PEDIATRICS Vol. 105 No. 3 March 2000, pp. 533-537
,
,
From the * Department of Neonatology, and the § Clinical
Biochemistry Laboratory, Shaare Zedek Medical Center; and the
Faculty of Medicine of the Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Objective. To assess the validity of predischarge serum bilirubin values in determining or predicting hyperbilirubinemia in glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G-6-PD)-deficient neonates, and to facilitate appropriate discharge planning.
Methods. Serum total bilirubin values were determined
between 44 and 72 hours of life in a cohort of term, healthy neonates
at high-risk for G-6-PD deficiency but with no other risk factors for
hyperbilirubinemia. Percentile-based bilirubin nomograms were
constructed for G-6-PD-deficient infants and normal infants according
to age at sampling. The incidence of hyperbilirubinemia (serum
bilirubin value
256 µmol/L [15 mg/dL]) for each group was
determined according to the percentiles for that group.
Results. In both G-6-PD-deficient neonates
(n = 108) and control neonates
(n = 215) with serum bilirubin values <50th
percentile for age, the incidence of hyperbilirubinemia was low in the
G-6-PD-deficient neonates, with no measurable incidence in the
controls. The incidence of hyperbilirubinemia became clinically
consequential, and significantly higher in the G-6-PD-deficient groups,
when the percentiles were
50: for those in the 50% to 74% range the
incidence was moderate (23%) for the G-6-PD-deficient and small (7%)
for the control infants (relative risk, 3.29; 95% confidence
interval, 1.01-10.67). Among those infants
75th percentile,
82% of the G-6-PD-deficient infants, compared with 25% of the control
infants, were either already hyperbilirubinemic at the time of
screening or subsequently developed hyperbilirubinemia (relative risk,
3.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.99-5.24).
Conclusions. Timed, predischarge serum bilirubin screening can be used to identify G-6-PD-deficient neonates at low, intermediate, or high-risk of developing severe neonatal hyperbilirubinemia, and thus offer a selective approach to the discharge and follow-up surveillance of these infants. Key words: bilirubin, neonatal jaundice, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency, screening test.
Kernicterus is a potentially severe complication of
glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G-6-PD) deficiency-associated
neonatal hyperbilirubinemia.1,2 Recent reports of
kernicterus arising from both Africa3 and from
America4,5 emphasize the importance of G-6-PD deficiency
in its etiology, even in modern times. Resurgence of kernicterus, a
preventable condition, in recent years, concomitant with the era of
early postnatal hospital discharge,6 has made
identification of infants at high-risk for this condition essential.
The predominant factor in the pathogenesis of neonatal
hyperbilirubinemia associated with G-6-PD deficiency has been shown to
be decreased bilirubin conjugation.7,8 This is the result
of a gene interaction between the G-6-PD deficiency and promoter
polymorphism for the variant gene for the bilirubin conjugating enzyme
UDP glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 seen in Gilbert syndrome.9
Prediction of hyperbilirubinemia in G-6-PD-deficient neonates will
therefore necessarily have to include a test reflective of bilirubin
conjugation. Because the serum total bilirubin value at any point in
time reflects the balance between bilirubin production and bilirubin
elimination (hepatic uptake, conjugation, and excretion), the serum
total bilirubin value can be regarded as a simple index of both these
factors.
Bhutani et al10 recently used this principle to
successfully evaluate the predictive value of universal predischarge serum bilirubin measurements. They determined that a percentile-based, timed bilirubin nomogram for the first week of life was useful for
classifying neonates at high- or low-risk for developing significant hyperbilirubinemia (defined as serum bilirubin value The aim of this study was thus to determine if age-specific serum total
bilirubin values, plotted on a percentile-based nomogram adapted from
Bhutani and colleague's10 model, would be useful
in determining the risk of developing hyperbilirubinemia in
G-6-PD-deficient neonates with no other obvious cause for
hyperbilirubinemia.
