REVIEW ARTICLE |

* Departments of Pediatrics
Physiology, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods.The Medline database was searched for randomized, clinical studies comparing griseofulvin and terbinafine for the treatment of tinea capitis. Acceptance criteria included oral administration of griseofulvin for at least 6 weeks and the identification of a pathogenic dermatophyte from the scalp at the time of enrollment in the study. Scalp culture status at least 8 weeks after enrollment was used as the outcome. The common odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test for significance, and the Breslow-Day test for homogeneity were calculated.
Results.Six articles that satisfied all inclusion criteria were identified. These studies were combined by using outcomes at 12 to 16 weeks after enrollment. The common OR was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.571.27). When the 5 studies that identified Trichophyton species as the predominant pathogen were combined, using outcomes 12 weeks after enrollment, the results nearly favored terbinafine (OR: 0.65 [95% CI: 0.421.01]). For outcomes at 8 weeks after enrollment, no difference was found between the agents (OR: 0.84 [95% CI: 0.541.32]).
Consclusions.A 2- to 4-week course of terbinafine is at least as effective as a 6- to 8-week course of griseofulvin for the treatment of Trichophyton infections of the scalp. Griseofulvin is likely to be superior to terbinafine for the rare cases caused by Microsporum species.
Key Words: tinea capitis Trichophyton Microsporum terbinafine griseofulvin meta-analysis
Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio CI, confidence interval
Tinea capitis is an increasingly common pediatric infection, with the highest incidence in this country occurring primarily in black children in inner-city populations.1,2 The most common etiology in the United States is Trichophyton tonsurans, with recent data showing a rise in both the prevalence and percentage of cases of tinea capitis caused by this organism.3,4 Current treatment requires a 6- to 8-week course of oral griseofulvin given once daily. Recent studies have investigated the use of newer oral antifungal agents including terbinafine, fluconazole, and itraconazole in the treatment of tinea capitis. Potential advantages over griseofulvin include improved efficacy as well as a shorter treatment course with associated cost savings and improved compliance.5 Of the newer antifungal agents, terbinafine is the most widely studied in trials against griseofulvin. To determine if any therapeutic difference exists between terbinafine and griseofulvin, we undertook this meta-analysis of randomized, comparative trials of the treatment of tinea capitis.
| METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Study Selection and Data Abstraction
Inclusion criteria were selected to identify studies that compared terbinafine and griseofulvin in a randomized fashion, identified an infecting agent, and used posttherapy culture results as an outcome measure. A minimum duration of 6 weeks of griseofulvin therapy was required, which represents current standard treatment duration.
Abstracts of all recovered articles were reviewed to select only those studies that compared terbinafine and griseofulvin for the treatment of tinea capitis. The methods section of each study that survived the initial culling was evaluated independently by 2 reviewers (S.C.A. and Marla Mikelait, MD) to ensure compliance with inclusion criteria. The reviewers were blinded with respect to title, authors, study size, and results.
Data Analysis
The data for each trial were expressed in 2 x 2 tables and compared cures and failures for each treatment. "Cure" was defined as having a negative scalp fungal culture and either no symptoms ("complete cure") or minimal symptoms ("mycologic cure"). Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated such that values < 1 favored terbinafine, and values >1 favored griseofulvin. The Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test for conditional independence was used to test the null hypothesis that the conditional odds for each 2 x 2 table = 1; the Breslow-Day statistic was used to test for homogeneity among the ORs for each 2 x 2 table. Common ORs with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were also calculated by using the Mantel-Haenszel method.6 All statistics and calculations used SAS 9.1 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Compared with griseofulvin, terbinafine has been shown to be less effective against Microsporum species in 2 separate trials.7,16 Dragos and Lunder16 treated 22 children infected with Microsporum canis with a 6-week course of terbinafine. At 14 weeks, only 7 of the 22 patients had achieved mycologic cure. Lipozencic et al7 compared the efficacy of griseofulvin and terbinafine in a population of 134 children with tinea capitis caused by Microsporum species; the cure rate for griseofulvin was significantly higher than that for terbinafine (88% vs 64%; P = .03). These observations suggest that griseofulvin may be the preferred agent for Microsporum infections. Memi
o
lu et al,11 however, treated a population of 67 children in which the etiologies were split between Microsporum and Trichophyton species and found no significant difference between terbinafine and griseofulvin.
