This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kicklighter, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Turner, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kicklighter, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Turner, R. B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Infectious Disease & Immunity

PEDIATRICS Vol. 107 No. 2 February 2001, pp. 293-298

Fluconazole for Prophylaxis Against Candidal Rectal Colonization in the Very Low Birth Weight Infant

Stephen D. Kicklighter, MD*, Shelley C. Springer, MD, MBA, MSDagger , Toby Cox, PharmD§, Thomas C. Hulsey, MSPH, ScD§, and Ronald B. Turner, MD§

From * Wake Medical Center, Raleigh, North Carolina; Dagger  Hennepin County Medical Center, Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota; and § Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.



    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Background.  Candidal infections are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in the very low birth weight (VLBW) infant. Current intervention focuses on treatment once candidal septicemia is either suspected or diagnosed. Studies have suggested that colonization with candidal species is an important risk factor for subsequent infection.

Objective.  To determine whether prophylactic fluconazole for the first 28 days of life results in a decreased incidence of candidal colonization in the VLBW infant.

Research Design.  Prospective, randomized, controlled, intention-to-treat design comparing prophylaxis with fluconazole versus placebo for the first 28 days of life.

Setting.  A tertiary level intensive care nursery in a major teaching hospital in Charleston, South Carolina.

Patients.  One hundred three infants with a birth weight of <1500 g, either inborn or outborn, who were admitted to the intensive care nursery between January 1998 and February 1999.

Methods.  Infants were enrolled within 72 hours of life with rectal cultures performed on the day of randomization (DOR), as well as day of life (DOL) 7, 14, and 28. Those infants with a birth weight of <1250 g had additional cultures on DOL 35, 49, and 56. Cultures were plated on selective media for isolation of candidal organisms. Infants were randomized to receive either fluconazole (6 mg/kg) or placebo on the DOR. Subsequent doses were given every 72 hours until DOL 7 and then every 24 hours until DOL 28. Medication was given either intravenously or by feeding tube once the infant had been gavage feeding for a 48-hour period without feeding intolerance. Aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase levels were obtained on DOR and DOL 7, 14, and 28 to assess for fluconazole toxicity. The minimal inhibitory concentration to fluconazole was determined for all positive cultures to assess the development of resistance.

Results.  The infants who received fluconazole (n = 53) and placebo (n = 50) had no statistical difference in the major risk factors known to increase the chances of candidal septicemia in the VLBW infant. Rectal colonization by candidal species was detected in 8 of the 53 fluconazole-treated patients (15.1%) and in 23 of the 50 infants treated with placebo (46%). Fluconazole significantly reduced rectal colonization from DOL 14 through DOL 56 in all infants with a birth weight of <1250 g, and from DOL 14 through DOL 56 in all infants with a birth weight of 1250 to 1500 g. Alanine aminotransferase levels were higher in the fluconazole versus the placebo-treated group on DOL 14 (18.1 IU/L vs 15 IU/L), but no clinically significant abnormalities were observed. Candida albicans was the most common species isolated. There was no increase in species of Candida noted for their intrinsic resistance to fluconazole, and there was no statistically significant difference in the minimal inhibitory concentrations to fluconazole for all C albicans isolates in either group at any period.

Conclusion.  Prophylactic administration of fluconazole to the VLBW infant for the first 28 days of life is safe and results in a decreased risk of rectal colonization by candidal species. Larger studies to determine the effect of prophylaxis on candidal septicemia and development of resistance in such a selective high-risk group are warranted before initiation of routine prophylaxis.fluconazole, very low birth weight infant, prophylaxis, candidal sepsis, sensitivities to fluconazole.