The population studied was drawn from newborns consecutively
delivered at the Shaare Zedek Medical Center to mothers of the Sephardic Jewish community at high-risk for G-6-PD
deficiency12,13 and its associated
hyperbilirubinemia.14 Both females and males were
included. The females in this group were drawn from previously
published databases9,15 whereas the males were collected
as part of an ongoing study. According to routine nursery protocol, all
neonates of this high-risk subset of our population are routinely
tested for G-6-PD deficiency on the first day of life. The results are
available to us the same day. Blood group typing and direct Coombs'
testing are performed on infants born to blood group O or Rh-negative
mothers, or on any infant whose bilirubin levels are high enough to
warrant phototherapy. Infants are routinely observed visually for the
development of significant clinical jaundice, and serum bilirubin
testing is performed as clinically indicated. G-6-PD-deficient infants
are observed in-hospital for a minimum of 72 hours. Subsequent to discharge, infants are followed by our medical staff, as outpatients, until stabilization of the serum bilirubin values or the need for
therapy is determined. Phototherapy is commenced in the
G-6-PD-deficient neonates if the serum bilirubin values exceeds 254 µmol/L (14.9 mg/dL), and exchange transfusion performed should the
serum bilirubin value exceed 342 µmol/L (20 mg/dL) and be
unresponsive to a trial of phototherapy for up to 3 hours.
Breastfeeding is encouraged, although the mothers are warned of the
dangers of eating fava beans while nursing or ingesting any drugs known
to be triggers of hemolysis in G-6-PD deficiency.
For the purpose of this study, the only deviation from routine
treatment was a mandatory serum bilirubin test performed between 44 and
72 hours of life, concurrent with routine predischarge metabolic
screening. The infants' ages were recorded at the time of this
bilirubin sampling. Additional serum bilirubin determinations were
performed as clinically required. Only healthy, inborn neonates admitted to the well-baby nursery, with gestational age Laboratory Analysis
Initial G-6-PD screening was performed using a commercial visual
qualitative color reduction kit (Kit No. 400, Sigma Diagnostics, St
Louis, MO) which has previously been shown to be accurate in determining the G-6-PD status in male neonates.16 Because of the inaccuracy of this test in identifying
heterozygotes,15 and to confirm those males with a
G-6-PD-deficient screening test result, molecular classification of the
G-6-PD genotype was performed by Dr Ernest Beutler at the Scripps
Research Institute, La Jolla, California, on DNA obtained from
umbilical cord blood. Polymerase chain reaction followed by
allele-specific oligonucleotide hybridization was used to determine the
presence or absence of nt 563, the nucleotide mutated in G-6-PD
Mediterranean.17 Details of the procedure have been
published elsewhere.9
Serum total bilirubin values were determined by reflectance
spectrophotometry using an Ektachem analyzer (Vitros 700c/750XRC Chemistry System, Johnson and Johnson Clinical Diagnostics, Rochester, NY). Blood group determinations and direct Coombs' testing were performed by routine laboratory techniques.
Data Analysis
The G-6-PD genotype as determined by molecular means was used to
classify the infants into study and control groups. The study group
comprised those who had been tested for the condition and found to have
G-6-PD deficiency, whereas the control population comprised those of
the same population group who had been tested and were found to be
G-6-PD normal. Because female G-6-PD-deficient homozygotes and
heterozygotes had a similar incidence of
hyperbilirubinemia,15 neonates with both these genotypes
were included in the G-6-PD-deficient study group. Females and males
were pooled in both the G-6-PD-deficient and normal groups, because the
incidence of hyperbilirubinemia was not significantly different between
the sexes. Hyperbilirubinemia was defined as a serum bilirubin Percentile-based bilirubin nomograms according to the age of life at
which the mandatory serum bilirubin values were drawn, were calculated
for the G-6-PD-deficient and normal control infants, respectively. Each
infant was represented by only 1 bilirubin point on the nomogram Timed serum bilirubin values were obtained in 323 neonates (172 males, 151 females), of whom 108 were G-6-PD-deficient and 215 were
G-6-PD normal. Demographic and clinical details of these infants are
summarized in Table 1. The mean
(plus/minus standard deviation) age of sampling was 56 ± 9 hours
and 55 ± 9 hours for the study and control groups, respectively.
