This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hellström-Westas, L.
Right arrow Articles by Inder, T. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hellström-Westas, L.
Right arrow Articles by Inder, T. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
PEDIATRICS Vol. 112 No. 4 October 2003, pp. 1001-1002

Amplitude-Integrated Electroencephalogram and Cerebral Injury

Lena Hellström-Westas, MD, PhD
Department of Paediatrics, University Hospital, SE-221 85 Lund, Sweden

Ingmar Rosén, MD, PhD
Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, University Hospital, SE-221 85 Lund, Sweden

Gorm Greisen, MD, PhD
Department of Neonatology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark

To the Editor.—

We have, with interest, read the study by Inder et al.1 The findings in the study support previous studies that neurophysiologic measurements are sensitive for early evaluation of cerebral injury in preterm infants. The newly presented method, spectral edge frequency (SEF), seems to be very promising in this respect. We were, however, astonished when Inder et al in their paper first stated (about amplitude-integrated electroencephologram [aEEG]) that "no published data exist on its utility in evaluation of cerebral injury in the premature infant" and later that "There have been no published studies of use of the aEEG in the premature infant." This is not correct; there are several published studies on aEEG/CFM (cerebral function monitor) in preterm infants. The studies include investigations of early aEEG in relation to cranial ultrasound abnormalities and outcome, to cerebral blood flow, and to cerebral responses to medications and care procedures.212 The predictive ability agrees with EEG studies, eg, by Cornell et al who used tape-recorded 2-channel EEG to investigate cerebral injury in preterm infants.13,14 Thornberg and Thiringer15 published a study on normal CFM in full-term and preterm infants (from 30–31 weeks) in 1990. A review of aEEG for clinical and research purposes was recently published.16 Apparently, Inder et al did not consider the difference between the measure of EEG amplitude used in their study and that used by the CFM. The CFM gives more weight to higher frequencies and hence may have some of the qualities of SEF. Furthermore, the CFM gives a possibility of evaluating the degree of background discontinuity, a quality that directly correlates with severity of intraventricular hemorrhage in preterm infants. During the last few years there has been an encouraging development of new methods for monitoring of electrocortical activity in newborn infants. We hope that the new methods will be compared and evaluated together in the future, with the aim of developing methods that are optimal for early detection of cerebral injury in newborn infants.

REFERENCES

  1. Inder TE, Buckland L, Williams CE, et al. Lowered electroencephalographic spectral edge frequency predicts the rpesence of cerebral white matter injury in preterm infants. Pediatrics.2003; 111 :27 –33[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Greisen G, Hellström-Westas L, Lou H, Rosén I, Svenningsen NW. Sleep-waking shifts and cerebral blood flow in stable preterm infants. Pediatr Res.1985; 19 :1156 –1159[Web of Science][Medline]
  3. Greisen G, Hellström-Westas L, Lou H, Rosén I, Svenningsen NW. EEG depression and germinal layer haemorrhage in the newborn. Acta Paediatr Scand.1987; 76 :519 –525[Web of Science][Medline]
  4. Greisen G, Pryds O, Rosen I, Lou H. Poor reversibility of EEG abnormalities in hypotensive, preterm neonates. Acta Paediatr Scand.1988; 77 :785 –790[Web of Science][Medline]
  5. Greisen G, Pryds O. Low CBF, discontinuous EEG activity, and periventricular brain injury in ill, preterm neonates. Brain Dev.1989; 11 :164 –168[Web of Science][Medline]
  6. Hellström-Westas L, Rosén I, Svenningsen NW. Cerebral function monitoring during the first week of life in extremely small low birthweight (ESLBW) infants. Neuropediatrics.1991; 22 :27 –32[Web of Science][Medline]
  7. Hellström-Westas L, Klette H, Thorngren-Jerneck K, Rosén I. Early prediction of outcome with aEEG in premature infants with large intraventricular haemorrhages. Neuropediatrics.2001; 32 :319 –324[Web of Science][Medline]
  8. Hellström-Westas L, Bell AH, Skov L, Greisen G, Svenningsen NW. Cerebroelectrical depression following surfactant treatment in preterm neonates. Pediatrics.1992; 89 :643 –647[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Bell AH, Greisen G, Pryds O. Comparison of the effects of phenobarbitone and morphine administration on EEG activity in preterm babies. Acta Paediatr.1993; 82 :35 –39[Web of Science][Medline]
  10. Hellström-Westas L, Inghammar M, Isaksson K, Rosén I, Stjernqvist K. Short term effects of incubator covers on quiet sleep in stable preterm infants. Acta Paediatr.2001; 90 :1004 –1008[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  11. Westrup B, Hellström-Westas L, Kleberg A, Stjernqvist K, Lagercrantz H. No indications of increased quiet sleep in infants who received care based on the Newborn Individualized Developmental Care and Assessment Program (NIDCAP). Acta Paediatr.2002; 91 :318 –322[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  12. Kuhle S, Klebermass K, Olischar M, et al. Sleep-wake cycling in preterm infants below 30 weeks of gestational age. Preliminary results of a prospective amplitude-integrated EEG study. Wien Klin Wochenschr.2001; 113 :219 –223[Web of Science][Medline]
  13. Connell J, Oozeer R, Regev R, de Vries LS, Dubowitz LMS, Dubowitz V. Continuous four-channel EEG monitoring in the evaluation of echodense ultrasound lesions and cystic leukomalacia. Arch Dis Child.1987; 62 :1019 –1024[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Connell J, de Vries L, Oozeer R, Regev R, Dubowitz LMS, Dubowitz V. Predictive value of early continuous electroencephalogram monitoring in ventilated preterm infants with intraventricular hemorrhage. Pediatrics.1988; 82 :337 –343[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Thornberg E, Thiringer K. Normal patterns of cerebral function monitor traces in term and preterm neonates. Acta Paediatr Scand.1990; 79 :20 –25[Web of Science][Medline]
  16. Hellström-Westas L, Rosén I. Amplitude-integrated electroencephalogram in newborn infants for clinical and research purposes. Acta Paediatr.2002; 91 :1028 –1030[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

 
Terrie E. Inder, MD, FRACP, MBChB
Royal Women’s and Royal Children’s Hospitals, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia

In Reply.—

In response to the letter from Drs Hellström-Westas, Rosén, and Greisen, I would first like to acknowledge the important contribution that these clinical investigators have made to the field of investigation of the aEEG in the newborn infant brain, as is reflected by their authorship of the cited articles in their letter. They have correctly highlighted that our manuscript has not cited the studies of aEEG in the premature newborn, and we are grateful for their highlighting this omission in the article for the general reader. Our study and article were highly focused on the relationship between these EEG measures and the presence of cerebral white matter injury, and thus have inadequately reflected the broader literature. Our introductory statement should have read that there is no published data that exist on aEEG in evaluation of cerebral "white matter" injury in the premature infant. This would have been a more correct statement, as highlighted by this response. Indeed, each EEG tool presents slightly unique information and may well complement each other in the assessment of both the premature and the term infant with cerebral injury. As suggested by these investigators, we are now undertaking a comparative analysis of these 2 tools in both the premature and the term infant and look forward to presenting that data in the near future.


PEDIATRICS (ISSN 1098-4275). ©2003 by the American Academy of Pediatrics

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hellström-Westas, L.
Right arrow Articles by Inder, T. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hellström-Westas, L.
Right arrow Articles by Inder, T. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?