PEDIATRICS Vol. 105 No. 2 February 2000, p. e20
,
,
,
,
,
, and
From the Departments of * Pediatrics and
Laboratory Medicine,
Mackay Memorial Hospital, and § Taipei Medical College, Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Objective. To assess the usefulness of laboratory parameters, including peripheral white blood cell (WBC) count, C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and microscopic urinalysis (UA), for identifying febrile infants younger than 8 weeks of age at risk for urinary tract infection (UTI), and comparison of standard UA and hemocytometer WBC counts for predicting the presence of UTI.
Methods. A total of 162 febrile children <8 weeks of age were enrolled in this prospective study. All underwent clinical evaluation and laboratory investigation, including WBC count and differential; ESR; CRP; blood culture; a lumbar puncture for cell count and differential, glucose level, protein level, Gram stain, and culture; and a UA and urine culture. All urine specimens were obtained by suprapubic aspiration and microscopically analyzed with standard UA as well as with hemocytometer WBC counts. Quantitative urine cultures were performed. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, likelihood ratios, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were determined for each of the screening tests.
Results. There were 22 positive urine culture results of
at least 100 colony-forming unit/mL. Eighteen of these 22 patients were
males, and all were uncircumcised. There were significant differences for pyuria
5 WBCs/hpf, pyuria
10 WBC/µL, CRP >20 mg/L, and ESR >30 mm/hour between culture-positive and culture-negative groups (P < .05). The ROC area for hemocytometer WBC
count, standard UA, peripheral WBC count, ESR, and CRP concentration
were .909 ± .045, .791 ± .065, .544 ± .074, .787 ± .060, and .822 ± .036, respectively. The ROC curve analysis
indicates that the CRP, ESR, and standard UA were powerful but
imperfect tools with which to discriminate for UTI in potentially
infected neonates. Hemocytometer WBC counts had the highest
sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and likelihood ratios for
identifying very young infants with positive urine culture results. For
all assessments, hemocytometer WBC counts were significantly different,
compared with the standard urinalysis. ESR, CRP, and peripheral WBC
counts were not helpful in identifying UTI in febrile infants.
Conclusion. UTI had a prevalence of 13.6% in febrile infants <8 weeks of age. The CRP, ESR, and standard UA were imperfect tools in discriminating for UTI, and the sensitivity of these laboratory parameters was relatively low. Hemocytometer WBC count was a significantly better predictor of UTI in febrile infants. Key words: urinary tract infection, standard urinalysis, hemocytometer white blood cell counts, receiver operator characteristic curves.
Urinary tract infection (UTI) is a frequent serious
bacterial infection in young infants.1 UTI is often
associated with vesicoureteral reflux or urinary tract
obstruction,2 conditions associated with a higher risk of
recurrent UTI.3 Moreover, UTI is believed to be the
leading cause of renal scarring,4,5 one of the most common
causes of end-stage renal disease in children.6,7
The presumptive diagnosis of UTI in children is often based on the
results of microscopic urinalysis (UA), and most infections remain
undiagnosed if tests are not performed routinely to detect them.
Febrile infants <8 weeks of age are frequently admitted for rigorous
diagnostic examinations, including consideration of UTI, and for
administration of parenteral antibiotics for treatment of possible
serious bacterial infection. The evaluation and management of febrile
infants remain controversial. Previous studies have attempted to
identify those febrile infants at risk for serious bacterial infection
using data ranging from clinical impressions to the use of multiple
laboratory examinations.8-12
Microscopic UA in pediatric primary care facilities is often performed
on centrifuged specimens and reported as cells per high-power
microscopic field (hpf), that is, a standard UA. The sensitivity,
specificity, and positive predictive value of the standard UA are so
low that only a third to half of patients with positive urine culture
results can be identified correctly.13-15 Dukes16,17 described a more accurate microscopic analysis
of uncentrifuged urine performed with a hemocytometer and reporting
cells per cubic millimeter, herein referred to as hemocytometer white
blood cell (WBC) counts. Stamm18 defined pyuria as the
presence of The present study was undertaken to evaluate a group of febrile
infants younger than 8 weeks of age 1) to assess the usefulness of the
WBC count, C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and UA for identifying infants at risk for
UTI; and 2) to compare standard WBC counts and hemocytometer WBC counts
in identifying very young infants with positive urine culture results.
