search text   Advanced Search

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) P3Rs: Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when P3Rs are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My File Cabinet Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (68) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sorof, J. M. Articles by Portman, R. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Sorof, J. M. Articles by Portman, R. J. Related Collections Heart & Blood Vessels

Carotid Artery Intimal-Medial Thickness and Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Children With Elevated Blood Pressure

Jonathan M. Sorof, MD^*, Andrei V. Alexandrov, MD, Gina Cardwell, LVN^* and Ronald J. Portman, MD^*

^* Departments of Pediatrics
Neurology, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Texas

-->

	ABSTRACT

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION CONCLUSION REFERENCES

 
Objectives. To determine the association between carotid artery intimal-medial thickness (cIMT) and left ventricular mass index (LVMI) in children with elevated blood pressure.

Methods. Study subjects (n = 32; mean age: 13.9 ± 2.7 years) were untreated new referrals to a pediatric hypertension clinic with confirmed elevated blood pressure. LVM was calculated from 2-dimensionally guided m-mode echocardiographic measurements of the left ventricle. LVMI was calculated as LVM (g)/height (m)^2.7, and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) was defined as LVMI >95th percentile. Carotid artery duplex ultrasound was performed by protocol by experienced vascular sonographers who were unaware of the echocardiography results. The thickest IMT complex of the far wall of the distal common carotid artery was measured in longitudinal B-mode section using a high-resolution linear array of 8 MHz.

Results. The prevalence of LVH and increased cIMT was 41% and 28%, respectively. Subjects with increased cIMT had higher LVMI (46.8 g/m^2.7 vs 31.4 g/m^2.7) than those with normal cIMT. The LVH prevalence was 89% (8 of 9) among subjects with increased cIMT as compared with 22% (5 of 23) in subjects with normal cIMT. cIMT was positively correlated with body mass index (r = 0.43), interventricular septal thickness (r = 0.58), posterior wall thickness (r = 0.54), and LVMI (r = 0.54). cIMT and LVMI were positively associated after accounting for age, gender, and body mass index.

Conclusions. These findings raise the possibility that carotid duplex ultrasound, by indicating the presence of early arterial wall changes, may be useful for predicting other cardiovascular sequelae in hypertensive children.

Key Words: hypertension • child • echocardiography • left ventricular hypertrophy • carotid ultrasound • intimal-medial thickness

Abbreviations: LVM, left ventricular mass • LVH, left ventricular hypertrophy • cIMT, intimal-medial thickness of the carotid artery • LVMI, left ventricular mass index • CCA, common carotid artery • BMI, body mass index

	INTRODUCTION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION CONCLUSION REFERENCES

 
Primary pediatric hypertension has become increasingly common in association with other cardiovascular risk factors such as obesity, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes.¹ Although clinically evident cardiovascular morbidity as a result of hypertension is rare during childhood, an accumulating body of evidence indicates that the sequelae of hypertension begin years or decades before the onset of clinical disease. In the absence of clearly defined morbid outcomes, surrogate markers, such as echocardiographic evidence of cardiac abnormalities, have been used to study the evolution of cardiovascular disease in hypertensive children. Specifically, studies of hypertensive children have revealed positive associations between blood pressure and left ventricular mass (LVM),^2–4 a high prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH),^5–12 and diastolic dysfunction in the form of impaired left ventricular relaxation.¹¹ These data suggest that early and aggressive treatment of pediatric hypertension may be warranted. However, the complex interactions in children among normal growth, body habitus, blood pressure, and LVM have confounded the analysis of the specific contribution of blood pressure elevation to the process of cardiac remodeling.

Ultrasound examination of the carotid arteries has emerged as an alternative noninvasive method to study the evolution of cardiovascular disease.¹³ In adults, increased intimal-medial thickness of the carotid artery (cIMT) has gained acceptance as a reliable marker for generalized atherosclerosis on the basis of the positive association between cIMT and the severity of several different cardiovascular disease risk factors, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, and stroke.^14–16 Increased cIMT has also been demonstrated in children with cardiovascular risk factors such as diabetes,^17–19 familial hypercholesterolemia,^17,20,21 and growth hormone deficiency,²² as well as in children with arteriopathic diseases such as Williams syndrome²³ and Kawasaki disease.²⁴ Importantly, studies of carotid ultrasound in healthy children show that cIMT does not vary with age, gender, and body habitus through the pediatric age range.²⁵ To date, no studies of hypertensive children have investigated cIMT or determined whether changes in cIMT occur in concert with changes in more established markers of cardiovascular disease such as LVM index (LVMI). To determine whether atherosclerosis and cardiac hypertrophy are comorbid conditions in hypertensive children, we investigated the relationship between cIMT and LVMI in newly referred patients to a pediatric hypertension clinic.

