This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Khoshoo, V.
Right arrow Articles by Clarke, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Khoshoo, V.
Right arrow Articles by Clarke, R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Heart & Blood Vessels

PEDIATRICS Vol. 105 No. 2 February 2000, p. e24

ELECTRONIC ARTICLE:
Effect of Cisapride on the QT Interval in Infants With Gastroesophageal Reflux

Vikram Khoshoo, MD, PhD, Dean Edell, MD, MPH, and Robert Clarke, MD

From West Jefferson Medical Center, New Orleans, Louisiana.


    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Objective.  We prospectively studied the effect of cisapride per se on QT interval in young infants (3-6 months) with gastroesophageal reflux (GER) in a controlled setting.

Study Design.  The infants diagnosed with GER and deemed to require therapy with cisapride were divided into 2 groups. Group A comprised infants with GER who underwent an electrocardiogram (ECG) before initiation of therapy with cisapride in the dose of 1 mg per kg per 24 hours, divided into 3 doses. They were reweighed after 7 to 10 days, and the dose was adjusted for their new weight. A repeat ECG was performed after ~2 weeks (12-18 days) of therapy. The QT interval was measured in each ECG and then the corrected QT interval was calculated by Bazett's formula. Group B comprised infants with GER who had already been on therapy with cisapride for over 1 month. All infants in group B received cisapride in an approximate dose of 1 mg per kg per 24 hours (.8-1.1 mg/kg/24 hours) given in 3 divided doses. They underwent only 1 ECG, ie, at 1 to 4 months after initiation of therapy. The measurement of the actual dose of cisapride was demonstrated to every parent and a marked measuring syringe was provided. The following categories of infants were not included: those with any underlying cardiopulmonary, renal, or hepatic problem; those with a history of apnea; those using a macrolide antibiotic or azole antifungal at any stage during the study; and infants hospitalized for any reason during the course of the study.

Results.  Cisapride therapy in the dose of 1 mg/kg/day frequently resulted in a slight increase in the QT interval (pretreatment: 390 ± 18 milliseconds; posttreatment: 400 ± 20 milliseconds) but the increase was still below the accepted upper limit of 440 milliseconds and not statistically significant. Even with prolonged therapy, the pattern of change in QT interval was similar to that with therapy for 2 weeks. Overall, 2 of 100 (2%) infants developed a prolongation of corrected QT interval beyond the normal range (456 and 486 milliseconds). Neither infant had evidence of any arrhythmia or conduction defect on ECG. No additional factor could be identified in either infant to explain prolongation of the QT interval.

Conclusion.  Our experience suggests that cautious cisapride therapy in young infants in a modest dose does not result in arrhythmias or conduction defects. We recommend that: 1) the dose of cisapride in infants be <1.2 mg/kg/day and preferably between .8 and 1 mg/kg/day; 2) the right measure of the dose be actually demonstrated to the parents; and 3) parents be provided a list of drug interactions with cisapride. One should think twice before denying the use of an effective drug simply because of the need for closer monitoring and extra time spent for parent education.  Key words:  cisapride, gastroesophageal reflux, corrected QT interval, arrhythmia.

Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) is a common problem during infancy. Promotility agents like cisapride are widely used to alleviate symptomatology of GER. Recently some concern has been expressed regarding the safety of using cisapride in children and adults. The major concern has been the association of cisapride with prolongation of QT interval, which may result in ventricular arrhythmia.1-3 In most of these cases, the common denominator has been circumstances resulting in increased serum level of cisapride either from overdose or concomitant use of drugs that inhibit cisapride metabolism or independently prolong QT interval.2,4 We prospectively studied the effect of cisapride per se on QT interval in young infants with GER in a controlled setting.

    METHODS
Top
Abstract
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

The infants diagnosed with GER and deemed to require therapy with cisapride were divided into 2 groups. Group A comprised of infants with GER who underwent an electrocardiogram (ECG) before initiation of therapy with cisapride in the dose of 1 mg per kg per 24 hours, divided into 3 doses. They were reweighed after 7 to 10 days and the dose was adjusted for their new weight. A repeat ECG was performed after ~2 weeks (12-18 days) of therapy. The QT interval was measured in each ECG and then the corrected QT interval was calculated by Bazett's formula.5 Group B comprised of infants with GER who had already been on therapy with cisapride for over 1 month. All infants in group B received cisapride in an approximate dose of 1 mg per kg per 24 hours (.8-1.1 mg/kg/24 hours) given in 3 divided doses. They underwent only 1 ECG, ie, at 1 to 4 months after initiation of therapy. All infants were managed by 1 of the 3 authors. The same pediatric cardiologist who was unaware of the treatment status read all ECGs. The measurement of the actual dose of cisapride was demonstrated to every parent and a marked measuring syringe was provided.

The following categories of infants were not included: those with any underlying cardiopulmonary, renal or hepatic problem; those with history of apnea; those using a macrolide antibiotic or azole antifungal at any stage during the study; and infants hospitalized for any reason during the course of the study.

