This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bratton, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Allison, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bratton, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Allison, J. W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Surgery

PEDIATRICS Vol. 107 No. 2 February 2001, pp. 299-303

Intussusception: Hospital Size and Risk of Surgery

Susan L. Bratton, MD, MPH*, Charles M. Haberkern, MD, MPHDagger , John H. T. Waldhausen, MD§, Robert S. Sawin, MD§, and Janice W. Allison, MDparallel

From the * Department of Pediatrics, Oregon Health Sciences University and Doernbecher Children's Hospital, Portland, Oregon; Departments of Dagger  Anesthesiology and § Surgery, University of Washington and Children's Hospital and Regional Medical Center, Seattle, Washington; and parallel  Department of Radiology, University of Arkansas Medical Sciences and Arkansas Children's Hospital, Little Rock, Arkansas.



    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References

Objective.  To determine whether the risk of operative management of children with intussusception varies by hospital pediatric caseload.

Design.  A cohort of all children with intussusception in Washington State from 1987 through 1996.

Setting.  All hospitals in Washington State.

Methods.  Five hundred seventy children with a hospital discharge diagnosis of intussusception were identified. Sixty-two were excluded because of missing data. Procedure codes for operative management and radiologic management were also identified.

Results.  Fifty-three percent of the children had operative reduction and 20% had resection of bowel. Children with operative reduction did not differ from those with nonoperative care by median age or gender; however, children with operative care were significantly more likely to receive care in hospitals with smaller pediatric caseloads and to have a coexisting condition associated with intussusception. Sixty-four percent of children who received care in a large children's hospital had nonoperative reduction, compared with 36% of children who received care in hospitals with 0 to 3000 annual pediatric admissions and 24% of children who had care in hospitals with 3000 to 10 000 annual pediatric admissions. Median length of stay and charges were significantly less in the large children's hospital, compared with other centers.

Conclusions.  Children who received care for intussusception in a large children's hospital had decreased risk of operative care, shorter length of stay, and lower hospital charges compared with children who received care in hospitals with smaller pediatric caseloads.  Key words:  intussusception, enema, children.

Intussusception is a common cause of bowel obstruction in young children. Compared with operative reduction, radiologic (nonoperative) reduction is associated with less patient discomfort, shorter hospital length of stay (LOS), lower hospital charges, and decreased risk of subsequent complications. Reports of successful radiologic reduction exceed 70% in some populations.1-5 Such patient clinical features as duration of symptoms, age, and presence of bowel obstruction, and such radiologic features as reduction technique and operator experience6,7 may affect the success rate of nonoperative management.

We examined all cases of intussusception in children from Washington State over a 10-year period to evaluate the association between hospital pediatric caseload and other factors with the success of nonoperative reduction for intussusception. The proportion of children requiring bowel resection, LOS, and hospital charges were also examined for this cohort of children.


    METHODS
Top
Abstract
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References

After institutional review board approval by the University of Washington, Children's Hospital and Regional Medical Center (CHRMC) and the State of Washington Health and Human Services Department, we obtained for the years 1987 through 1996 computerized information available for all persons hospitalized in Washington State. Participants were included if they had a principle diagnosis code for intussusception (codes 560.0 from the International Classification of Diseases)8 and if they were <17 years of age. Variables that were examined in the analysis included age, gender, and hospital of admission. A maximum of 6 International Classification of Diseases diagnosis codes and 6 procedure codes were examined, as well as LOS, charges, and survival.

Nonoperative management was defined as a radiologic procedure code 87.64 for a lower gastrointestinal examination and the absence of any procedure codes for surgery.8 Operative management was defined as any of the following procedure codes: open reduction without bowel resection (46.80-46.82, 45.00-45.03) and open reduction with bowel resection (45.60-46.30).8 Specific diagnosis codes for the following conditions associated with intussusception were also noted: Meckel's diverticulum, hemolytic uremic syndrome, idiopathic thrombocytopenia purpura, ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, and Henoch-Schönlein anaphylactic purpura (HSP).8 One author (C.M.H.) reviewed all cases from CHRMC, Seattle, Washington to determine the accuracy of the dataset. The hospital discharge dataset was not altered for CHRMC patients based on the chart review to prevent a bias in the dataset.

