 |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Department of Pediatrics
Center for Health and Technology, University of California, Davis, California
 |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
 TOP ABSTRACT METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
Design. We report the results of a pretelemedicine medical-needs survey conducted in March 1999 by using a convenience sample of CSHCN living in a rural, medically underserved community located 90 miles north of the University of California Davis Children’s Hospital (Davis, CA). In April 1999, a telemedicine program was initiated to provide consultations to CSHCN and has continued since. We also report the parent/guardian’s perceptions of the appropriateness and quality of telemedicine consultations and the local provider’s satisfaction with telemedicine consultations completed from April 1999 to April 2002.
Results. The pretelemedicine medical-needs assessment demonstrated several barriers in access to subspecialty care including traveling >1 hour for appointments (86% of parents/guardians), missing work for appointments (96% of working parents/guardians), and frequently relying on emergency department services and/or self-regulation of their child’s medications. From April 1999 to April 2002, 130 telemedicine consultations were completed on 55 CSHCN. Overall, satisfaction was very high. All the parents/guardians rated satisfaction with telemedicine care as either "excellent" or "very good," and all but 2 of the rural providers’ surveys reported satisfaction with telemedicine as "excellent" or "very good." The frequency of telemedicine consultations has increased with time.
Conclusions. Pediatric subspecialty telemedicine consultations can be provided to CSHCN living in a rural, medically underserved community with high satisfaction among local providers and parents/guardians. Telemedicine should be considered as a means of facilitating care to CSHCN that, relative to the customary delivery of health care, is more accessible, family-centered, and coordinated among patients and their health care providers.
Key Words: telehealth • telemedicine • children • pediatrics • rural health • medical home • children with special health care needs • subspecialties • referral and consultation
Abbreviations: CSHCN, children with special health care needs • UCDCH, University of California Davis Children’s Hospital
Residents living in rural communities are confronted with significant inequities in access to health care compared with residents living in urban and suburban communities.1 Rural residents face a relative shortage of specialty and subspecialty physicians and show several inferior measures of health status. Children who reside in rural and medically underserved regions experience disparities in access because there are relatively fewer pediatric specialty and subspecialty services available, and those services that are available are typically distant from their rural residence.1 Moreover, for children with special health care needs (CSHCN) living in rural communities, obtaining specialty or subspecialty care is especially challenging because these children require more frequent routine and urgent medical assessments.
In 1999, the Center for Health and Technology at the University of California Davis Medical Center and the University of California Davis Children’s Hospital (UCDCH; Davis, CA) established a telemedicine program to a rural and medically underserved community with the objective of providing pediatric subspecialty telemedicine consultations to CSHCN.2 This project was begun to improve access to specialty care for CSHCN and as a step toward our nation’s Healthy People 2000 and 2010 goal of providing a medical home for all CSHCN.3 Telemedicine has become an increasingly viable solution to address the physician shortages and geographic barriers that rural residents face and has been implemented successfully to provide adult and pediatric consultations in specialties such as dermatology,4 psychiatry,5 cardiology,6 home health care,7 radiology,8 and pediatric specialty care.9 Additionally, the use of telemedicine to provide specialty consultations for CSHCN with their primary care provider in their own community can facilitate care that is more accessible, family-centered, and coordinated, thereby reinforcing other efforts in providing a medical home.10,11
Before implementing the telemedicine program, a prospective medical-needs survey of CSHCN and their parents/guardians was conducted. The first objective of this study was to report the results of the medical-needs assessment including the parent/guardian’s perceived role that telemedicine could play in the care of their children. The second objective was to assess the success of the telemedicine program and report the parents/guardians’ perceptions of the appropriateness and quality of telemedicine consultations for their children after the telemedicine program was initiated.
|
METHODS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
Pretelemedicine Survey
In March 1999, a survey was designed to assess the medical needs of CSHCN and assess the parents/guardians’ perceptions of the feasibility and extent to which telemedicine could help meet their children’s medical needs. Before the initiation of the telemedicine clinic, a convenience sample was identified by the UCDCH of pediatric patients who received subspecialty consultations at the UCDCH in fiscal year 1998 and resided in Oroville. An a priori decision was made to survey 25% of this convenience sample randomly. A single attempt at a telephone contact was made during working hours to conduct the telephone survey. Participants were included if they were able to understand and speak English.
The pretelemedicine survey consisted of several questions designed to inquire about certain aspects of the utilization of primary and subspecialty health care services: the logistics of attending medical appointments; alternative care obtained (including self-regulation) in the absence of direct access to the subspecialists; and, after providing a standardized description of outpatient telemedicine, questions regarding the parents’ perceived advantages and disadvantages of using telemedicine for specialty consultations and the likelihood that they would agree to use telemedicine to obtain specialty consultations for their child (survey is available on request).
