This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (18)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peters, J. W. B.
Right arrow Articles by Tibboel, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Peters, J. W. B.
Right arrow Articles by Tibboel, D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Developmental/Behavior
Right arrowRelated AAP Red Book topics:
Poliovirus Infections

PEDIATRICS Vol. 111 No. 1 January 2003, pp. 129-135

Major Surgery Within the First 3 Months of Life and Subsequent Biobehavioral Pain Responses to Immunization at Later Age: A Case Comparison Study

Jeroen W. B. Peters, PhD, RN*, Hans M. Koot, PhD{ddagger}, Josien B. de Boer, PhD§, Jan Passchier, PhD||, Jolien M. Bueno-de-Mesquita, MD*, Frank H. de Jong, PhD, Hugo J. Duivenvoorden, PhD|| and Dick Tibboel, MD, PhD*

* Department of Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus MC-Sophia, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
{ddagger} Department of Developmental Psychology, Free University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
§ Department of Child Health Division, TNO Prevention and Health, Leiden, the Netherlands
|| Department of Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, NIHES, Erasmus-MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, Erasmus-MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands

-->
    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
Objectives. Pain exposure during early infancy affects the pain perception beyond infancy into childhood. The objective of this study was to examine whether major surgery within the first 3 months of life in combination with preemptive analgesia alters pain responses to immunization at 14 or 45 months and to assess whether these alterations are greater in toddlers with a larger number of negative hospital experiences.

Methods. Two groups of 50 toddlers each were compared: index group and control group. All index toddlers had participated within the first 3 months of their life in a randomized, clinical trial that evaluated the efficacy of preemptive morphine administration for postoperative analgesia. The controls were matched by type of immunization and community health care pediatrician. Pain reactions were recorded at routine immunization at either 14 (measles-mumps-rubella immunization) or 45 months (diphtheria-tetanus-trivalent polio immunization) of age. Outcome measures were facial reaction, coded by the Maximum Discriminative Facial Movement Coding System; heart rate (HR); and cortisol saliva concentration. Negative hospital experiences included number of operations requiring postoperative morphine administration, cumulative Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System scores, and length of stay in the intensive care unit or total hospitalization days.

Results. No differences were found between the index and control groups in the facial display of pain, anger, or sadness or in physiologic parameters such as HR and cortisol concentrations. Intragroup analyses of the index group showed that after measles-mumps-rubella vaccination, the number of negative hospital experiences correlated positively with the facial responsiveness and negatively with HR responses. No effect was seen after diphtheria-tetanus-trivalent polio immunization.

Conclusions. Major surgery in combination with preemptive analgesia within the first months of life does not alter pain response to subsequent pain exposure in childhood. Greater exposure to early hospitalization influences the pain responses after prolonged time. These responses, however, diminish after a prolonged period of nonexposure.

Key Words: prospective study • newborn infant • repetitive pain • biobehavioral pain response • analgesia

Abbreviations: NICU, neonatal intensive care unit • ELBW, extreme low birth weight • HR, heart rate • MMR, measles-mumps-rubella • DTT, diphtheria-tetanus-trivalent polio • MAX, Maximum Discriminative Facial Movement Coding System • AC, appearance change • FEN, forehead/eyebrows/nasal • ENC, eye/nose/cheek • MLC, mouth/lips/chin • TISS, Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System • CNS, central nervous system


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
It has been well established that the nociceptive pathways, (sub)cortical centers, and neurochemical systems necessary for pain perception and transmission are intact and functional from an early stage of fetal development.1 However, in newborns, this neural system is still very immature and matures within the first year of life.1 Experiments in animals suggest that during this "critical period of immaturity," alterations in normally occurring activity patterns, eg, as a result of frequent pain exposure, make this system more susceptible to perturbation than at any other time of life.25

Newborns who are admitted to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) will be exposed to noxious interventions associated with life-saving high-technology care.6 In neonates, both mature and premature, this may result in hypersensitivity to tissue damage, ie, decreased pain threshold.711 This coincides with clinically significant biobehavioral changes in pain reaction, ie, facial reaction, cardiovascular response, and saliva cortisol response.1216

