ELECTRONIC ARTICLE |

,||
* Department of Ambulatory Care and Prevention, Harvard Medical School/Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Boston, Massachusetts
Departments of Nutrition
Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
|| Channing Laboratory, Brigham and Womens Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods. We conducted a survey of 7981 girls and 6900 boys, 9 to 14 years of age, who are participants in the Growing Up Today Study, a US nationwide study of diet, activity, and growth. In 1996, participants reported height, weight, diet, activity, and other variables by self-administered mailed questionnaire. We linked these data with information reported by their mothers, participants in the Nurses Health Study II, including GDM, height, current weight, and childs birth weight. We excluded births <34 weeks gestation and mothers who had preexisting diabetes. We defined overweight as BMI (kg/m2) >95th percentile, and at risk for overweight as 85th to 95th percentile, for age and gender from US national data.
Results. Mean birth weight was 3.4 kg for girls and 3.6 kg for boys. Among the 465 subjects whose mothers had GDM, 17.1% were at risk for overweight and 9.7% were overweight in early adolescence. In the group without maternal diabetes, these estimates were 14.2% and 6.6%, respectively. In multiple logistic regression analysis, controlling for age, gender, and Tanner stage, the odds ratio for adolescent overweight for each 1-kg increment in birth weight was 1.4 (95% confidence interval: 1.21.6). Adjustment for physical activity, television watching, energy intake, breastfeeding duration, mothers BMI, and other maternal and family variables reduced the estimate to 1.3 (1.11.5). For offspring of mothers with GDM versus no diabetes, the odds ratio for adolescent overweight was 1.4 (1.12.0), which was unchanged after controlling for energy balance and socioeconomic factors. Adjustment for birth weight slightly attenuated the estimate (1.3; 0.91.9); adjustment for maternal BMI reduced the odds ratio to 1.2 (0.81.7).
Conclusions. Higher birth weight predicted increased risk of overweight in adolescence. Having been born to a mother with GDM was also associated with increased adolescent overweight. However, the effect of GDM on offspring obesity seemed only partially explained by its influence on birth weight, and adjustment for mothers own BMI attenuated the GDM associations. Our results only modestly support a causal role of altered maternal-fetal glucose metabolism in the genesis of obesity in the offspring. Alternatively, GDM may program risk for a postnatal insult leading to obesity, or it may merely be a risk marker, not in the causal pathway.
Key Words: birth weight gestational diabetes obesity childhood adolescence
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus OR, odds ratio CI, confidence interval
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Evidence from animal and human studies indicates that many adult chronic diseases, especially cardiovascular diseases, have their origins in fetal life.12 Less information, however, is available for the early origins of obesity. Several studies have addressed the association between birth weight and body mass index (BMI) in childhood and early adulthood. Most of these studies have found direct associations, ie, that higher birth weight is associated with higher attained BMI.1330 Many are limited, however, by incomplete data on gestational age, parental adiposity, or socioeconomic factors, which may have independent influences on both birth weight and later weight gain.
Observations that higher birth weight is associated with higher attained BMI have led to the hypothesis that in utero determinants of birth weight may also program the fetus for elevated risk of later obesity. Of primary interest is altered maternal-fetal glucose metabolism. Maternal hyperglycemia leads to excess fetal insulin, itself a growth hormone for the fetus. Thus, offspring of mothers with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) have higher birth weights.31 Furthermore, animal studies suggest that fetal hyperinsulinemia can alter expression of hypothalamic neurotransmitters, leading to offspring hyperphagia and increased weight.32
Despite this evidence, few epidemiologic studies have investigated associations of maternal GDM with offspring obesity. These studies have produced mixed results, with some showing evidence of a direct association33,34 and others showing no association.35 Explanations for the lack of consistency could include that some studies have not distinguished between pregestational and gestational diabetes and some included only mild cases of GDM, whereas others took place in areas of endemic diabetes, and some lacked information on covariates such as maternal BMI.
The purposes of this study were to examine the independent associations of birth weight and GDM with adolescent BMI, with adjustment for relevant covariates, and to determine to what extent the effect of maternal GDM is explained by its influence on birth weight. We were also particularly interested in the role of maternal BMI in explaining these associations.
| METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
For this analysis, we excluded 343 participants outside the age range 9 to 14 years on the baseline questionnaire in 1996, 418 whose mothers did not complete the 1997 supplemental questionnaire, 374 who had missing or outlying (± >3 age- and gender-specific standard deviations) values for BMI on the baseline questionnaire, 46 who had missing or outlying values (<0.5 kg or >6.0 kg) for birth weight, 454 who had missing values for Tanner sexual maturity rating, 71 whose mothers either failed to report their diabetic status during the index pregnancy or had preexisting diabetes, and 167 who had childhood medical conditions that might have interfered with growth. These conditions were diabetes (n = 43); juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (n = 24); inflammatory bowel disease (n = 18); cerebral palsy (n = 28); Down syndrome (n = 6); acute lymphocytic leukemia (n = 7); and 41 other selected infectious, endocrine, metabolic, neurologic, renal, respiratory (not asthma), and orthopedic conditions and congenital anomalies. We also excluded 128 whose mothers reported a gestation of <34 completed weeks. (Excluding subjects born <37 weeks gestation gave similar results.) We therefore based our analyses on 14 881 participants, 7981 girls and 6900 boys.
