This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Li, R.
Right arrow Articles by Grummer-Strawn, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Li, R.
Right arrow Articles by Grummer-Strawn, L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Miscellaneous
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

PEDIATRICS Vol. 111 No. 5 May 2003, pp. 1198-1201

Prevalence of Breastfeeding in the United States: The 2001 National Immunization Survey

Ruowei Li, MD, PhD*, Zhen Zhao, PhD{ddagger}, Ali Mokdad, PhD§, Lawrence Barker, PhD{ddagger} and Laurence Grummer-Strawn, PhD*

* Division of Nutrition and Physical Activity
{ddagger} Data Management Division, the National Immunization Program
§ Division of Adult and Community Health, the National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia

-->
    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Objective. To address key gaps in the annual monitoring of breastfeeding prevalence in the United States, 3 breastfeeding questions concerning the initiation, duration, and exclusivity of breastfeeding were added to the rotating modules of the National Immunization Survey (NIS) beginning in the third quarter of 2001. The present study examines the current prevalence of breastfeeding in the United States using NIS data from this initial quarter.

Methods. The NIS is a random-digit-dialing survey of households with children aged 19 to 35 months, followed by a mail survey of the eligible children’s vaccination providers to validate the child’s vaccination information. In the third quarter of 2001, a randomly selected subset of households interviewed in the NIS (N = 896) were asked questions about breastfeeding.

Results. Almost two thirds (65.1%) of children had ever been breastfed. At 6 and 12 months, 27.0% and 12.3%, respectively, were receiving some breast milk. Non-Hispanic blacks had the lowest rates of breastfeeding initiation and continuation. Exclusive breastfeeding rates were low in the United States with only 7.9% at 6 months.

Conclusions. Although breastfeeding initiation is near the national goal of 75%, breastfeeding continuation lags behind the national goals of 50% and 25% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Strenuous public health efforts are needed to improve breastfeeding practices among blacks.

Key Words: breastfeeding prevalence • surveillance • National Immunization Survey

Abbreviations: NIS, National Immunization Survey


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Worldwide, breastfeeding is recognized as beneficial for both infants and mothers.13 The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends breast milk as the preferred feeding for all infants, including premature and sick newborns, with rare exceptions.1 In the United States, the goals of Healthy People 2010 are to increase the proportion of mothers who breastfeed their infants to 75% in the early postpartum period, 50% at 6 months, and 25% at 1 year.4

Although several national surveys collect breastfeeding data, including the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, the National Health Interview Survey, and the National Survey of Family Growth, none of them meet the criteria for an ideal breastfeeding surveillance system and none monitor breastfeeding prevalence annually.5 Therefore, the Healthy People 2010 goals on breastfeeding were established and have been tracked with data collected by Ross Products Division of Abbott Laboratories, manufacturers of infant formula.4 To date, most of the quoted statistics on breastfeeding rates have been derived from the Ross Laboratories Mothers Surveys, whose questionnaires are mailed to a large sample of mothers who have given birth within the past year of each survey. Unfortunately, the Ross Laboratories Mothers Surveys has a relatively low response rate (50%), and it cannot be used to estimate the exclusive breastfeeding rate.6 In addition, use of data obtained from formula manufacturers to establish and monitor national goals on breastfeeding represents a conflict of interest.

Appropriate monitoring of the Healthy People 2010 goals and objectives is a high priority for the US Department of Health and Human Services. In response to requests from the US Breastfeeding Committee, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention held a breastfeeding surveillance meeting in November 1999 to review current methods for assessing this practice.5 The attendees recommended using existing surveillance systems to improve data collection immediately. As a result, 3 questions on breastfeeding were added to the rotating modules of the National Immunization Survey (NIS) beginning from the third quarter of 2001. The present study examines breastfeeding rates in the United States using data from this quarter of NIS.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
The NIS is conducted annually by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to obtain national, state, and selected urban-area estimates of vaccination coverage rates for US children aged 19 to 35 months. The NIS uses random-digit dialing to survey households with age-eligible children, followed by a mail survey to the eligible children’s vaccination providers to validate the vaccination information. Analyses of NIS data are limited to children whose vaccination histories receive this validation. The data concerning those children are weighted to represent the US population of 19- to 35-month-old children. Details of the weighting methodology appear elsewhere.7,8

In addition to immunization data, demographic data are collected in the NIS. Respondents are asked to self-classify by race/ethnicity. In this analysis, we grouped the classification as non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Hispanic, and others.