Thirty-one (28.7%) of the G-6-PD-deficient neonates developed
hyperbilirubinemia, compared with 18 (8.4%) of the control population
(P < .0001). At the time of the mandatory bilirubin
determination, some infants already had serum bilirubin values which
met our definition of hyperbilirubinemia: 14 of the G-6-PD-deficient
neonates already had a serum bilirubin value TABLE 1
95th percentile for age in hours). Because a serum bilirubin value at the beginning of
the second day may be at a much higher point on the percentile scale
than the identical value at the end of that day,11 the
nomograms were constructed based on hour-specificity. In their study,
Bhutani et al10 included primarily infants at low-risk for
hyperbilirubinemia. We therefore asked whether this principle would be
of use in the high-risk, G-6-PD deficiency situation.
![]()
METHODS
Top
Abstract
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
37 weeks, free of any condition which might exacerbate hyperbilirubinemia, such
as cephalhematoma, maternal diabetes, sepsis (ruled out by clinical
evaluation and blood cultures as deemed necessary), Down syndrome, or
Coombs'-positive hemolytic anemia, were included in the survey. The
Institutional Review Board of the Shaare Zedek Medical Center approved
this bilirubin testing.
256
µmol/L (15 mg/dL) during the first week of life.
that
drawn at the time of the metabolic screening. Previous or subsequent
serum bilirubin values, determined for clinical reasons, were not
included in the nomogram. For the purpose of the nomogram, infants were
divided into groups at 4-hour intervals, starting at 44 hours and
continuing until 72 hours. For each 4-hour interval, the percentiles of
the serum bilirubin values taken during that time interval were
calculated and smoothed percentile curves were drawn. The number of
study and control infants who developed hyperbilirubinemia in each
percentile range was noted. Relative risk was calculated to estimate
the risk of developing hyperbilirubinemia in the G-6-PD-deficient
groups relative to that of the control group. Ninety-five percent
confidence intervals (CIs), with hyperbilirubinemia as dependent, and
G-6-PD status as an independent variable, were used as a measure of the
statistical precision of each relative risk, and were regarded as
significant when the 95% CIs were wholly more than or less than 1. If
the 95% CI straddled 1, the results were regarded as not significant. Categorical variables were compared using
2
analysis, whereas continuous variables were analyzed using Student's t test, significance being defined as P < .05.
![]()
RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
256 µmol/L (15 mg/dL),
compared with 6 of the control infants (P = .002).
Phototherapy was not commenced in any patient before the testing. All
infants who did require phototherapy responded to this treatment. No
infant required exchange transfusion and no infant developed
kernicterus. The mean (standard deviation) peak serum bilirubin value
of those neonates with a value
256 µmol/L (15 mg/dL) was 316 ± 22 µmol/L (18.5 ± 1.3 mg/dL) (upper limit, 371 µmol/L
[21.7 mg/dL]) and 284 ± 15 µmol/L (16.6 ± 0.9 mg/dL)
(upper limit, 320 µmol/L [18.7 mg/dL]) for the G-6-PD-deficient and
control infants, respectively. However, institution of phototherapy in
many of these patients most likely prevented these values from reaching
their natural peak.
Demographic Details of Neonates Studied
Smoothed percentile nomograms for timed serum bilirubin values for the
G-6-PD-deficient and control neonates are shown in Fig
1A and B, respectively. The incidence of
hyperbilirubinemia in neonates of each group, according to these timed
percentiles is illustrated in Fig 2. It
will be noted that, of those with a timed bilirubin in the
50th
percentile group, there was a minimal risk of hyperbilirubinemia in the
G-6-PD-deficient neonates, and no measurable incidence in the control
group. G-6-PD-deficient infants in the 50% to 74% group had a 23%
incidence of hyperbilirubinemia, whereas in the control neonates this
was only 7% (relative risk, 3.29; 95% CI range, 1.01-10.67). In the
75% to 89% group, the respective incidences of hyperbilirubinemia
were 76.5% and 22.6% (relative risk, 3.37; 95% CI range, 1.68-6.84;
P = .0009), while in the percentile range
90,
respective values were 90.9% and 29.2% (relative risk, 3.12; 95% CI
range, 1.63-5.98; P = .003) for the G-6-PD-deficient
and control neonates.
