlier efforts focused on avoiding antibiotics in primarily viral illnesses, such as rhinitis, bronchitis, and the common cold. The rationale for observation stems from the favorable natural history of untreated AOM10 and the unfavorable harm/benefit ratio of universal antibiotic therapy.6,7 Perhaps we should offer the words of British biologist Hans Krebs to children with AOM, "You and your family must clearly understand that the great ultimate healer is always nature itself and that the drug, the physician, and the patient can do no more than assist nature, by providing the very best conditions for your body to defend and heal itself."38 What a marvelous campaign slogan for the greater good.


    FOOTNOTES
 
Accepted May 10, 2004.

Address correspondence to Richard M. Rosenfeld, MD, MPH, Department of Otolaryngology, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center and the Long Island College Hospital, 339 Hicks St, Brooklyn, NY 11201. E-mail: richrosenfeld{at}msn.com


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Lieberthal AS, Ganiats TG, Cox EO, et al. American Academy of Pediatrics and American Academy of Family Physicians: Clinical Practice Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Acute Otitis Media. Available at: www.aap.org/policy/aomfinal.pdf. Accessed March 22, 2004
  2. New York Regional Otitis Project. Observation Option Toolkit for Acute Otitis Media. Albany, NY: New York Department of Health; 2002. Publication 4894
  3. Dowell SF, Butler JC, Giebink GS, et al. Acute otitis media: management and surveillance in an era of pneumococcal resistance: a report from the Drug-Resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae Therapeutic Working Group. Pediatr Infect Dis. 1999;18 :1 –9[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  4. Rosenfeld RM. Observation option toolkit for acute otitis media. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2001;58 :1 –8[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  5. Marcy M, Takata G, Shekelle P, et al. Management of Acute Otitis Media: Evidence Report/Technology Assessment 15. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2001. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Publication 01-E010
  6. Levy SB. The Antibiotic Paradox: How the Misuse of Antibiotics Destroys Their Curative Powers. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Publishing; 2002
  7. Shnayerson M, Plotkin MJ. The Killers Within: The Deadly Rise of Drug-Resistant Bacteria. Boston, MA: Little, Brown; 2002
  8. Jacobs MR. Worldwide trends in antimicrobial resistance among common respiratory pathogens in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2003;22(suppl) :S109 –S119[CrossRef]
  9. Lieberman JM. Appropriate antibiotic use and why it is important: the challenges of bacterial resistance. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2003;22 :1143 –1151[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  10. Rosenfeld RM, Kay DJ. Natural history of untreated otitis media. Laryngoscope. 2003;113 :1645 –1657[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  11. Rosenfeld RM. Clinical efficacy of medical therapy. In: Rosenfeld RM, Bluestone CD, eds. Evidence-Based Otitis Media. 2nd ed. Hamilton, ON, Canada: BC Decker; 2003:199 –226
  12. Marchant CD, Dagan R. Bacteriologic efficacy of antimicrobial agents. In: Rosenfeld RM, Bluestone CD, eds. Evidence-Based Otitis Media. 2nd ed. Hamilton, ON, Canada: BC Decker; 2003:256 –267
  13. Johann-Liang R, Zalikar J, Powers JH. Correlation between bacteriologic and clinical endpoints in trials of acute otitis media. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2003;22 :936 –937[ISI][Medline]
  14. Halsted C, Lepow ML, Balassanian N, Emmerich J, Wolinsky E. Otitis media: clinical observations, microbiology, and evaluation of therapy. Am J Dis Child. 1968;115 :542 –551[Medline]
  15. Laxdal OE, Merida J, Trefor Jones RH. Treatment of acute otitis media: a controlled study of 142 children. Can Med Assoc J. 1970;102 :263 –268[Medline]
  16. Mygind N, Meistrup-Larsen KI, Thomsen J, Thomsen VF, Josefsson K, Sorensen H. Penicillin in acute otitis media: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Clin Otolaryngol. 1981;6 :5 –13[ISI][Medline]
  17. van Buchem FL, Dunk JHM, van't Hof MA. Therapy of acute otitis media: myringotomy, antibiotics, or neither: a double-blind study in children. Lancet. 1981;2 :883 –887[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Thalin A, Densert O, Larsson A, Lydén E, Torvald R. Is penicillin necessary in the treatment of acute otitis media? In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Acute and Secretory Otitis Media, Part 1, Jerusalem, Israel, 17–22 November 1985. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Kugler Publications; 1986:441 –446
  19. Appelman CLM, Claessen JQPJ, Touw-Otten FWMM, Hordijk GJ, DeMelker RA. Coamoxiclav in recurrent acute otitis media: placebo-controlled study. BMJ. 1991;303 :1450 –1452
