This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Langer, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by To, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Langer, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by To, T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Surgery
PEDIATRICS Vol. 113 No. 5 May 2004, pp. 1342-1347

Does Pediatric Surgical Specialty Training Affect Outcome After Ramstedt Pyloromyotomy? A Population-Based Study

Jacob C. Langer, MD*,{ddagger},§ and Teresa To, PhD*,§,||

* Population Health Sciences, Research Institute, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
{ddagger} Department of Surgery, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
§ Department of Pediatrics, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
|| the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Objective. Ramstedt pyloromyotomy is a common operation in infants and is often done by general surgeons. We wished to determine whether there are any differences in outcome when this procedure is done by subspecialist pediatric general surgeons as compared with general surgeons.

Methods. All Ramstedt pyloromyotomies in the province of Ontario between 1993 and 2000 were reviewed. Children with complex medical conditions or prematurity were excluded. Cases done by general surgeons were compared with those done by pediatric surgeons, specifically examining hospital stay and complications.

Results. Of 1777 eligible infants, 67.9% were operated on by pediatric surgeons and 32.1% by general surgeons. Total and postoperative lengths of stay were longer in the general surgeon group compared with the pediatric surgeons (4.31 vs 3.50 days for length of stay; 2.95 vs 2.25 days for postoperative length of stay). The general surgeons had a higher overall complication rate (4.18% vs 2.58%). The incidence of duodenal perforation among general surgeons was almost 4 times that of pediatric surgeons (relative risk: 3.65; 95% confidence interval: 1.43-9.32). Of the 4 infants who required repeat surgery because of an incomplete pyloromyotomy, all were originally operated on by a general surgeon. Analysis of the effect of surgeon volume on outcomes suggested that higher volume resulted in better outcome in both groups.

Conclusion. Subspecialist pediatric general surgeons achieve superior outcomes for children who undergo Ramstedt pyloromyotomy.


Key Words: pyloric stenosis • subspecialization • patient volume • pediatric surgery • general surgery • outcomes analysis

Abbreviations: GS, general surgeon • CIHI, Canadian Institute for Health Information • ICD-9, International Classification of Diseases Ninth Revision • PGS, pediatric general surgeon • LOS, length of stay

Hypertrophic pyloric stenosis affects approximately 1 of every 400 children. Most present at ~1 month of age with nonbilious vomiting and undergo surgical treatment with the Ramstedt pyloromyotomy. Because of the simplicity of the operation, the usually excellent outcome, and the frequency of the condition, many general surgeons (GSs) are trained and qualified to perform it. However, there has been ongoing controversy about whether this is appropriate. A number of authors have suggested that outcomes are excellent in the hands of GSs,14 whereas others suggest that specialty-trained pediatric surgeons may have superior outcomes.5,6 The difficulties in assessing this issue include the very low rate of complications after pyloromyotomy and the lack of a population-based approach in most of the previous studies. Our goal was to address this question using a population-based approach and including a large number of infants.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The study was approved by the appropriate Institutional Review Board.

Source of Data
Computerized data on hospital discharges in Ontario from the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) were used for fiscal years 1993 through 2000. A fiscal year runs from April 1 to March 31 of the following year. Collection of hospital discharge data for submission to CIHI is mandatory for all hospitals in Canada. Data are collected on all patients who are discharged from public, private, and federal hospitals in Ontario. The database includes patient demographic data for each hospital stay (birth date, gender, and residence) and clinical data (admission date, discharge date, length of stay, codes from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision [ICD-9]7 for discharge diagnoses [up to 16 fields], and surgical procedures performed).

Inclusions
All infants (<1 year of age) in Ontario who had a diagnosis of pyloric stenosis with an ICD-9 code 750.5 and a hospital admission for pyloromyotomy (ICD-9 code 43.3) in fiscal years 1993-2000 were included.

Exclusions
It was important to ensure that only patients who would have been eligible for surgery by either a GS or a pediatric general surgeon (PGS) were included. Therefore, 69 preterm or low birth weight infants (<2000 g) and 72 infants with other major medical conditions were excluded.

Follow-up Through Record Linkages
The Ontario health care number, which is unique to each individual, was available in the CIHI data from April 1, 1993, through March 31, 2001, and was essential in tracing individuals for their readmissions. Using health care numbers, each child was followed through record linkages in the CIHI database for 30 days from the time of discharge after pyloromyotomy.