	METHODS

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION CONCLUSION REFERENCES

 
Study subjects (n = 32) were recruited from a subspecialty pediatric hypertension clinic. All subjects were newly referred to the clinic after documentation of elevated blood pressure by a primary care provider on several preceding occasions. Elevated blood pressure was confirmed in the clinic by averaging the last 3 of 4 blood pressure measurements made at the first clinic visit with a Critikon oscillometric monitor (Tampa, FL) after 5 minutes of rest. Inclusion criteria for the study were average clinic blood pressure greater than the gender, age, and height-specific 90th percentile by current Task Force criteria²⁶; age 6 years and 18 years; no past or current use of antihypertensive medication; no concurrent use of medications known to affect blood pressure; and no known secondary causes of hypertension. The protocol was approved by an institutional review committee, and subjects and parents gave informed assent and consent, respectively.

Echocardiography was performed by sonographers who were blinded to carotid ultrasound results. A complete 2-dimensional echocardiographic examination, consisting of parasternal long and short, apical 4-chamber, subcostal coronal and sagittal, and suprasternal long and short axes, was first obtained to rule out congenital heart disease, with particular attention to ensure that the aortic arch was patent and that there was no coarctation of the aorta present. LVM was calculated from 2-dimensionally guided m-mode measurements made during diastole of the left ventricular internal dimension, interventricular septal thickness, and posterior wall thickness according to methods established by the American Society of Echocardiography. LVM was calculated using the equation reported by Devereux et al.²⁷ LVMI was calculated by dividing LVM by height in meters to the power of 2.7 to minimize the effect of age, gender, ethnicity, and overweight status.^28,29 LVH was defined as LVMI >38.6 g/m^2.7, a value reported to represent the pediatric 95th percentile of LVMI in normotensive healthy children.²⁸

Carotid artery ultrasound was performed by experienced vascular sonographers who were blinded to echocardiography results according to previously developed and validated scanning protocol. Briefly, subjects were examined in a supine position. A longitudinal view of the distal common carotid artery (CCA) was obtained using a linear 8-MHz transducer. The gain and focus settings were optimized to contrast the vessel lumen and IMT appearance. The IMT measurements were made on both CCAs on the far wall of the distal CCA at least 2 cm below the flow divider. A longitudinal B-mode image of the CCA with sharp edges of the far wall IMT complex was used to place 2 measurements with digital calipers at 1 cm apart. The measurements were carried on frozen images demonstrating the thickest IMT complex with calipers placed on a zoomed CCA image. The reproducibility of measurements of maximum IMT thickness in the distal CCA was determined for repeat assessments by the same sonographer and by 2 sonographers independently in a sample of 10 healthy volunteers yielding values of >0.9. In our validation studies, the difference between these measurements was <10% (average 5%).

Descriptive statistics are presented as percentages, means, and standard deviations. Univariate analyses for group comparisons of continuous variables were performed using Student t test. Multivariate analyses for group comparisons were performed using analysis of covariance. The correlations among LVMI; cIMT; and continuous demographic, clinical, and hemodynamic variables were determined using the Pearson correlation coefficient. Multiple regression analysis was used to determine the strength of association among LVMI, cIMT, and multiple independent variables. Fisher exact test was used to compare the LVH percentage between groups. P < .05 indicated statistical significance.