Hospital pediatric caseload for each hospital in the state was categorized as 0 to 3000, 3001 to 10 000, and >10 000 annual admissions of children <17 years of age based on 1996 hospital admissions. Children who were transferred from one inpatient facility to another were only counted once and were assigned to the final hospital for analysis.

The Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis H test were used to compare skewed continuous data and a Bonferonni's adjustment was used for multiple pair-wise comparisons. The median values with 25th and 75th quartiles are reported in the manuscript. Categorical data were examined using the chi 2 test. The relationships between hospital pediatric caseload and success of nonoperative management of children with intussusception and risk of bowel resection among children who had surgery were examined by calculating adjusted odds ratio (OR) using multiple logistic regression (SPSS, Version 7.5 for Windows; SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL) to control for potential confounding variables. Children with HSP were excluded from the final analysis regarding risk of operative management and bowel resection because they are routinely treated with operative care rather than radiologic reduction. The adjusted OR was reported with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Statistical significance was defined as P < .05.


    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References

Five hundred seventy children were identified. No procedure codes were recorded in the dataset for 200 children, of whom 138 children had a hospital LOS of 1 day. One hundred four of the 138 children (76%) without any procedure codes who were hospitalized for 1 day were admitted to CHRMC; all of these 104 patients had successful nonoperative reduction confirmed by review of the medical records. Two children admitted to CHRMC for 1 day underwent operative reduction after failed radiologic treatment. Both cases were correctly recorded in the dataset as operative reduction. Therefore, children admitted to any hospital in the state for intussusception for only 1 day who did not have a procedure code were considered to have nonoperative management for analysis. The remaining 62 children without listed procedure codes and with hospitalization >1 day were excluded from further analysis. Children who were excluded did not significantly differ from those included participants by age, gender, coexisting conditions, insurance status, or hospital pediatric caseload.

Review of the 276 charts of the CHRMC patients demonstrated that data present in the hospital discharge data were generally accurate. There were no errors regarding patient age, hospital LOS, or need for bowel resection. The payer was inaccurately recorded in 12 cases (4%), surgical reduction was not coded in 8 cases (3%), and the diagnosis of intussusception was miscoded in 3 cases (1%).

There were 16 hospitals with 0 to 3000 annual pediatric admissions, 13 with 3001 to 10 000, and 1 with >10 000 annual admissions. The demographic features of the remaining 508 children are presented in Table 1. The median age was .8 years (.5, 2.3 years), and two thirds of the patients were male. Thirty-five children (6%) had recurrent intussusception during the study. The median time to relapse was 118 days (23, 314 days). One 6-month-old child with a Meckel's diverticulum, who had both surgery and bowel resection, died of sepsis.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 

TABLE 1
Demographic and Clinical Features of Patients With Intussusception

Operative reduction occurred in 270 children (53%), of whom 104 (20%) required bowel resection (Table 2). Children who required operative reduction had similar median age compared with children who had nonoperative reduction (. 7 years [.4, 2.5 years] vs .9 years [.5,2.0 years], respectively), although children ages 1 to 2 years were least likely to have operative reduction. Children who had operative reduction were more likely to have either a coexisting condition associated with intussusception or be transferred from another inpatient facility than children who did not have operative care. Children in a health maintenance organization (HMO) were less likely to have operative care than were children with commercial insurance or Medicaid. Both hospital charges and LOS were significantly longer for children who required surgery, compared with children who had nonoperative reduction.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 

TABLE 2
Demographic and Clinical Features of Children Comparing Nonoperative and Operative Reduction

One hundred four children had bowel resected. These children were significantly older (median age: 1.0 years [.5,5.3 years]) compared with children who had operative reduction without bowel resection (median age: .8 years [.5,1.9 years]). Children who had bowel resected were more likely to have a coexisting condition associated with intussusception than were children who underwent operative reduction without resection (34% vs 7%, respectively). Children with bowel resection had greater hospital median LOS (6 days [4,8]) and median charges ($7760 [$5786,$12 872]) compared with children without bowel resection (4 days [3,5] and $4531 [$3332,$6625]).