Nosocomial infections are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in premature infants. In a recent study by Fanaroff et al,1 16% of very low birth weight (VLBW) infants developed late-onset infections. Candidal organisms cause 3% to 9%2-4 of these late-onset infections and have a mortality rate of 25% to 60%.4,5 A recent review of outcomes in infants <1250 g found that infants with candidemia or candidal meningitis had a significantly higher incidence of mortality or neurodevelopmental disabilities than do controls (60% vs 28%, respectively; P < .05).5 Published risk factors for candidal sepsis in this group of infants are prolonged intubation,3,6 corticosteroid administration,7 parenteral nutrition,6 central line utilization, antibiotics,3,6 and the use of theophylline8; however, colonization with candidal species seems to be the most important predictor of invasive disease.9-14

Various reports indicate that 4.8% to 10% of VLBW infants are colonized at birth and subsequent colonization in the nursery setting results in an incidence of up to 64% by 4 weeks of age.10-14 Of all sites cultured to determine the incidence of colonization in this group of infants, a positive rectal culture seems to be most predictive. Candidal colonization can also occur by horizontal transmission, with the incidence peaking at 1 to 4 weeks of age.10,12-14 It has further been noted that the incidence of colonization correlates inversely with birth weight and gestational age.10-12,14

Fluconazole prophylaxis is effective for prevention of candidal colonization and sepsis in immunosuppressed children and adults.15,16 Neonatal candidal prophylaxis has been attempted with both oral nystatin17 and oral miconazole18 with little success. Several case reports have noted that fluconazole, a bis-triazole antifungal, has been effective for the treatment of VLBW infants with systemic candidal infections.19,21-22 With essentially equivalent oral and intravenous bioavailability, administration of fluconazole is more convenient than conventional antifungal agents such as amphotericin B. Furthermore, adverse effects with fluconazole seem minimal. Transient elevation of liver enzymes, which return to baseline after discontinuation of the drug, has been the only side effect noted with fluconazole in the treatment of VLBW infants for systemic disease with fluconazole.20-23

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of fluconazole to reduce candidal colonization, as determined by rectal culture, in the VLBW infant. Our hypothesis was that prophylactic treatment with fluconazole in the first 28 days of life in VLBW infants would result in a decreased incidence of candidal colonization. Reports of long-term prophylaxis with fluconazole in the adult literature have prompted concerns about development of, or selection for, more resistant species of Candida.24-26 Therefore, the effect of prophylactic treatment with fluconazole on the minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of all candidal species isolated from the time of prophylaxis up to 4 weeks after the treatment period in those infants <1250 g at birth was also evaluated.


    METHODS
Top
Abstract
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

All infants with a birth weight <1500 g admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit at the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) between January 1, 1998 and February 20, 1999 were eligible for participation. Exclusion criteria were parental refusal, admission after 72 hours of life, cyanotic congenital heart disease, congenital defects requiring surgical intervention, fatal chromosomal defects, hepatic insufficiency as demonstrated by aspartate aminotransferase (AST), or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation >4 times normal values for gestational age (>244 IU/L or >152 IU/L, respectively), or an infant so critically ill that he or she was not expected to live for >24 to 48 hours after birth. Patients were enrolled within the first 72 hours of life.

The average length of stay for infants with a birth weight of 1250 to 1500 g is 4 to 5 weeks and no cultures were collected from these infants after day 28 to avoid selecting for infants with an unusually complicated neonatal course. Rectal cultures were performed on the day of randomization (DOR), as well as on day of life (DOL) 7, 14, and 28 in all infants. Infants with a birth weight of <1250 g also had rectal cultures on DOL 35, 49, and 56. In all infants, AST and ALT levels were measured on the DOR, DOL 7, DOL 14, and DOL 28 to assess for hepatotoxicity while on drug or placebo therapy.

Infants were randomized to either fluconazole (6 mg/kg) or placebo (normal saline) intravenously. The investigational drug center (IDC) at MUSC performed randomization by random number assignment27 with all others blinded to the assignment group. The drug was given every 72 hours until DOL 7 and then every 24 hours on DOL 8 to 28.23 The drug was given by feeding tube once the infant had tolerated gavage feeding for a 48-hour period. Maalox (CIBA Self-Medication Inc, Woodbridge, NJ) was used as the placebo once infants were changed to oral administration. Pfizer Inc supplied both oral and intravenous fluconazole (Diflucan, Roerig Division of Pfizer, Inc, New York, NY). All doses were distributed by the IDC to be given by the patient's nurse, with all investigators and caregivers blinded to the infant's randomization. After 1 week of life, dosing was adjusted to 3 mg/kg if there was evidence of renal insufficiency as indicated by serum creatinine >1.0 mg/dL. To adjust dosing for weight gain or loss, the IDC was notified of the infant's weight on a weekly basis with dosage adjusted accordingly. All patients were routinely screened for potential drug interactions with fluconazole and other concomitantly prescribed medications.