	RESULTS

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION CONCLUSION REFERENCES

 
Demographic and clinical data for study subjects are shown (Table 1). The majority of subjects in the study were male (78%) with Hispanic the predominant ethnicity (47%). Fifty-three percent of subjects were obese, defined as body mass index (BMI) 95th percentile for age and gender, and 78% had BMI 90th percentile. Fifty-three percent of subjects had isolated systolic blood pressure elevation, 3% had isolated diastolic blood pressure elevation, and 44% had both systolic and diastolic blood pressure elevation. The mean time between echocardiography and carotid ultrasound was 5.9 ± 10.6 days. Twenty-three of 32 subjects had echocardiography and carotid ultrasound performed on the same day, with a maximum time between studies of 34 days.

cIMT was positively correlated with weight (r = 0.50; P = .003) and BMI (r = 0.43; P = .014) but did not vary by gender, ethnicity, age, height, or clinic blood pressure values. The upper quartile of maximum cIMT within the study population was bounded by a threshold of 0.8 mm. The prevalence of subjects with increased cIMT (ie, upper quartile) was 28% (9 of 32). Subjects with increased cIMT were heavier (91.3 kg vs 68.9 kg; P = .002) and had higher BMI (33.7 g/m^2.7 vs 26.1 g/m^2.7; P = .003) compared with those with cIMT in the lower 3 quartiles but did not differ in age, height, or blood pressure.

The relationship between carotid ultrasound and echocardiography parameters was determined by univariate and multivariate analysis. Subjects with increased cIMT had higher LVMI (46.8 g/m^2.7 vs 31.4 g/m^2.7; P < .0001; Fig 1). Similarly, subjects with LVH had higher cIMT (0.72 mm vs 0.63 mm; P = .047) than those without LVH. By univariate analysis, cIMT was positively correlated with LVMI (r = 0.54; P = .001; Fig 2), interventricular septal thickness (r = 0.58; P < .001), and posterior wall thickness (r = 0.54; P = .001). By multivariate analysis, the relationship between cIMT and LVMI remained significant after controlling for either BMI or weight (r = 0.42; P = .018). Stepwise linear regression analysis showed that 33% of the variability of cIMT was accounted for by LVMI and weight (r = 0.62; r² = 0.39; P < .001).

View larger version (12K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig 1. Comparison of LVMI between subjects with normal versus thickened IMT. Nml, carotid IMT <0.8 mm; Thick, carotid IMT 0.8 mm.

View larger version (12K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig 2. Scatterplot of cIMT versus LVMI.

	DISCUSSION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION CONCLUSION REFERENCES

 
The results from the current study demonstrate for the first time in children with elevated blood pressure that early arterial wall changes related to atherosclerosis and increases in LVM occur in concert. This relationship is evidenced both by the positive correlation between LVMI and cIMT and the association between LVH and increased cIMT. Specifically, a compelling finding of the study is the high percentage of LVH in children with increased cIMT. Eight of 9 children in the upper quartile of cIMT had LVH, as compared with only 5 of 23 in the lower 3 quartiles. These findings are consistent with studies of hypertensive adults showing an association between increased cIMT and cardiovascular alterations such as LVH.^30–32 Although the conclusions that can be drawn are limited by the relatively small number of subjects studied and the lack of a normotensive control group, these results raise the possibility that carotid ultrasound, by indicating the presence of early arterial wall changes, may be useful for predicting other cardiovascular sequelae in hypertensive children.

In contrast to adults, in whom increased cIMT may be confounded by factors such as advancing age and body habitus, cIMT is reportedly independent of age, gender, BMI, fat mass, or serum cholesterol in healthy children through 18 years of age.²⁵ However, in the current study, both cIMT and LVMI were positively associated with BMI. Although an independent relationship between cIMT and LVMI was found after controlling for body habitus, other atherogenic factors that were not assessed in this study, such as glucose intolerance and dyslipidemia, and that are often associated with obesity (present in more than half of study subjects) may be important modifiers of the association between cIMT and LVMI. It is interesting to note that neither cIMT nor LVMI correlated with clinic blood pressure. This lack of correlation suggests that the severity of clinic blood pressure elevation may be unreliable for quantifying the risk of target organ sequelae in children. However, the small sample size, with its inherent lack of power to detect relatively weaker associations, creates uncertainty regarding the interpretation of negative results.

The presence of preclinical atherosclerosis in children with cardiovascular risk factors has been documented in previous studies.³³ Autopsy studies have revealed the presence of fatty streaking and plaque formation in the abdominal aorta of children and young adults with cardiovascular risk factors before the onset of clinical disease.^34–37 Studies using carotid ultrasound to measure cIMT in children at high risk for atherosclerotic disease are consistent with these autopsy findings. Increased cIMT has been reported in children with diabetes ^17–19 and in children with familial hypercholesterolemia^17,20,21 as compared with normal controls. Furthermore, prospective community-based studies have shown that total serum cholesterol measured in childhood predicts cIMT measured in the same subjects in adulthood.³⁸ In aggregate, these studies provide strong evidence that the atherosclerotic process begins in children who are at risk many years before disease becomes clinically apparent.