Measurements
We ascertained all information from mailed self-administered questionnaires. On the 1996 baseline questionnaire, each cohort participant reported age, gender, race/ethnicity, height, weight, pubic hair sexual maturity (Tanner stage) rating using validated pictograms,37 diet and physical activity in the past 12 months using validated frequency questionnaires,38,39 and average time spent watching television.
From the 1997 supplemental questionnaire to mothers, we obtained information about each childs birth weight and length; gestational age in the categories <34 weeks, 34 to 37 weeks, and >37 weeks; medical illnesses during childhood; and duration of breastfeeding during infancy. From the initial Nurses Health Study II questionnaire in 1989, we obtained information about each mothers diabetes history, including whether she had GDM during the index pregnancy, and about her smoking habits during the early life of the child. From the 1995 Nurses Health Study II questionnaire, we ascertained mothers other lifestyle habits that may be related to childrens body weight, including single questions representing aspects of dietary restraint ("I eat anything I want, anytime I want"yes or no), weight fluctuation ("What is the difference between your highest and lowest weight in the last 2 years [excluding pregnancy-related changes]?"), and weight concerns ("I pay a great deal of attention to changes in my figure"yes or no). When present, we obtained maternal weight and height from the 1995 Nurses Health Study II questionnaire; when not, we obtained this information from the earlier questionnaire closest to 1995.40 Our measure of maternal BMI was thus "current" BMI, ie, the value closest to the 1996 baseline cohort questionnaire. We explored use of several other estimates for mothers BMI, including at age 18 or in 1989, or values that we obtained using a parity-adjusted least squares regression model to interpolate her BMI at the time of the childs conception. Because these estimates were highly correlated with each other and each of these approaches gave similar results, we used "current" maternal BMI in all reported analyses.
To obtain estimates of household income, we mapped each subjects address to a US census tract. We used US census data from 1990 to assign the median household income for that census tract to the individual subject.
Exposure Assessment
Our main exposures of interest were birth weight and maternal gestational diabetes, defined as maternal report of diabetes diagnosed by a doctor during the index pregnancy. The validity of self-report of GDM for this group of women is satisfactory: Solomon et al24 found that among a sample of 114 Nurses Health Study II participants who self-reported GDM in a singleton pregnancy and whose medical records were available for review, a physician diagnosis of GDM was confirmed in 107 (94%). Among a sample of 100 women who reported a pregnancy not complicated by GDM, 77 (83%) reported having a 1-hour 50-g glucose screening test, and all reported 2 or more urine glucose screens during pregnancy.
Outcome Ascertainment
Our outcome variables were overweight, defined as BMI (weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters) greater than the age- and gender-specific 95th percentile in a national sample of US children, and at risk for overweight, ie, between the 85th and 95th percentiles.41 For overweight analyses, we defined not overweight (a "noncase") as BMI less than the 95th percentile; for at risk for overweight, we defined a noncase as BMI less than the 85th percentile. We computed BMI in early adolescence from the height and weight reported by each Growing Up Today Study participant on the baseline 1996 questionnaire. Although self-reports of these measures are known to be valid in adults, recent data also suggest high validity among children and adolescents. In samples ranging in age from 11 to 16 years, Shannon et al42 and Strauss43 reported correlation coefficients in the range 0.84 to 0.94 for self-reported versus actual weight and 0.62 to 0.91 for height. Recently, Goodman et al44 estimated a correlation of 0.92 between BMI calculated from self-report versus measured height and weight among participants in the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. Despite the tendency for heavier children to underreport their weight, the obesity status of only 3.8% of youth in that study was misclassified.
