COMMENTARY |
Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Maternal and Child Health, Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Minneapolis, MN 55455
Abbreviations: AAP, American Academy of Pediatrics APS, American Pediatric Society AMA, American Medical Association
The reason that advocacy is so much embedded in the work of pediatrics is that children have little political voice of their own and rely on the proxy voice of others including pediatricians to speak out on their behalf. This voice is so important because of the overrepresentation of our children among the poor and underserved. It should be stated that the "shared voice" of pediatrics has been heard throughout our historyspeaking on behalf of all children.
As we proceed into the next millennium, it is proper to reflect on pediatrics past, our present, and future so that, as a profession, advocacy will continue to play a key role. At the turn of the century, there were about a half dozen practitioners devoted to the care of children. Today, the membership of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) is >57 000 physicians.
| ABRAHAM JACOBIS LEGACY: A TRADITION OF PEDIATRIC ADVOCACY |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the United States, Dr Abraham Jacobi is considered the "Father of Pediatrics." In 1859, he published his seminal text titled: Midwifery and Diseases of Women and Children. In addition, he was the first professor of pediatrics in America at New York Medical College, and in 1860 established the first free pediatric clinic in America.1 Dr Jacobi was one of the pediatric pioneers who understood the link between the environmental milieu children found themselves and the incidence of disease. His efforts characterized the beneficence of our profession.
The emergence of the Industrial Revolution in the 19th century led to urbanization and a dismal state of public hygiene as we entered the 20th century. This was also the time of the "Great Wave of Immigration" when >25 million immigrants from southern and eastern Europe passed through the sanctuary of Ellis Island. One in 5 newborns did not survive to their fifth birthday, succumbing frequently to infantile diarrheal diseases resulting from contaminated milk. Eventually, milk stations providing pasteurized bottled milk in the 1920s augmented free clinics and dispensaries. This significantly reduced the infant and childhood mortality associated with diarrheal diseases.2
| THE AAP: AN ORGANIZATION BORN OF ADVOCACY |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the early 20th century the pediatric section began to move away from the AMA because of philosophical differences on the need to advocate on behalf of women and children. The Sheppard-Towner and Infancy Protection Act of 1921 has been hailed as the first significant health care legislation in the United States. Its purpose was to reduce maternal and infant mortality rates in the United States by providing centers for prenatal and child health care. By 1922, 41 states provided instruction in maternal and infant hygiene.4 The AMA, however, was not supportive. In 1922 the AMA House of Delegates condemned the Act for its presumed radical and socialist approach to medicine, despite the support of the pediatric section. With intense lobbying by the AMA, the law was eventually repealed in 1929 and by 1930 the pediatric section broke away because of the philosophical schism and strain to form the AAP.3
| PEDIATRICS: A PROFESSION DEDICATED TO ACCESS FOR ALL CHILDREN |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The Academy was instrumental with the passage of the State Child Health Insurance Plan or Title XIX of the Social Security Act in 1997, some 30 years after the passage of Medicaid.9 Today, 5 years after its passage, the State Child Health Insurance Plan has extended health coverage to 4 million children and adolescents and we continue to advocate for universal health coverage for all children through the MediKids proposal.
| PEDIATRICS TODAY: REFINING AN ADVOCACY AND POLICY PERSPECTIVE |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It is, therefore, apropos that the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (the American Board of Pediatrics and its Residency Review Committee) have incorporated the following advocacy provision in the requirements for the pediatric resident in their community experience.
"There must be a structured education experience that prepares residents for the role of advocate for the health of the children with the community."
Table 1 provides the pediatric residency requirements that have been operationalized into core curricular competencies.10
|
In addition, to be effective pediatricians need to develop an arsenal of tools similar to their clinical skills that will facilitate their advocacy activities. Table 2 provides a summary of an Advocacy Skills Tool Kit that is part of a curriculum taught at the University of Minnesota in a semester format titled: Advocacy Change for Children. The class is designed as a multidisciplinary seminar open across the Academic Health Center to graduate students in public health, public policy, nursing, and social work as well as medical students, residents, and pediatric and adolescent fellows. The major components include the advocacy skills listed in Table 2.
|
The "letter to the editor" is probably the first step taken by many. It consists of taking a prominent topic that is receiving some discussion and stepping forward to contribute your professional insights. The litany of topics from access to care, efficacy of immunization, and the importance of well-child care, are just a few of the topics that have health implications which need pediatrician input.
The "advocacy fact sheet" usually consists of a 1- to 2-page summary of a topic designed to get others interested in learning more on a topic. The task is to take the research findings that exist on an issue and to summarize succinctly the importance of the issue and why action is necessary to affect change. It frequently also encourages contacting their legislator in support of the proposal.
A "political context analysis" attempts to capture in no more than a few pages the present political milieu and an assessment of the fiscal and economic situation that a community, state, and/or federal government is dealing with. The purpose is to identify the top concerns of policymakers that may relate to, crowd out, or otherwise influence thinking on childrens issues. How we advocate for change varies depending on whether we are in a growth economy such as much of the 1990s or a period of cyclical recessions that we see as part of the typical business cycle as characterized as the recession of 1981, 1991, or of 2003. The political context analysis is an internal needs assessment that is used by an organization in the development of the remainder of the "pediatricians advocacy tool kit."
Developing a "coalition strategy" is an attempt to list the potential organizations pediatricians might want to try to convince to become coalition members and why they are needed as children advocates. In addition, it is important to identify unlikely supporters or opponents.
The "press release" should announce the unveiling of the coalition, the problem that has been identified, the recommendation being proposed, and where someone could get more information. In addition, the press release is part of an overall media strategy that should include a plan that visions out a 12- to 24-month approach on how the coalition will used the media to build public support for your proposal.
An "issue brief" is a stand-alone paper that can be shared as representing your organizations and/or coalitions perspective with either the legislative or executive branches of government at any level. It should assume that the reader is quite inexperienced on childrens issues. This paper must be fair, but must also be persuasive and convincing regarding the argument for the proposal. The issue brief must be no more than 6 pages in length and single-spaced, including a 1-page executive summary. It should contain summary information on:
Finally, the "written testimony" provides the information extracted from all the above on what should be present personally if called to provide testimony at a legislative hearing or with an executive branch agency.
| EPILOGUE: WHAT DOES THE FUTURE HOLD? |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The recent Annie Dyson community grants provide an opportunity to explore and develop such skills. It should also be noted that the AAP through the annual legislative conference and advocacy forums continue to train a cadre of pediatricians in the importance of public policy and advocacy. In addition, the Committee on Federal Government Affairs and the Committee on State Government Affairs provide expertise, leadership, experience, and assistance to those chapters and individual pediatricians looking to make a change for children.
Finally, as always, the hope of pediatrics for the future is to improve the health and well-being of our children. Such skills will be necessary as we attempt to address the pressing issues of persistent health disparities, inadequate access to health care, limited dental and mental health services, environmental protection, and the promotion of a medical home for all children. This hope remains as relevant today as it was for our predecessors and serves as a beacon for the voyage into the 21st century.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Reprint requests to (C.N.O.) Department of Pediatrics
University of Minnesota Medical School
Maternal and Child Health
Division of Epidemiology
School of Public Health
West Bank Office Building, 1300 Second St SouthSte 300, Minneapolis, MN 55455. E-mail: oberg001{at}umn.edu
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Committee on Community Health Services The Pediatrician's Role in Community Pediatrics Pediatrics, April 1, 2005; 115(4): 1092 - 1094. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||