This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hernandez-Reif, M.
Right arrow Articles by Beutler, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hernandez-Reif, M.
Right arrow Articles by Beutler, J.

PEDIATRICS Vol. 108 No. 4 October 2001, pp. 1053

Evidence-Based Medicine and Massage

To the Editor.

Over the past 20 years, randomized, controlled studies have evaluated tactile/kinesthetic stimulation effects (more popularly referred to as massage therapy) for preterm infants residing in neonatal intensive care units. The protocol in these studies typically involves administering 30 to 45 minutes of daily stroking and flexion and extension of extremities to medically stable preterm infants. The massage therapy is provided in 10- to 15-minute sessions, 3 times a day, for 2 to 4 weeks.

Critical findings from 3 studies indicate a 21% to 47% greater weight gain for the massage therapy versus the standard care control group. Other findings of interest include greater bone mineralization,1 earlier hospital discharge,2,3 and more optimal behavioral and motor responses for the massage therapy group.2,3 These findings and a meta-analysis of 19 studies indicating that 72% of infants receiving massage therapy did better than controls support the view that massage therapy improves the clinical and developmental course of preterm infants.4

In a more recent study, we were unable to replicate the weight gain findings when the massage therapy was performed on medically stable preterm infants who were within 7 to 10 days of discharge from a neonatal intermediate care unit (Table 1). A closer inspection of the data revealed that the preterm weight at time of entry for the current study was approximately 468 g greater (M entry weight = 1764) than that of the earlier studies (M entry weight = 1296). Massage therapy apparently facilitates weight gain only if the intervention is started when the preterm infant weighs between 1100 and 1300 g.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 

TABLE 1
Background, Data Entry, and Outcome Variables for Massage Therapy Studies

Given that the percent of preterm births rose to 11.8% over the past decade5 and weight gain is a critical measure for evaluating growth and well-being in the preterm infant, interventions, such as massage therapy, that promote weight gain should be of interest to the neonatologist and should be implemented at a time when they yield the most benefit. Underlying-mechanism studies are currently underway to examine massage therapy effects on IGF-1, oxytocin, and gastric motility with preterm infants weighing between 1100 and 1300 g at entry.

Maria Hernandez-Reif, PhD
Tiffany Field, PhD
Miguel Diego
Julia Beutler
Touch Research Institutes
Department of Pediatrics
University of Miami School of Medicine
Miami, FL 33101

REFERENCES

  1. Moyer-Mileur L, Luetkemeier M, Boomer L, Chan G Effect of physical activity on bone mineralization in premature infants. J Pediatr. 1995; 127:620-625 [CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Field T, Schanberg SM, Scafidi F, Tactile/kinesthetic stimulation effects on preterm neonates. Pediatrics. 1986; 77:654-658 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Scafidi F, Field T, Schanberg S Factors that predict which preterm infants benefit most from massage therapy. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1993; 14:176-180 [Medline]
  4. Ottenbacher K, Muller L, Brandt D, The effectiveness of tactile stimulation as a form of early intervention: a quantitative evaluation. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1987; 8:68-77 [Medline]
  5. Ventura S, Martin J, Curtin S, Menacker F, Hamilton B Births: final data for 1999. National Vital Statistics Report. 2001; 49:1-100

Pediatrics (ISSN 0031 4005). Copyright ©2001 by the American Academy of Pediatrics




This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hernandez-Reif, M.
Right arrow Articles by Beutler, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hernandez-Reif, M.
Right arrow Articles by Beutler, J.