Emerging evidence suggests that these biobehavioral changes will persist after discharge from the hospital. At corrected ages of 4 and 8 months, premature infants who were born with extreme low birth weight (ELBW) and perinatally subjected to pain show less facial activity but higher heart rate (HR) in response to subsequent pain than infants without any history of hospital exposure.17,18 These effects were most pronounced in the infants who seemed to be sicker at birth, stayed longer in the NICU, experienced more NICU-related procedures, and received greater amounts of morphine.17 Parents’ reports suggest that ELBW neonates at 18 months’ corrected age are less reactive to everyday pain than peers without any history of perinatal pain exposure.19 At the age of 8 to 10 years, ELBW children rated pictures of medical events as more painful than pictures of psychosocial pain events, unlike term-born peers.20 At the age of 12 to 16 years, however, no differences could be demonstrated between adolescents with and without a history of perinatal pain exposure.21

The few reports on healthy full-term-born infants showed that these alterations in pain threshold are not restricted only to premature-born infants. Neonatal circumcision without any form of analgesia increased the infants’ biobehavioral pain responses to subsequent immunization at the age of 4 to 6 months.2224 Also, stressful conditions at birth, eg, assisted delivery versus elective caesarean section, were associated with increased salivary cortisol responses to vaccination at 2 to 6 months of age.25,26

The effects of major surgery on the immature nervous system and subsequent pain response in childhood are unknown. In contrast with a decade ago, neonates nowadays receive preemptive analgesia for postoperative pain relief.27 Experiments in animals suggest that appropriate doses of morphine may prevent the development of an altered pain threshold.2 In humans, however, it is unknown whether effective dosages of morphine diminish these iatrogenic effects of pain.

This is why we examined whether major surgery in the first 3 months of life, under the condition of preemptive analgesia, alters the pain response to immunization at toddler age. We were also interested in whether the number of negative hospital experiences during infancy negatively affects pain responses to immunization at toddler age, because infants who are born with congenital abnormalities often undergo more than 1 surgical intervention and are hospitalized for a relatively prolonged period during which they are subjected to many noxious procedures. In contrast with pain after major surgery, many noxious procedures are still conducted without any form of analgesia.28


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
Design and Subjects
A prospective matched-control study in a number of community health care centers in the Netherlands was undertaken. This study includes part of a cohort of (young) children who participated in a large double-blind, randomized, clinical trial that was conducted at the ICU of the Sophia Children’s Hospital, the Netherlands, between April 1996 and August 1999. The aim of that trial was to assess the efficacy of preemptive continuous versus intermittent morphine administration after major abdominal or thoracic surgery. Evidence shows that both forms of morphine administration provided adequate pain relief as assessed by validated behavioral pain measures and hormonal stress responses.29 Moreover, no differences were found in efficacy between the 2 forms of morphine administration.29

The inclusion criteria of these children to be included in this underlying matched-control study were as follows: having participated in the above-mentioned trial within the first 3 months of life and having received either routine measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) or diphtheria-tetanus-trivalent polio (DTT) immunization between January 1998 and July 2000. The immunization was given at each toddler’s own community health care center.

At each center, a matched control toddler was selected. The match variables were community health care pediatrician and type of immunization. For preventing selection bias, the toddler closest in time to the immunization of the index child was selected. When parents refused consent, the toddler next in time was selected.

Inclusion criteria for the matched controls were no history of abdominal or thoracic surgery and undergoing either MMR or DTT vaccination. Exclusion criteria for the index as well as the control group were 1) mental retardation, 2) deafness, 3) blindness, and 4) overt signs of illness on the day of vaccination. According to routine schedules for immunization in infancy and childhood, the MMR was given at the age of 14 months and the DTT at the age of 45 months. The Medical Ethical Committee of this hospital approved this study, and informed parental consent was obtained.

Assessment Measures
Alterations in pain responses were assessed from a biobehavioral perspective. The behavioral response to immunization was assessed by the Maximum Discriminative Facial Movement Coding System (MAX).30,31 This is an anatomy-based facial coding system that focuses on movements/appearance changes (ACs) in the face. These ACs are served by 3 separate branches of the facial nerve and by 3 relatively independent sets of muscles in 3 regions of the face: the forehead/eyebrows/nasal root (FEN region), eye/nose/cheek root (ENC region), and the mouth/lips/chin root (MLC region). The FEN region has 6 ACs, the ENC region has 7 ACs, and the MLC region has 17 ACs. Combinations of these ACs represent the presence of pain/distress or discrete emotions, eg, anger, sadness, fear.32 Thus, the MAX yields data not only about the occurrence of pain but also about the affective aspects of the pain experience.

