Erratum for Committee on Medical Liability, Pediatrics 109 (5) 974-979.
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

PEDIATRICS Vol. 110 No. 3 September 2002, pp. 651

ERRATUM

An error occurred in the policy statement "Guidelines for Expert Witness Testimony in Medical Malpractice Litigation" by the AAP Committee on Medical Liability (Pediatrics. 2002;109:974–979). The statement’s reference to Fadjo and Bucciarelli (1995)* incorrectly characterized that article as addressing "pretrial screening panels," which it did not. More significantly, the authors of that article did not express an opinion about whether medical experts during pretrial depositions are more likely to offer unreliable testimony. Rather, Fadjo and Bucciarelli advocate the voluntary use of review panels to evaluate expert testimony in medical liability actions. While the author of the AAP policy statement does not support the use of pretrial screening panels, he remains concerned that expert testimony provided in the pretrial phase of malpractice actions is subject to even less scrutiny and accountability than expert testimony provided later. The author and the Committee on Medical Liability regret the error.


    FOOTNOTES
 

FOOTNOTES

* Fadjo D, Bucciarelli RL. Peer review of the expert witness: an opportunity to improve our medical liability system. J Child Neurol. 1995;10:403–404[Free Full Text] Back


PEDIATRICS (ISSN 1098-4275). ©2002 by the American Academy of Pediatrics

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?