
* Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Section of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods. A retrospective cohort study was conducted of all live births (singleton: n = 22 546 718; twin: n = 535 544) in the United States in 19851986, 19901991, and 19951996. Risks and relative risks for infant deaths by maternal age before and after adjustments for birth cohort, gravidity, birth weight, and gestational age were measured.
Results. Maternal age had a U-shaped association with mortality among singletons, with highest rates seen at extremes of age. Among twins, however, there was a steep and inverse relationship between age and mortality, with those born to young mothers experiencing the highest mortality rates. Seven percent of twin births resulted in an infant death for women who were younger than 20 years, 2.7% for those 30 to 34 years, and 2.0% for women 40 to 49 years. Even after adjustments for gravidity, birth weight, and gestational age, these trends persisted. Additional examination by timing of death indicated that this relationship was primarily a function of postneonatal rather than neonatal mortality.
Conclusions. The highest mortality among twins occurred to women who delivered in their teens and early 20s. The implications of these findings, both from a clinical and a public health perspective, deserve attention.
Key Words: multiple gestations twins infant mortality postneonatal mortality maternal age
Abbreviations: NCHS, National Center for Health Statistics RR, relative risk SIDS, sudden infant death syndrome
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We sought to characterize the relationship between maternal age and infant mortality among singleton and twin births. The possible explanations for this relationship were examined in relation to 1) differences in birth weight and gestational age-specific mortality and 2) differences in the distribution of birth weight and gestational age. Patterns of neonatal and postneonatal mortality in relation to maternal age among twins and singletons were also explored.
| METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Gestational age assignment was predominantly based on the date of last menstrual period.11 Effects of maternal age on mortality were examined as both a continuous variable and a categorical predictor. Maternal age was categorized as 15 to 19 years, 20 to 24 years, 25 to 29 years, 30 to 34 years, 35 to 39 years, and 40 to 49 years. Birth weight was categorized as <1500 g, 1500 to 2499 g, 2500 to 3999 g, and
4000 g; and gestational age was grouped as 20 to 27, 28 to 31, 32 to 34, 35 to 36, and
37 completed weeks. Gravidity (number of previous pregnancies) was categorized at 1, 2, or 3+.
Infant mortality (up to first year) rates by maternal age were derived for singleton and twin births. Unadjusted relative risks (RR) for infant deaths were calculated for each maternal age stratum, with 25 to 29 years serving as the universal reference category. Multivariable logistic regression models were developed to derive adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals of infant deaths by age categories, after adjusting for birth cohorts (19851986, 19901991 and 19951996), gravidity (gravida 1, gravida 2, and gravida
3), birth weight, and gestational age. Finally, we also examined the influence of maternal age on neonatal (first 28 days) and postneonatal (deaths between 28 and 365 days) deaths among twins.
We sequentially excluded missing data on gestational age (n = 457 216), missing birth weight (n = 12 187), or maternal age <15 or >50 years (n = 64 105) from the singleton cohort, leaving 22 546 718 births for analysis. Similarly, we excluded 11 128 births with missing data on gestational age, 955 with missing data on birth weight, and 703 births with mothers age <15 or >50 years. These exclusions left us with 535 544 twin births for analysis.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
1500 g. Singletons born to mothers in their 30s did not seem to be at lower or higher risk of infant mortality, regardless of birth weight, compared with the reference group (2529 years). Among twin infants, those who were born to younger mothers were at increased risk in all birth weight categories, but there was a stronger age effect on mortality in the higher birth weight ranges. Therefore, the trend with birth weight was similar to what was observed for singletons (effect modified with increasing birth weight), but there was an increased risk in the <1500 g and 1500 to 2499 g birth weight groups in twins that was absent among singletons. The data suggest a protective effect of older maternal age (
30 years) among twins across birth weight groups without any consistent patterns. Adjustment for gestational age had little effect on the RRs and did not alter the observed patterns (Table 4).
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Among twin gestations, we found that increasing maternal age was strongly associated with declines in infant mortality. This was in sharp contrast to the U-shaped association among singletons seen in our data (Fig 1). A similar effect was noted across all 3 cohorts that were examined (19951996, 19901991, 19851986). We postulated that this effect might be explained by differences in birth weight or gestational age-specific mortality or by differences in the distribution of birth weight and gestational age. Rolett and Kiely12 recently reported an excess risk of preterm birth (<35 weeks) in twins who were born to adolescent mothers that was significantly greater than the increased risk for singletons who were born to adolescents. Similarly, Cheung et al13 found that maternal age was negatively related to preterm birth in twins but positively related to preterm birth in singletons. Our results, however, do not support differences in birth weight or gestational age as the explanation for the maternal age trends. When we examined whether these trends differed according to time of death, we found that maternal age had little influence on neonatal mortality. This was not surprising, given the patterns seen for preterm and low birth weight infants, the group most likely to die during the neonatal period. In contrast, the postneonatal mortality trends by maternal age in twins mirrored the trends seen for the overall infant mortality rates.