HR and salivary cortisol concentration were the biophysiologic pain indicators. HR was registered by pulse oximeter (Ohmeda Biox 3700; Ohmeda, Boulder, CO). Cortisol in saliva was assessed using a coated-tube radioimmunoassay method supplied by Diagnostic Products Corporation (Los Angeles, CA).33

Negative hospital experiences are understood to be total number of minor surgical procedures (ie, not requiring morphine for postoperative analgesia), major operations (ie, requiring morphine postoperatively), amount of illness as evaluated by the Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (TISS),34 length of stay in the NICU, and length of hospital stay. TISS is a well-established and validated parameter that can be regarded as a measure of the care and treatment given to patients.3436 TISS scores are determined daily by the nurses. For the purpose of this study, for each patient, all TISS scores were summed up into an index of illness.

Procedures and Apparatus
Immunization
The child was put backward on the parent’s lap. The parent was instructed to hold the child in a "tight hug." The immunization was then given by the pediatrician, according to a protocol standardized for all participating community health care centers. The protocol did not allow for pain interventions of any kind such as eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA), distraction, or giving the toddler control over the situation.37

Data Sampling
The facial response to immunization was recorded by an 8-mm video camera (Hitachi VM-H90E, Tokyo, Japan). This camera was handheld to get a close up of at least two thirds of the children’s face. The same type of camera was put on a tripod to record the display of the pulse oximeter. For getting an impression of each toddler’s neutral face, video recordings of at least 60 seconds were made before immunization.

Two saliva samples were taken: one before and one 20 to 30 minutes after immunization.13,38 To stimulate saliva flow, 0.3 mL of a citric acid solution (1.5%) was administered orally. The saliva was sampled with a cotton-bar on which a nonwoven swab was fixed. At least 0.5 mL of saliva was collected during a maximum period of 5 minutes. After swabbing, saliva was squeezed from the nonwoven swab in a syringe and stored in a vial at -20°C. A duplicate analysis of cortisol was done in each saliva sample. For avoiding interassay variation, samples of 1 individual were analyzed in the same assay.

Video Analysis
MAX and HR were coded by 1 of the 2 coders (J.W.B.P. or J.B.d.M.). With respect to the MAX, video playbacks were used to code separately the brow, eye, and mouth regions of the face. One specific code was given for each AC. Coding of the face spanned the period from needle insertion up to 60 seconds thereafter. Several measures as a reaction to immunization were created: 1) sensory reaction, ie, time of presence of pain/distress expression, and 2) affective reactions, ie, time of presence of anger, sadness, or fear expression.

HR data were coded from the videotapes on a second-by-second basis starting from 60 seconds before to 60 seconds after immunization. These data were used to calculate HR before (HR before; ie, average HR of the 30 seconds before insertion of the needle) and HR after immunization (HR response; ie, average HR of the 60 seconds after immunization).

Apparatus
For marking onset and offset of the ACs in a chronological order and registering HR response with exact 1-second intervals, a copy was made of each videotape and a Vertical Interval Time Code was added (Adrienne Electronics Corporation; Las Vegas, NV). This means that each video frame (picture) was marked with a unique format frame (hours: minutes: seconds: frames), enabling selection and coding of various segments of the tape. A videotape analysis system was used, which included a computer with a vertical time code reader (16-bits ISA-board), the Observer 3.0 Base Package for Windows and the Observer 4.0 Software Package for video analysis (Noldus, Wageningen, the Netherlands), a videocassette recorder (Panasonic AG 5700, Yokohama, Japan) with remote control and stop action and slow motion feedback, and a 50-Hz monitor.

Reliability
Interobserver reliability had previously been obtained by using the MAX manual and training videotape. Each coder coded independently the training tape. Interobserver reliability was assessed with the master code and was computed following Izard’s32 indications in the MAX manual: agreements/(agreements + disagreements). The interobserver reliability was above the required 80% (86% and 88% for the 2 coders).

Data Analysis
To find out whether there was a difference between the index and control groups, we conducted 2 different statistical techniques.

As the facial response findings were highly skewed and could not be transformed to normality, polychotomous logistic regression analysis was conducted using the BMDP for DOS software package (SPSS, Inc, Chicago, IL). This technique computes the maximum likelihood estimates of parameters of logistic models for multinomial data, ie, nominal or ordinal data. For the purpose of this study, the facial responses were categorized into 4 categories: expression did not occur, duration of an expression lasted 0.1 to 10.0 seconds, duration of an expression lasted 10.1 to 20.0 seconds, or duration of an expression lasted >20.0 seconds. Each category contained at least 15% of the data. The following variables were considered to be of clinical interest and for this reason were entered as covariables: group, type of immunization, minor surgery, and hospitalization.