Rectal cultures were obtained by gentle insertion of a calcium alginate swab that was then streaked at the patient's bedside onto brain-heart infusion agar supplemented with 0.05 g/L of chloramphenicol and 0.05 of g/L gentamicin. Cultures were incubated aerobically at 35°C with examination for growth at 2, 5, and 7 days after plating. Those cultures with growth were further analyzed using standard microbiologic techniques by the department of microbiology at MUSC for identification of candidal species. The MIC to fluconazole for all Candida isolates was determined at the University of Iowa according to the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) for susceptibility testing.28

An infant was considered colonized if candidal organisms were isolated from the rectal culture. Charts were reviewed on a weekly basis for known risk factors for sepsis. Duration of antibiotics, intubation, parenteral nutrition, total central catheter use (umbilical venous line, umbilical arterial catheter, peripherally inserted central catheter, Broviac), corticosteroids and theophylline were noted and the duration defined in days (with any portion of a day constituting 1 day of treatment). Infants were removed from the clinical study if they developed AST or ALT levels >3 times reported normal baseline values for neonates or culture positive fungemia (blood, urine, or cerebrospinal fluid).

Power analysis predicted an enrollment of 50 patients in each group would be required to show a reduction in the incidence of colonization from 34% to 14% with a P <=  .05 and a power of 90%. All data were entered, and statistical analyses for group comparisons were performed, using a standardized data collection tool (Statview for Windows, Abacus Concepts Inc, Berkeley, CA). Descriptive statistics, chi 2 test with Yates correction, the Fisher's exact test, and Student's t test were used as appropriate. The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board at MUSC, and informed written consent was obtained from the mother (or maternal grandmother if the mother was considered a minor) before enrollment.


    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Enrollment

One hundred ninety-one infants were born during the period of enrollment. Eighty-eight infants were excluded from the study. Twelve (14%) were admitted after 72 hours of age, 69 (78%) were excluded because of lack of parental consent, 6 infants (7%) were not expected to survive >48 hours, and 1 infant (1%) had congenital heart disease. Of the 103 infants enrolled in the study, 53 (51.5%) were randomized to the fluconazole treatment group and 50 (48.5%) were enrolled in the placebo treatment group. There were no significant differences between the treatment groups in any of the characteristics examined either at the time of randomization (Table 1) or during the subsequent hospital course (Table 2). Thirty-five of the 53 infants enrolled in the fluconazole-treated group (66%) and 33 of the 50 infants enrolled in the placebo-treated group (66%) were alive and remained hospitalized on DOL 56, the end of the observation period (P = .508). Overall, there were 5 deaths (9.4%) in the fluconazole treatment group and 10 (20%) in the placebo treatment group (P = .131; Table 2).


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 

TABLE 1
Patient Demographics


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 

TABLE 2
Clinical Variables

Effect of Fluconazole Prophylaxis on Candida Colonization

Candida colonization was detected over the course of the study in 8/53 of the fluconazole-treated patients (15.1%) and in 23/50 of the infants treated with placebo (46%; P = .0005). No infant demonstrated initial colonization after DOL 28. Fluconazole significantly reduced rectal colonization from DOL 14 through DOL 28 in all weight groups, which was persistent through DOL 56 in the <1250-g birth weight group (Fig 1). The highest incidence of colonization in the fluconazole group was on DOL 7, when 8 of 52 cultures (15.4%) were positive for a candidal species. In contrast, the highest incidence of colonization in the placebo group was on DOL 28, when 17 of 42 cultures (40.5%) performed were positive. Multiple Candida species were isolated in 1 culture from a fluconazole-treated patient and in 4 cultures from placebo-treated patients. The breakdown of Candida isolates is as follows: Candida albicans in 7 (13%) and 12 (24%), Candida parapsilosis in 1 (2%) and 10 (20%), and Candida glabrata in 1 (2%) and 1 (2%) of fluconazole versus placebo-treated infants. Furthermore, Candida lusitaniae was isolated in 3 (6%) and Candida tropicalis was isolated in 1 (2%) of those infants in the placebo-treated group.