We prospectively studied all febrile (rectal temperature
>38°C) infants younger than 8 weeks of age who presented to the
Pediatric Clinic or Emergency Department of Mackay Memorial Hospital
(MMH), from September 1, 1997, through August 31, 1998. All infants
were hospitalized. Infants who had received an antibiotic agent or who
had undergone suprapubic bladder aspiration or bladder catheterization within 24 hours were excluded.
Every infant underwent a history and physical examination, and a full
evaluation for sepsis was performed, including peripheral WBC count and
differential; ESR; CRP; blood culture; a lumbar puncture for cell count
and differential, glucose level, protein level, Gram stain, and
culture; and a UA and urine culture. Blood, urine, and cerebrospinal
fluid specimens were cultured using standard media and techniques.
Blood samples were cultured on aerobic, anaerobic, and hypertonic
media. Stool specimens were cultured when indicated.
All urine specimens were obtained by suprapubic bladder
aspiration. The bladder tap was performed after the infant had been well hydrated intravenously or one half to 1 hour after feeding. Eligibility was limited to urine specimens of >5 mL obtained on a
single aspiration. All urinalyses were performed in a certified clinical laboratory. Specimens were analyzed with both standard UA and
hemocytoneter WBC counts simultaneously. For the standard UA, specimens
were centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 10 minutes and were examined
microscopically for pyuria reported as the number of leukocytes per
high-power field. For hemocytometer WBC counts, the uncentrifuged urine
specimens were examined microscopically on a KOVA Slide 10 (Hycor Biomedical, Inc, Irvine, CA) chamber by the same technician. The
KOVA Slide 10 chamber is a glass disposable cell counting chamber with
methodology based on Neubauer ruling that is similar to the Neubauer
hemocytometer. One milliliter of undiluted, uncentrifuged urine was
trapped by a KOVA pipet and was transferred to the notch on a KOVA
Slide 10 chamber hemocytometer. By capillary action 6.6 µL of the
sample was drawn into the chamber. Average leukocyte contained per
small grid were counted on the chamber and multiplied by 90 to obtain
total cells per µL.
Quantitative urine cultures were performed in the MMH Microbiology
Laboratory. A loop calibrated to deliver ~.01 mL was used to
inoculate plates containing sheep blood agar, Columbia CAN agar, and
MacConkey agar. All plates were incubated at 35° to 37°C and
examined at 24 to 48 hours for colony count and bacterial identification.
For standard UA, pyuria was defined as at least 5 WBCs/hfp. For
hemocytometer WBC counts, pyuria was defined as at least 10 WBCs/µL.
Growth of a single urinary pathogen at a concentration of at least 100 CFU/mL was defined as positive and considered diagnostic of
UTI.15 Cultures with growth of mixed organisms or
nonpathogenic Gram-positive cocci were considered contaminated.
A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed to
describe the diagnostic properties of the peripheral WBC count, CRP,
ESR, standard UA, and hemocytometer WBC counts. The ROC curves are
plots of the probability of a true-positive rate against false-negative
rate at various cutoff levels obtained for each laboratory parameter.
The curve demonstrates the empirical relationship between sensitivity
and specificity. The area under the curve (AUC) quantifies a test's
discriminating power into a single figure. A test can have an AUC value
of between .5 (which represents a true UTI being diagnosed by chance)
and 1.0 (which represents perfect discrimination of UTI from other
conditions). The difference in the AUCs was analyzed with a
Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and likelihood ratios (LR)
for laboratory parameters, with the decision cutoff criterion, were
calculated. The Of 223 febrile infants who presented to our hospital during the
study period, 61 (27.4%) were excluded: 8 for previous antibiotic treatment, 14 for failure to aspirate urine, 16 for urine specimens of
<5 mL, and 23 for >1 aspiration. A total of 162 infants <2 months of
age were enrolled in this study of whom 94 were boys. All infants were
hospitalized and initially treated with parenteral antibiotics. All
patients had negative blood and CSF culture results. Of the 162 febrile
infants, 22 (13.6%) had positive urine culture results. Four were
female and 18 were male. All the infected boys were uncircumcised. Of
the 22 positive urine culture results, 16 (73%) had colony counts
The ROC curves for each laboratory test are presented in Fig
1. There were no significant differences
between the AUCs of the standard UA, CRP, and ESR. The AUC of the
hemocytometer WBC counts was significantly better than that of any
other laboratory parameter (P < .05). The AUC of the
total WBC was significantly smaller than any of the rest
(P < .05).
