| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PEDIATRICS Vol. 105 No. 3 March 2000, pp. 638-640
The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
seeks to improve the health and well-being of America's children, in
part, by formulating well-designed child health policy statements. The
development of child health policy statements should always consider 4 key principles: integrity, credibility, fairness, and responsibility. A
recent example of the child health policymaking process of the AAP was
the joint statement of the AAP and US Public Health Service on the use
of a mercury-containing preservative called thimerosal in vaccines and
recommendations for hepatitis B vaccine administration. The perceived
need to address the thimerosal issue quickly to provide pediatricians
with timely recommendations precluded an extensive inclusive
policymaking process. The process used demonstrates that the AAP, the
US Public Health Service and other public agencies, and experts from
academia can respond quickly and work together in the best interests of
our children. This commentary will reflect on how the child health
policymaking process of the AAP tried to consider these 4 key
principles in its deliberations and understand the possible
implications of alternative policy options.
The principle of integrity involves the need to gain as
complete an understanding of the issue as possible and communicate an
unbiased assessment, acknowledging both what is known and not known.
The AAP sought to maintain the integrity of the process by presenting
the available information to pediatricians in as impartial and
intellectually honest way as possible. The AAP became aware of
information that children who received all the recommended immunizations could be exposed to amounts of mercury in
thimerosal-containing vaccines during the first 6 months of life in
excess of the Environmental Protection Agency-recommended limits.
However, the exposure was within the safe levels established by the
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Agency for Toxic Substances and
Disease Registry (ATSDR) federal agencies. The AAP policymakers
believed that disregarding the Environmental Protection Agency
guidelines in favor of the ATSDR and FDA levels might compromise the
perceived integrity of the policymaking process. All 3 of these federal
agency guidelines were based on data obtained from pregnant women after
inadvertent exposures to high concentrations of methyl mercury after
the ingestion of contaminated grain or fish. Unfortunately, the
information on thimerosal was insufficient to provide answers to all
the relevant policy questions. First, human toxicity data were not
available on ethyl mercury, the type of mercury contained in
thimerosal, which is considered to be less toxic than methyl mercury.
Second, insufficient data were available to quantify the risk of
low-level mercury exposures. The basis for determining safe amounts of
mercury was unclear especially with respect to the age of the child and the difference between intermittent and prolonged exposures. AAP policymakers dealt with the issue of insufficient information and
nonquantifiable risk by using the words "small, if any risk, of
thimerosal-containing vaccines."
The principle of credibility involves issues of conflict
of interest and the belief that AAP policymakers are serving the best
interests of children rather than the special interests of pediatricians, governmental agencies, or the vaccine industry. The AAP
wanted to be proactive and to provide pediatricians and the public with
well reasoned recommendations about thimerosal in a timely manner.
Concern was raised that delaying the release of the information and our
analysis of its implications until after the information came out in
the media could be viewed by the public as a cover up. Public
confidence in the safety of vaccines could be eroded and parents might
think that pediatricians were unaware of the hazards of thimerosal or
chose to ignore FDA concerns about vaccine safety. Early release of
information would maintain confidence in the vaccine program.
The principle of fairness addresses the need to develop policy
recommendations that result in 1 uniform standard of care for all
children, rather than multiple standards that may be influenced by
family income, insurance status, or other sociodemographic factors.
Formulating policy that would result in immunizing low-income children
eligible for VFC-free vaccines with thimerosal-containing vaccines while offering other children the option of receiving the
limited supplies of vaccines without thimerosal would not be fair.
The principle of responsibility involves recognizing how
the consequences of the policy might have unintended effects
detrimental to the public good. The AAP tried to balance the need to
address the small but nonquantifiable risk of thimerosal with the
importance of maintaining confidence in the safety of vaccines and
their role in protecting our children from preventable disease. There were 2 extreme policy options. One was to advocate a ban on all thimerosal-containing vaccines to eliminate any possible mercury risk
associated with a preventive intervention. The other was to take no
immediate action because vaccine manufacturers, at the urging of the
FDA, were developing thimerosal-free vaccines and federal guidelines
for mercury exposure were imprecise and may not indicate toxic exposure
levels. The AAP believed that a ban on all thimerisal-containing
vaccines was irresponsible and unwarranted. Such a policy
recommendation misrepresented the level of risk and could create
widespread panic about the safety of vaccines. Such a policymaking
decision would be the public health equivalent of inappropriately
shouting fire in a crowded theater. However, doing nothing until
thimerosal vaccine supplies became available would fail to take action
to increase the margin of safety associated with the existing vaccines.
Therefore, the AAP recommended that thimerosal-containing hepatitis B
vaccine be postponed for 6 months in infants whose mothers were
documented to be serologically hepatitis B uninfected until sufficient
supplies of hepatitis B vaccine without thimerosal become available.
The AAP hoped that temporarily altering the schedule slightly for hepatitis B vaccine would not place infants of serologically negative mothers at increased risk of becoming infected during this time period.
The policy would extend the margin of safety for continuing to use
other thimerosal-containing vaccines for all children until vaccine
manufactures could produce adequate supplies of thimerosal-free vaccines to resume routine hepatitis B immunizations at birth. However,
the AAP also recognized the difficulties in assessing how the
recommendations might impact the prevention of hepatitis B. To what
extent would delaying the first doses of hepatitis B result in newborns
at risk not being immunized and older infants not receiving hepatitis B
vaccinations? To what extent would these recommendations alter the
public perception of the hepatitis B vaccine safety? Would physicians
restart newborn immunizations once sufficient thimerosal-free hepatitis
B vaccine becomes available? We are still uncertain about the answers
to these questions. Therefore, in addition to dealing with a
nonquantifiable risk of thimerosal, the AAP had to consider the
nonquantifiable consequences of its recommendations on both hepatitis B
and the entire vaccine delivery system.
The AAP tried to respond to the thimerosal issue with
integrity, credibility, fairness, and a sense of responsibility in a very timely manner. It appears that sufficient supplies of
thimerosal-free hepatitis B vaccine are or soon will be available to
resume routine newborn hepatitis B immunization practices. Once this
occurs, pediatricians must take the lead to assure that children
receive maximum protection against hepatitis B and rapidly resume
routine newborn immunization.
Department of Pediatrics
University of Colorado School of Medicine
Denver, CO 80218
FOOTNOTES
Received for publication Nov 23, 1999; accepted Dec 1, 1999.
Address correspondence to Stephen Berman, MD, FAAP, The Children's Hospital, 1056 E 19th Ave, B032, Denver, CO 80218. E-mail: berman.stephen{at}tchden.org
ABBREVIATIONS
AAP, American Academy of Pediatrics; FDA, Food and Drug Administration; ATSDR, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||