View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Positive rectal cultures expressed as percent of total number of cultures performed at each interval and in each treatment group. Infants of birth weight <1500 g with rectal cultures performed from DOR to DOL 28. Infants with a birth weight of <1250 g with rectal cultures performed on all dates (* P < .01; dagger P < .05).

Laboratory Side Effects of Fluconazole

Fluconazole had no clinically significant effect on hepatic enzymes. The ALT concentration in the fluconazole-treated patients (18.1 IU/mL) was significantly higher than in the control patients (15.0 IU/mL) on DOL 14 (P = .008). However, no significant difference in hepatic enzymes was seen on DOL 28 and no infant was removed from the study because of unacceptably high elevation in values or clinical signs of hepatic toxicity.

Effect of Fluconazole Prophylaxis on Development of Candida Resistance

Analysis of the effect of fluconazole on development of resistance was limited to C albicans since 7 of the 9 (78%) Candida isolates in the treatment group were albicans species. There were no significant differences in the MICs of isolates from the treated and control patients at any time during the treatment period or for the 4 weeks after discontinuation of the study drug (Fig 2). There was no increase in isolation of species of Candida noted for their intrinsic resistance to fluconazole, with 1 infant in each group colonized with C glabrata. One infant in the fluconazole group remained colonized with C albicans from DOR to DOL 56. Those isolates from this infant were all susceptible to fluconazole with an MIC of 0.12 to 0.25 µg/mL.



View larger version (77K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   A, Number of isolates (bar, left value axis), range, and mean sensitivities in µg/mL (line and star, right value axis) for the fluconazole-treated C albicans isolates at 48 hours after plating to fluconazole. Infants of birth weight <1500 g with rectal cultures performed from DOR to DOL 28. Infants with a birth weight of <1250 g with rectal cultures performed on all dates. B, Number of isolates (bar, left value axis), range, and mean sensitivities in µg/mL (line and star, right value axis) for the placebo-treated C albicans isolates at 48 hours after plating to fluconazole. Infants of birth weight <1500 g with rectal cultures performed from DOR to DOL 28. Infants with a birth weight of <1250 g with rectal cultures performed on all dates.

Risk Factors for Colonization

Previous reports have noted a greater proportion of colonized infants to have a lower gestational age,10,12 vaginal delivery,14 an increased length of antibiotics,10,12-14 steroids,14 intubation,10,14 central line use,10 length of parenteral nutrition,13 Intralipid,13 and theophylline.10 Although the present study was not designed to determine factors associated with colonization, gestational age was found to be statistically associated with colonization in both groups (P < .05; Table 3). Furthermore, vaginal delivery, length of parenteral nutrition, and Intralipid in the fluconazole-treated and length of antibiotics in the placebo-treated group were factors associated with colonization.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 

TABLE 3
Clinical Variables and Association With Colonization

Colonization and Infection

Although this study was not designed to assess prevention of candidal infection, there were 2 infants in each group who developed candidal infection. Both infants in the placebo-treated group were colonized before developing sepsis. One was a 1318-g infant who was colonized with C parapsilosis on DOL 28 and developed a urinary tract infection on DOL 42. The second infant, 561 g at birth, was colonized with C parapsilosis from DOL 7 to DOL 35 and C lusitaniae from DOL 14 to DOL 49. This infant developed C parapsilosis fungemia on DOL 99.