Although the results from the current study are consistent with previous studies showing increased cIMT in children with atherogenic risk factors, the ultrasound method for IMT does not allow for differentiation of intimal thickening because of the atherosclerotic process from medial hypertrophy (smooth muscle growth) as a result of pressure effects. It has been argued that increased cIMT in younger patients does not represent local atherosclerosis but instead reflects an adaptive response to altered flow, shear stress, and pressure.³⁹ The positive relationship between IMT and LVM found in the current study is consistent with the latter interpretation by indicating a generalized augmentation of cardiovascular growth inducing both increased LVM and medial thickening. However, an autopsy study by the Pathobiological Determinants of Atherosclerosis in Youth Study reported that intimal lesions appeared in all of the aortas and more than half of the right coronary arteries in patients aged 15 to 19 years.⁴⁰ Given that these subjects who underwent autopsy were unselected for cardiovascular risk factors, it seems likely that the children in the current study with hypertension and elevated BMI would have the same or a greater degree of intimal changes. In either case, the risk of future cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease in adults increases gradually with increasing common cIMT.⁴¹ Thus, increased cIMT may serve as a graded marker for cardiovascular risk by showing the same type of adaptive response to chronic blood pressure elevation that is presumed to cause increased LVMI.

Although both LVH and increased cIMT are independently predictive of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in adults, the threshold values of "abnormality" for LVMI and cIMT are not as well validated in children. In the current study, LVM was calculated by the formula of Devereux et al²⁷ and indexed to height to the power of 2.7 to minimize the effect of age, gender, and overweight status.^28,29 LVH defined as LVMI greater than the pediatric 95th percentile was found in 42% of subjects, consistent with previous studies of hypertensive children using a similar LVH definition.^12,42 In hypertensive adults, LVH defined as LVMI >51 g/m^2.7 is associated with a 4-fold higher risk for the development of cardiovascular endpoints.⁴³ In contrast, the pediatric definition of LVH used in this study has not been validated by linkage to morbid outcomes.

The definition of abnormal cIMT is less clear, particularly in children. A study of hypertensive adults found that the prevalence of abnormally thickened cIMT increased from 15% to 44% as the definition threshold decreased from 1.0 mm to 0.8 mm.³² When linked to clinical events, specific studies of adults have reported that cIMT 1 mm is associated with a 2- to 5-fold greater risk of coronary events,^44–46 and cIMT 1.18 is associated with a 4-fold greater risk for combined acute myocardial infarction and stroke.⁴⁷ A meta-analysis of studies in adults relating cIMT measurements to the risk of coronary and cerebrovascular events showed that the risk of first myocardial infarction increases with an IMT of 0.822 mm or more and the risk of stroke with an IMT of 0.75 mm or more.⁴⁸

The upper quartile of cIMT in the current study population (cIMT 0.8 mm) is within the range of cIMT associated with the increased risk defined in the meta-analysis of adult studies and higher than the normal values described in the largest study of carotid ultrasound in children.²⁵ However, differences in measurement technique make comparisons between studies difficult. Reported values for cIMT in normal pediatric patients vary from 0.42 mm¹⁹ to 0.64 mm,²² with several studies reporting values intermediate to these extremes.^{18,20,23–25,49} In the absence of a concomitant control group, it cannot be definitively concluded that cIMT is increased in hypertensive as compared with normotensive children. Although the threshold for abnormal cIMT in children is likely lower than the value of 0.8 mm used in the current study, 0.8 mm bounded the upper quartile of values in the current study and therefore defined the high end of the range of values within this selected patient population. The method in the current study of choosing the maximum cIMT value likely overestimates IMT thickness compared with an average of multiple measurements used in previous large-scale studies in adults along similar CCA segments by 0.01 to 0.02 mm. However, the internally consistent cross-sectional observations of 1 maximum cIMT measurement in the current study suggest that early arterial wall changes are present in hypertensive children and deserve additional study.

