This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dewey, K. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dewey, K. G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Nutrition & Metabolism
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

PEDIATRICS Vol. 106 No. 5 Supplement November 2000, pp. 1281

Complementary Feeding and Infant Growth and Body Composition

Kathryn G. Dewey, PhD

Department of Nutrition and Program in International Nutrition University of California, Davis Davis, CA 95616

    ARTICLE
Top
Article
References

Although there have been few experimental studies to assess the impact of complementary feeding practices on infant growth and body composition, there is considerable relevant information in the scientific literature. Some of the key findings are:

a. In affluent populations, breastfed infants gain less weight and are leaner than formula-fed infants; in disadvantaged populations the reverse is often true.1

b. There has been controversy over whether complementary foods should be introduced between 4 and 6 months, or around 6 months of age. Observational studies in affluent populations generally show no difference in weight or length gain between exclusively breastfed and partially breastfed infants during the 4- to 6-month period.1,2 In disadvantaged populations the studies have shown either no difference in growth between these 2 subgroups or an advantage to continued exclusive breastfeeding during this period.1 In the latter situation, the growth advantage of exclusive breastfeeding is often attributable to reduced morbidity.

c. There have been only 2 experimental studies comparing outcomes in exclusively breastfed infants and in breastfed infants given nutritious, hygienically prepared complementary foods during the 4- to 6-month-old age period: one in a general, low-income population3 and the other in term, small-for-gestational age infants.4 Both studies were conducted in Honduras, and neither showed a significant impact on weight or length gain during the first year of life.

d. After 6 months, it has been hypothesized that growth of breastfed infants may be limited by the micronutrient content of complementary foods. The nutrients most likely to be deficient in the diet are iron, zinc, and calcium.1 This is true in both affluent and disadvantaged populations. Micronutrient intervention studies are underway in many countries. So far, there is little evidence of a growth effect in affluent populations, and the results in disadvantaged populations have been mixed.5 Prenatal undernutrition and other factors may limit the postnatal growth response to micronutrient supplementation.

Research Questions

  1. How should we define "optimal" growth and body composition during infancy? Long-term studies of functional outcomes related to growth and body composition during the period of complementary feeding should be conducted.
  2. There is a need for additional experimental studies regarding the optimal timing of introduction of complementary foods, especially in populations with maternal malnutrition.
  3. What is the relative contribution of prenatal versus postnatal nutrition to growth faltering during infancy?
  4. What is the most feasible way of providing complementary foods with adequate nutrient density to optimize growth?

    REFERENCES
Top
Article
References
  1. Brown KH, Dewey KG, Allen LH. Complementary Feeding of Young Children in Developing Countries: A Review of Current Scientific Knowledge. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1998. WHO/NUT/98.1
  2. Heinig MJ, Nommsen LA, Peerson JM, Lonnerdal B, Dewey KG Intake and growth of breast-fed and formula-fed infants in relation to the timing of introduction of complementary foods: The DARLING Study. Acta Paediatr. 1993; 82:999-1006 [Medline]
  3. Cohen RJ, Brown KH, Canahuati J, Riviera LL, Dewey KG Effects of age of introduction of complementary foods on infant breast milk intake, total energy intake, and growth: a randomised intervention study in Honduras. Lancet. 1994; 344:288-293 [CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Dewey KG, Cohen RJ, Brown KH, Landa Rivera L Age of introduction of complementary foods and growth of term, low-birth-weight, breast-fed infants: a randomized intervention study in Honduras. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999; 69:679-686 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Lartey A, Manu A, Brown KH, Peerson JM, Dewey KG A randomized, community-based trial of the effects of improved, centrally processed complementary foods on growth and micronutrient status of Ghanaian infants from 6 to 12 months of age. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999; 70:391-404 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

Pediatrics (ISSN 0031 4005). Copyright ©2000 by the American Academy of Pediatrics

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
V. O Owino, L. M Kasonka, M. M Sinkala, J. K Wells, S. Eaton, T. Darch, A. Coward, A. M Tomkins, and S. M Filteau
Fortified complementary foods with or without {alpha}-amylase treatment increase hemoglobin but do not reduce breast milk intake of 9-mo-old Zambian infants
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, October 1, 2007; 86(4): 1094 - 1103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
M. K. Schmidt, S. Muslimatun, C. E. West, W. Schultink, R. Gross, and J. G. A. J. Hautvast
Nutritional Status and Linear Growth of Indonesian Infants in West Java Are Determined More by Prenatal Environment than by Postnatal Factors
J. Nutr., August 1, 2002; 132(8): 2202 - 2207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dewey, K. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dewey, K. G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Nutrition & Metabolism
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?