Colonization was not detected in either infant in the fluconazole group before the onset of fungemia. The first infant was a 720-g male infant born at 271/2 weeks by cesarean section secondary to fetal distress whose clinical course was complicated by severe respiratory distress syndrome, a perforated urachus, and coagulase-negative staphylococcal bacteremia on DOL 12. On DOL 14, his blood culture showed growth of C parapsilosis. The infant was subsequently removed from support on DOL 20 because of intractable pulmonary disease and sepsis. The second infant was a 1200-g male infant born at 271/2 weeks by vaginal delivery with maternal preterm labor whose clinical course was complicated by severe respiratory distress syndrome, nonsurgical necrotizing enterocolitis, chronic lung disease, and 4 episodes of nosocomial bacteremia. He then developed a C parapsilosis urinary tract infection on DOL 83 that was successfully treated with fluconazole.


    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

We have performed the first randomized, placebo-controlled, intention-to-treat trial looking at prophylaxis of the VLBW infant with fluconazole to prevent horizontal acquisition of candidal colonization. Our results show that fluconazole prophylaxis reduced the incidence of candidal colonization during the first month of life for all infants with a birth weight of <1500 g from 46% to 15%, a statistically significant reduction. Furthermore, a statistically significant reduction in colonization rates was apparent during the second month of life in those infants with a birth weight of <1250 g. In this relatively small sample of infants studied, there was no evidence of hepatotoxicity, as evidenced by elevated AST or ALT levels, or development of resistant organisms.

The incidence of Candida colonization in our placebo-treated group is comparable to that in previous prospective studies of VLBW infants. Baley et al10 followed 146 VLBW infants and found the highest incidence of colonization on DOL 7 with an incidence 48.7%. Rowen et al14 followed 116 VLBW infants and found that 64% of colonized infants were culture-positive by DOL 14. The earlier peak in colonization incidence in previous studies may be explained by their use of multiple culture sites to assess colonization status.

VLBW infants acquire candidal colonization through both vertical and horizontal means. Our population of infants had an initial colonization rate of 8/103 (7.8%), similar to the incidence in previous reports.9,10,13 Two of the 8 infants with initial colonization were born by cesarean delivery without previous rupture of membranes, were colonized with C albicans, and were in the fluconazole group. In these infants, colonization was either the result of vertical transmission across the placental membranes or of horizontal acquisition that occurred before randomization (both infants were randomized at 68 hours of life).

The use of antimicrobial prophylaxis is associated with the potential risk of selection of resistant organisms. This may take the form of either a subtle increase in the MICs of previously sensitive species or an increased incidence of inherently resistant species. Candida krusei and C glabrata are Candida species with intrinsic resistance to fluconazole, and the use of fluconazole prophylaxis in immunosuppressed adult patients has been associated with an increased incidence of infection with these species.24-26 No increase in either the incidence of isolation of resistant species (defined by the NCCLS as an MIC of 64 µg/mL or above28) or in the MIC of C albicans was seen in this study. Our study, however, was too short in duration and involved too few patients to determine the risk of selection for resistance. Furthermore, it is important to note that susceptibility testing of fungal isolates is imperfect and MIC breakpoints may not accurately predict in vivo susceptibility.29

The only known side effect of fluconazole in the VLBW infant is transient elevation in liver enzyme values that resolves promptly after discontinuation of therapy.19,23 In our study, the 53 infants who received fluconazole had a statistically significant increase in the ALT value on DOL 14 that was considered clinically insignificant. No infant required removal from the present study because of elevated liver enzyme levels.

This study demonstrates that fluconazole prophylaxis is both safe and effective for reducing the incidence of candidal rectal colonization in VLBW infants. In this relatively small study, there were no clinically significant side effects of the medication; no evidence of development of resistance to fluconazole was detected. This study was not designed to assess the effectiveness of fluconazole prophylaxis for prevention of candidal infection. Evaluation of the effectiveness and the relative risk versus benefit of fluconazole prophylaxis will require a controlled trial in a much larger number of infants. Therefore, routine prophylaxis is not presently advocated in this group of high-risk infants.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The Pfizer Corporation contributed grant support and medication. Supplemental grant support was received from the Medical University of South Carolina Research Development Group.