Telemedicine Program
After the medical-needs assessment was completed, the telemedicine program started in April 1999 and has continued since. A part-time telemedicine site coordinator was hired shortly after April 1999 for this and other telemedicine clinic coordination in Oroville. The telemedicine connection utilizes 3 ISDN lines (384 kilobits per second) providing fully live, interactive video and audio and a peripheral general patient examination camera. For each telemedicine consultation, the patient, the patient’s parent/guardian(s), the referring health care provider (physician or physician assistant), and the UCDCH subspecialist participate in the entire encounter. At the end of the encounter, either a hand-written or dictated consultation note from the subspecialist is faxed to the Oroville site to be included in both the Oroville and UCDCH medical records.
Standardized, pretested satisfaction surveys were administered to the parents/guardians of the CSHCN as well as to the Oroville physician or physician assistant who accompanied the patient during the examination.2 Satisfaction surveys consist of eight 5-point Likert scale questions with answers as excellent, very good, good, poor, and very poor. Surveys were administered after each individual telemedicine consultation independent of whether the parent/guardian had completed a survey after a previous visit. The data reported here are from 36 consecutive months (until April 2002) of consultations.
Statistics
Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the demographic, diagnostic, and survey data. Comparisons between median Likert scale satisfaction scores were performed by using the Mann-Whitney U 2-sample statistic. Statistical significance was determined at the P = .05 level. The Human Subjects Review Committee at UCDCH approved the study.
|
RESULTS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
Baseline characteristics for the surveyed population are shown in Table 1. The age range of the children whose parents/guardians participated in the survey was 1 to 16 years old (mean: 8 years). Twenty-five (60%) were male, and 28 (67%) of the patients had Medicaid as their sole health insurance. A majority of the CSHCN (54%) had been receiving subspecialty care for 
3 years. Diagnoses included asthma, leukemia, epilepsy, diabetes mellitus, cerebral palsy, congenital heart disease, a digestive disorder, or a coagulation abnormality.
|
Perceived advantages and disadvantages of receiving subspecialty care using telemedicine varied substantially. Positive comments about telemedicine included: "could see 2 doctors at one time," "saves time and gas," "wouldn’t have to miss work," "access specialists right away," "we could see the same doctors we always see and not have to reexplain things to new doctors," and "if there is a doctor who knows more and is far away, I would do it to get the best care." Comments made about the perceived disadvantages of telemedicine included: "if it is an emergency, I would rather be face to face with the doctor," "they would not be able to do physical examinations," "potential failure of the electronic system," "if I’m not talking face to face, [the doctor] is not going to tell me the truth," and "I prefer face-to-face meetings... I want to talk with [the doctor] with nothing in between us." Twenty-one caregivers (50%) indicated that they would be "very likely" to use telemedicine in the future when available, 15 (36%) indicated that they would be "likely" to use telemedicine in the future, and 4 (9%) stated it would be "unlikely" for them to use telemedicine when offered in the future. There were no comments reported from 2 parents/guardians.
Telemedicine
During the subsequent 36-month telemedicine period (April 1999 to April 2002), 55 pediatric patients with SHCN received a total of 130 telemedicine consultations from pediatric subspecialists. The frequency of telemedicine consultations has increased since the program’s inception (Fig 1). The median number of visits per individual was 2 (range: 1–12). The ages of the patients ranged from 1 to 18 years with a mean age of 11.2 years. Forty-eight percent of the pediatric patients were male. A majority of the 55 patients (72%) had either no medical insurance or Medicaid.
|
|
Satisfaction of care provided by the telemedicine consultations is shown in Fig 2 for parents/guardians and Fig 3 for providers. One-hundred thirty parent/guardian surveys (from 55 individual parents/guardians) and eighty-one provider surveys were collected. Overall, satisfaction was very high, with all the parents/guardians rating satisfaction of telemedicine care as either "excellent" or "very good." All but one of the surveyed parents/guardians stated that they wished to continue to receive their consultations using telemedicine. Ninety percent of overall telemedicine satisfaction scores ranked as "very good" and "excellent," and the lowest overall satisfaction reported from one parent/guardian was "poor."
|
|
|
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
There are several potential advantages to the use of telemedicine as a means of providing subspecialty consultations to CSHCN living in rural, underserved communities. First, by increasing local access to subspecialty health care expertise, telemedicine may provide a means of supporting a medical home in communities that otherwise have limited access to comprehensive care. Telemedicine may promote increased care coordination between the primary care physicians and subspecialists and allows primary care providers to coordinate and directly participate in the team management of CSHCN. Telemedicine also may provide an educational benefit to the rural primary care providers, reduce provider isolation, and potentially increase their knowledge in a medical subspecialty. Telemedicine decreases the travel and work-loss burdens for the parents/guardians of CSHCN and potentially lessens the chances for medical errors caused by delayed or lack of communication between the subspecialist and primary care provider. Last, telemedicine allows patients to remain in the care of their primary care physicians, assists community providers in retaining patients, and may improve patient and parent/guardian perception of their primary care providers.