Patient demographic features and outcome are compared by hospital pediatric caseload in Table 3. Children treated in a large referral center with >10 000 annual pediatric admissions were less likely to require operative reduction or bowel resection; however, among children who had surgery, the proportion with bowel resection was similar for the various pediatric caseload groups. Children treated at the large pediatric referral center had shorter LOS (median stay of 1 day) compared with those treated at centers with 0 to 3000 annual pediatric admissions (median stay of 3 days) and those treated at centers with 3001 to 10 000 annual pediatric admissions (median stay of 4 days). Similarly, median hospital charges were less ($1875 vs $3718 and $4532, respectively).


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 

TABLE 3
Patient Demographic Features and Outcome Related to Hospital Pediatric Volume

The adjusted analyses of factors associated with operative reduction and bowel resection are in Table 4. Children with HSP (n = 3) were excluded from the analysis. Children over 4 years of age were >3 times as likely to have bowel resection, compared with younger children. Children with coexisting conditions that are associated with intussusception had a fivefold greater risk of operative reduction compared with children without such conditions, and they were almost 5 times as likely to require bowel resection. Patients who were transferred from another inpatient facility were 5 times more likely to have operative management but were not significantly more likely to have bowel resection. Children treated at facilities with smaller pediatric caseloads had increased risk of operative reduction after adjustment for age and other conditions associated with intussusception. However, among children who had operative reduction, there was no increased risk of bowel resection at hospitals with <10 000 annual pediatric admissions.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 

TABLE 4
Risk Factors for Operative Care and Bowel Resection

If children with a coexisting condition associated with intussusception were excluded from the analysis, then the risk of operative reduction for children with intussusception in a hospital with 0 to 3000 annual pediatric cases remained 3.2 (95% CI: 1.9-5.3) times greater than for children who received care in a hospital with >10 000 annual admissions. The risk of operative management for children with intussusception in a hospital with 3000 to 10 000 annual admissions was 5.7 (95% CI: 3.5-9.3) times greater than for children with intussusception who received care in a hospital with >10 000 annual admissions (data not shown).


    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References

We found that children with intussusception who received care in a large pediatric hospital had a lower risk of requiring operative intervention compared with children who received care in hospitals with smaller pediatric caseloads. Children had between 1.7 and 2 times greater unadjusted risk of operative care when they were treated in smaller hospitals compared with a large children's hospital and the estimated risk was greater after adjustment for potential confounding features, such as age and coexisting conditions. As expected, nonoperative management was associated with shorter LOS and lower hospital charges.9

The explanation for this finding cannot be determined from the information that we have available for study. We could not determine when in the course of the disease the children presented for care, whether the diagnosis was recognized and appropriate consultation obtained without delay, and, finally, what specific radiologic techniques were used and how experienced the radiologic interventionists were. This information was not available in the hospital discharge data and may have differed among hospitals with differing pediatric caseloads.

Studies have shown that radiologists with a large experience treating intussusception have improved reduction rates compared with those with less2,5 and that repeated radiologic attempts are frequently successful after a failed initial attempt.1,10 Pediatric radiologists are reported to repeat attempts for radiologic reduction more frequently than do operators with less experience.5 Although we believe that increased radiologic experience at a large pediatric center explains part of the difference in the rates of nonoperative management, the state hospital discharge dataset does not provide direct information to confirm this.

Use of hospital discharge data has another limitation (ie, missing data). We excluded all cases of >1 day hospital LOS without listed procedure codes, ~10% of the cases, because we could not assume that they had nonoperative management. If we were to assume that all children without a procedure code who were admitted for 2 days or less had nonoperative management, then only 25 children (4%) would have been excluded. When the logistic analysis was repeated using this assumption, the risk of surgery and of bowel resection by age, insurance status, and hospital pediatric caseload did not substantively change. The presence of missing data, therefore, does not seem to alter our conclusions.