Recent studies suggest that the incidence and prevalence of tinea capitis caused by Microsporum infections in American children has declined significantly.14 Weitzman et al4 surveyed dermatophyte culture results from 23 states and >40 laboratories between 1993 and 1995. Compared with prior studies performed 10 to 15 years earlier, T tonsurans increased in prevalence from 28% to 41%; M canis accounted for only 3% of the total isolates. Williams et al1 cultured 224 black school students in Philadelphia aged 5 to 13 years. Of 125 positive cultures, T tonsurans was recovered from 96%. Ghannoum et al2 cultured the scalps of 937 elementary school children in Cleveland. Fungal cultures from 13% of the children were positive, and all but 1 yielded T tonsurans. Similar results were reported from the San Francisco Bay area.3 These studies suggest that Trichophyton species are the predominant cause of tinea capitis among American children.
Our initial meta-analysis combining all 6 studies and including 603 patients failed to show a significant difference between the efficacies of the 2 medications. Notably, 1 of the studies was markedly different in that all pathogens were from the Microsporum genus. When this study was removed from the meta-analysis, the 5 remaining studies were homogeneous. When outcomes 12 weeks after enrollment were compared, 469 patients were included; the common OR favored short courses of terbinafine, and statistical significance was almost reached (OR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.421.01; P = .054). When outcomes 8 weeks after enrollment were compared, 4 studies with a total of 369 patients were included; no significant difference was found between the drugs. These observations suggest that if a difference between the agents does exist, it may become more apparent with increasing time after treatment.
Together, these observations suggest that 2 to 4 weeks of terbinafine therapy is at least as effective as 6 to 8 weeks of griseofulvin therapy for the treatment of tinea capitis caused by Trichophyton species in children. Additional factors that may influence the choice between equally effective therapies include tolerability, safety, compliance, and cost. None of the 6 studies included here found any significant differences in tolerability or adverse effects between terbinafine and griseofulvin, with all authors concluding that both drugs were safe and well tolerated. There is some uncertainty as to the need for hematologic and biochemical monitoring when using the newer antifungal agents in children. In this series, 3 of the 6 studies required blood work during treatment, including complete blood counts and serum transaminases. No clinically serious laboratory abnormalities were identified.
The potential cost savings from using terbinafine depend on the length of the treatment course. In our hospital's outpatient pharmacy, a 6-week course of griseofulvin liquid for a 25-kg child would cost approximately $280, compared with $145 for a 4-week course of terbinafine and only $70 to $80 for a 2-week course. Factors that currently deter routine first-line use of terbinafine in children with tinea capitis include the lack of both a liquid preparation and Food and Drug Administration approval for this indication.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Address correspondence to David Fleece, MD, Department of Pediatrics, Temple University Children's Medical Center, 5th Floor, 3509 N Broad St, Philadelphia, PA 19140. E-mail: fleeced{at}tuhs.temple.edu
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
o
lu HR, Erboz S, Akkaya S, et al. Comparative study of the efficacy and tolerability of 4 weeks of terbinafine therapy with 8 weeks of griseofulvin therapy in children with tinea capitis.
J Dermatol Treat. 1999;10
:189
193This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Managing scalp ringworm in children. DTB, December 1, 2007; 45(12): 89 - 92. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Saunte, F. Simmel, N. Frimodt-Moller, L. B. Stolle, E. L. Svejgaard, M. Haedersdal, C. Kloft, and M. C. Arendrup In Vivo Efficacy and Pharmacokinetics of Voriconazole in an Animal Model of Dermatophytosis Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., September 1, 2007; 51(9): 3317 - 3321. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Treatment for Tinea Capitis: Griseofulvin or Terbinafine? Journal Watch Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, November 29, 2004; 2004(1129): 3 - 3. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
Treatment for Tinea Capitis: Griseofulvin or Terbinafine? Journal Watch (General), November 16, 2004; 2004(1116): 1 - 1. [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||