|
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the current study, we have confirmed the usefulness of
percentile-based nomograms for timed bilirubin values in predicting hyperbilirubinemia in infants at low-risk for developing that condition, and demonstrated its efficacy in identifying infants in
jeopardy in the extremely high-risk G-6-PD-deficient population as
well. More than 80% of G-6-PD-deficient neonates with a timed serum
bilirubin in the
75th percentile developed hyperbilirubinemia, a
threefold increased risk compared with the control population. In
contrast, both in the study and control populations, those with
bilirubin values
50th percentile were at minimal risk of developing
hyperbilirubinemia. Predischarge serum bilirubin screening is therefore
a useful way of assessing the risk of developing hyperbilirubinemia in
G-6-PD-deficient neonates.
We did not evaluate our data on the previously published healthy infant nomogram of Bhutani et al,10 but preferred to construct our own which would better reflect the geographic, ethnical, and cultural characteristics distinctive to our population as opposed to that of Bhutani and colleague's population. We believed that this would be more accurate in that environmental or other genetic influences might affect the distribution of the bilirubin values. Furthermore, as the G-6-PD-deficient neonates have such a high incidence of hyperbilirubinemia, we believed it justified to construct a separate nomogram especially for this study group. Because G-6-PD status is usually available at our institution by the time of the predischarge bilirubin screening, each individual infant can be plotted on the appropriate graph before discharge.
In Israel, by order of the government Ministry of Health, infants are kept hospitalized for a minimum of 48 hours after delivery. Because of the especially high-risk of G-6-PD-deficient neonates developing severe hyperbilirubinemia, at this hospital we keep such neonates in-hospital for a minimum of 72 hours. Therefore the time period during which the routine bilirubin screening was performed, between 44 and 72 hours, was appropriate for our population in this setting. In other countries where earlier discharge may be the rule, construction of percentile curves for that population at an earlier period in the infants' lives may be warranted.
For the purpose of this study, consistent with our other studies, we
defined hyperbilirubinemia as a serum bilirubin of
256 µmol/L (15 mg/dL). This value is equivalent to the 97th percentile of both the
Collaborative Perinatal Project,18 and a subsequent study
of >2000 neonates studied in the 1980s.19 It is also the
cutoff point at which we routinely begin phototherapy in
G-6-PD-deficient newborns, a measure which has enabled us to keep the
need for exchange transfusion to a minimum. Therefore our definition of
hyperbilirubinemia differs from that of Bhutani et al,10
and, as a result, the number of neonates who became hyperbilirubinemic
in the control group are necessarily different from the numbers in that
study. However, despite differences in definition, the underlying
concept of very low-risk for hyperbilirubinemia in those neonates whose
serum bilirubin values were <50th percentile, and high-risk in those
>75th percentile, was shown in both studies. The G-6-PD-deficient
neonates also fall into this pattern.
Percentile curves in both study (Fig 1A) and control populations (Fig 1B) show an apparent peak between 52 and 59 hours, with a fall from 60 to 63 hours, and a subsequent rise toward 72 hours. We do not think that this is a specific pattern inherent to our population, but rather a combination of the relatively small numbers from which these curves were constructed, and the coincidence of several infants who had particularly low bilirubin values at the time of screening, who happened to fall into this time frame. Although it would obviously be preferable to include a patient cohort of the size used by Bhutani et al,10 the Sephardic Jewish population at-risk for G-6-PD deficiency comprises only a small percentage of the population delivering at this hospital. Because we encounter only a few G-6-PD-deficient patients weekly, it would take an excessively long time period to collect a number of patients similar to that of Bhutani et al. Despite the smaller cohort size, our results clearly show that the concept of universal bilirubin screening for the determination or prediction of hyperbilirubinemia is valid also in a population subgroup with a high incidence of hyperbilirubinemia.
Although these high-risk neonates were followed-up as outpatients after
discharge, we do not believe that this system resulted in many patients
being lost to follow-up. Patient (parental) compliance in our
population is excellent. Parents of all G-6-PD-deficient neonates
receive both a written explanatory sheet and oral instruction enumerating the risks of their infants developing severe jaundice and
the implications thereof. There is no cost to the family for the first
bilirubin test as an outpatient. Furthermore, because of the Jewish
religious injunction not to perform ritual circumcision should a infant
be jaundiced, there is a greater awareness of neonatal jaundice in the
community. We therefore feel confident that certainly all G-6-PD
neonates who developed a serum bilirubin value
256 µmol/L (15 mg/dL), and virtually all control infants, were brought to our
attention.
