This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Makhoul, I. R.
Right arrow Articles by Sujov, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Makhoul, I. R.
Right arrow Articles by Sujov, P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Infectious Disease & Immunity
Right arrowRelated AAP Red Book topics:
Group A Streptococcal Infections
Staphylococcal Infections
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

PEDIATRICS Vol. 108 No. 1 July 2001, p. e16

ELECTRONIC ARTICLE:
Staphylococcal Scalded-Skin Syndrome in a Very Low Birth Weight Premature Infant

Imad R. Makhoul, MD, DSc*, Imad Kassis, MDDagger , Nehama Hashman, MSc§, and Polo Sujov, MD*

From the Departments of * Neonatology, Dagger  Pediatric Infectious Disease Unit and § Microbiology Laboratory, Rambam Medical Center and Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.



    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Discussion
References

Exfoliative skin diseases are rare in neonates. When caused by coagulase-positive Staphylococcus aureus, scalded-skin diseases such as staphylococcal scalded-skin syndrome (SSSS), bullous impetigo, and staphylococcal scarlet fever may develop. These diseases might cause significant complications and mortality. SSSS is caused by staphylococcal exfoliative toxins A or B, which split the granular layer of the skin, induce proteolysis, and might exhibit superantigen activities, such as epidermolysis and lymphocyte mitogenicity. We describe a 1378-g premature male infant who was born at 29 weeks' gestation and developed SSSS on day 3 of life, with no clinical signs of neonatal sepsis. After cultures from the lesion and bloodstream were obtained, intravenous cloxacillin therapy was started. Infection control measures were implemented instantly and included isolation of the infected infant, personnel handwashing with hexachlorophene, and placement of exposed neonates into a cohort. The initial lesion expanded and additional lesions appeared, but 12 hours after initiation of antibacterial therapy, the lesions ceased to proliferate. Cultures from scalded-skin lesions grew coagulase-positive Staphylococcus aureus, whereas the bloodstream culture was sterile. The lesions resolved completely within 6 days, and the infant's subsequent course was uneventful. No similar skin lesions were noticed in other infants in the neonatal intensive care unit. We discuss recent advances in understanding the pathogenesis of neonatal SSSS, highlight the importance of early diagnosis and treatment, and stress the need for new adjunctive therapies for this disease.

 Key words:  premature infant, very low birth weight, Staphylococcus aureus, scalded-skin syndrome.

Exfoliative skin diseases are rare in neonates, especially in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants. When caused by coagulase-positive Staphylococcus aureus (CPSA), these diseases might be associated with significant complications and mortality. We describe a VLBW premature infant who developed staphylococcal scalded-skin disease, discuss recent advances in understanding its pathogenesis, highlight the importance of early diagnosis and treatment, and stress the need for new adjunctive therapies.

    CASE REPORT

A 1378-g premature male infant was the first of twins, born at 29 weeks' gestation by cesarean section after premature uterine contractions. The Apgar score was 6 and 7 at 1 and 5 minutes, respectively. The mother was healthy and had no family history of hereditary skin disease. Pregnancy was uneventful without premature rupture of membranes. Corticosteroids were given to the mother before delivery. The infant experienced transient tachypnea of newborn. Laboratory tests obtained after delivery showed a normal blood count and no growth of bacteria or fungi in cultures of bloodstream, external ear, or gastric aspirate. Specific IgM titers for toxoplasmosis, cytomegalovirus, rubella, and herpes simplex were negative.

On day 3 of life, an 8 × 7-mm skin lesion with blisters and epidermal peeling was noticed on the right upper thigh with no clinical signs of neonatal sepsis. Nikolsky's sign was positive. Cultures from the lesion and the bloodstream were obtained, and intravenous cloxacillin therapy was started. A skin biopsy was not performed. Infection control measures were implemented instantly and included isolation of the infected infant, personnel handwashing with hexachlorophene, and placement of exposed neonates into a cohort. Skin cultures from members of the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) medical and nursing staff were not obtained.

Within 3 hours, the initial lesion expanded and a perioral erythematous lesion was noticed. In addition, 2 new rapidly spreading skin lesions on the left upper thigh and on the periumbilical area appeared within 4 and 6 hours, respectively (Fig 1), but 12 hours after initiation of antibacterial therapy, the lesions ceased to expand or proliferate. Cultures obtained from periumbilical and right thigh skin grew CPSA, whereas the bloodstream culture was sterile. Because of technical problems, identification of exfoliative toxins A (ETA) and B (ETB) was not performed. Complete blood counts were normal. Six days later, the lesions had resolved completely and the infant's subsequent course was uneventful. During this period, no similar skin lesions were noticed in the infant's twin or in other infants in the neonatal intensive care unit.


View larger version (113K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Skin lesions on the upper thighs with superficial epidermal peeling and a periumbilical skin lesion with exudative erosions, 24 hours after onset of disease.