Starting from the third quarter of 2001, approximately 13.2% of households interviewed in the NIS (N = 896) were randomly selected to answer breastfeeding questions pertaining to the topic of "Day Care Arrangements/Breastfeeding Practices/WIC Participation," 1 of the 3 topics added to the core questionnaire (referred to as a rotating topical module). Additional quarters of breastfeeding data are being gathered but were not available at this writing. Data concerning the initiation, duration, and exclusivity of breastfeeding were collected from the recall of survey respondents.

We calculated the percentage of children who were ever breastfed, exclusively breastfed at ages 0 to 6 months, and receiving breast milk to any extent at ages 0 to 12 months. All of the data are presented as a percentage among all children who participated in this study. In this study, breastfeeding initiation rate was represented as a proportion of mothers who reported ever breastfeeding their children, whereas the rate of exclusive breastfeeding in the early postpartum period was estimated as a proportion of infants who were not fed something other than breast milk or water before 7 days. We estimated the continuation of breastfeeding month by month up to 6 months for exclusive breastfeeding and up to 12 months for any breastfeeding. All calculations were performed using SUDAAN, Version 7.5.9 The variance estimates are expressed through 95% confidence intervals.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
The current study included a total of 727 children with complete information on ever breastfeeding, breastfeeding duration, and adequate immunization data. The sample size for exclusive breastfeeding is slightly smaller (709) because of missing data on age at introduction of supplements to breast milk. Overall, almost two thirds (65.1%; 95% confidence interval: 59.5%–70.7%) of children had ever been breastfed. Results at 6 and 12 months for continued breastfeeding were 27.0% (21.7%–32.3%) and 12.3% (8.9%–15.7%), respectively. At 7 days, 59.3% (53.7%–64.9%) of children were exclusively breastfed; at 6 months, this figure was 7.9% (5.0%–10.8%). As shown in Fig 1, non-Hispanic blacks had the lowest rates of both initiation and continuation of breastfeeding.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. Racial/ethnic disparities in breastfeeding (mean and 95% confidence interval), NIS, July–September 2001.

 
As revealed in Fig 2, exclusive breastfeeding and any breastfeeding rates declined almost in parallel for the first 3 months of life. The largest monthly drop in any breastfeeding (15 percentage points) occurred between 2 and 3 months, whereas the largest drop in exclusive breastfeeding was between 3 and 4 months (13 percentage points).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 2. Any and exclusive breastfeeding by age, NIS, July–September 2001.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
This analysis shows that although considerable progress toward the goal of 75% for breastfeeding initiation has been made, breastfeeding prevalence at 6 and 12 months still lags behind the Healthy People 2010 goals for breastfeeding continuation (short by 23 and 13 percentage points at 6 and 12 months, respectively). Although the national objectives do not include a goal for exclusive breastfeeding, both the World Health Organization and the American Academy of Pediatrics recommend exclusive breastfeeding for the first 6 months.1,10 In contrast, we found that only approximately 60% of US infants are exclusively breastfed in the early postpartum period and just 8% are exclusively breastfed by 6 months. In addition, this study found that non-Hispanic blacks have the lowest rates of breastfeeding initiation and continuation, which is consistent with previous findings about racial and ethnic disparities.1114

The similarity in patterns of decline in partial and exclusive breastfeeding over the first 3 months suggests that the factors associated with exclusive breastfeeding might be similar to those associated with any breastfeeding in early life.15 Special attention needs to be paid to the sharp decline in any breastfeeding between 2 and 3 months. For many women, this is the period when they return to work or school and need additional environmental and social support to continue breastfeeding. It has been reported that lack of lactation support in the workplace is a major barrier for maintaining breastfeeding.16,17 Therefore, work site facilities and policies that allow mothers to continue to provide breast milk for their infants after their return to work is an essential component for improving breastfeeding duration. The sharp decline in exclusive breastfeeding between 3 and 4 months might be explained by multiple reasons. In addition to the social, cultural, and environmental constraints identified previously,18 it might include the beliefs that mothers cannot provide sufficient nutrition to their infants beyond this age.19 A previous study found that 31% of US adults believe that infants ought to be fed cereal or infant food by 3 months.20 If mothers are told by their family and friends that their infants should be fed solid foods in the first few months, then they will find it difficult to avoid feeding their infants solids until 6 months of age, despite their pediatrician’s recommendation to breastfeed exclusively.