10 WBCs/µL in uncentrifuged urine and found it to be
very sensitive, identifying 96% of symptomatic adult patients with
bacteriuria of
1000 colony-forming unit (CFU)/mL.
![]()
METHODS
Top
Abstract
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
2 test.
2 test (or Fisher's exact
test when the numbers were small) was used for comparison of diagnostic
sensitivity and specificity; P < .05 was considered statistically
significant. The LR(+) for a positive test result is the ratio of the
frequency of a finding among the diseased patients (true-positive rate)
and among the nondiseased patients (false-positive rate), or the
sensitivity/(1
specificity). The LR(
) for a negative or
normal test result is the false-negative fraction divided by the
true-negative fraction, or the (1
sensitivity)/specificity. A
test result with an LR of >1.0 raises the probability of disease and
is often referred as a positive test result. A test result with an LR
of <1.0 lowers the probability of disease and is often called a
negative test result. Unlike the positive and negative predictive
values, the LR is independent of the prevalence of the disease among
the studied patients.
![]()
RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
100 000 CFU/mL. The remaining had between 100 and 50 000 CFU/mL.
Eighteen infants had Escherichia coli infection, 15 (83%)
of these had bacterial colony counts
100 000 CFU/mL. The pathogens
from the other 4 infants were Pseudomonas aeruginosa
10 000 CFU/mL (2 infants), Klebsiella pneumoniae
100 000 CFU/mL (1 infant), and group B streptococcus
10 000
CFU/mL (1 infant). Of the 22 infants with UTI, 13 had pyuria
5
WBCs/hpf, 18 had pyuria
10 WBCs/µL, 13 had CRP >20 mg/L, 16 had
ESR >30 mm/hour, and 8 had WBC >15 000/µL. There were significant
differences (P < .05) between infants with and without
UTI for pyuria
5 WBCs/hpf, pyuria
10 WBCs/µL, CRP >20 mg/L,
and ESR >30 mm/hour.

View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
ROC curves in febrile infants younger than 8 weeks of age with UTI
showing the sensitivity and specificity of WBC, ESR, CRP (A), standard
UA, and hemocytometer WBC counts (B). The ROC area for WBC count, ESR,
CRP, standard UA, and hemocytometer WBC counts was .544 ± .074, .787 ± .060, .822 ± .036, .791 ± .065, and .909 ± .045, respectively.
Comparison of sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and LR for CRP
>20 mg/L, ESR >30 mm/hour, peripheral WBC >15 000/µL, pyuria
5
WBCs/hpf, and pyuria
10 WBCs/µL, in relation to the presence of a
positive urine culture result is shown in Table
1. None of the blood tests were sensitive
indicators of UTI. The most sensitive indicator for UTI was pyuria
10 WBCs/µL (P < .05). Pyuria
5 WBCs/hpf had
poor sensitivity but high specificity. The combination of pyuria
10
WBCs/µL and CRP >20 mg/L increased the specificity to 98%. The
specificity of pyuia
10 WBCs/µL combined with a positive ESR was
97%. The sensitivity of these combinations decreased significantly to
54% and 72%, respectively (P < .05).
|
For febrile infants in our study, UTI was significantly more likely
when the urine had
5 WBCs/hpf or
10 WBCs/µL. A febrile infant
with pyuria
10 WBCs/µL had a greater likelihood of infection than
with pyuria of
5 WBCs/hpf. In contrast, UTI was highly unlikely when
there was a normal hemocytometer WBC counts result.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
UTI had a prevalence in our series of 13.6% in febrile infants <8 weeks of age, suggesting that UTIs may be a relatively common cause of fever in these patients. Males comprised 82% of the infants with UTI in our sample.