	CONCLUSION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION CONCLUSION REFERENCES

 
The current study is consistent with the results from other studies of cardiovascular risk in children that arterial wall changes may be present at an early age. The study findings are strengthened by the prospective, protocolized enrollment of subjects; the independent measurements of blood pressure, LVMI, and cIMT by separate study personnel; and the persistence of the association between LVMI and cIMT after controlling for age, gender, or body habitus. In the face of an evolving epidemic in children of hypertension, obesity, type 2 diabetes, and dyslipidemia,⁵⁰ more sensitive and specific diagnostic studies to define present and future cardiovascular risk are needed. In this regard, additional studies of carotid ultrasound in hypertensive children will help determine the extent to which increased cIMT may be used as a marker for this risk.

	ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

 
This research was supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute grant K23 HL04217-01A1—"End-Organ Injury in Hypertensive Children."

	FOOTNOTES

 
Received for publication Apr 3, 2002; Accepted Jun 13, 2002.

Reprint requests to (J.M.S.) Division of Pediatric Nephrology and Hypertension, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, 6431 Fannin St, Rm 3.124, Houston, TX 77030. E-mail: jsorof{at}uth.tmc.edu

	REFERENCES

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION CONCLUSION REFERENCES

 

1. Berenson GS, Srinivasan SR. Emergence of obesity and cardiovascular risk for coronary artery disease: the Bogalusa Heart Study. Prev Cardiol.2001; 4 :116 –121[Medline]
2. Burke GL, Arcilla RA, Culpepper WS, Webber LS, Chiang YK, Berenson GS. Blood pressure and echocardiographic measures in children: the Bogalusa Heart Study. Circulation.1987; 75 :106 –114[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Malcolm DD, Burns TL, Mahoney LT, Lauer RM. Factors affecting left ventricular mass in childhood: the Muscatine Study. Pediatrics.1993; 92 :703 –709[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Daniels SR, Kimball TR, Morrison JA, Khoury P, Witt S, Meyer RA. Effect of lean body mass, fat mass, blood pressure, and sexual maturation on left ventricular mass in children and adolescents. Statistical, biological, and clinical significance. Circulation.1995; 92 :3249 –3254[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Laird WP, Fixler DE. Left ventricular hypertrophy in adolescents with elevated blood pressure: assessment by chest roentgenography, electrocardiography, and echocardiography. Pediatrics.1981; 67 :255 –259[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Goldring D, Hernandez A, Choi S, et al. Blood pressure in a high school population. II. Clinical profile of the juvenile hypertensive. J Pediatr.1979; 95 :298 –304[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
7. Culpepper WS. Cardiac anatomy and function in juvenile hypertension. Current understanding and future concerns. Am J Med.1983; 75 :57 –61
8. Culpepper WS, Sodt PC, Messerli FH, Ruschhaupt DG, Arcilla RA. Cardiac status in juvenile borderline hypertension. Ann Intern Med.1983; 98 :1 –7
9. Schieken RM, Clarke WR, Lauer RM. Left ventricular hypertrophy in children with blood pressures in the upper quintile of the distribution. The Muscatine Study. Hypertension.1981; 3 :669 –675[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Daniels SR, Meyer RA, Loggie JM. Determinants of cardiac involvement in children and adolescents with essential hypertension. Circulation.1990; 82 :1243 –1248[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Johnson MC, Bergersen LJ, Beck A, Dick G, Cole BR. Diastolic function and tachycardia in hypertensive children. Am J Hypertens.1999; 12 :1009 –1014[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
12. Belsha CW, Wells TG, McNiece KL, Seib PM, Plummer JK, Berry PL. Influence of diurnal blood pressure variations on target organ abnormalities in adolescents with mild essential hypertension. Am J Hypertens.1998; 11 :410 –417[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
13. Simon A, Gariepy J, Chironi G, Megnien JL, Levenson J. Intima-media thickness: a new tool for diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular risk. J Hypertens.2002; 20 :159 –169[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