Other important findings of the study include the effect of age and cocoexisting conditions on the risk of operative management of intussusception. As previously reported,11 we found that median age did not differ between children who had operative reduction, compared with nonoperative reduction; however, the relatively small number of older children had an increased risk of bowel resection, compared with the younger children. This difference was similar to previous reports.7,12 Children ages 1 to 2 years had the lowest risk of operative care. This age group has the highest incidence of intussusception and a low rate of coexisting conditions associated with intussusception.

We were surprised to find that children with HMO medical coverage had a decreased risk of surgery compared with children with Medicaid or no insurance, but that children with commercial insurance did not have a decreased rate. Other studies have shown that patients with Medicaid have increased risk for perforation with acute appendicitis.13-15 Potential explanations for the decreased risk among children with HMO insurance include better access to primary care and higher parental economic status compared with Medicaid patients. The lower risk among HMO patients may be because of greater HMO insurance in western Washington, which is more urban than the remainder of the state. However, we cannot determine the specific causes for this association.


    CONCLUSION
Top
Abstract
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References

We found that children with the diagnosis of intussusception who received care in a specialized pediatric facility had a lower risk of operative reduction, decreased LOS, and lower hospital charges compared with children treated in other facilities. The risk of surgical management in the small and medium pediatric experience facilities were not statistically different from each other. Numerous studies of specific procedures have demonstrated that hospitals with more experience have lower mortality compared with less experienced centers.16-18 Other studies have shown that pediatric radiologists who have more experience with intussusception have greater radiologic reduction rates than do radiologists with less experience.1,3,5

We believe that greater physician experience in the large referral center explains some of the difference in nonoperative management by hospital pediatric caseload in our study. We examined the radiologic reduction rates at 2 medium caseload centers in Washington that have radiologists with pediatric training on staff. The rates of operative management were 87% and 80%, suggesting that experience rather than training may be key. However, other important features may have contributed to lower risk of operative care in a large pediatric center that we were unable to evaluate in this study.

We suggest that transfer to a center with a high pediatric volume be considered if a child has an intussusception that cannot be radiographically reduced if the patient is hemodynamically stable and the time needed for transport is acceptable to the involved surgical and radiologic staff.


    FOOTNOTES

Received for publication Mar 15, 2000; accepted Jun 6, 2000.

Reprint requests to (S.L.B.) Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, F-6884, Mott/0243, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, Ann Arbor, MI 48109. E-mail: sbratton{at}umich.edu


    ABBREVIATIONS

LOS, length of stay; CHRMC, Children's Hospital and Regional Medical Center; HSP, Henoch-Schönlein purpura; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; HMO, health maintenance organization.