None of our patients with UTI had associated bacteremia. This
contrasts with the results of Ginsburg and McCracken,19 in
which sepsis was documented in 31% of neonates and 21% of infants 1 to 2 months of age, and that of Wiswell and Geschke,20 bacteremia in 36.4% of uncircumcised male infants with UTI. These results also differ from those of Bachur and Caputo,21 who, in a retrospective analysis of 354 children
2 years of age with
UTI, found all cases of bacteremia were observed in children <6 months
of age, and that one third of young infants with bacteremia were <2
months of age. This discrepancy in the rate of positive blood culture
results may result from differences in our study population. MMH is a
medical center that provides inpatient medical care to people from all
over Taipei and surrounding towns. All febrile infants <2 months of
age who are referred to MMH or seen in the MMH Pediatric Clinic or
emergency room are evaluated and hospitalized. Therefore, our sample
reflects the general population of febrile infants with UTI rather than
primarily those who seem to be too sick to treat as outpatients. The
results of our study support those of Krober et al22 and
Crain and Gershel,15 who studied similar patient
populations.
CRP >20 mg/L, ESR >30 mm/hour, and WBC >15 000/µL are key findings in various studies on febrile infants.8-12 The diagnostic value of these parameters for predicting serious bacterial infection in febrile infants, however, is conflicting.8-12 Our investigation showed that febrile infants with CRP >20 mg/L and ESR >30 mm/hour were at risk for UTI (P < .05) but that a WBC count >15 000/µL was not significantly associated with UTI (P > .05). Although the specificity of ESR and CRP was high, their sensitivity relatively low, demonstrating that elevated CRP and ESR are poor predictors for identifying UTI in febrile infants. Our results corroborate the findings of Crain and Gershel,15 whose sample was similar to ours. In that report of 442 hospitalized febrile infants younger than 8 weeks of age studied prospectively, reliable clinical or laboratory indicators of UTI were lacking.
The presence of pyuria
5 WBC/hpf has been found to be a poor
predictor of a positive urine culture.13-15 In our
report, the sensitivity (59%) of the standard UA was relatively low
for predicting a positive urine culture result, compatible with
previous studies of febrile infants and children.14,15,23 The hemocytometer WBC counts reported here showed significantly greater
sensitivity for identifying febrile infants with UTI, compared with the
standard UA. These results in young infants were similar to those in
young children with UTI.24-27 In studies by Hoberman and
Wald26,27 on febrile children <24 months of age,
89.6~91.2% of catheterized urine specimens with bacterial colony
counts
50 000 CFU/mL had at least 10 WBCs/µL, discriminating true
UTI from bacteriuria associated with contamination or colonization of
the urinary tract. Hoberman et al24 further compared
standard UA versus hemocytometer WBC counts combined with bacteriuria
using sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive
values, in 698 febrile children for whom catheterized urine specimens
were obtained. There was a significantly higher sensitivity (84.5%)
and positive predictive value (93.1%) of the hemocytometer WBC counts
combined with bacteriuria to detect UTI.
The diagnostic accuracy and the interpretation of microscopic UA are influenced by the preparation of the specimen (centrifuged vs uncentrifuged), and the method of quantifying and reporting leukocytes (per microscopic high-power field vs per cubic millimeter). Hemocytometer WBC counts allow counting of a fixed volume of urine and facilitate accurate counting by providing a small, marked visual field and uniform illumination. The method reduces variability in results by avoiding the concentration and resuspension of solid elements attained by centrifugation.
Our study favors the use of hemocytometer WBC counts to evaluate febrile infants for UTI. The greater sensitivity of the hemocytometer WBC counts compared with the standard UA substantially increases its accuracy in diagnosing UTI. We conclude that hemocytometer WBC counts is of definite value as an aid in early diagnosis of UTI in febrile infants <8 weeks of age.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENT |
|---|
We thank Dr A. L. Hoekman for his revision of the text.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Received for publication Jun 14, 1999; accepted Sep 7, 1999.
Reprint requests to (F.-Y.H.) Department of Pediatrics, Mackay Memorial Hospital, No. 92, Section 2, Chung-Shan N Rd, Taipei, Taiwan. E-mail: contax{at}ms1.mmh.org.tw
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
UTI, urinary tract infection; UA, urinalysis; hpf, high-power microscopic field; WBC, white blood cell; CFU, colony-forming unit; CRP, C-reactive protein; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; MMH, Mackay Memorial Hospital; ROC, receiver operator characteristic curves; AUC, area under the curve; LR, likelihood ratio.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||