Outcome Measures
The main outcome measures for this study were overall average total length of stay (LOS) in the hospital, postoperative LOS, surgical complications, and 30-day readmission rates. Surgical complications included ICD-9 codes 998.0 (postoperative shock), 998.1 (hemorrhage or hematoma complicating a procedure), 998.3 (disruption of operation wound), 998.4 (accidental puncture or laceration during a procedure, hereafter referred to as duodenal mucosal perforation), 998.5 (postoperative infection), 998.6 (persistent postoperative fistula), and 998.8 to 998.9 (other specified or unspecified complication of procedure). All outcome measures were compared between 2 surgeon groups: 129 GSs and 17 PGSs. GSs were defined as those with specialty certification in general surgery from the Royal College of Surgeons of Canada. PGSs were defined as GSs who had 2 additional years of subspecialty training in pediatric general surgery and had achieved specialty certification in pediatric general surgery from the Royal College of Surgeons of Canada.

Pyloromyotomies all were performed in hospitals and were billed to the Ontario Health Insurance Plan for reimbursement of the services rendered. Each physician's unique Ontario Health Insurance Plan billing number in the billing record was obtained and was then linked to the Canadian National Physician Database to determine the specialty of the surgeon who performed the surgery. The Canadian National Physician Database contains data on sociodemographic characteristics (including specialty training) and billing activities of all licensed physicians in Canada.

Statistical Analysis
Rates of pyloromyotomy were expressed as per 1000 Ontario population of infants, with population figures based on the Canada Census data. Statistical comparisons were assessed using the {chi}2 test for nominal data (eg, surgeon groups, gender of the patient) and the t test for continuous variables (eg, age, birth weight, total LOS, postoperative LOS). Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the independent association among surgeon group, volume, and surgical complications. Year of operation and type of hospital (teaching vs community) were included in the logistic regression to account for potential confounding effect. The effect of surgeon volume on outcome was also modeled using random-effects hierarchical logistic regression model. The software package MlwiN (Multi-Level Modeling: Window-based version)8 was used in this hierarchical logistic regression analysis, which took into account the hierarchical nature of the data, with patients clustered within surgeons and surgeons clustered within hospitals. Because surgical volume was vastly different between the 2 surgeon groups, the relationship between volume and outcome was also analyzed separately for each group. All analyses were performed using the Statistical Analysis Systems software.9


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Population Characteristics
A total of 1777 infants were included in this study. Of these, 1487 (83.7%) were boys. The majority of the operations were done by PGSs (67.9%). The infants who were operated on by each surgeon group were similar in age and birth weight.

Pyloromyotomy Rates, 1993-2000
Table 1 shows the rates of pyloromyotomy from 1993 to 2000. Except for a slight increase in rates in 1998 and 1999, there was a general declining trend from 1.71 per 1000 in 1993 to 1.61 per 1000 in 2000, representing an overall decrease of 6% over 8 years. In 1993, the 2 surgeon groups shared ~50% of the volume of pyloromyotomies. Since 1993, there was a steady decrease of these operations performed by GSs. By 2000, 76.8% of all pyloromyotomies in Ontario were performed by pediatric surgeons.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Rate of Pyloromytomy in Ontario per 1000 Infants, 1993–2000

 
Total LOS
Figures 1 and 2 show the average total LOS and postoperative LOS for pyloromyotomy. Overall, the total LOS and postoperative LOS were longer in the GS group compared with the pediatric surgeons (4.31 vs 3.50 days for total LOS, P < .001; 2.95 vs 2.25 days for postoperative LOS, P < .001, respectively). The magnitude of the difference between groups was almost the same for total LOS and postoperative LOS, suggesting that the preoperative preparation time was unaffected by surgeon group. Both the total LOS and postoperative LOS in both surgeon groups were stable over the 8 years of observation.


Figure 1
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Total LOS for patients who underwent pyloromyotomy between 1993 and 2000, by surgeon group. PS, pediatric surgeons.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Postoperative LOS for patients who underwent pyloromyotomy between 1993 and 2000, by surgeon group.

 
Hospital volume of pyloromyotomy and postoperative LOS had a statistically significant negative correlation (Pearson correlation coefficient: –0.12446, P < .0001). However its negative correlation with total LOS was not statistically significant (Pearson correlation coefficient: –0.02996, P < .2068).