The HR and cortisol findings, on the contrary, could be transformed (natural log) to normality. For this reason, multiple regression analysis was conducted for these data. The following covariables were entered: group, type of immunization, minor surgery, hospitalization, and HR/cortisol before immunization. With respect to cortisol, the time of saliva sampling was also entered, to adjust for circadian rhythm effects on cortisol.

Spearman rank correlation was used to assess the association between negative hospital experiences and pain responses. Analysis of principal components was conducted before to find out which variables were interrelated and which could be clustered into 1 variable of adverse hospital events. This technique has the advantage that the number of independent variables can be reduced and hence reduces the risk at type I error. Missing values were replaced by predicted mean matching method.39


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
The index group consisted of 50 children. These toddlers were visited at their own community health care center, 44 in total, at which 50 matched controls were included. Patient characteristics are presented in Table 1. Overall, 28 children received MMR and 72 received DTT immunization. Gender did not differ significantly between the index and control groups. With respect to the index group, the median number of minor and major operations, ie, requiring morphine or not for postoperative pain relief, equals 1; the median number of days of hospitalization and NICU stay was 42 and 13 days, respectively; and the median total TISS score was 115. Of the children in the control group, 16 had stayed in a hospital. Nine of them spent several days in the hospital for observation purposes, mainly because of birth circumstances, eg, forceps delivery, vacuum extraction. The other 7 children had been admitted to a hospital because they had to undergo minor surgery in child care, such as adenotomy or myringotomy. These surgical procedures all were conducted over the age of 18 months.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Background Characteristics

 
Age-Related Differences in Facial Responsiveness
The number of children who reacted with pain or emotion did not differ between the index and control groups (Table 2). The proportion of toddlers who reacted with a pain expression was greater after MMR than after DTT (89% and 33%, respectively). Anger and sadness were also more prominently present in the MMR group. Fear was not a common reaction as it was present in 3 children and therefore was excluded from additional analysis. In addition, the times of occurrence of each of these facial expressions were longer after MMR than after DTT immunization, except for fear (Fig 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Number of Subjects Who Showed Pain/Distress and Emotional Facial Expressions

 


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. Times of presence of facial expressions.

 
Differences Between Index and Control Groups
No differences were found between the index and control groups in any of the biobehavioral pain responses. Thus, time of presence of the pain, sadness, or anger expression did not differ between the 2 groups. HR before and HR responses to immunization as well as cortisol concentrations before and after immunization were similar between the 2 groups.

Differences Between Type of Immunization
On the contrary, most of the biobehavioral pain responses did differ between the 2 types of immunization. As shown in Fig 1, the times of presence of the facial pain and anger expressions were significantly shorter in children of the DTT group (P < .01). The times of presence of the sadness expression did not differ between the MMR and DTT groups. As expected, HR before was significantly (P < .01) lower in children of the DTT group, which is explained by their higher average age. After immunization, the response in HR was lower in children of the DTT group (Fig 2), although it did not reach statistical significance (P = .06). Cortisol concentrations before and after immunization did not differ between the MMR and DTT groups (Fig 3).



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 2. HRs at baseline and postimmunization.

 


View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 3. Salivary cortisol responses to immunization.

 
Association Between Hospitalization and Minor Surgery
No association was found between hospitalization or minor surgery and times of presence of the pain, anger, or sadness expressions as well as with the physiologic values for HR before and after immunization and cortisol concentration before and after immunization.

Index Subgroup Analysis
Principal component analysis demonstrated that 3 of the 5 negative hospital experiences—major operations, total TISS score, and length of stay at the NICU—were closely interrelated. Therefore, these 3 variables were grouped together into a score of adverse hospital events. The other variables—minor surgery and days of stay in the hospital—were considered to be independent.