  20. Burke P, Bain J, Robinson D, Dunleavey J. Acute red ear in children: controlled trial of nonantibiotic treatment in general practice. BMJ. 1991;303 :558 –562
  21. Kaleida PH, Casselbrant ML, Rockette HE, et al. Amoxicillin or myringotomy or both for acute otitis media: results of a randomized clinical trial. Pediatrics. 1991;87 :466 –474[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Damoiseaux RAMJ, van Balen FAM, Hoes AW, Verheij TJM, de Melker RA. Primary care based randomised double blind trial of amoxicillin versus placebo for acute otitis media in children aged under 2 years. BMJ. 2000;320 :350 –354[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Van Zuijlen DA, Schilder AG, Van Balen FA, Hoes AW. National differences in incidence of acute mastoiditis: relationship to prescribing patterns of antibiotics for acute otitis media? Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2001;20 :140 –144[ISI][Medline]
  24. Ghaffar F, Muniz LS, Katz K. Effects of amoxicillin/clavulanate or azithromycin on nasopharyngeal carriage of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae in children with acute otitis media. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;31 :875 –880[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  25. Gonzales R, Malone DC, Maselli JH, Sande MA. Excessive antibiotic use for respiratory infections in the United States. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33 :757 –762[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  26. Ghaffar F, Muniz LS, Katz K, et al. Effects of large dosages of amoxicillin/clavulanate or azithromycin on nasopharyngeal carriage of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, nonpneumococcal {alpha}-hemolytic streptococci, and Staphylococcus aureus in children with acute otitis media. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;34 :1301 –1309[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  27. Erickson PR, Herzberg MC. Emergence of antibiotic resistant Streptococcus sanguis in dental plaque of children after frequent antibiotic therapy. Pediatr Dent. 1999;21 :181 –185[Medline]
  28. Dagan R, Leibovitz E, Cheletz G, Leiberman A, Porat N. Antibiotic treatment in acute otitis media promotes superinfection with resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae carried before initiation of treatment. J Infect Dis. 2001;183 :880 –886[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  29. Little P, Williamson I, Warner G, Gantley M, Kinmonth AI. Reattendance and complications in a randomized trials of prescribing strategies for sore throat: the medicalising effect of prescribing antibiotics. BMJ. 1997;315 :350 –352[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Dagan R, Johnson CE, McLinn S, et al. Bacteriologic and clinical efficacy of amoxicillin/clavulanate vs. azithromycin in acute otitis media. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2000;19 :95 –104[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  31. Dagan R, Hoberman A, Johnson C, et al. Bacteriologic and clinical efficacy of high dose amoxicillin/clavulanate in children with acute otitis media. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2001;20 :829 –837[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  32. Rosenfeld RM. Diagnostic certainty for acute otitis media. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2002;64 :89 –95[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  33. Cates C. An evidence based approach to reducing antibiotic use in children with acute otitis media: controlled before and after study. BMJ. 1999;318 :715 –716[Free Full Text]
  34. Little P, Gould C, Williamson I, Moore M, Warner G, Dunleavey J. Pragmatic randomized controlled trial of two prescribing strategies for childhood acute otitis media. BMJ. 2001;322 :336 –342[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Siegel RM, Kiely M, Bien JP, et al. Treatment of otitis media with observation and a safety-net prescription. Pediatrics. 2003;112 :527 –531[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Ruben RJ. Sequelae of antibiotic therapy. In: Rosenfeld RM, Bluestone CD, eds. Evidence-Based Otitis Media. Hamilton, ON, Canada: BC Decker; 1999:303 –314
  37. Besser RE.Opening remarks. Presented at: Expanding Our Vision: CDC and Partners' National Conference on Appropriate Antibiotic Use in the Community; June 5–6, 2003; Atlanta, GA
  38. Brallier JM. Medical Wit and Wisdom: From Hippocrates to Groucho Marx. Philadelphia, PA: Running Press; 1993:63

PEDIATRICS (ISSN 1098-4275). ©2004 by the American Academy of Pediatrics



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PediatricsHome page
E. R. Wald
To Treat or Not to Treat
Pediatrics, April 1, 2005; 115(4): 1087 - 1089.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rosenfeld, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rosenfeld, R. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Infectious Disease & Immunity