    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Table 1 shows that cisapride therapy in the dose of 1 mg/kg/day frequently resulted in a slight increase in the QT interval, but the increase was still below the accepted upper limit of 440 milliseconds and not statistically significant (P > .05; paired t test). Even with prolonged therapy, the pattern of change in QT interval was similar to that with therapy for 2 weeks (P > .05). Overall, 2 of 100 (2%) infants developed a prolongation of QT interval beyond the normal range (456 and 486 milliseconds). Neither infant had evidence of any arrhythmia or conduction defect on ECG. No additional factor could be identified in either infant to explain prolongation of the QT interval.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 

TABLE 1
QTc Before and After Cisapride Treatment

    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Our experience suggests that cautious cisapride therapy in young infants in a modest dose does not result in arrhythmias or conduction defects.

Lewin et al1 reported a 2-month-old expremature infant with prolonged QT interval and 2:1 atrioventricular conduction while being on cisapride in the dose of 1.2 mg/kg/day. The infant was concomitantly on caffeine, ferrous sulfate, and ranitidine, none of which have been associated with a prolongation of QT interval. However, the infant was breastfed and the mother was on miconazole suppositories. Miconazole is an inhibitor of cytochrome P450 3A4 and although there is minimal systemic absorption of vaginal miconazole, it raises the possibility of a drug interaction. Hill et al2 reported 11 children with prolonged QT interval while being on cisapride therapy, of whom 2 developed torsades de pointes ventricular tachycardia. Both of these children were concomitantly on macrolide antibiotics. Lupoglazoff et al4 reported 7 small infants (age: 14-79 days; weight: 1.2- 4 kg; 6 of 7 were premature) with prolonged QT interval without arrhythmia while being on a large dose of cisapride (1-1.7 mg/kg/day). The QT interval returned to normal within 48 hours after the dose was reduced to a more modest dose of .8 mg/kg/day. This fits in nicely with the findings of a large study by Levine et al6 involving 30 premature infants, none of whom had any evidence of prolongation of QT interval or arrhythmia when cisapride was given in the dose of .8 mg/kg/day.

Several features of our prospective study need to be highlighted: 1) study patients were full-term, small infants over 3 months of age, in the age group in which GER is most prevalent, cisapride most often prescribed, and cytochrome P450 3A4 levels are below adult levels,7 so risk of toxicity is high; 2) patients had an established, reliable history and a narrow age range making the group homogenous; 3) patients served as their own controls, a method which offers a better comparison than using normal healthy controls as has been previously reported; 4) cisapride was given in a modest dose with very close follow-up and frequent monitoring and adjustment of dose; 5) all clinical conditions that could potentially increase the toxicity of cisapride were excluded. None of the drugs that prolong QT interval were given (ie, quinidine, sotalol, and procainamide). None of the drugs that inhibit cytochrome P450 3A4, thus increasing serum levels of cisapride, were concomitantly given (ie, ketoconazole, itraconazole, fluconazole, miconazole, troleandomycin, erythromycin, clarithromycin, ritonavir, indinavir, nefazodone, amitryptaline, astemizole, thioridazine, and haloperidol). Under such conditions, cisapride was not associated with any ventricular arrhythmia. Our findings support the opinion expressed in the consensus statement by the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, and this study responds to their recommendation for collecting more data on this issue.8

Finally, we would like to make the following recommendations: 1) the dose of cisapride in infants be <1.2 mg/kg/day and preferably between .8 and 1 mg/kg/day; 2) the right measure of the dose be actually demonstrated to the parents; and 3) parents be provided a list of drug interactions with cisapride. One should think twice before denying the use of an effective drug simply because of the need for closer monitoring and extra time spent for parent education.

    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Dana Allemand, Diana Buras, Becky Falgout, and Mona Hernandez for consoling all young infants and patiently performing so many ECGs.

    FOOTNOTES

Received for publication Jul 26, 1999; accepted Sep 17, 1999.

Reprint requests (V.K.) 4709 Butternut Pl, Midland, MI 48640. E-mail: vkhoshoo{at}earthlink.net

    ABBREVIATIONS

GER, gastroesophageal reflux; ECG, electrocardiogram.

    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
  1. Lewin M, Bryant R, Fenrich A, Grifka R Cisapride induced long QT interval. J Pediatr 1996; 128:279-281 [CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Hill S, Evangelista J, Pizzi AM, Mobbassaleh M, Fulton D, Berul C Proarrhythmia associated with cisapride in children. Pediatrics 1998; 101:1053-1056 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Bran S, Murray W, Hirscg I, Palmer J Long QT syndrome during high-dose cisapride. Arch Intern Med 1995; 155:765-768 [Abstract]
  4. Lupoglazoff JM, Bedu A, Faure C, Long QT syndrome under cisapride in neonates and infants. Arch Pediatr 1997; 4:509-514 [CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Bazett HC An analysis of the time relation of electrocardiogram. Heart 1920; 7:353-370
  6. Levine A, Fogelman R, Sirota L, Zangen Z, Shamir R, Dinari G. QT interval in children and infants receiving cisapride. Pediatrics. 1998; 101(3). URL: http://www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/101/3/e9
  7. Leeder JS, Kearns GL Pharmacogenetics in pediatrics: implications for practice. Pediatr Clin North Am 1997; 44:55-77 [CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Shulman RJ, Boyle JT, Coletti RB, The use of cisapride in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1999; 28:529-533 [CrossRef][Medline]

Pediatrics (ISSN 0031 4005). Copyright ©2000 by the American Academy of Pediatrics




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Khoshoo, V.
Right arrow Articles by Clarke, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Khoshoo, V.
Right arrow Articles by Clarke, R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Heart & Blood Vessels