Spearman rank correlation coefficients between biobehavioral pain responses and adverse hospital events, minor surgery, and days of stay in the hospital are presented in Table 3. For the index children who received MMR, a greater number of adverse hospital events were associated with increased facial pain responses but with a diminished HR acceleration to immunization. Total days of hospitalization was also negatively associated with HR response. No association was found between the other biobehavioral pain responses and number of negative hospital experiences.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. Spearman Rank Correlations Between Negative Hospital Experiences and Biobehavioral Pain Responses

 
For the control children who received MMR, no association was found between the biobehavioral pain indices and number of days hospitalized or number of minor surgical procedures. For the control children who received the DTT, there was only a negative association between HR response and history of minor surgery. However, HR before immunization was also lower in these children.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
We found that major surgery in combination with preemptive morphine administration within the first 3 months of life does not alter the behavioral and physiologic pain response to intrusive immunization at the age of 14 or 45 months. However, in the index group, negative hospital experiences, as evidenced by higher number of major surgical procedures, higher TISS scores, and longer stays in the NICU, were positively associated with greater facial pain but with a reduced HR response to immunization at the age of 14 months but not at 45 months.

Experimental studies in animals have demonstrated that nociception during a distinct period of life changes the neuroanatomical architecture and decreases pain thresholds.3,4,40 It has been suggested that these alterations may be maximal when 6- to 9-day-old rats are exposed to pain.5 No alterations are seen when pain is induced in 14-day-old rats.3 The central nervous system (CNS) of a 7-day-old rat functions like that of a full-term human neonate, and that of a 14-day-old rat corresponds to that of an infant 1 year of age.1 The specific mechanisms by which these alterations in neuroanatomy and hypersensitivity to pain are induced have not fully been established. It is assumed that activation of the N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor ion complex produces an increase in intracellular calcium and other second messengers, which stimulate protein kinases and new gene expression.2,5,41 On this basis, we theorized that major surgery in early infancy induces structural alterations in children’s CNS and reduces their pain threshold. It was assumed that alterations in pain threshold were paralleled by alterations in biobehavioral responses to pain.22,23,25,26

In this study, no differences were found in the biobehavioral pain responses between the index and control groups, suggesting that appropriate pain relief after major surgery prevents the development of alterations in pain threshold in the long term. Others found that preemptive application of the analgesic EMLA cream prevents young infants from developing lower pain thresholds after repeated heel sticks7 but not after neonatal circumcision.42 EMLA, however, has only mild to moderate analgesic properties for circumcision.43 Findings in animals also have demonstrated that judicious use of pain relief prevents the development of altered pain threshold.2

On the contrary, Oberlander et al17 found that infants who had received greater amounts of morphine during their stay in the NICU were more sensitive to pain. It is unclear from that study whether judicious dosages of morphine were administered. Inadequate doses of morphine (too low or too high) also induce neuroanatomical changes, which may give the same outcome as nociception.2

For practical reasons, we were not able to select control children without any history of minor surgery; however, surgeries were conducted after 18 months of age. All of these children received relief for postoperative pain. According to the findings of Ruda et al,3 we did not expect that minor surgery would have any effect on pain thresholds as no alterations in neuroanatomy of the dorsal horn or in pain thresholds were found in adult rats that were exposed to pain at the age of 14 days. This was confirmed by our statistical analyses.

Subgroup analysis of the index group shows that negative hospital experiences such as major surgical procedures, higher TISS scores, and longer stays in the NICU affect pain thresholds at 14 months of age. These alterations, however, are not permanent as there was no association between the number of these negative hospital experiences and biobehavioral pain responsiveness at the age of 45 months. Experimental studies in animals also suggest recovery over time as the altered pain thresholds return to normal values at adult age.40,44 A possible explanation is the plasticity of the CNS; besides pain in early infancy, daily experiences in infancy and childhood form and reform neuronal pathways. These "learning effects" may eventually influence children’s neural processing of nociception, even in the presence of CNS alterations. This seems to be evident for the children who had few negative hospital experiences and received MMR and for all who received DTT immunization. Additional research, however, is necessary.

Another explanation for the absence of associations between negative hospital experiences and biobehavioral pain responses at the age of 45 months is that these children can be instructed on what to expect and can be rewarded after good behavior.45 Furthermore, their ability to cope with the situation and the pain are more extended compared with 14-month-olds. A third explanation might be that the DTT immunization is less painful than the MMR.

An unexpected finding was the diminution in HR accelerations when the number of negative hospital experiences increased. From a psychophysiologic perspective, HR deceleration can be regarded as a process that facilitates environmental intake; HR acceleration, on the contrary, filters out irrelevant stimuli (eg, nociception) that have distraction value for the performance of internalized cognitive elaboration.46 From this perspective, it thus seems that with increasing number of negative hospital experiences, children become less effective in filtering nociceptive input. However, the less vigorous acceleration in HRs can also be regarded as an adaptive response of the body as it reduces among others overall oxygen consumption.

