Erratum for Mayer et al., Pediatrics 113 (2) e109-e115.
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
PEDIATRICS Vol. 114 No. 2 August 2004, pp. 516


ERRATA

ERRATUM

Two errors appeared in the article by Mayer et al, titled "Unmet Need for Routine and Specialty Care: Data From the National Survey of Children With Special Health Care Needs," that was published in the February 2004 Pediatrics electronic pages (2003;113:e109–e115). In the methods section on page e111, the authors imply that all persons with missing values were omitted from the analysis. For 2 variables, poverty status and site of care, those with missing values were recoded inadvertently to the most frequent value (ie, >200% poverty and doctor’s office, respectively). To avoid the loss of a large number of observations (~19% of the sample), the authors have rerun the prevalence estimates and logit analyses, coding those with a missing value for poverty or site of care to a "poverty missing" or "site of care missing." The change in the analysis resulted in only slight adjustments to the bivariate estimates and logit analyses. Tables containing the new analyses are available on the Cecil G. Sheps Center Web site at: www.shepscenter.unc.edu/research_programs/child_health/Errata%20tables.pdf.

In addition, 3 numerical errors appeared in Table 3. Each of the physician ratios under the Environment row heading was calculated per 10 000 population <18, not per 1000. In the body of the article, the pediatrician and pediatric subspecialist ratios are stated correctly; however, on page e111, left column (first full paragraph), the fifth sentence currently reads: "We also created a ratio of the number of internist subspecialists per 1000 people for inclusion in the analysis of unmet need for specialty care, because these providers may substitute for pediatric subspecialists in areas in which these providers are not available." It should read: "We also created a ratio of the number of internist subspecialists per 10 000 people for inclusion in the analysis of unmet need for specialty care, because these providers may substitute for pediatric subspecialists in areas in which these providers are not available."


PEDIATRICS (ISSN 1098-4275). ©2004 by the American Academy of Pediatrics

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?