Advertising Disclaimer
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Williams, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
PEDIATRICS Vol. 110 No. 2 August 2002, pp. 432


ALLERGY: PREDICTION AND PREVENTION

Does Living on a Farm During Childhood Protect Against Asthma, Allergic Rhinitis, and Atopy in Adulthood?

Larry Williams, MD

Durham, NC

Purpose of the Study. The authors used a previously generated database from the European Community Respiratory Health Survey to search for an association between childhood residence on a farm and protection from atopic disease in adult life. This investigation was prompted by the multiple studies showing decreased allergic rhinitis and asthma among children living on farms. The persistence of this effect into adult life had not been previously studied.

Study Population. Patients were drawn from 48 centers in 5 countries (Belgium, France, the Netherlands, Sweden, and New Zealand). Unselected individuals 20 to 44 years old responded to a short postal questionnaire about asthma and allergy symptoms. A random sample of responders received a more extensive questionnaire and additional tests. Questions allowed identification of subjects who had grown up on a farm.

Methods. Data obtained on subjects entering the second phase of the study included pulmonary function testing with methacholine challenge, total immunoglobulin E (IgE), and IgE specific for dust mite, cat, Cladosporium, and Timothy grass, and 1 additional pollen common to the region of the individual center. Subjects with farm residence in childhood were compared with those without a history of farm residence by univariate and logistic regression with adjustment for potential confounders, including pet exposure in childhood, number of siblings, and parental history of allergy.

Results. Information on whether a subject had lived on a farm in childhood was available for 6251 of the 6604 subjects entering the second phase of the study. Compared with the other adults, those who had lived on a farm in childhood had a reduced risk of atopic sensitization (odds ratio = 0.76, 95% confidence interval 95% = 0.60–0.97). There was a lower risk of nasal symptoms from pollen in the farm-raised, but no difference in the prevalence of asthma compared with those not raised on a farm, or in the prevalence of nasal symptoms in the presence of animals or dust.

Conclusions. The authors conclude that environmental factors encountered in childhood may have a lifelong effect on the development of allergy. The effect has been previously noted in children, but this study indicates that a reduction of allergic sensitization persists into adulthood. However, studies of children have not consistently noted a reduction of asthma in those living on farms, as indeed was not seen in these adults. The reason for the protective effect of farm residence is not clear, but several potential alternatives are not supported by the data. The effect remains even after controlling for pet exposure in childhood, number of siblings, and presence of parental allergy. Of note, the reported rate of parental allergy was similar in the farm and nonfarm parents, an argument against the "healthy farmer" effect that supposes the allergic individuals would have elected to leave the allergen-rich farm environment.

Reviewer’s Comments. The hygiene hypothesis for atopy remains perplexing. Much data has accumulated in favor of the influence of early life "steering" away from atopy by environmental factors. An understanding of exactly what factors are critical or alterable remains elusive. Additionally, there is not even agreement that an effect exists for asthma, which for most patients is a much more significant illness than allergic rhinitis. For those interested, a pro/con editorial in the same journal (Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;164:1106–1109) from von Mutius and Platts-Mills sets forth the arguments in more extensive fashion.

REFERENCES

Leynaert B, Neukirch C, Jarvis D, Chinn S, Burney P, Neukirch F. Am J Respir Crit Care Med.2001; 164 :1829 –1834[Abstract/Free Full Text]


PEDIATRICS (ISSN 1098-4275). ©2002 by the American Academy of Pediatrics

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Williams, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?