Experimental studies in animals show that repetitive neonatal pain may, apart from alterations in pain thresholds, lead to vulnerability to stress disorders and anxiety-mediated adult behavior.40 Grunau et al20 found, in ELBW-born children, that the duration of NICU stay after 8 to 10 years was related to small increases in pain affect ratings in recreational and daily living settings but not for medical and psychological pain. We therefore investigated whether major surgery or number of negative hospital experiences would alter the affective dimension of the pain experience. Anxiety was found in only 3 children, 2 of which had a history of major surgery. However, this emotion was fleeting, as the maximum time of occurrence was not more than 2 seconds. Moreover, no differences were found in the occurrence with the other affective pain reactions such as anger and sadness between the index and control groups. Neither was there a relation between these emotions and number of negative hospital experiences.


    CONCLUSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
This is the first clinical study to demonstrate that major surgery in combination with an appropriate and standardized analgesic protocol within the first months of life does not result in an altered pain response to subsequent pain exposure in childhood. Prolonged exposure to early hospitalization contributes to an altered pain response, which seems to "recover" over time. Whether in humans structural neuroanatomical alterations are still apparent after a prolonged period is not known but seems highly likely. New achievements in neuroimaging, such as magnetic resonance imaging47 or contrast positron emission tomography scan,48 might give new clues to answer these intriguing questions.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This study was supported by a research grant from the Sophia Foundation for Medical Research (grant 247).

We thank Ko Hagoort for editing.


    FOOTNOTES
 
Received for publication May 30, 2002; Accepted Aug 20, 2002.

Reprint requests to (J.W.B.P.) Erasmus MC-Sophia, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Box 2060, 3000 CB Rotterdam, the Netherlands. E-mail: peters{at}anes.azr.nl