Sam Messer, PhD, at the University of Iowa, performed the susceptibility testing on all Candida isolates.


    FOOTNOTES

Received for publication Mar 7, 2000; accepted Jun 20, 2000.

Reprint requests to (S.D.K.) Wake Medical Center, 3000 New Bern Ave, Box 14465, Raleigh, NC 27620. E-mail: skicklighter{at}wakemed.org


    ABBREVIATIONS

VLBW, very low birth weight; MIC, minimal inhibitory concentration; MUSC, Medical University of South Carolina; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; DOR, day of randomization; DOL, day of life; IDC, investigational drug center; NCCLS, National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards.


    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
  1. Fanaroff AA, Korones SB, Wright LL, Incidence, presenting features, risk factors and significance of late onset septicemia in very low birth weight infants. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1998; 17:593-598 [CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Ronnestad A, Abrahamsen TG, Gaustad P, Finne PH Blood culture isolates during 6 years in a tertiary neonatal intensive care unit. Scand J Infect Dis 1998; 30:245-251 [CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Faix RG, Kovarik SM, Shaw TR, Johnson RV Mucocutaneous and invasive candidiasis among very low birth weight (<1500 grams) infants in intensive care nurseries: a prospective study. Pediatrics 1989; 83:101-107 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Stoll BJ, Gordon T, Korones SB, Late-onset sepsis in very low birth weight neonates: a report from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development neonatal research network. J Pediatr 1996; 129:63-71 [CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Lee BE, Cheung P, Robinson JL, Evanochko C, Robertson CM Comparative study of mortality and morbidity in premature infants (birth weight <1,250 g) with candidemia or candidal meningitis. Clin Infect Dis 1998; 27:559-565 [Medline]
  6. Weese-Mayer DE, Fondriest DW, Brouillette RT, Shulman ST Risk factors associated with candidemia in the neonatal intensive care unit: a case-control study. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1987; 6:190-196 [Medline]
  7. Botas CM, Kurlat I, Young SM, Sola A Disseminated candidal infections and intravenous hydrocortisone in preterm infants. Pediatrics 1995; 95:883-887 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Bourne HR, Lehrer RI, Cline MJ, Melmon KL Cyclic 3', 5'-adenosine monophosphate in the human leukocyte: synthesis, degradation, and effects on neutrophil candidacidal activity. J Clin Invest 1971; 50:920
  9. Waggoner-Fountain, LA, Walker MW, Hollis, RJ, et al Vertical and horizontal transmission of unique candida species to premature newborns. Clin Infect Dis 1996; 22:803-808 [Medline]
  10. Baley JE, Kliegman RM, Boxerbaum B, Fanaroff AA Fungal colonization in the very low birth weight infant. Pediatrics 1986; 78:225-232 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. El-Mohandes AE, Johnson-Robbins L, Keiser JF, Simmens SJ, Aure MV Incidence of Candida parapsilosis colonization in an intensive care nursery population and its association with invasive fungal disease. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1994; 13:520-524 [Medline]
  12. Hageman JR, Stenske J, Keuler H, Randall E Candida colonization and infection in very low birth weight infants. J Perinatol 1985; 6:251-254