In an era of prescribed early neonatal discharge, universal predischarge timed bilirubin screening in G-6-PD-deficient neonates may enable these infants to be categorized into those at high-risk, and those at low-risk, for developing neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. A selective approach to follow-up and surveillance of G-6-PD-deficient neonates may enable those with serum bilirubin values in the <50th percentile range to be discharged at 48 hours along with their G-6-PD normal counterparts, provided adequate follow-up arrangements are available. Delayed discharge could be limited to those at high-risk for developing hyperbilirubinemia. It is possible that prediction could be even further enhanced if the risk based on percentile oriented bilirubin values was further modified by taking into consideration additional factors known to exacerbate the degree of neonatal jaundice, such as prematurity, maternal diabetes mellitus, breastfeeding, and ecchymoses or cephalhematoma.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENT |
|---|
We thank Ernest Beutler, MD, for the G-6-PD genotyping and review of the manuscript.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Received for publication May 7, 1999; accepted Aug 13, 1999.
Reprint requests to (M.K.) Department of Neonatology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Box 3235, Jerusalem 91031, Israel. E-mail: kaplan{at}cc.huji.ac.il
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
G-6-PD, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase; CI, confidence interval.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Keren, X. Luan, S. Friedman, S. Saddlemire, A. Cnaan, and V. K. Bhutani A Comparison of Alternative Risk-Assessment Strategies for Predicting Significant Neonatal Hyperbilirubinemia in Term and Near-Term Infants Pediatrics, January 1, 2008; 121(1): e170 - e179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D Turner, C Hammerman, B Rudensky, Y Schlesinger, C Goia, and M S Schimmel Procalcitonin in preterm infants during the first few days of life: introducing an age related nomogram Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., July 1, 2006; 91(4): F283 - F286. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Maisels and E. Kring Transcutaneous Bilirubin Levels in the First 96 Hours in a Normal Newborn Population of >=35 Weeks' Gestation Pediatrics, April 1, 2006; 117(4): 1169 - 1173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. B. Newman, P. Liljestrand, and G. J. Escobar Combining Clinical Risk Factors With Serum Bilirubin Levels to Predict Hyperbilirubinemia in Newborns Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, February 1, 2005; 159(2): 113 - 119. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Maisels Conflict of Interest and Purpose in Bilirubin Screening: In Reply Pediatrics, October 1, 2004; 114(4): 1133 - 1134. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Subcommittee on Hyperbilirubinemia Management of Hyperbilirubinemia in the Newborn Infant 35 or More Weeks of Gestation Pediatrics, July 1, 2004; 114(1): 297 - 316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Maisels, E. M. Ostrea Jr, S. Touch, S. E. Clune, E. Cepeda, E. Kring, K. Gracey, C. Jackson, D. Talbot, and R. Huang Evaluation of a New Transcutaneous Bilirubinometer Pediatrics, June 1, 2004; 113(6): 1628 - 1635. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kaplan, C. Hammerman, and S. U. Sarici Familial Hyperbilirubinemia in ABO-Incompatible Neonates Pediatrics, December 1, 2003; 112(6): 1453 - 1454. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kaplan, N. Algur, and C. Hammerman Onset of Jaundice in Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase-Deficient Neonates Pediatrics, October 1, 2001; 108(4): 956 - 959. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. K. Stevenson, A. A. Fanaroff, M. J. Maisels, B. W. Y. Young, R. J. Wong, H. J. Vreman, J. R. MacMahon, C. Y. Yeung, D. S. Seidman, R. Gale, et al. Prediction of Hyperbilirubinemia in Near-Term and Term Infants Pediatrics, July 1, 2001; 108(1): 31 - 39. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kaplan and C. Hammerman Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase-Deficient Neonates: A Potential Cause for Concern in North America Pediatrics, December 1, 2000; 106(6): 1478 - 1479. [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||