| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PEDIATRICS Vol. 107 No. 6 June 2001, pp. 1496
Benefits of Asthma Education Programs
To the Editor.
The article by Kelly et al1 that appeared in the
May 2000 issue of Pediatrics demonstrates that a
comprehensive program for asthmatic children with Medicaid insurance
can reduce health care utilization and save costs. The study was a
controlled clinical trial that alternately assigned children with a
history of frequent use of emergent health care services for asthma to
either usual care or to an intervention using an asthma self-management
education program coupled with clinical care that conformed to the
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute clinical practice guidelines for asthma management.
As opposed to a recent meta-analysis of the effects of asthma education
in children,2 the authors of this study found significant
benefits in favor of the intervention group. Children in the
intervention group had a statistically significant increase in their
use of preventive practices including influenza vaccination and the use
of an antiinflammatory medications. Moreover, children in the
intervention group had a statistically significant reduction in
emergent health care utilization, manifested by lower ED visits and
hospitalizations.
Because the study was not a true randomized trial, it is possible that
the groups were unbalanced on a key variable or 2 that might account
for some of the effects seen. Indeed, the intervention group had a
significantly lower use of antiinflammatory agents at baseline. This
suggests that the intervention group may have had poorer access to
needed health care services. If this were true, then improvements in
access to care as part of the intervention could account for the
effects seen in this group.
There were 2 dropouts in the intervention group and none in the control
group. Explanations for these dropouts were provided by the authors: 1 subject relocated to another area and another withdrew herself from the
study. It is possible that these withdrawals were associated with worse
outcomes. If the authors have outcome data on the subject who withdrew
herself, it might be useful to include that data in an
intention-to-treat analysis to provide a less biased estimate of the
effect of the intervention.
Also, it is unclear what component of the intervention may have
accounted for the beneficial effects observed in the intervention group. The intervention consisted of both educational and clinical care
components. It did not appear possible to disentangle the effects of
the educational component from the clinical care component. It would be
of interest to replicate the study in the future and incorporate a
factorial design whereby the independent effects of both components can
be better evaluated.
It is becoming increasingly clear that asthma education
programs are beneficial, particularly in adults.3-5 Despite the caveats given above, studies such as this one by Kelly and
colleagues help to demonstrate the beneficial effects of asthma education in children. Additional work on the specific components of
asthma educational programs that demonstrate effectiveness and
cost-effectiveness may help educators to determine which programs may
be most effective in their patient populations.6
Departments of Pediatrics and Medical Education
University of Washington School of Medicine
Seattle, WA 98195
REFERENCES
-
Kelly C,
Morrow A,
Shults J,
Nakas N,
Strope G,
Adelman R
Outcomes
evaluation of a comprehensive intervention program for asthmatic
children enrolled in Medicaid.
Pediatrics.
2000;
105:1029-1035
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Bernard-Bonnin A, Stachenko S, Bonin D, Charette C, Rousseau E Self-management teaching programs and morbidity of pediatric asthma: a meta-analysis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1995; 95:34-41 [CrossRef][Medline]
- Gibson P, Coughlan J, Abramson M, et al. Effects of self-management education and regular practitioner review in adults with asthma (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library. Oxford, UK: Update Software; 1998 (Issue 2)
- Wolf F, Guevara J, Grum C, Clark N. Effects of self-management educational interventions vs usual care for adults with asthma: a meta-analysis of 23 controlled trials. In press
-
Clark N,
Gong M
Management of chronic disease by practitioners and
patients: are we teaching the wrong things?
BMJ.
2000;
320:572-575
[Free Full Text] - Clark N, Nothwehr F Self-management of asthma by adult patients. Patient Educ Couns. 1997; 32:S5-S20 [CrossRef][Medline]
Pediatrics (ISSN 0031 4005). Copyright ©2001 by the American Academy of Pediatrics
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||