Although our regression model showed that hospital volume had a significant negative relationship with postoperative LOS, this relationship did not hold when subspecialty training (general vs pediatric surgeon) was included in the analysis. This indicates that the majority of the variance in postoperative LOS was in fact explained by the surgeon subspecialty training. Similar results were observed using total LOS as the outcome variable. Subspecialty training remained the most significant independent predictor in postoperative LOS.

Postoperative Complications
The GS group had a higher overall complication rate compared with the pediatric surgeons (4.18% vs 2.58%), although the difference was not statistically significant (Table 2). The risk of duodenal mucosal perforation among GSs was almost 4 times that of the pediatric surgeons (relative risk: 3.65; 95% confidence interval: 1.43-9.32). However, this risk ratio was not statistically significant after adjusting for surgical volume, suggesting that surgeon volume had some influence on outcome in both groups. Figure 3 shows the predicted probabilities of duodenal mucosal perforation by surgical volume estimated from a logistic regression model. General or pediatric surgeons who performed 5 or more cases per year had relatively low predicted probabilities (<1%) of duodenal mucosal perforation during surgery (Fig 3). Although not statistically significant, GSs with a volume of <5 cases per year had substantially higher predicted probabilities of duodenal mucosal perforation than higher volume GSs or PGSs.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Outcome Measures Associated With Pyloromyotomy by Surgeon Groups

 

Figure 3
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Effect of pediatric surgical subspecialty training and surgeon volume on the risk of duodenal mucosal perforation. {ddagger} Probabilities were calculated on the basis of a logistic regression model. §Because few general surgeons did >6 pyloromyotomies per year, probabilities of duodenal mucosal perforation and surgical volume beyond 6 were only approximated. Similarly, none of the PGSs did <6 pyloromyotomies per year, and probabilities below 6 were also approximated

 
Readmissions
There was no statistically significant difference in the 30-day readmission rates between the PGS and GS groups (4.82% vs 5.92%). During the 8 years of observation, only 4 infants were readmitted for a repeat pyloromyotomy within 30 days of the original operation. Although repeat pyloromyotomy was too rare to allow for any statistical inference, it is important to note that all 4 cases were originally operated on by a GS.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Patient outcomes are dependent on many factors, and in recent years, there has been much attention on analysis of these factors to improve the quality of care. This area of investigation has become increasingly important in the face of diminishing resources and the economic pressures generated by health care reform.10 Our data suggest that children who have hypertrophic pyloric stenosis and are operated on by a surgeon with subspecialty training in pediatric general surgery have better outcomes than those who are operated on by GSs. In particular, there is a shorter postoperative hospital stay and a lower incidence of duodenal perforation and inadequate myotomy.

The affect of subspecialty surgical training on patient outcomes has been studied in a number of adult series. In the areas of vascular surgery11,12 and several types of cancer surgery,1317 outcomes have been shown to be improved when the procedures are performed by subspecialty-trained individuals. However, many of these studies have been flawed by virtue of their retrospective nature and failure to use a population-based approach. Similarly, several studies in the pediatric population have demonstrated superior outcomes when children have undergone pyloromyotomy5,6 or appendectomy18,19 by PGSs as compared with GSs, although some of these studies suffer from the same limitations. The recent study by Pranikoff et al6 used a statewide database to address this issue for pyloromyotomy. Although their total number of patients was smaller than ours (780), their results were very similar, suggesting that our findings are applicable in the context of the American health care system as well as the Canadian system.

In addition to specialty training, there are several factors that may have an impact on outcome for children with pyloric stenosis. The factor that has been studied most in recent years is the effect of surgeon or institution volume on patient outcome. Although some studies have failed to demonstrate an effect of volume on outcome,20 most studies have found a correlation between surgeon or institution volume of cases and a variety of positive outcome measures.11,15,2123 This has also been true for the management of nonsurgical diseases such as myocardial infarction.24 Our data suggest that volume is likely an important contributing factor to the difference in outcomes between GSs and PGSs. Our data also suggest that GSs who perform a higher volume of cases may have better outcomes. This fact supports the concept that GSs can achieve excellent outcomes but that these cases should be concentrated among a smaller group of GSs within a given community so that each individual maintains an adequate volume.

