This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reingold;, S.
Right arrow Articles by Harper, M. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reingold;, S.
Right arrow Articles by Harper, M. B.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated AAP Red Book topics:
Haemophilus influenzae Infections
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

PEDIATRICS Vol. 107 No. 2 February 2001, pp. 450-451

Reevaluation of Outpatients With Streptococcus pneumoniae Bacteremia

To the Editor.

The findings of Drs Bachur and Harper1 in their report, "Reevaluation of Outpatients With Streptococcus pneumoniae Bacteremia," should cause them to rethink their emergency department's policy of using the complete blood count (CBC) to screen febrile children for occult bacteremia (OB).

Their protocol targets children 3 to 36 months old with a temperature >= 39°C and no identifiable source for the fever to have a blood culture, CBC, and urine culture when appropriate. They recommend that those children with a white blood cell count (WBC) >15 000/µL be given a single dose of ceftriaxone (although in their study it appears that approximately 50% of these patients received an oral antibiotic instead and a number were given no antibiotic at all---nearly half of the 73 patients in the "no antibiotic" group with a median WBC of 14.6). The use of 15 000 as a cutoff for obtaining blood cultures was recommended by experts for practical reasons, "... because WBC counts are more easily obtained in many physicians' offices and are less expensive than a blood culture and because such a strategy reduces the number of children treated empirically."2

In Bachur and Harper's study the greatest percentage of patients with significant complications came from the "no antibiotic" group: persistent bacteremia in 20% versus 2.6% and 0% in the oral and parenteral antibiotic groups, respectively; meningitis in 4.6% versus 0.9% and 1.5%, respectively. The 3 "no antibiotic" patients with meningitis had WBCs of 7.5, 12.6, and 16.4 (×1000/mm3).

Because there has been no data to suggest that a patient with occult bacteremia and a WBC <15 000 has any better outcome than one with a count >15 000 and their data demonstrates a skew of complications among untreated patients below this value, then if the clinician chooses to diagnose and treat OB,3 the 13%4 of patients with OB and a WBC <15 000 should not be excluded from consideration.

In a busy emergency department it is far more efficient to make a decision on OB based on the demographics of age, immunization status, and temperature height,5 rather than waiting for the CBC, calling the patient's pediatrician back to discuss the result (which is the norm in many community EDs) and most importantly using the extra 0.5 to 1 mL of blood that is obtained to increase the yield of the blood culture. This study supports the practice of not obtaining a CBC in evaluation of febrile children.

Stewart Reingold
Pediatric Emergency Medicine
Emergency Medicine Department
Advocate Christ Hospital and Medical Center
Oak Lawn, IL 60453

REFERENCES

  1. Bachur R, Harper MB Reevaluation of outpatients with Streptococcus pneumoniae bacteremia. Pediatrics. 2000; 105:502-509 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Baraff LJ, Bass JW, Fleisher GR, Practice guideline for the management of infants and children 0 to 36 months of age with fever without source. Pediatrics. 1993; 92:1-12 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Kramer MS, Shapiro ED Management of the young febrile child: a commentary on recent practice guidelines. Pediatrics. 1997; 100:128-134 [Free Full Text]
  4. Lee GM, Harper MB Risk of bacteremia for febrile young children in the post-Haemophilus influenzae type b era. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1998; 152:624-628 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Kupperman N, Fleisher GR, Jaffee DM Predictors of occult pneumoccocal bacteremia in young febrile children. Ann Emerg Med. 1998; 31:679-687 [CrossRef][Medline]


In Reply.

The objective of our article was to evaluate the follow-up management of outpatients with a known positive blood culture for Streptococcus pneumoniae. Dr Reingold has used the opportunity to comment on the appropriate initial evaluation of highly febrile young children at risk for S pneumoniae bacteremia; although related, we believe that his comments deserve another forum for complete discussion. Nevertheless, he does point out that most complications occurred among patients who did not receive antibiotic treatment at the initial evaluation and who had lower white blood cell counts (WBCs) at the initial evaluation. The lower WBCs and lack of antibiotic use are the result of a thoughtful management strategy---those patients with higher WBCs are treated empirically with an antibiotic pending the result of blood culture. In our emergency department, our clinicians use a strategy to give empiric antibiotics only to those patients at an elevated risk of occult bacteremia as judged by a WBC >= 15 000/mm3. This strategy identifies 80% of patients with S pneumoniae bacteremia.1 Treatment at the initial visit is intended to prevent the development of complications before notification of the positive blood culture. Because the WBC was used as a determining factor for which patients received antibiotic therapy, it cannot be evaluated as an independent predictor of complications. Dr Reingold also states that for pragmatic reasons he uses some less sensitive and specific parameters for determining which children are at risk for occult pneumococcal bacteremia. It is not clear from his comments whether he empirically treats all patients felt to be at risk for bacteremia or whether he waits for the growth in the blood culture. We find that the WBC is particularly useful for excluding patients from being treated empirically with antibiotics. Additionally, when faced with an unexpectedly elevated WBC, we reconsider what infectious foci we may have missed by examination alone (eg, urinary tract infection, pneumonia).2,3 It is likely that our approach to the initial management of febrile children will change after widespread use of the conjugate pneumococcal vaccine, but until then, we find our current strategy to be efficient and logical. Nonetheless, regardless of the initial management, clinicians occasionally still will be faced with patients having been identified as having S pneumoniae bacteremia. We hope that our article provides useful data to help properly care for these children.

Richard Bachur, and Marvin B. Harper
Division of Emergency Medicine
Children's Hospital
Boston, MA 02115

REFERENCES

  1. Lee GM, Harper MB Risk of bacteremia for febrile young children in the post-Haemophilus influenzae type b era. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1998; 152:624-628
  2. Mazur LJ, Kline MW, Lorin MI Extreme leukocytosis in patients presenting to a pediatric emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care. 1991; 7:215-218 [Medline]
  3. Bachur R, Perry H, Harper MB. Occult pneumonias: empiric chest radiographs in febrile children with leukocytosis. Ann Emerg Med. 1999;33:166-173. See comments

Pediatrics (ISSN 0031 4005). Copyright ©2001 by the American Academy of Pediatrics

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reingold;, S.
Right arrow Articles by Harper, M. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reingold;, S.
Right arrow Articles by Harper, M. B.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated AAP Red Book topics:
Haemophilus influenzae Infections
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?