14. Heiss G, Sharrett AR, Barnes R, Chambless LE, Szklo M, Alzola C. Carotid atherosclerosis measured by B-mode ultrasound in populations: associations with cardiovascular risk factors in the ARIC study. Am J Epidemiol.1991; 134 :250 –256[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. O’Leary DH, Polak JF, Kronmal RA, et al. Distribution and correlates of sonographically detected carotid artery disease in the Cardiovascular Health Study. The CHS Collaborative Research Group. Stroke.1992; 23 :1752 –1760[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Salonen JT, Salonen R. Ultrasound B-mode imaging in observational studies of atherosclerotic progression. Circulation.1993; 87 :II56 –II65
17. Jarvisalo MJ, Jartti L, Nanto-Salonen K, et al. Increased aortic intima-media thickness: a marker of preclinical atherosclerosis in high-risk children. Circulation.2001; 104 :2943 –2947[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Peppa-Patrikiou M, Scordili M, Antoniou A, Giannaki M, Dracopoulou M, Dacou-Voutetakis C. Carotid atherosclerosis in adolescents and young adults with IDDM. Relation to urinary endothelin, albumin, free cortisol, and other factors. Diabetes Care.1998; 21 :1004 –1007[Abstract]
19. Jarvisalo MJ, Putto-Laurila A, Jartti L, et al. Carotid artery intima-media thickness in children with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes.2002; 51 :493 –498[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Tonstad S, Joakimsen O, Stensland-Bugge E, et al. Risk factors related to carotid intima-media thickness and plaque in children with familial hypercholesterolemia and control subjects. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol.1996; 16 :984 –991[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Virkola K, Pesonen E, Akerblom HK, Siimes MA. Cholesterol and carotid artery wall in children and adolescents with familial hypercholesterolaemia: a controlled study by ultrasound. Acta Paediatr.1997; 86 :1203 –1207[ISI][Medline]
22. Capaldo B, Patti L, Oliviero U, et al. Increased arterial intima-media thickness in childhood-onset growth hormone deficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab.1997; 82 :1378 –1381[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Sadler LS, Gingell R, Martin DJ. Carotid ultrasound examination in Williams syndrome. J Pediatr.1998; 132 :354 –356[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
24. Noto N, Okada T, Yamasuge M, et al. Noninvasive assessment of the early progression of atherosclerosis in adolescents with Kawasaki disease and coronary artery lesions. Pediatrics.2001; 107 :1095 –1099[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Sass C, Herbeth B, Chapet O, Siest G, Visvikis S, Zannad F. Intima-media thickness and diameter of carotid and femoral arteries in children, adolescents and adults from the Stanislas cohort: effect of age, sex, anthropometry and blood pressure. J Hypertens.1998; 16 :1593 –1602[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
26. Update on the 1987 Task Force Report on High Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents: a working group report from the National High Blood Pressure Education Program. National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on Hypertension Control in Children and Adolescents. Pediatrics.1996; 98 :649 –658[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Devereux RB, Alonso DR, Lutas EM, et al. Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy: comparison to necropsy findings. Am J Cardiol.1986; 57 :450 –458[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
28. Daniels SR, Kimball TR, Morrison JA, Khoury P, Meyer RA. Indexing left ventricular mass to account for differences in body size in children and adolescents without cardiovascular disease. Am J Cardiol.1995; 76 :699 –701[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
29. de Simone G, Daniels SR, Devereux RB, et al. Left ventricular mass and body size in normotensive children and adults: assessment of allometric relations and impact of overweight. J Am Coll Cardiol.1992; 20 :1251 –1260[Abstract]
30. Linhart A, Gariepy J, Giral P, Levenson J, Simon A. Carotid artery and left ventricular structural relationship in asymptomatic men at risk for cardiovascular disease. Atherosclerosis.1996; 127 :103 –112[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
31. Vaudo G, Schillaci G, Evangelista F, Pasqualini L, Verdecchia P, Mannarino E. Arterial wall thickening at different sites and its association with left ventricular hypertrophy in newly diagnosed essential hypertension. Am J Hypertens.2000; 13 :324 –331[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
32. Cuspidi C, Lonati L, Macca G, et al. Prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy and carotid thickening in a large selected hypertensive population: impact of different echocardiographic and ultrasonographic diagnostic criteria. Blood Press.2001; 10 :142 –149[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
