This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow Dentistry & Otolaryngology
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
PEDIATRICS Vol. 109 No. 2 February 2002, pp. 328-329


AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS

Follow-up Management of Children with Tympanostomy Tubes

Section on Otolaryngology and Bronchoesophagology


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 PROPOSED GUIDELINES
 BIBLIOGRAPHY
 
The follow-up care of children in whom tympanostomy tubes have been placed is shared by the pediatrician and the otolaryngologist. Guidelines are provided for routine follow-up evaluation, perioperative hearing assessment, and the identification of specific conditions and complications that warrant urgent otolaryngologic consultation. These guidelines have been developed by a consensus of expert opinions.


    PROPOSED GUIDELINES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 PROPOSED GUIDELINES
 BIBLIOGRAPHY
 

  1. The initial postoperative follow-up examination of the child in whom a tympanostomy tube has been placed should be performed by the otolaryngologist to verify the patency and functional status of the tube. This postoperative visit is usually performed within the first month after placement of the tube. Problems related to tubal patency and function can be addressed at this visit, past or present communication needs can be assessed, and a strategy can be outlined regarding the management of future otitis media episodes.
  2. The baseline hearing status of any child who has middle ear disease severe enough to warrant the placement of a tympanostomy tube needs to be determined. An audiologic evaluation should be performed postoperatively if normal hearing was not established preoperatively. The techniques and goals of the audiologic evaluation vary depending on the age and cooperation level of the child. Children who are too young to be tested by behavioral audiologic means (generally children 6 months and younger) can be assessed by otoacoustic emission or brainstem auditory evoked response testing. Children with persistent conductive or sensorineural hearing loss after placement of tympanostomy tubes require additional diagnostic workup.
  3. Because the average functional duration of a standard "short-term" ventilation tube has been estimated to range between 6 and 18 months with a mean of 13 months, follow-up examinations of children with tympanostomy tubes should be performed at intervals no longer than 6 months. Such interval ear examinations may be performed by the otolaryngologist or the pediatrician with documented communication (eg, letter, fax, e-mail) between the 2 physicians regarding the child’s otologic status.
  4. Complete tympanic membrane healing, adequate eustachian tube function, and normal hearing after extrusion or removal of the tympanostomy tube should be established before discharge from the otolaryngologist’s care.
  5. Some children with tympanostomy tubes may require referral to the otolaryngologist before planned interval examinations. These include but are not limited to:
    • Children with chronic, recurrent, or unresponsive otorrhea;
    • Children with hearing deterioration, balance difficulties, or persistent otalgia;
    • Children in whom perforation, cholesteatoma, or other structural disease of the tympanic membrane is suspected (distinguishing such from myringosclerosis can sometimes be difficult);
    • Symptomatic children with documented tympanostomy tube obstruction from cerumen, dry secretions, or granulation tissue;
    • Symptomatic children in whom a previously placed tympanostomy tube cannot be visualized;
    • Children in whom an extruded tympanostomy tube cannot be removed from the ear canal;
    • Children with a documented medialized tympanostomy tube (a tube that has migrated into the middle ear space);
    • Children who have retained a tympanostomy tube for more than 2 years;
    • Children whose ears are difficult to examine because of external ear canal stenosis, as seen in some children with Down syndrome and other craniofacial syndromes; and
    • Children with preexisting sensorineural hearing loss, documented language or developmental delay, or special needs in whom the additional conductive hearing compromise associated with a nonfunctional tympanostomy tube could be particularly debilitating.

SECTION ON OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND BRONCHOESOPHAGOLOGY, 2000–2001

Michael J. Cunningham, MD, Chairperson
David H. Darrow, MD, DDS
Mark N. Goldstein, MD
Andrew J. Hotaling, MD
Bruce R. Maddern, MD
Nina L. Shapiro, MD

LIAISON

Anthony E. Magit, MD
American Society of Pediatric Otolaryngology

CONSULTANTS

Craig S. Derkay, MD
Seth M. Pransky, MD
Audie L. Whooley, MD

STAFF

Chelsea Kirk


    BIBLIOGRAPHY
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 PROPOSED GUIDELINES
 BIBLIOGRAPHY
 
General Review
Derkay CS, Caron JD, Wiatrak BJ, Choi SS, Jones JE. Postsurgical follow-up of children with tympanostomy tubes: results of the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Pediatric Otolaryngology Committee National Survey. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.2000 ;122 :313 –318

Isaacson G, Rosenfeld RN. Care of the child with tympanostomy tubes: a visual guide for the pediatrician. Pediatrics.1994 ;93 :924 –929[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Audiologic Evaluation
Emery M, Weber PC. Hearing loss due to myringotomy with tube placement and the role of preoperative audiograms. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.1998 ;124 :421 –424[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Manning SC, Brown OE, Roland PS, Phillips DZ. Incidence of sensorineural hearing loss in patients evaluated for tympanostomy tubes. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.1994 ;120 :881 –884[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Otorrhea
Chloe RA, Hubbell RN. Antimicrobial activity of silastic tympanostomy tubes impregnated with silver oxide. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.1995 ;121 :562 –565[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Force RW, Hart MC, Plummer SA, Powell DA, Nahata MC. Topical ciprofloxacin for otorrhea after tympanostomy tube placement. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.1995 ;121 :880 –884[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mandel EM, Casselbrant ML, Kurs-lasky M. Acute otorrhea: bacteriology of a common complication of tympanostomy tubes. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol.1994 ;103 :713 –718[Medline]

Indications for Tympanostomy Tube Removal
Cunningham MJ, Eavey RD, Krouse JH, Kiskaddon RM. Tympanostomy tubes: experience with removal. Laryngoscope.1993 ;103 :659 –662[Medline]

Sequelae of Tympanostomy Tube Extrusion/Removal
Bulkley WJ, Bowes AK, Marlowe JF. Complications following ventilation of the middle ear using Goode T tubes. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.1991 ;117 :895 –898[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Matt BH, Miller RP, Meyers RM, Campbell JM, Cotton RT. Incidence of perforation with Goode T tubes. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol.1991 ;21 :1 –6[CrossRef][Medline]

Maw AR, Bawden R. Tympanic membrane atrophy, scarring, atelectasis and attic retraction in persistent untreated OME and following ventilation tube insertion. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol.1994 ;30 :189 –204[CrossRef][Medline]

Nichols PT, Ramadan HH, Wax MK, Santrock RD. Relationship between tympanic membrane perforation and retained ventilation tubes. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.1998 ;124 :417 –419[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Tos M, Stangerup S-E. Hearing loss in tympanosclerosis caused by grommets. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.1989 ;115 :931 –935[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Weigel MT, Parker MY, Goldsmith MM, Postma DS, Pillsbury HC. A prospective randomized study of four commonly used tympanostomy tubes. Laryngoscope.1989 ;99 :252 –256[Medline]


PEDIATRICS (ISSN 1098-4275). ©2002 by the American Academy of Pediatrics

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow Dentistry & Otolaryngology
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?