Data Analysis
To adjust for covariates and to account for correlated values among siblings (n = 6343), we used logistic models with estimation by generalized estimating equations.45 We analyzed birth weight as a continuous variable and GDM as binary, and we fit separate models for the 2 outcomes, overweight and at risk for overweight. In our base model, we adjusted for age and Tanner stage, because adolescent BMI varies by these 2 variables.46,47 Because we obtained similar results in gender-specific analyses, we analyzed girls and boys together and adjusted for gender. In subsequent models, we adjusted for total physical activity, amount of television watched, and total daily energy intake as proxies for energy balance. In addition, we adjusted for duration of breastfeeding because that variable predicts adolescent overweight in this cohort,40 as well as other maternal and family variables that could be related to GDM, birth weight, and/or adolescent BMI. We then added birth weight and maternal BMI to the models, separately and in combination.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Birth weights and current maternal BMI were higher among offspring of mothers who experienced GDM than those who did not (Table 1). Among the 465 participants whose mothers had GDM, 17.1% were at risk for overweight and 9.7% were overweight. In the group without maternal diabetes, these estimates were 14.2% and 6.6%, respectively. In both groups, estimates of both overweight and at risk for overweight were higher for boys than for girls. Among both boys and girls, mean adolescent BMI as well as proportions for overweight and at risk for overweight rose across increasing birth weight category (Table 2).
|
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In addition, we found that maternal GDM was associated with an OR of 1.4 for adolescent overweight, before controlling for birth weight and maternal BMI. This estimate was slightly attenuated by addition of birth weight to the model, suggesting that the association of GDM with later obesity could partially be explained by its influence on birth weight.
Maternal BMI played a confounding role in these analyses; adding it to the multivariate models resulted in a blunted association of maternal GDM with offspring overweight. Maternal BMI is clearly a risk factor for GDM, but its relation with offspring obesity could be through several pathways. First, preexisting maternal obesity could cause GDM, which in turn could cause offspring obesity. Given the observed confounding effect of maternal BMI, this pathway is unlikely to be the only explanation for our findings. Additional explanations include that offspring of obese mothers could take on similar adverse dietary and physical activity behaviors, and mothers and their children could share genes that cause obesity in both of them.
To some extent, then, GDM may be only a risk marker for offspring obesity, not in the causal pathway. Such an interpretation would be consistent with the null findings of Whitaker et al.35 Like the managed care study population of Whitaker et al,35 GDM in a cohort of nurses such as ours may not be severe enough to observe a life-long effect of its presence. It is also possible that effective treatment of GDM in this group of health care professionals could have blunted any long-term consequences, but the long-term effects of GDM treatment on the offspring are not known.48 In contrast, among the Pima Indians, in which diabetes, including gestational diabetes, is endemic, GDM is more clearly associated with offspring obesity. Dabelea et al33 examined BMI among Pima siblings, aged 9 to 24, whose fetal lives were discordant for the presence of maternal diabetes. Offspring who were exposed to diabetes in utero had higher BMI than their unexposed siblings. That study is important because it mitigates the roles of both shared genes and postnatal environment, likely similar within a sibling set, thus emphasizing the potential role of the fetal environment.
Although our results do not implicate GDM as a sufficient cause of offspring obesity, they may be consistent with GDMs programming the fetus for later, postnatal influences that lead to obesity. This interpretation is consistent with the findings of Silverman et al,34 who reported that at age 14 to 17 years, offspring of mothers with GDM had a mean BMI of 26.0 kg/m2, compared with 20.9 kg/m2 in control subjects. In addition, amniotic fluid insulin levels, which reflect fetal pancreatic insulin production, correlated with obesity during adolescence. Notably, the increased BMI was apparent at birth and progressively after the age of 4 years but not at ages 1 to 3 years, suggesting a delayed influence of GDM or the necessity of a "second hit" in childhood to produce the adolescent obesity.31 It is possible that the effect of GDM on overweight in the participants in our study would be more evident later in adolescence.
Although the participants in this study lived in all 50 states and several US territories, they compose a largely homogeneous population in terms of race/ethnicity. This limitation, however, is more likely to affect generalizability than internal validity. Despite a large sample size, GDM is uncommon enough that CIs were relatively wide. For example, our OR estimate of 1.2 for the maternal BMI-adjusted association of GDM with offspring overweight was consistent (with 95% confidence) with estimates ranging from 0.8 to 1.7. Although a 20% increase in odds could be important from a public health viewpoint, we could not distinguish this estimate very well from larger or smaller, including null, effects.
Because we did not obtain data during the preschool- and school-age periods for each child, we were unable to examine growth trajectories over time. Residual and unmeasured confounding is always of concern in an observational study, but we were able to control for several relevant covariates not available in many previous studies. Another strength is that in contrast to some previous studies, we excluded mothers with pregestational diabetes, because long-standing diabetes can cause severe placental dysfunction and growth-retarded, rather than macrosomic, newborns.
| CONCLUSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank the staff and participants of the Growing Up Today Study and the Nurses Health Study II, and we thank Julia C. L. Wong for contributions to the manuscript.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Reprint requests to (M.W.G.) 133 Brookline Ave, 6th Fl, Boston, MA 02215. E-mail: matthew_gillman{at}hms.harvard.edu
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. K. Kumanyika, E. Obarzanek, N. Stettler, R. Bell, A. E. Field, S. P. Fortmann, B. A. Franklin, M. W. Gillman, C. E. Lewis, W. C. Poston II, et al. Population-Based Prevention of Obesity: The Need for Comprehensive Promotion of Healthful Eating, Physical Activity, and Energy Balance: A Scientific Statement From American Heart Association Council on Epidemiology and Prevention, Interdisciplinary Committee for Prevention (Formerly the Expert Panel on Population and Prevention Science) Circulation, July 22, 2008; 118(4): 428 - 464. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. H Wrotniak, J. Shults, S. Butts, and N. Stettler Gestational weight gain and risk of overweight in the offspring at age 7 y in a multicenter, multiethnic cohort study Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, June 1, 2008; 87(6): 1818 - 1824. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Ingram, I. Z. Lien, L. E. Mead, M. Estes, D. N. Prater, E. Derr-Yellin, L. A. DiMeglio, and L. S. Haneline In Vitro Hyperglycemia or a Diabetic Intrauterine Environment Reduces Neonatal Endothelial Colony-Forming Cell Numbers and Function Diabetes, March 1, 2008; 57(3): 724 - 731. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. D. Clausen, E. R. Mathiesen, T. Hansen, O. Pedersen, D. M. Jensen, J. Lauenborg, and P. Damm High Prevalence of Type 2 Diabetes and Pre-Diabetes in Adult Offspring of Women With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus or Type 1 Diabetes: The role of intrauterine hyperglycemia Diabetes Care, February 1, 2008; 31(2): 340 - 346. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Shankar, A. Harrell, X. Liu, J. M. Gilchrist, M. J. J. Ronis, and T. M. Badger Maternal obesity at conception programs obesity in the offspring Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, February 1, 2008; 294(2): R528 - R538. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. Candib Obesity and Diabetes in Vulnerable Populations: Reflection on Proximal and Distal Causes Ann. Fam. Med, November 1, 2007; 5(6): 547 - 556. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. A. Hillier, K. L. Pedula, M. M. Schmidt, J. A. Mullen, M.-A. Charles, and D. J. Pettitt Childhood Obesity and Metabolic Imprinting: The ongoing effects of maternal hyperglycemia Diabetes Care, September 1, 2007; 30(9): 2287 - 2292. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Y. Chu, W. M. Callaghan, S. Y. Kim, C. H. Schmid, J. Lau, L. J. England, and P. M. Dietz Maternal Obesity and Risk of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Diabetes Care, August 1, 2007; 30(8): 2070 - 2076. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. P. Gunderson Breastfeeding After Gestational Diabetes Pregnancy: Subsequent obesity and type 2 diabetes in women and their offspring Diabetes Care, July 1, 2007; 30(Supplement_2): S161 - S168. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Knight, B. M. Shields, A. Hill, R. J. Powell, D. Wright, and A. T. Hattersley The Impact of Maternal Glycemia and Obesity on Early Postnatal Growth in a Nondiabetic Caucasian Population Diabetes Care, April 1, 2007; 30(4): 777 - 783. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Thomas, E. Hypponen, and C. Power Prenatal Exposures and Glucose Metabolism in Adulthood: Are effects mediated through birth weight and adiposity? Diabetes Care, April 1, 2007; 30(4): 918 - 924. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Lambin, R. van Bree, S. Caluwaerts, L. Vercruysse, I. Vergote, and J. Verhaeghe Adipose tissue in offspring of Leprdb/+ mice: early-life environment vs. genotype Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, January 1, 2007; 292(1): E262 - E271. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Lambin, R. van Bree,, I. Vergote, and J. Verhaeghe Chronic Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha} Infusion in Gravid C57BL6/J Mice Accelerates Adipose Tissue Development in Female Offspring Reproductive Sciences, December 1, 2006; 13(8): 558 - 565. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. J. Mayer-Davis, S. L. Rifas-Shiman, L. Zhou, F. B. Hu, G. A. Colditz, and M. W. Gillman Breast-Feeding and Risk for Childhood Obesity: Does maternal diabetes or obesity status matter? Diabetes Care, October 1, 2006; 29(10): 2231 - 2237. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Chen, M. L Pennell, M. A Klebanoff, W. J Rogan, and M. P Longnecker Maternal smoking during pregnancy in relation to child overweight: follow-up to age 8 years Int. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2006; 35(1): 121 - 130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. W. Gillman Developmental origins of health and disease. N. Engl. J. Med., October 27, 2005; 353(17): 1848 - 1850. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. J. Rosenberg, S. Garbers, H. Lipkind, and M. A. Chiasson Maternal Obesity and Diabetes as Risk Factors for Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: Differences Among 4 Racial/Ethnic Groups Am J Public Health, September 1, 2005; 95(9): 1545 - 1551. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||