Maternal age is not a simple construct and is regarded by some as a social factor and by others as a biological one. Our objective here was to examine how maternal age related to infant outcomes in twin gestations in the United States. Our findings of a decreased risk for infant mortality in twins but not among singletons with older mothers can be interpreted as indicating that maternal age may serve as a proxy for needed resources or risk factors in a twin birth more strongly than in a singleton birth. Alternatively, one could argue that the factors that increase risk for singletons who are born to older mothers are less frequent in twin gestations. What differences might there be between a young mother and an older mother both giving birth to twins? It is likely that there are socioeconomic differences. Younger mothers may be more likely to be less affluent, less educated, and employed in positions with higher demands and lower control over their environment as compared with older women who give birth to twins. From a social perspective, these differences might have a greater impact in a more vulnerable twin as compared with a singleton gestation.
Our determination that the (negative) association with maternal age is largely the result of postneonatal mortality suggests that understanding the influence of young maternal age on twin births may lie in an examination of the postneonatal causes of death. We were unable to do so with our data as the cause of death information is available only for the most recent cohort in our data set (19951996). Sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) is the leading cause of death in the postneonatal period.14 In some studies, but not all, young maternal age has been identified as a risk factor for SIDS.15 Multiple-gestation infants are also at increased risk for SIDS.15 Furthermore, a number of infant care practices have been correlated with SIDS, most notably sleep position.15 A recent review on SIDS concluded that "the affected infants are not completely normal in development but possess some inherent weakness which may only become obvious when the infant is subjected to an unusual stress."15 Twins may be more vulnerable to SIDS, and this vulnerability may interact with maternal age through infant care behaviors. Injury is another leading cause of death during the postneonatal period. Certainly the stress of caring for 2 infants might affect risk for injury in an unequal manner for a young mother as compared with an older one. An older mother may be more likely to have sufficient resources to provide a safe home environment and may be more educated overall and with regard to safe infant care practices.
Although it is likely that the increased risk of mortality in infants who are born to younger mothers is related to socioeconomic differences, this should not deter clinicians and public health professionals from considering maternal age as an important factor in an assessment of risks and needs for women who are pregnant with twins. Unlike many putative risk factors, maternal age is easily and accurately measured. For example, although a number of studies have now concluded that the increased risk of adverse outcomes for singletons who are born to teenage mothers is attributable to social and not biological factors,4 clinical providers would correctly assess the average teenage prenatal patient as being at increased risk.
These data were somewhat limited in terms of covariates. Although education of the mother was recorded, its utility is dubious in an examination of maternal age, as young women may not have completed their education. Vital statistics data are necessarily limited in their scope, but only data such as these are likely to have sufficient numbers of outcomes to conduct analyses with adequate statistical power. Another limitation of our study pertains to the analysis of mortality among twins. Because mortality risk within a sibship is likely to be higher when 1 of the twins dies compared with 2 unrelated singleton infants, this introduces an intracluster correlation. Failure to adjust for this intracluster correlation will likely yield biased confidence intervals of the RRs, although the RRs themselves will remain unaffected.16 The extent of such a bias, however, would depend on the strength of the intracluster correlation. The US natality and mortality data files, unfortunately, do not identify twins within a sibship for us to adjust for the intracluster correlation during statistical analysis. Although the NCHS has recently released the matched multiple birth file that links multiple births to the same mother for 19951997, multiple births from the older cohorts (19851986 and 19901991) remain unlinked.
Communities with a high proportion of teen births would likewise assess needs as greater than those communities with lower rates of teen births. Although the proportion of live births that result in twins is lower among younger mothers, it is not negligible and has been increasing in the past 2 decades. If twins who are born to mothers who are younger than 20 years experienced infant mortality rates equal to twins who are born to 25- to 29-year-old mothers, our analyses suggest that there would be 229 fewer infant deaths with an attributable risk of 7.8%. For singletons, the attributable risk would be just one tenth of that in twins, approximately 0.78%. The increased risk for twin infants who are born to younger women needs to be examined more carefully by public health and clinical practitioners as well as by public health and clinical researchers.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Adam Allston for assistance in producing the initial vital statistics tables that led the authors to identify the associations with maternal age.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Reprint requests to (D.P.M.) Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, University of Michigan School of Public Health, 1420 Washington Heights, M5015, Ann Arbor, MI 48109. E-mail: dmisra{at}umich.edu
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Helle Why twin pregnancies are more successful at advanced than young maternal age? A potential role of 'terminal reproductive investment' Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2008; 23(10): 2387 - 2389. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Qiu, S. K. Lee, K. Tan, B. Piedboeuf, R. Canning, and for the Canadian Neonatal Network Comparison of Singleton and Multiple-Birth Outcomes of Infants Born at or Before 32 Weeks of Gestation Obstet. Gynecol., February 1, 2008; 111(2): 365 - 371. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. M. Tomashek, C. Wallman, and and the Committee on Fetus and Newborn, American A Cobedding Twins and Higher-Order Multiples in a Hospital Setting Pediatrics, December 1, 2007; 120(6): 1359 - 1366. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. M. Salihu, D. Emusu, M. H. Aliyu, R. S. Kirby, and G. R. Alexander Low Maternal Age and Neonatal Survival of Extremely Preterm Twins (20-28 Weeks of Gestation) Obstet. Gynecol., June 1, 2004; 103(6): 1246 - 1254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
OTHER ARTICLES NOTED (24 Jan 03 to 18 Apr 03) Evid. Based Nurs., July 1, 2003; 6(3): e1 - 12. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||