This study has 2 major limitations. First, although the strict definition of exclusive breastfeeding specifies that no other liquids or solids except breast milk are given to the infant,21 this study allows water feeding for exclusive breastfeeding. Second, given the relatively small sample size available in only 1 quarter’s data, we were not able to conduct stratified analysis to explore further the racial and ethnic disparities in breastfeeding practices.

We compared our results with the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1988–1994 in which the same breastfeeding questions were used but different sampling designs were applied.15 The breastfeeding initiation has increased from 54% to 65% over the past decade, and continuation of any breastfeeding seems to have increased from 22% to 27% at 6 months and from 9% to 12% at 12 months (these last 2 trends were not statistically significant).


    CONCLUSIONS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Although the national goal for breastfeeding initiation has nearly been reached, the gap in achieving the goals for continuation of breastfeeding remains large. The health care system has an important role to play in the promotion and support of breastfeeding. Maternity care and newborn facilities should follow practices that are conducive to proper lactation, and all health care providers who interact with women or infants should be knowledgeable and skillful in counseling women about breastfeeding and lactation and in providing medical care to breastfeeding mothers.22 Additional research is needed to identify the social, cultural, economic, and psychological barriers to breastfeeding that all women face, especially black women.


    FOOTNOTES
 
Received for publication Oct 2, 2002; Accepted Dec 4, 2002.

Address correspondence to Ruowei Li, MD, PhD, Division of Nutrition and Physical Activity (MS K-25), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Hwy, NE, Atlanta, GA 30341-3717. E-mail: ril6{at}cdc.gov


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. American Academy of Pediatrics, Work Group on Breastfeeding. Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics.1997; 100 :1035 –1039[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. World Health Organization and United Nations Children’s Fund. The Innocenti Declaration on the Protection, Promotion and Support of Breastfeeding. Florence, Italy: World Health Organization and United Nations Children’s Fund; 1990
  3. American Dietetic Association. Position of the American Dietetic Association: promotion of breastfeeding. J Am Diet Assoc.1986; 86 :1580 –1585[Web of Science][Medline]
  4. US Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2010: Conference Edition. Vols I and II. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 2000:47–48
  5. Grummer-Strawn LM, Li R. US national surveillance of breastfeeding behavior. J Hum Lact.2000; 16 :283 –290[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Ryan AS. The resurgence of breastfeeding in the United States. Pediatrics.1997; 99(4) . Available at: www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/99/4/e12
  7. Smith PJ, Battaglia MP, Huggins V, et al. Overview of the sampling design and the statistical methods used in the National Immunization Survey. Am J Prev Med.2001; 20(4 suppl) :17 –24[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Zell ER, Ezzati-Rice TM, Battaglia MP, Wright RA. National Immunization Survey: the methodology of a vaccination surveillance system. Public Health Rep.2000; 115 :65 –77[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  9. Shah BV, Barnwell BG, Bieler GS. SUDAAN User’s Manual, Release 7.5. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute; 1997
  10. World Health Organization. The optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding. Note for the Press No. 7, April 2, 2001. Available at: www.who.int/inf-pr-2001/er/note2001-07.html
  11. Wiemann CM, DuBois JC, Berenson AB. Racial/ethnic differences in the decision to breastfeed among adolescent mothers. Pediatrics.1998; 101(6) . Available at: www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/101/6/e11
  12. Timbo B, Altekruse S, Headrick M, Klontz K. Breastfeeding among black mothers: evidence supporting the need for prenatal intervention. J Soc Pediatr Nurs.1996; 1 :35 –40[Medline]
  13. Kurinij N, Shiono PH, Rhoads GG. Breast-feeding incidence and duration in black and white women. Pediatrics.1988; 81 :365 –371[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Rassin DK, Richardson CJ, Baranowski T, et al. Incidence of breast-feeding in a low socioeconomic group of mothers in the United States: ethnic patterns. Pediatrics.1984; 73 :132 –137[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Li R, Ogden C, Ballew C, Gillespie C, Grummer-Strawn L. Prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding among US infants: The Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (Phase II, 1991–1994). Am J Public Health.2002; 92 :1107 –1110[Free Full Text]
  16. Cohen R, Mrtek MB. The impact of two corporate lactation programs on the incidence and duration of breast-feeding by employed mothers. Am J Health Promot.1994; 8 :436 –441[Medline]
  17. Fein SB, Roe B. The effect of work status on initiation and duration of breastfeeding. Am J Public Health.1998; 88 :1042 –1046[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Scott JA, Binns CW. Factors associated with the initiation and duration of breastfeeding: a review of the literature. Breastfeed Rev.1999; 7 :5 –16[Medline]
  19. Obermeyer CM, Castle S. Back to nature? Historical and cross-cultural perspectives on barriers to optimal breastfeeding. Med Anthropol.1996; 17 :39 –63[Medline]
  20. Li R, Fridinger F, Grummer-Strawn. Public perceptions on breastfeeding constraints. J Hum Lact.2002; 18 :223 –231
  21. Labbok M, Krasovec K. Toward consistency in breastfeeding definition. Stud Fam Plann.1990; 21 :226 –230[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  22. US Department of Health and Human Services. HHS Blueprint for Action on Breastfeeding. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, Office on Women’s Health; 2000