The data from our pretelemedicine survey are consistent with previous studies that investigated the perceived advantages and disadvantages of telemedicine. The issues of missed work, costs and time for transportation, and the time needed to schedule a face-to-face appointment as barriers to specialty and subspecialty services are consistent with the concerns expressed by participants in our study.12 Similarly, in a survey conducted by Allen and Hayes13 on patient satisfaction with telemedicine in a rural clinic, faster and easier access to a subspecialist was noted as the primary advantage of telemedicine. That study reported that patients "would rather see specialists on the TV system than to wait for a few days to see him or her in person."
Karp et al9 reported similar overall parent/guardian satisfaction when using telemedicine to provide subspecialty consultations to CSHCN. Their experience was analogous to ours insofar as only a few subspecialty groups conducted a majority of the consultations. In the report by Karp et al, allergy-immunology and pulmonology accounted for 64% of the consultations, and in our experience, 89% of the consultations were performed by endocrinology-obesity and child psychiatry. These results are consistent with previous telemedicine research that has demonstrated that some health care providers are more likely to adopt and increase their utilization of telemedicine technologies, whereas others are slow to adopt or never adopt such technologies.14,15 In our experience, some clinicians prefer to have personal contact with their patients and have variable degrees of comfort with new technologies, which may partly explain why some subspecialists were more or less likely to adopt telemedicine. Other reasons for the unequal use of telemedicine among subspecialists include the varying need for different subspecialists in Oroville, the families’ willingness to participate in telemedicine, the referring physicians’ preference to refer patients using telemedicine, the subspecialists comfort with using telemedicine, and the frequency with which patients need to be seen for their condition.
Telemedicine, however, is not without its critics. Some authors believe that using telecommunications technology threatens basic components of medical care and urge careful consideration of its use.16 Stanberry,17 for example, warned "against excessive reliance on technology to the detriment of traditional clinician-patient relationships and against complacency regarding the risks and responsibilities—many of which are as yet unknown—that distant medical intervention, consultation and diagnosis carry." He emphasized that, with telemedicine, an intangible aspect about traditional health care is threatened, which is "the comfort and compassion human beings can only bring each other when they are face to face."
There are several limitations to our data. First, because our pretelemedicine telephone survey was limited to English-speaking parents, biases could have been introduced such that the reported perceived advantages, disadvantages, and proportion of families willing to participate in telemedicine is not reflective of non-English-speaking families. Second, certain subspecialties such as endocrinology-obesity have been relatively more successful at incorporating telemedicine, measured in terms of number of consultations. This variance between subspecialty areas may have been caused by the reluctance of parents/guardians or subspecialty providers, or both, to use and maintain telemedicine because of factors related to their specific subspecialties, respectively. Because of this, the feasibility of this program may not be possible to duplicate in other settings. Additionally, although the referring physicians from Oroville were general pediatricians, one might expect that the perceptions of the need for telemedicine (or subspecialty consultation) would be different between referring pediatricians and/or other primary care physicians. We believe that the success of a telemedicine program depends on financial and personnel resources, patient and parent/guardian attitudes, the referring and consulting health care providers’ commitment to telemedicine, and the specific medical condition being considered for telemedicine consultation.
Our report of a telemedicine program established to provide pediatric subspecialty services to CSHCN is among the first such reports in the literature. This program should encourage other providers and patients to use and evaluate the use of telemedicine as a means of providing subspecialty care as well as promote similar efforts to attain medical homes for CSHCN living in rural, underserved regions.
|
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
|
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Reprint requests to (J.P.M.) Department of Pediatrics, Section of Critical Care, University of California Davis Children’s Hospital, 2516 Stockton Blvd, Sacramento, CA 95817. E-mail: jpmarcin{at}ucdavis.edu
|
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  E. A. Jewett, M. R. Anderson, and G. S. Gilchrist The Pediatric Subspecialty Workforce: Public Policy and Forces for Change Pediatrics, November 1, 2005; 116(5): 1192 - 1202. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. A. Cayce, D. P. Krowchuk, S. R. Feldman, F. T. Camacho, R. Balkrishnan, and A. B. Fleischer Healthcare Utilization for Acute and Chronic Diseases of Young, School-age Children in the Rural and Non-rural Setting Clinical Pediatrics, July 1, 2005; 44(6): 491 - 498. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. M. McConnochie, N. E. Wood, H. J. Kitzman, N. E. Herendeen, J. Roy, and K. J. Roghmann Telemedicine Reduces Absence Resulting From Illness in Urban Child Care: Evaluation of an Innovation Pediatrics, May 1, 2005; 115(5): 1273 - 1282. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. W. Callahan, F. Malone, D. Estroff, and D. A. Person Effectiveness of an Internet-Based Store-and-Forward Telemedicine System for Pediatric Subspecialty Consultation Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, April 1, 2005; 159(4): 389 - 393. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
||
|
||
Home | My Pediatrics | Journal Information | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscriptions & Services | Contact Us Click here for faster international access © 2004 American Academy of Pediatrics. All rights reserved. |
||
|
||