33. Oalmann MC, Strong JP, Tracy RE, Malcom GT. Atherosclerosis in youth: are hypertension and other coronary heart disease risk factors already at work? Pediatr Nephrol.1997; 11 :99 –107[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
34. Enos WF, Holmes RH, Beyer J. Coronary disease among United States soldiers killed in action in Korea. Preliminary report. JAMA.1953; 152 :1090 –1093
35. McNamara JJ, Molot MA, Stremple JF, Cutting RT. Coronary artery disease in combat casualties in Vietnam. JAMA.1971; 216 :1185 –1187[CrossRef][Medline]
36. Strong JP, Malcom GT, Oalmann MC. Environmental and genetic risk factors in early human atherogenesis: lessons from the PDAY study. Pathobiological Determinants of Atherosclerosis in Youth. Pathol Int.1995; 45 :403 –408[ISI][Medline]
37. Berenson GS, Srinivasan SR, Bao W, Newman WP, Tracy RE, Wattigney WA. Association between multiple cardiovascular risk factors and atherosclerosis in children and young adults. The Bogalusa Heart Study. N Engl J Med.1998; 338 :1650 –1656[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38. Davis PH, Dawson JD, Riley WA, Lauer RM. Carotid intimal-medial thickness is related to cardiovascular risk factors measured from childhood through middle age: the Muscatine Study. Circulation.2001; 104 :2815 –2819[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39. Bots ML, Hofman A, Grobbee DE. Increased common carotid intima-media thickness. Adaptive response or a reflection of atherosclerosis? Findings from the Rotterdam Study. Stroke.1997; 28 :2442 –2447[Abstract/Free Full Text]
40. Strong JP, Malcom GT, McMahan CA, et al. Prevalence and extent of atherosclerosis in adolescents and young adults: implications for prevention from the Pathobiological Determinants of Atherosclerosis in Youth Study. JAMA.1999; 281 :727 –735[Abstract/Free Full Text]
41. Bots ML, Hoes AW, Hofman A, Witteman JC, Grobbee DE. Cross-sectionally assessed carotid intima-media thickness relates to long-term risk of stroke, coronary heart disease and death as estimated by available risk functions. J Intern Med.1999; 245 :269 –276[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
42. Daniels SR, Loggie JM, Khoury P, Kimball TR. Left ventricular geometry and severe left ventricular hypertrophy in children and adolescents with essential hypertension. Circulation.1998; 97 :1907 –1911[Abstract/Free Full Text]
43. de Simone G, Devereux RB, Daniels SR, Koren MJ, Meyer RA, Laragh JH. Effect of growth on variability of left ventricular mass: assessment of allometric signals in adults and children and their capacity to predict cardiovascular risk. J Am Coll Cardiol.1995; 25 :1056 –1062[Abstract]
44. Salonen JT, Salonen R. Ultrasonographically assessed carotid morphology and the risk of coronary heart disease. Arterioscler Thromb.1991; 11 :1245 –1249[Abstract/Free Full Text]
45. Chambless LE, Heiss G, Folsom AR, et al. Association of coronary heart disease incidence with carotid arterial wall thickness and major risk factors: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study, 1987–1993. Am J Epidemiol.1997; 146 :483 –494[Abstract/Free Full Text]
46. Chambless LE, Folsom AR, Clegg LX, et al. Carotid wall thickness is predictive of incident clinical stroke: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. Am J Epidemiol.2000; 151 :478 –487[Abstract/Free Full Text]
47. O’Leary DH, Polak JF, Kronmal RA, Manolio TA, Burke GL, Wolfson SKJ. Carotid-artery intima and media thickness as a risk factor for myocardial infarction and stroke in older adults. Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group. N Engl J Med.1999; 340 :14 –22[Abstract/Free Full Text]
48. Aminbakhsh A, Mancini GB. Carotid intima-media thickness measurements: what defines an abnormality? A systematic review. Clin Invest Med.1999; 22 :149 –157[ISI][Medline]
49. Parikh A, Sochett EB, McCrindle BW, Dipchand A, Daneman A, Daneman D. Carotid artery distensibility and cardiac function in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. J Pediatr.2000; 137 :465 –469[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
50. Daniels SR. Is there an epidemic of cardiovascular disease on the horizon? J Pediatr.1999; 134 :665 –666[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. M Franks, C. E O'Brien, C. D Stowe, T. G Wells, and S. F Gardner Candesartan Cilexetil Effectively Reduces Blood Pressure in Hypertensive Children Ann. Pharmacother., October 1, 2008; 42(10): 1388 - 1395. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Urbina, B. Alpert, J. Flynn, L. Hayman, G. A. Harshfield, M. Jacobson, L. Mahoney, B. McCrindle, M. Mietus-Snyder, J. Steinberger, et al. Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in Children and Adolescents: Recommendations for Standard Assessment: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Atherosclerosis, Hypertension, and Obesity in Youth Committee of the Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young and the Council for High Blood Pressure Research Hypertension, September 1, 2008; 52(3): 433 - 451. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. S. Gidding Measuring Children's Blood Pressure Matters Circulation, June 24, 2008; 117(25): 3163 - 3164. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Velasquez-Mieyer, C. P. Neira, R. Nieto, and P. A. Cowan Review: Obesity and cardiometabolic syndrome in children Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, October 1, 2007; 1(1): 61 - 81. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Hadtstein and F. Schaefer What adult nephrologists should know about childhood blood pressure Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., August 1, 2007; 22(8): 2119 - 2123. [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Beauloye, F. Zech, H. Tran Thi Mong, P. Clapuyt, M. Maes, and S. M. Brichard Determinants of Early Atherosclerosis in Obese Children and Adolescents J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2007; 92(8): 3025 - 3032. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Hernandez-Diaz, L. J. Van Marter, M. M. Werler, C. Louik, and A. A. Mitchell Risk Factors for Persistent Pulmonary Hypertension of the Newborn Pediatrics, August 1, 2007; 120(2): e272 - e282. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Groner, M. Joshi, and J. A. Bauer Pediatric Precursors of Adult Cardiovascular Disease: Noninvasive Assessment of Early Vascular Changes in Children and Adolescents Pediatrics, October 1, 2006; 118(4): 1683 - 1691. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. R. Gale, B. Jiang, S. M. Robinson, K. M. Godfrey, C. M. Law, and C. N. Martyn Maternal Diet During Pregnancy and Carotid Intima-Media Thickness in Children Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., August 1, 2006; 26(8): 1877 - 1882. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. T. Flynn What Is the Significance of Increased Carotid Intima Media Thickness in Hypertensive Adolescents? Hypertension, July 1, 2006; 48(1): 23 - 24. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. B. Lande, N. L. Carson, J. Roy, and C. C. Meagher Effects of Childhood Primary Hypertension on Carotid Intima Media Thickness: A Matched Controlled Study Hypertension, July 1, 2006; 48(1): 40 - 44. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. R. Srinivasan, L. Myers, and G. S. Berenson Changes in Metabolic Syndrome Variables Since Childhood in Prehypertensive and Hypertensive Subjects: The Bogalusa Heart Study Hypertension, July 1, 2006; 48(1): 33 - 39. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Pinto, R. Roldan, and T. P. Sollecito Hypertension in children: an overview. J Dent Educ., April 1, 2006; 70(4): 434 - 440. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Abdelghaffar, M. El Amir, A. El Hadidi, and F. El Mougi Carotid Intima-Media Thickness: An Index for Subclinical Atherosclerosis in Type 1 Diabetes J Trop Pediatr, February 1, 2006; 52(1): 39 - 45. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Iannuzzi, M. R. Licenziati, C. Acampora, V. Salvatore, L. Auriemma, M. L. Romano, S. Panico, P. Rubba, and M. Trevisan Increased Carotid Intima-Media Thickness and Stiffness in Obese Children Diabetes Care, October 1, 2004; 27(10): 2506 - 2508. [Full Text] [PDF]

				National High Blood Pressure Education Program Wor The Fourth Report on the Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents Pediatrics, August 1, 2004; 114(2/S2): 555 - 576. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. H. Slyper What Vascular Ultrasound Testing Has Revealed about Pediatric Atherogenesis, and a Potential Clinical Role for Ultrasound in Pediatric Risk Assessment J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2004; 89(7): 3089 - 3095. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. B. J. Mancini, B. Dahlof, and J. Diez Surrogate Markers for Cardiovascular Disease: Structural Markers Circulation, June 29, 2004; 109(25_suppl_1): IV-22 - IV-30. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Ten and N. Maclaren Insulin Resistance Syndrome in Children J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2004; 89(6): 2526 - 2539. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Sorof, J. Turner, D. S. Martin, K. Garcia, Z. Garami, A. V. Alexandrov, F. Wan, and R. J. Portman Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Sequelae in Hypertensive Children Identified by Referral Versus School-Based Screening Hypertension, February 1, 2004; 43(2): 214 - 218. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) P3Rs: Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when P3Rs are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar ar