    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Discussion
References

The differential diagnosis of the described exfoliative skin lesions in neonates includes staphylococcal scalded-skin syndrome (SSSS), bullous impetigo (BI), drug-induced toxic epidermal necrolysis, epidermolysis bullosa, bullous mastocytosis, herpetic lesions, and neonatal pemphigus. In our VLBW premature infant, the history, the exfoliative nature of the skin lesion, the course of disease, and the growth of CPSA from skin lesions suggest the diagnosis of SSSS or BI.

Three forms of staphylococcal skin disease have been described in neonates: SSSS, BI, and a generalized scarlatiniform eruption without exfoliation (staphylococcal scarlet fever).1 SSSS (Ritter's disease) and BI have many clinical features in common, and the lesions of BI are actually considered to represent a localized form of SSSS. However, compared with BI, the skin lesions of SSSS are larger, CPSA is less frequently isolated, and less inflammatory infiltrate in the skin lesions is noticed.1 Characteristically, SSSS consists of diffuse erosions, with epidermal separation in the subcorneal layer through the granular layer,2 whereas in BI, a flaccid, transparent bulla develops most commonly on the skin of the face, buttocks, trunk, perineum, and extremities and in the diaper area.

SSSS is caused by staphylococcal ETA and ETB, secreted mainly from phage II staphylococci and strains 71, 3A, 3B, 3C, and 55.3 In the absence of specific antibodies against ETA and ETB, as is the case mainly in infants and children, these toxins spread hematogenously and cause SSSS. ETA and ETB differ in that ETA is encoded by bacterial genes and is heat stable, whereas ETB is encoded on a plasmid and is heat labile.2 The split in the granular layer is attributable to the binding of ETA or ETB to desmolgen I within desmosomes2 and to keratohyalin granules of the granular layer.4 These toxins induce proteolysis by trypsin-like serine proteases.5,6 Also of note is that the catalytic site of V8 protease is present both in ETA and in ETB.7

Recent work suggests that ETA exhibits superantigen activities, such as epidermolysis and lymphocyte mitogenicity, whereas several single amino acid mutants of ETA lack the T-lymphocyte mitogenic activity.5,8 All ETA mutants that have lost the esterase activity were found also to have lost the epidermolytic activity, whereas a persistent esterase activity also retained the epidermolytic ability.5 Furthermore, incubation of partially purified exfoliative toxin with serine protease inhibitors before inoculation into mice delayed epidermal splitting.7 These observations implicate serine protease activity in the causation of SSSS.

In BI, CPSA is always the causative organism and can be isolated from skin lesions but rarely from the bloodstream.8 The same exfoliative toxins of SSSS (ETA, ETB) also are found in cases of BI and play a role in the exfoliative process of this localized disease.8

SSSS and BI have been reported predominantly in infants and children <5 years, because children in this age group lack specific anti-ETA and anti-ETB antibodies.9 ETA antibody was detected in 88% of cord blood samples. This rate diminished to 30% at 3 to 24 months and rose again to 91% by 40 years of age.10 Septicemia is not a common feature of SSSS in newborn infants. To date, SSSS and BI have been reported in 9 premature infants; only 1 patient's disease was associated with sepsis, and the patient died.111-16

Medical staff who are infected or colonized with exfoliative toxin-producing CPSA usually are the source of outbreaks of SSSS and BI in the NICU, and CPSA can be isolated from the anterior nostrils of 25% and 27% of NICU medical and nursing staff, respectively.3,13 The complications of SSSS and BI in children and infants include fluid loss, dehydration, cellulitis, pneumonia, sepsis, osteomyelitis, septic arthritis, necrotizing fasciitis, and a 4% risk of mortality.2,9,17

SSSS may be life threatening in VLBW premature infants and can provoke serious outbreaks of the disease in the NICU. A high index of suspicion, prompt diagnosis, implementation of infection control measures, and early institution of treatment all are indispensable steps for halting the expansion of SSSS in the infant, avoiding complications and mortality, and preventing the spread of disease to other infants.

In the neonate described here, the above-mentioned infection control measures were successful in preventing nosocomial spread to the other NICU infants. Despite SSSS/BI in our infant, no systemic signs of sepsis were evident; therefore, additional therapies, such as pooled human immunoglobulins, did not become warranted. Future development of specific anti-ETA and anti-ETB antibodies might enrich our therapeutic arsenal and help in slowing the expansion of SSSS, lessening its severity, and minimizing its complications. Such therapeutic approach becomes particularly important in view of the growing rate of SSSS that is caused by methicillin-resistant CPSA.18,19

    ACKNOWLEDGMENT

We thank Professor Moshe Berant for reviewing this manuscript.

    FOOTNOTES

Received for publication Nov 8, 2000; accepted Feb 7, 2001.