  13. Huang Y, Li C, Lin T, Association of fungal colonization and invasive disease in very low birth weight infants. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1998; 17:819-822 [CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Rowen JL, Rench MA, Kozinetz CA, Adams JM, Baker C Endotracheal colonization with Candida enhances risk of systemic candidiasis in very low birth weight neonates. J Pediatr 1994; 124:789-794 [CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Ninane J, Multicentre Study Group A multicentre study of fluconazole versus oral polyenes in the prevention of fungal infection in children with hematological or oncological malignancies. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1994; 13:330-337 [CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Goodman JL, Winston DJ, Greenfield RA, A controlled trial of fluconazole to prevent fungal infections in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation. N Eng J Med 1992; 326:845-851 [Abstract]
  17. Sims ME, Yoo Y, You H, Salminen C, Walther FJ Prophylactic oral nystatin and fungal infections in very-low-birthweight infants. Am J Perinatol 1988; 5:33-36 [Medline]
  18. Wainer S, Cooper PA, Funk E, Bental RY, Sandler DA, Patel J Prophylactic miconazole oral gel for the prevention of neonatal fungal rectal colonization and systemic infection. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1992; 11:713-716 [Medline]
  19. Driessen M, Ellis JB, Cooper PA, Fluconazole vs. amphotericin B for the treatment of neonatal fungal septicemia: a prospective randomized trial. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1996; 15:1107-1112 [CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Gurpinar AN, Balkan E, Kilic N, Kiristioglu I, Avsar I, Dogruyol H Fluconazole treatment of neonates and infants with severe fungal infections. J Int Med Res 1997; 25:214-218 [Medline]
  21. Wainer S, Cooper PA, Gouws H, Akierman D Prospective study of fluconazole therapy in systemic neonatal fungal infection. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1997; 16:763-767 [CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Huttova M, Hartmanova I, Kralinsky K, Candida fungemia in neonates treated with fluconazole: report of forty cases, including eight with meningitis. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1998; 17:1012-1015 [CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Saxen H, Hoppu K, Pohjavuori M Pharmacokinetics of fluconazole in very low birth weight infants during the first two weeks of life. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1993; 54:269-276 [Medline]
  24. Nguyen MH, Peacock JE, Morris AJ, The changing face of candidemia: emergence of non-Candida albicans species and antifungal resistance. Am J Med 1996; 100:617-623 [CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Price MF, LaRocco MT, Gentry LO Fluconazole susceptibilities of Candida species and distribution of species recovered from blood cultures over a 5-year period. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1994; 38:1422-1424 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Rex JH, Rinaldi MG, Pfaller MA Resistance of Candida species to fluconazole. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1995; 39:1-8 [Medline]
  27. Shott S. Statistics for Health Professionals. 1st ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1990:57-67
  28. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Reference Method for Broth Dilution of Susceptibility Testing for Yeasts: Proposed Strategy. Villanova, PA: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards; 1992. M27-P
  29. Lewis RE, Klepser ME, Pfaller MA Update on clinical antifungal susceptibility testing for Candida species. Pharmacotherapy 1998; 18:509-515 [Medline]