PEDIATRICS (ISSN 1098-4275). ©2003 by the American Academy of Pediatrics

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Hum LactHome page
J. A. F. Tender, J. Janakiram, E. Arce, R. Mason, T. Jordan, J. Marsh, S. Kin, Jianping He, and R. Y. Moon
Reasons for In-Hospital Formula Supplementation of Breastfed Infants From Low-Income Families
J Hum Lact, February 1, 2009; 25(1): 11 - 17.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Hum LactHome page
R. Forste and J. P. Hoffmann
Are US Mothers Meeting the Healthy People 2010 Breastfeeding Targets for Initiation, Duration, and Exclusivity? The 2003 and 2004 National Immunization Surveys
J Hum Lact, August 1, 2008; 24(3): 278 - 288.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Hum LactHome page
A. C. Chin, L. Myers, and J. H. Magnus
Race, Education, and Breastfeeding Initiation in Louisiana, 2000-2004
J Hum Lact, May 1, 2008; 24(2): 175 - 185.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Hum LactHome page
L. A. Nommsen-Rivers, M. J. Heinig, R. J. Cohen, and K. G. Dewey
Newborn Wet and Soiled Diaper Counts and Timing of Onset of Lactation as Indicators of Breastfeeding Inadequacy
J Hum Lact, February 1, 2008; 24(1): 27 - 33.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Epidemiol RevHome page
D. A. Salmon, P. J. Smith, A. M. Navar, W. K. Y. Pan, S. B. Omer, J. A. Singleton, and N. A. Halsey
Measuring Immunization Coverage among Preschool Children: Past, Present, and Future Opportunities
Epidemiol. Rev., August 1, 2006; 28(1): 27 - 40.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
R. A. Royce
Birth spacing--the long and short of it.
JAMA, April 19, 2006; 295(15): 1837 - 1838.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
C. M. Gibson-Davis and J. Brooks-Gunn
Couples' Immigration Status and Ethnicity as Determinants of Breastfeeding
Am J Public Health, April 1, 2006; 96(4): 641 - 646.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Coll. Nutr.Home page
W. W.K. Koo, E. M. Hockman, and M. Dow
Palm olein in the fat blend of infant formulas: effect on the intestinal absorption of calcium and fat, and bone mineralization.
J. Am. Coll. Nutr., April 1, 2006; 25(2): 117 - 122.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
A. S. Ryan and W. Zhou
Lower Breastfeeding Rates Persist Among the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children Participants, 1978-2003
Pediatrics, April 1, 2006; 117(4): 1136 - 1146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
American Heart Association, S. S. Gidding, B. A. Dennison, L. L. Birch, S. R. Daniels, M. W. Gilman, A. H. Lichtenstein, K. T. Rattay, J. Steinberger, N. Stettler, et al.
Dietary Recommendations for Children and Adolescents: A Guide for Practitioners
Pediatrics, February 1, 2006; 117(2): 544 - 559.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Hum LactHome page
S. R. Geraghty, J. C. Khoury, and H. J. Kalkwarf
Human Milk Pumping Rates of Mothers of Singletons and Mothers of Multiples
J Hum Lact, November 1, 2005; 21(4): 413 - 420.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
Endorsed by the American Academy of Pediatrics, S. S. Gidding, B. A. Dennison, L. L. Birch, S. R. Daniels, M. W. Gilman, A. H. Lichtenstein, K. T. Rattay, J. Steinberger, N. Stettler, et al.
Dietary Recommendations for Children and Adolescents: A Guide for Practitioners: Consensus Statement From the American Heart Association
Circulation, September 27, 2005; 112(13): 2061 - 2075.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
A. Merewood, S. D. Mehta, L. B. Chamberlain, B. L. Philipp, and H. Bauchner
Breastfeeding Rates in US Baby-Friendly Hospitals: Results of a National Survey
Pediatrics, September 1, 2005; 116(3): 628 - 634.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Hum LactHome page
K. Wambach, S. H. Campbell, S. L. Gill, J. E. Dodgson, T. C. Abiona, and M. J. Heinig
Clinical Lactation Practice: 20 Years of Evidence
J Hum Lact, August 1, 2005; 21(3): 245 - 258.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Hum LactHome page