Reprint requests to (I.R.M.) Department of Neonatology, Rambam Medical Center, Bat-Galim, Haifa 31096, Israel. E-mail: makhoul{at}rambam.health.gov.il

    ABBREVIATIONS

VLBW, very low birth weight; CPSA, coagulase-positive Staphylococcus aureus; NICU, neonatal intensive care unit; ETA, exfoliative toxin A; ETB, exfoliative toxin B; SSSS, staphylococcal scalded-skin syndrome; BI, bullous impetigo.

    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Discussion
References
  1. Curran JP, Al-Salihi FL Neonatal staphylococcal scalded-skin syndrome: massive outbreak due to an unusual phage type. Pediatrics 1980; 66:285-290 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Darmstadt GL. The skin: cutaneous bacterial infections. In: Behrman RE, Kliegman RM, Jenson HB, eds. Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics. 16th ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 2000:2028-2036
  3. Elsner P, Hartmann AA Epidemiology of ETA- and ETB-producing staphylococci in dermatological patients. Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A 1988; 268:534A
  4. Smith TP, John DA, Bailey CJ The binding of epidermolytic toxin from Staphylococcus aureus to mouse epidermal tissue. Histochem J 1987; 19:137-149 [CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Rago JV, Vath GM, Bohach GA, Ohlendorf DH, Schlievert PM Mutational analysis of the superantigen staphylococcal exfoliative toxin A (ETA). J Immunol 2000; 164:2207-2213 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Ladhani S, Poston SM, Joannou CL, Evans RW (ETA) induces serine protease activity when combined with A431 cells. J Dermatol 1999; 26:507-511 [Medline]
  7. Dancer SJ, Garratt R, Sandanha J, Jhoti H, Evans R The epidermolytic toxin are serine proteases. FEBS Lett 1990; 268:129-132 [CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Qasim W, Landhani S, Evans RW Superantigen scalded-skin syndromes. Arch Dis Child 1998; 79:290 [Free Full Text]
  9. Cribier B, Piemont Y, Grosshans E Staphylococcal scalded-skin skin syndrome in adults. J Am Acad Dermatol 1994; 30:319-324 [Medline]
  10. Melish ME, Chen FS, Sprouse S, Stuckey M, Murata MS Epidermolytic toxin in staphylococcal infection: toxin levels and host response. Zentralbl Bakteriol 1981; 10:287-298
  11. Leaute-Labreze C, Sarlangue J, Pedespan L, Doermann HP, Taieb A Neonatal staphylococcal epidermolysis due to maternal-fetal transmission. Ann Dermatol Venereol 1999; 126:713-715 [Medline]
  12. Peters B, Hentschel J, Mau H, Halle E, Witte W, Obladen M Staphylococcal scalded-skin syndrome complicating wound infection in a preterm infant with postoperative chylothorax. J Clin Microbiol 1998; 36:3057-3059 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Siaman L, Jakob K, Holmes KW, Molecular epidemiology of staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome in premature infants. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1998; 17:329-334 [CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Hoffmann R, Lohner M, Bohm N, Schaefer HE, Leititis J Staphylococcal scalded-skin syndrome (SSSS) and consecutive septicemia in a preterm infant. Pathol Res Pract 1994; 190:77-81 [Medline]
  15. Itani O, Crumb R, Mimouni F, Tunnessen WW Jr Picture of the month. Ritter's disease (neonatal staphylococcal scalded-skin syndrome). Am J Dis Child 1992; 146:425-426 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Florman AL, Holzman RS Nosocomial scalded-skin syndrome. Ritter's disease caused by phage group 3 Staphylococcal aureus. Am J Dis Child 1980; 134:1043-1045 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Hsieh WS, Yang PH, Chao HC, Lai JY. Neonatal necrotizing fasciitis: a report of 3 cases and review of the literature. Pediatrics. 1999;103(4). URL: http://www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/abstract/103/4/e53
  18. Acland KM, Darvay A, Griffin C, Aali SA, Russell-Jones R Staphylococcal scalded-skin syndrome in an adult associated with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Br J Dermatol 1999; 140:518-520 [CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Zafar AB, Butler RC, Reese DJ, Gaydos LA, Mennonna PA Use of 0.3% triclosan (Bacti-Stat) to eradicate an outbreak of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a neonatal nursery. Am J Infect Control 1995; 23:200-208 [CrossRef][Medline]

Pediatrics (ISSN 0031 4005). Copyright ©2001 by the American Academy of Pediatrics

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
M G A Baartmans, M H Maas, and J Dokter
Neonate with staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., January 1, 2006; 91(1): F25 - F25.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
L Foix-L'Helias, O Baud, R Lenclen, M Kaminski, and T Lacaze-Masmonteil
Benefit of antenatal glucocorticoids according to the cause of very premature birth
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., January 1, 2005; 90(1): F46 - F48.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Makhoul, I. R.
Right arrow Articles by Sujov, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Makhoul, I. R.
Right arrow Articles by Sujov, P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Infectious Disease & Immunity
Right arrowRelated AAP Red Book topics:
Group A Streptococcal Infections
Staphylococcal Infections
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?