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Fitzgerald M, Anand KJS. Developmental neuroanatomy and neurophysiology of pain. In: Schechter NL, Berde CB, Yaster M, eds. Pain in Infants, Children and Adolescents. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1993:11–31
  2. Dickenson AH, Rahman W. Mechanisms of chronic pain and the developing nervous system. In: McGrath PJ, Finley A, eds. Chronic and Recurrent Pain in Children and Adolescent. Vol 13. Seattle, WA: IASP Press; 1999:5–38
  3. Ruda MA, Ling QD, Hohmann AG, Peng YB, Tachibana T. Altered nociceptive neuronal circuits after neonatal peripheral inflammation. Science.2000; 289 :628 –631[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Reynolds ML, Fitzgerald M. Long-term sensory hyperinnervation following neonatal skin wounds. J Comp Neurol.1995; 358 :487 –498[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  5. Anand KJ, Scalzo FM. Can adverse neonatal experiences alter brain development and subsequent behavior? Biol Neonate.2000; 77 :69 –82[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  6. Barker DP, Rutter N. Exposure to invasive procedures in neonatal intensive care unit admissions. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed.1995; 72 :F47 –F48[Abstract]
  7. Fitzgerald M, Millard C, McIntosh N. Cutaneous hypersensitivity following peripheral tissue damage in newborn infants and its reversal with topical anaesthesia. Pain.1989; 39 :31 –36[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  8. Andrews K, Fitzgerald M. The cutaneous withdrawal reflex in human neonates: sensitization, receptive fields, and the effects of contralateral stimulation. Pain.1994; 56 :95 –101[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  9. Fitzgerald M, Shaw A, MacIntosh N. Postnatal development of the cutaneous flexor reflex: comparative study of preterm infants and newborn rat pups. Dev Med Child Neurol.1988; 30 :520 –526[ISI][Medline]
  10. Fitzgerald M, Millard C, MacIntosh N. Hyperalgesia in premature infants. Lancet.1988; 1 :292[ISI][Medline]
  11. Grunau RE, Oberlander TF, Whitfield MF, Fitzgerald C, Lee SK. Demographic and therapeutic determinants of pain reactivity in very low birth weight neonates at 32 weeks’ postconceptional age. Pediatrics.2001; 107 :105 –112[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Porter FL, Wolf CM, Miller JP. Procedural pain in newborn infants: the influence of intensity and development. Pediatrics.1999; 104(1) . Available at: www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/104/1/e13
  13. Gunnar MR. Reactivity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical system to stressors in normal infants and children. Pediatrics.1992; 90 :491 –497[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Grunau RVE, Craig KD, Drummond JE. Neonatal pain behaviour and perinatal events: implications for research observations. Can J Nurs Res.1989; 21 :7 –17
  15. Johnston CC, Stremler R, Horton L. Effect of repeated doses of sucrose during heel stick procedure in preterm neonates. Biol Neonate.1999; 75 :160 –166[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  16. Johnston CC, Stevens BJ. Experience in a neonatal intensive care unit affects pain response. Pediatrics.1996; 98 :925 –930[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Oberlander TF, Grunau RVE, Whitfield MF, Fitzgerald C, Pitfield S, Saul JP. Biobehavioral pain responses in former extremely low birth weight infants at four months’ corrected age. Pediatrics.2000; 105(1) . Available at: www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/105/1/e6
  18. Grunau RVE, Oberlander TF, Whitfield MF, Fitzgerald C, Saul P. Prior pain experience and pain reactivity in former extremely low birthweight infants and term born controls at corrected age 8 months. Pediatric Academic Societies and the American Association of Pediatrics Year 2000 Joint Meeting; May 12–16, 2000; Boston, MA
  19. Grunau RVE, Whitfield MF, Petrie JH. Pain sensitivity and temperament in extremely low-birth-weight premature toddlers and preterm and full-term controls. Pain.1994; 58 :341 –346[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  20. Grunau RVE, Whitfield MF, Petrie JH. Children’s judgements about pain at age 8–10 years: do extremely low birthweight (< 1000g) children differ from full birthweight peers? J Child Psychol Psychiatry.1998; 39 :587 –594[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  21. Saigal S, Feeny D, Rosenbaum P, Furlong W, Burrows E, Stoskopf B. Self-perceived health status and health-related quality of life of extremely low-birth-weight infants at adolescence. JAMA.1996; 276 :453 –459[Abstract]
  22. Taddio A, Goldbach M, Ipp M, Stevens B, Koren G. Effect of neonatal circumcision on pain responses during vaccination in boys. Lancet.1995; 345 :291 –292[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  23. Taddio A, Katz J, Ilersich AL, Koren G. Effect of neonatal circumcision on pain response during subsequent routine vaccination. Lancet.1997; 349 :599 –603[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  24. Gunnar MR, Porter FL, Wolf CM, Rigatuso J, Larson MC. Neonatal stress reactivity: predictions to later emotional temperament. Child Dev.1995; 66 :1 –13[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  25. Taylor A, Fisk NM, Glover V. Mode of delivery and subsequent stress response. Lancet.2000; 355 :120[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  26. Ramsay DS, Lewis M. The effects of birth condition on infants’ cortisol response to stress. Pediatrics.1995; 95 :546 –549[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Lima DJ, Lloyd-Thomas AR, Howard RF. Infant and neonatal pain: anesthetist’s perceptions and prescribing patterns. BMJ.1996; 313 :787[Free Full Text]
  28. Johnston CC, Collinge JM, Henderson SJ, Anand KJS. A cross-sectional survey of pain and pharmacological analgesia in Canadian neonatal intensive care units. Clin J Pain.1997; 13 :308 –312[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  29. Bouwmeester NJ, Anand KJS, Dijk van M, Hop WCJ, Boomsma F, Tibboel D. Hormonal and metabolic stress responses after major surgery in children aged 0–3 years: a double blind, randomized trial comparing the effects of continuous versus intermittent morphine. Br J Anaesth.2001; 87 :390 –399[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Izard CE, Hembree EA, Dougherty LM, Spizzirri CC. Changes in facial expressions of 2- to 19-month-old infants following acute pain. Dev Psychol.1983; 19 :418 –426[CrossRef]
  31. Izard CE, Hembree EA, Huebner RR. Infants’ emotion expressions to acute pain: developmental change and stability of individual differences. Dev Psychol.1987; 23 :105 –113[CrossRef][ISI]
  32. Izard CE. The Maximum Discriminative Facial Movement Coding System. Newark, DE: University of Delaware; 1995
  33. Kirschbaum C, Strasburger CJ, Jammers W, Hellhammer DH. Cortisol and behavior: 1. Adaptation of a radioimmunoassay kit for reliable and inexpensive salivary cortisol determination. Pharmacol Biochem Behav.1989; 34 :747 –751[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  34. Keene AR, Cullen DJ. Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System: update 1983. Crit Care Med.1983; 11 :1 –3[ISI][Medline]
  35. Malstam J, Lind L. Therapeutic intervention scoring system (TISS): a method for measuring workload and calculating costs in the ICU. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand.1992; 36 :758 –763[ISI][Medline]
  36. Smith L, Orts CM, O’Neil I, Batchelor AM, Gascoigne AD, Baudouin SV. TISS and mortality after discharge from intensive care. Int Care Med.1999; 25 :1061 –1065[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  37. Ross DM, Ross SA. Childhood Pain: Current Issues, Research, and Management. Baltimore, MD: Urban & Schwarzenberg; 1988
  38. Gunnar MR, Brodersen L, Krueger K, Rigatuso J. Dampening of adrenocortical responses during infancy: normative changes and individual differences. Child Dev.1996; 67 :877 –889[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  39. Little RJA. Missing-data adjustment in large surveys. J Business Economic Stat.1988; 6 :287 –296
  40. Anand KJ, Coskun V, Thrivikraman KV, Nemeroff CB, Plotsky PM. Long-term behavioral effects of repetitive pain in neonatal rat pups. Physiol Behav.1999; 66 :627 –637[CrossRef][Medline]
  41. Woolf CJ, Thompson SW. The induction and maintenance of central sensitization is dependent on N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor activation: implications for the treatment of post-injury pain hypersensitivity states. Pain.1991; 44 :293 –299[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  42. Taddio A, Stevens B, Craig K, et al. Efficacy and safety of lidocaine-prilocaine cream for pain during circumcision. N Engl J Med.1997; 336 :1197 –1201[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Lander J, Fowler-Kerry S. TENS for children’s procedural pain. Pain.1993; 52 :209 –216[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  44. Hammond DL, Ruda MA. Developmental alterations in nociceptive threshold, immunoreactive calcitonin gene-related peptide and substance P, and fluoride-resistant acid phosphatase in neonatally capsaicin-treated rats. J Comp Neurol.1991; 312 :436 –450[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  45. McGrath PJ, McAlpine L. Psychological perspectives on pediatric pain. J Pediatr.1993; 122 :S2 –S8[ISI][Medline]
  46. Lacey JI. Somatic response patterning and stress: some revisions of activation theory. In: Appley MH, Trumbull R, eds. Psychological Stress: Issues in Research. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1967:14–42
  47. Huppi PS, Schuknecht B, Boesch C, et al. Structural and neurobehavioral delay in postnatal brain development of preterm infants. Pediatr Res.1996; 39 :895 –901[ISI][Medline]
  48. Rainville P, Duncan GH, Price DD, Carrier B, Bushnell MC. Pain affect encoded in human anterior cingulate but not somatosensory cortex. Science.1997; 277 :968 –971[Abstract/Free Full Text]

