PEDIATRICS Vol. 105 No. 4 April 2000, pp. 920-921
To the Editor.
In Southern California, Agran et al1 found that
Hispanic (mainly Mexican) children had much higher rates of serious injury requiring hospitalization than did non-Hispanic white children. To investigate possible reasons for this disparity, we designed an
ethnographic study involving in-depth interviews and observations in
homes in geographical areas where large numbers of such injuries had
occurred. Our subjects consisted of Mexican mothers (born and educated
in Mexico), Mexican American mothers (of Mexican ancestry but born and
educated in the United States), and non-Hispanic US-born white mothers.
We assumed that the children in these families would have the same
racial and ethnic identity as their mothers and that in this way we
could study possible effects of cultural factors on injury rates.
We found that the children of the Mexican and Mexican American mothers
did indeed share their mothers' ethnicities, but of the 30 white
mothers interviewed, 10 had children who had Hispanic surnames because
their biological fathers were Hispanic. These children, many of whom
spoke Spanish as well as English, would have been classified as
"Hispanic" in most studies. Furthermore, in 5 of the 10 cases the
biological father was not living with the family and, thus, whatever
attitudes and behaviors were present in the home were much more a
function of the non-Hispanic white mother than of the absent Hispanic
father.
We bring this to the attention of other researchers because of its
implication for interpretation of "ethnic" data and subsequent design of programmatic interventions. Particularly where children are
involved, ethnic classifications should not be considered in isolation
from the total household situation. With increased mixing of
ethnicities and races,2 especially in areas such as
California,3 it is becoming very difficult to say that a
particular health condition or behavior is purely the result of
ethnicity rather than, for example, a function of social class. Indeed,
Krieger and Fee4 and Krieger et al5 have
called for the reintroduction of social class variables into health
statistics Recent articles have pointed out two major problems besetting attempts
to study ethnicity in relation to health status. One is the fact that
in virtually all published research, including that on
Hispanics,6 the ethnic classifications used are not
clearly defined.7 Another is the marked lack of
reliability in ethnic identifications regardless of whether the
identifications are provided by subjects themselves or by other people,
especially where classifications other than "white" and "black"
are in question.8,9 Misclassification may cause erroneous
conclusions to be drawn, leading to inappropriate health
interventions.10
Our research reveals yet another complication in studies of ethnicity
focusing on children: the adult controlling the physical and emotional
environment in the household may be of a different ethnicity from the
child whose health status is being investigated. As stated in a recent
task force report on the health of immigrant children sponsored by the
National Research Council and the Institute of Medicine,11
in-depth ethnographic studies of household factors influencing health
are essential if statistics from broader surveys are to be fully
understood.
variables now used in all developed nations with the
exception of the United States.
Pediatric Injury Prevention Research Group
Center for Health Policy and Research
University of California, Irvine
Irvine, CA 92697-5800
REFERENCES
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||