Another potential factor that may be unrelated to either subspecialization or volume is the use of specialized teams of nonsurgeons, such as anesthesiologists, critical care physicians, and nurses,25,26 and the expertise and experience of the primary care family physicians and pediatricians in the community. We were unable to capture data on this issue, but it is likely that institutions with full-time PGSs (mostly children's hospitals) also have a wide variety of specialized pediatric-oriented individuals in supportive roles.

What action should be taken from these data? In similar circumstances, many authors have drawn the conclusion that all such cases should be referred to subspecialist surgeons or high-volume institutions.27 In many competitive urban environments, this would seem to be the most effective way to achieve the highest quality of care possible. In the Canadian system, which attempts to rationalize care geographically, as well as in rural areas of the United States and many other countries, it would be impossible for all pyloromyotomies to be performed at a children's hospital by fully trained and board-certified PGSs. Therefore, the presence of these discrepancies in outcome must stimulate a process of education, mentoring, and focusing of community practices to the point that GSs who choose to care for children with pyloric stenosis can achieve the same outcomes as subspecialist PGSs. This might require centralization of cases within and among groups of GSs so that those with interest and expertise in dealing with infants would deal with a higher volume of children with pyloric stenosis. Chiefs of surgery at community hospitals must take responsibility for scrutinizing the outcomes for each of the GSs who perform pyloromyotomy to determine whether they meet the standards established by the pediatric general surgery group in this and other studies. In addition, development of additional specialized training programs for GSs who wish to take care of routine surgical problems in children might be useful in promoting better outcomes.

Limitations
First, although the database used in this study was population based, it was not designed for research but rather for administrative purposes. Therefore, it limits our capability to account for clinical factors that may influence postoperative outcome. Nevertheless, we were able to demonstrate a surgeon volume–outcome relationship with LOS and risks of surgical complications in our multivariable logistic regression analysis after adjusting for patient's gender, surgeon specialty, and surgeon volume.

Second, there could have been undercoding or incomplete documentation of surgical complications among different surgeons and across various hospitals. Few studies have validated face sheet data or administrative database data against the entire hospital record to assess the accuracy and completeness of coding of administrative data. Although we do not have direct assessment of the accuracy and completion of coding of postoperative complications in the CIHI data, chart abstraction studies conducted by others did not indicate a concern. For example, a recent study by Hawker et al,28 which measured the accuracy of administrative data for assessing outcomes after knee replacement surgery, suggested that although the agreement on complication data varied by organ system and type (ranged from 90.9% [urinary tract infection] to 100.0% [wound dehiscence]), the overall agreement for in-hospital complications was 96.8%. This study was also based on the Ontario CIHI data that we used in this study. Furthermore, there are no solid reasons for us to expect that the documentation of complication codes would have a differential distribution among PGSs and GSs.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This study was supported by the Robert M. Filler Chair in Pediatric General Surgery, Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute; the Canadian Institutes of Health Research; and the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-term Care.


    FOOTNOTES
 
Received for publication May 22, 2003; Accepted Sep 15, 2003.

Reprint requests to (J.C.L.) Rm 1526, Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X8 Canada. E-mail: jacob.langer{at}sickkids.ca