    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
  1. Gorenstein A, Raucher A, Serour F, Witzling M, Katz R Intussusception in children: reduction with repeated, delayed air enema. Radiology 1998; 206:721-724 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Guo J, Ma X, Zhou Q Results of air pressure enema reduction of intussusception: 6396 cases in 13 years. J Pediatr Surg 1986; 21:1201-1203 [CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Gu L, Alton DJ, Daneman A, Intussusception reduction in children by rectal insufflation of air. Am J Radiol 1988; 150:134-1348
  4. Beasley SW, Lubitz L A continuing quality improvement (CQI) approach to improving the results of treatment in intussusception. J Qual Clin Pract 1995; 15:23-28 [Medline]
  5. Katz ME, Kolm P Intussusception reduction 1991: an international survey of pediatric radiologists. Pediatr Radiol 1992; 22:318-322 [CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Jewell FM, Robottom C, Duncan A Variations in the radiological management of intussusception: results of a postal survey. Br J Radiol 1995; 68:13-18 [Abstract]
  7. Barr LL, Stansberry SD, Swischuk LE Significance of age, duration, obstruction and the dissection sign in intussusception. Pediatr Radiol 1990; 20:454-456 [CrossRef][Medline]
  8. International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification. 4th ed. Los Angeles, CA: Practice Management Information Corporation; 1994
  9. Stein JE, Beasley SW, Phelan E The cost benefit of changing protocols in the management of intussusception. Aust N Z J Surg 1997; 67:330-331 [Medline]
  10. Eshel G, Barr J, Heyman E, Intussusception: a 9-year survey (1986-1995). J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1997; 24:253-256 [CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Meier DE, Coln CD, Rescorla F, OlaOlorun A, Tarpley JL Intussusception in children: international perspective. World J Surg 1996; 20:1035-1040 [CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Stringer MD, Pablot SM, Brereton RJ Paediatric intussusception. Br J Surg 1992; 79:867-876 [Medline]
  13. Braveman P, Schaaf VM, Egerter S, Bennett T, Schecter W Insurance-related differences in the risk of ruptured appendix. N Engl J Med. 1994; 331:444-449 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. O'Toole SJ, Karamanoukian HL, Allen JE, Insurance-related differences in the presentation of pediatric appendicitis. J Pediatr Surg 1996; 31:1032-1034 [CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Bratton SL, Haberkern CM, Waldhausen JHT Acute appendicitis risks of complications: age and medicaid insurance. Pediatrics 2000; 106:75-78 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Thiemann DR, Coresh J, Oetgen WJ, The association between hospital volume and survival after acute myocardial infarction in elderly patients. N Engl J Med 1999; 340:1640-1648 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Hannan EL, Racz M, Kavey RE, Quaegebeur JM, Williams R Pediatric cardiac surgery: the effect of hospital and surgeon volume on in-hospital mortality. Pediatrics 1998; 101:963-969 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Hannon EL, Siu Al, Kumar D, The decline in coronary artery bypass graft surgery mortality in New York State: the role of surgery volume. JAMA 1995; 273:209-213 [Abstract]

Pediatrics (ISSN 0031 4005). Copyright ©2001 by the American Academy of Pediatrics



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AAP Grand RoundsHome page
S. L. Bratton
Case Load and Mortality in Pediatric Cardiac Surgery
AAP Grand Rounds, August 1, 2007; 18(2): 17 - 18.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
J. G. Berry, T. A. Lieu, P. W. Forbes, and D. A. Goldmann
Hospital Volumes for Common Pediatric Specialty Operations
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, January 1, 2007; 161(1): 38 - 43.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
A. J. Donoghue, V. M. Nadkarni, M. Elliott, D. Durbin, and for the American Heart Assocation National Registr
Effect of Hospital Characteristics on Outcomes From Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Report From the National Registry of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Pediatrics, September 1, 2006; 118(3): 995 - 1001.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. E. Applegate
Clinically Suspected Intussusception in Children: Evidence-Based Review and Self-Assessment Module
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2005; 185(3_supp): S175 - S183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
D. H. Davis, A. R. Localio, P. W. Stafford, M. A. Helfaer, and D. R. Durbin
Trends in Operative Management of Pediatric Splenic Injury in a Regional Trauma System
Pediatrics, January 1, 2005; 115(1): 89 - 94.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
D. S. Smink, J. A. Finkelstein, K. Kleinman, and S. J. Fishman
The Effect of Hospital Volume of Pediatric Appendectomies on the Misdiagnosis of Appendicitis in Children
Pediatrics, January 1, 2004; 113(1): 18 - 23.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
L. Bajaj and M. G. Roback
Postreduction Management of Intussusception in a Children's Hospital Emergency Department
Pediatrics, December 1, 2003; 112(6): 1302 - 1307.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of HealthHome page
N J West, I R Daniels, and N D Carr
Lessons to be learned: a case study approach: Chronic intussusception in childhood
The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health, September 1, 2003; 123(3): 181 - 184.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch GeneralHome page
Where Should Children with Intussusception Go for Care?
Journal Watch (General), February 20, 2001; 2001(220): 5 - 5.
[Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bratton, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Allison, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bratton, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Allison, J. W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Surgery