PEDIATRICS (ISSN 1098-4275). ©2003 by the American Academy of Pediatrics



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PediatricsHome page
American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Fetus and Newborn and Section on Surg, Canadian Paediatric Society, and Fetus and Newborn Committee
Prevention and Management of Pain in the Neonate: An Update
Pediatrics, November 1, 2006; 118(5): 2231 - 2241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
S H P Simons, M van Dijk, R A van Lingen, D Roofthooft, F Boomsma, J N van den Anker, and D Tibboel
Randomised controlled trial evaluating effects of morphine on plasma adrenaline/noradrenaline concentrations in newborns
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., January 1, 2005; 90(1): F36 - F40.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
S. H. P. Simons, M. van Dijk, R. A. van Lingen, D. Roofthooft, H. J. Duivenvoorden, N. Jongeneel, C. Bunkers, E. Smink, K. J. S. Anand, J. N. van den Anker, et al.
Routine Morphine Infusion in Preterm Newborns Who Received Ventilatory Support: A Randomized Controlled Trial
JAMA, November 12, 2003; 290(18): 2419 - 2427.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
R. F. Howard
Current Status of Pain Management in Children
JAMA, November 12, 2003; 290(18): 2464 - 2469.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
S. H. P. Simons, M. van Dijk, K. S. Anand, D. Roofthooft, R. A. van Lingen, and D. Tibboel
Do We Still Hurt Newborn Babies?: A Prospective Study of Procedural Pain and Analgesia in Neonates
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, November 1, 2003; 157(11): 1058 - 1064.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (18)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peters, J. W. B.
Right arrow Articles by Tibboel, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Peters, J. W. B.
Right arrow Articles by Tibboel, D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Developmental/Behavior
Right arrowRelated AAP Red Book topics:
Poliovirus Infections