K. A. Bonuck, K. Freeman, and M. Trombley
Country of Origin and Race/Ethnicity: Impact on Breastfeeding Intentions
J Hum Lact, August 1, 2005; 21(3): 320 - 326.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Hum LactHome page
L.-Y. Chien, K.-H. Chu, C.-J. Tai, and C.-Y. Lin
National Prevalence of Breastfeeding in Taiwan
J Hum Lact, August 1, 2005; 21(3): 338 - 344.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
J. M. Norris, K. Barriga, E. J. Hoffenberg, I. Taki, D. Miao, J. E. Haas, L. M. Emery, R. J. Sokol, H. A. Erlich, G. S. Eisenbarth, et al.
Risk of Celiac Disease Autoimmunity and Timing of Gluten Introduction in the Diet of Infants at Increased Risk of Disease
JAMA, May 18, 2005; 293(19): 2343 - 2351.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
A. C. Celi, J. W. Rich-Edwards, M. K. Richardson, K. P. Kleinman, and M. W. Gillman
Immigration, Race/Ethnicity, and Social and Economic Factors as Predictors of Breastfeeding Initiation
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, March 1, 2005; 159(3): 255 - 260.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
J. Labarere, N. Gelbert-Baudino, A.-S. Ayral, C. Duc, M. Berchotteau, N. Bouchon, C. Schelstraete, J.-P. Vittoz, P. Francois, and J.-C. Pons
Efficacy of Breastfeeding Support Provided by Trained Clinicians During an Early, Routine, Preventive Visit: A Prospective, Randomized, Open Trial of 226 Mother-Infant Pairs
Pediatrics, February 1, 2005; 115(2): e139 - e146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
R. Li, N. Darling, E. Maurice, L. Barker, and L. M. Grummer-Strawn
Breastfeeding Rates in the United States by Characteristics of the Child, Mother, or Family: The 2002 National Immunization Survey
Pediatrics, January 1, 2005; 115(1): e31 - e37.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Hum LactHome page
M. L. Sullivan, S. J. Leathers, and M. A. Kelley
Family Characteristics Associated With Duration of Breastfeeding During Early Infancy Among Primiparas
J Hum Lact, May 1, 2004; 20(2): 196 - 205.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
E. M. Taveras, R. Li, L. Grummer-Strawn, M. Richardson, R. Marshall, V. H. Rego, I. Miroshnik, and T. A. Lieu
Mothers' and Clinicians' Perspectives on Breastfeeding Counseling During Routine Preventive Visits
Pediatrics, May 1, 2004; 113(5): e405 - e411.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
E. M. Taveras, R. Li, L. Grummer-Strawn, M. Richardson, R. Marshall, V. H. Rego, I. Miroshnik, and T. A. Lieu
Opinions and Practices of Clinicians Associated With Continuation of Exclusive Breastfeeding
Pediatrics, April 1, 2004; 113(4): e283 - e290.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CLIN PEDIATRHome page
S. M. H. Nainar and S. Mohummed
Role of Infant Feeding Practices on the Dental Health of Children
Clinical Pediatrics, March 1, 2004; 43(2): 129 - 133.
[PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
A. S. Ryan, R. Li, and L. Grummer-Strawn
The Truth About the Ross Mothers Survey
Pediatrics, March 1, 2004; 113(3): 626 - 627.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Hum LactHome page
L. M. Jansson, M. Velez, and C. Harrow
Methadone Maintenance and Lactation: A Review of the Literature and Current Management Guidelines
J Hum Lact, February 1, 2004; 20(1): 62 - 71.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
L. M. Grummer-Strawn and Z. Mei
Does Breastfeeding Protect Against Pediatric Overweight? Analysis of Longitudinal Data From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Pediatric Nutrition Surveillance System
Pediatrics, February 1, 2004; 113(2): e81 - 86.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Li, R.
Right arrow Articles by Grummer-Strawn, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Li, R.
Right arrow Articles by Grummer-Strawn, L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Miscellaneous
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?