Pediatrics (ISSN 0031 4005). Copyright ©2001 by the American Academy of Pediatrics



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NeoReviewsHome page
C. M. Healy
Fungal Prophylaxis in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
NeoReviews, December 1, 2008; 9(12): e562 - e570.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
D. Kaufman
Fluconazole Prophylaxis Decreases the Combined Outcome of Invasive Candida Infections or Mortality in Preterm Infants
Pediatrics, November 1, 2008; 122(5): 1158 - 1159.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.Home page
D. Trofa, A. Gacser, and J. D. Nosanchuk
Candida parapsilosis, an Emerging Fungal Pathogen
Clin. Microbiol. Rev., October 1, 2008; 21(4): 606 - 625.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
L Clerihew, N Austin, and W McGuire
Systemic antifungal prophylaxis for very low birthweight infants: a systematic review
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., May 1, 2008; 93(3): F198 - F200.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
C. M. Healy, J. R. Campbell, E. Zaccaria, and C. J. Baker
Fluconazole Prophylaxis in Extremely Low Birth Weight Neonates Reduces Invasive Candidiasis Mortality Rates Without Emergence of Fluconazole-Resistant Candida Species
Pediatrics, April 1, 2008; 121(4): 703 - 710.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
B. A McCrossan, E. McHenry, F. O'Neill, G. Ong, and D. G Sweet
Selective fluconazole prophylaxis in high-risk babies to reduce invasive fungal infection
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., November 1, 2007; 92(6): F454 - F458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
P. Manzoni, I. Stolfi, L. Pugni, L. Decembrino, C. Magnani, G. Vetrano, E. Tridapalli, G. Corona, C. Giovannozzi, D. Farina, et al.
A Multicenter, Randomized Trial of Prophylactic Fluconazole in Preterm Neonates
N. Engl. J. Med., June 14, 2007; 356(24): 2483 - 2495.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
M. P. Venkatesh, D. Pham, M. Fein, L. Kong, and L. E. Weisman
Neonatal Coinfection Model of Coagulase-Negative Staphylococcus (Staphylococcus epidermidis) and Candida albicans: Fluconazole Prophylaxis Enhances Survival and Growth
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., April 1, 2007; 51(4): 1240 - 1245.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
P. Manzoni, D. Farina, M. Leonessa, E. A. d'Oulx, P. Galletto, M. Mostert, R. Miniero, and G. Gomirato
Risk Factors for Progression to Invasive Fungal Infection in Preterm Neonates With Fungal Colonization
Pediatrics, December 1, 2006; 118(6): 2359 - 2364.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
L. A. Burwell, D. Kaufman, J. Blakely, B. J. Stoll, and S. K. Fridkin
Antifungal Prophylaxis to Prevent Neonatal Candidiasis: A Survey of Perinatal Physician Practices
Pediatrics, October 1, 2006; 118(4): e1019 - e1026.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
S. Uko, L. M. Soghier, M. Vega, J. Marsh, G. T. Reinersman, L. Herring, V. A. Dave, S. Nafday, and L. P. Brion
Targeted Short-Term Fluconazole Prophylaxis Among Very Low Birth Weight and Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants
Pediatrics, April 1, 2006; 117(4): 1243 - 1252.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
C. Charlier, E. Hart, A. Lefort, P. Ribaud, F. Dromer, D. W. Denning, and O. Lortholary
Fluconazole for the management of invasive candidiasis: where do we stand after 15 years?
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., March 1, 2006; 57(3): 384 - 410.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
E. Sarvikivi, O. Lyytikainen, D. R. Soll, C. Pujol, M. A. Pfaller, M. Richardson, P. Koukila-Kahkola, P. Luukkainen, and H. Saxen
Emergence of Fluconazole Resistance in a Candida parapsilosis Strain That Caused Infections in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
J. Clin. Microbiol., June 1, 2005; 43(6): 2729 - 2735.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.Home page
D. Kaufman and K. D. Fairchild
Clinical Microbiology of Bacterial and Fungal Sepsis in Very-Low-Birth-Weight Infants
Clin. Microbiol. Rev., July 1, 2004; 17(3): 638 - 680.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
Perinatal with allergy, immunity, and infection
Arch. Dis. Child., April 1, 2004; 89(suppl_1): A32 - A33.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
D. K. Benjamin Jr, E. R. DeLong, W. J. Steinbach, C. M. Cotton, T. J. Walsh, and R. H. Clark
Empirical Therapy for Neonatal Candidemia in Very Low Birth Weight Infants
Pediatrics, September 1, 2003; 112(3): 543 - 547.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeoReviewsHome page
S. D. Kicklighter
Antifungal Agents and Fungal Prophylaxis in the Neonate
NeoReviews, December 1, 2002; 3(12): e249 - 255.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
C. Dani, G. Bertini, M. Pezzati, D. Casalaz, D. Kaufman, R. Boyle, and L. B. D. Grossman
Fluconazole Prophylaxis against Fungal Infection in Preterm Infants
N. Engl. J. Med., June 13, 2002; 346(24): 1913 - 1914.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
D. Kaufman, R. Boyle, K. C. Hazen, J. T. Patrie, M. Robinson, and L. G. Donowitz
Fluconazole Prophylaxis against Fungal Colonization and Infection in Preterm Infants
N. Engl. J. Med., December 6, 2001; 345(23): 1660 - 1666.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
M. N. Neely and J. R. Schreiber
Fluconazole Prophylaxis in the Very Low Birth Weight Infant: Not Ready for Prime Time
Pediatrics, February 1, 2001; 107(2): 404 - 405.
[Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kicklighter, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Turner, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kicklighter, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Turner, R. B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Infectious Disease & Immunity