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Saunders M, Williams C. Infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: experience in a district general hospital. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1990;35 :36 –38[Medline]
  2. Dube S, Dube P, Hardy J, Rosenfeld R. Pyloromyotomy of Ramstedt: experience of a nonspecialized centre. Can J Surg. 1990;33 :95 –96[Medline]
  3. Jahangiri M, Osborne M, Jayatunga A, Bradley J, Mitchenere P. Infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: where should it be treated? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1993;75 :34 –36[ISI][Medline]
  4. Maxwell-Armstrong C, Cheng M, Reynolds J, Holliday H. Surgical management of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis-can it be performed by general surgeons. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2000;82 :341 –343[ISI][Medline]
  5. Brain A, Roberts D. Who should treat pyloric stenosis: the general or specialist pediatric surgeon? J Pediatr Surg. 1996;31 :1535 –1537[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  6. Pranikoff T, Campbell B, Travis J, Hirschl R. Differences in outcome with subspecialty care: pyloromyotomy in North Carolina. J Pediatr Surg. 2002;37 :352 –356[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  7. International Classification of Diseases, Clinical Modification. Los Angeles, CA: Practice Management Information Corporation; 1995:1429
  8. Goldstein H, Rasbash J, Plewis I. A User's Guide to MlwiN. London, England: Institute of Education, University of London; 1998
  9. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 8. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc; 1999:1375–1428
  10. Stoddard J, Cull W, Jewett E, Brotherton S, Mulvey H, Alden E. Providing pediatric subspecialty care: a workforce analysis. AAP Committee on Pediatric Workforce Subcommittee on Subspecialty Workforce. Pediatrics. 2000;106 :1325 –1333[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Hannan E, Popp A, Feustel P, et al. Association of surgical specialty and processes of care with patient outcomes for carotid endarterectomy. Stroke. 2001;32 :2890 –2897[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Tu J, Austin P, Johnston K. The influence of surgical specialty training on the outcomes of elective abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery. J Vasc Surg. 2001;33 :654 –656[Medline]
  13. Puls L, Carrasco R, Morrow M, Blackhurst D. Stage I ovarian carcinoma: specialty-related differences in survival and management. South Med J. 1997;90 :1097 –1100[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Silvestri G, Handy J, Lackland D, Corley E, Reed C. Specialists achieve better outcomes than generalists for lung cancer surgery. Chest. 1998;114 :675 –680[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Hillner B, Smith T, Desch C. Hospital and physician volume or specialization and outcomes in cancer treatment: importance in quality of cancer care. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18 :2327 –2340[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Orr J, Roland P, Orr P, Bolen D, Hutcheson S. Subspecialty training: does it affect the outcome of women treated for a gynecologic malignancy? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2001;13 :1 –8[Medline]
  17. Fleischer A, Feldman S, Barlow J, et al. The specialty of the treating physician affects the likelihood of tumor-free resection margins for basal cell carcinoma: results from a multi-institutional retrospective study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2001;44 :224 –230[Medline]
  18. Alexander F, Magnuson D, DiFiore J, Jirousek K, Secic M. Specialty versus generalist care of children with appendicitis: an outcome comparison. J Pediatr Surg. 2001;36 :1510 –1513[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  19. Kokoska E, Minkes R, Silen M, et al. Effect of pediatric surgical practice on the treatment of children with appendicitis. Pediatrics. 2001;107 :1298 –1301[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Khuri S, Daley J, Henderson W, et al. Relation of surgical volume to outcome in eighty common operations: results from the VA National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg. 1999;230 :414 –429[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  21. Begg C, Cramer L, Hoskins W, Brennan M. Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery. JAMA. 1998;280 :1747 –1751[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Cox C, Salud C, Cantor A, et al. Learning curves for breast cancer sentinel lymph node mapping based on surgical volume analysis. J Am Coll Surg. 2001;193 :593 –600[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  23. Chang RK, Klitzner TS. Can regionalization decrease the number of deaths for children who undergo cardiac surgery? A theoretical analysis. Pediatrics 2002;109 :173 –181[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Thiemann D, Coresh J, Oetgen W, Powe N. The association between hospital volume and survival after acute myocardial infarction in elderly patients. N Engl J Med. 1999;340 :1640 –1648[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Boissoneau R, Sprengel A, Snell W. A national study: the use of specialty surgical teams. Health Mark Q. 1999;17 :49 –58[Medline]
  26. Daley J. Quality of care and the volume-outcome relationship: what's next for surgery? Surgery. 2002;131 :16 –18[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  27. Sosa J, Bowman H, Gordon T, et al. Importance of hospital volume in the overall management of pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg. 1998;228 :429 –438[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  28. Hawker G, Coyte P, Wright J, Paul J, Bombardier C. Accuracy of administrative data for assessing outcomes after knee replacement surgery. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50 :265 –273[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

PEDIATRICS (ISSN 1098-4275). ©2004 by the American Academy of Pediatrics



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
D. P. Ly, J. G. Liao, and R. S. Burd
Effect of Surgeon and Hospital Characteristics on Outcome After Pyloromyotomy
Arch Surg, December 1, 2005; 140(12): 1191 - 1197.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
T. To, A. Wajja, P. W. Wales, and J. C. Langer
Population Demographic Indicators Associated With Incidence of Pyloric Stenosis
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, June 1, 2005; 159(6): 520 - 525.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Langer, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by To, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Langer, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by To, T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Surgery