PEDIATRICS Vol. 105 No. 1 January 2000, pp. 112-114
In the July 1999 issue of the
Journal of the American Medical Association, Dr Leonard
Hudson proclaims that "the concept of ventilator-induced lung
injury (VILI) has come of age."1 His comments were
derived from a report by Ranieri et al2 which shows that a
"lung-protective strategy" of respiratory support reduces cytokine
levels in both the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and serum of adult
patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Dr Hudson's
enthusiasm is increased by the recent press release from the National
Institutes of Health (NIH) ARDS Network Study, reporting positive
results of a study evaluating a "lung-protective strategy" in >800
adults with ARDS. The NIH study was stopped early, when the
safety monitoring committee noted "25% fewer deaths" among
patients receiving small (6 mL/kg) rather than large (12 mL/kg) tidal
volumes to support gas exchange.
The importance of these observations is that they provide data in
support of the hypothesis that VILI can cause biotrauma associated with
a "mediator storm" (perhaps cytokines) that is responsible for
distal organ dysfunction, subsequent multiorgan failure, and
death.3 These adult data unequivocally prove that how we
support gas exchange in patients with lung disease markedly affects
outcome.
Although it has been shown that pulmonary cytokine levels also appear
to be elevated in some neonates on assisted ventilation, an exact
relationship to neonatal lung injury has not yet been well
defined.4-7 Proinflammatory mediators may be elevated
because of fetal exposure to maternal inflammatory mediators, postnatal
infection, or by release from preterm lungs attributable to
ventilator-induced injury.5 The neonatal lung is still in
stages of development and growth, therefore cytokine responses and
effects may be immature and different from what is seen in adults.
Indeed, data from Kwong et al8,9 suggests a possible
relationship between cytokine signaling and lung generation. However,
these data do not minimize the compelling evidence establishing the
presence of VILI in the neonate.510-16
The most common reason neonates need respiratory support is because of
respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). In this disease, the
pathophysiology is one of progressive loss of lung volume, intrapulmonary shunt, and deflation instability. Animal models of RDS
clearly show that ventilator strategy alters the clinical and
pathologic evolution of RDS. In addition, it is well known that
neonates with RDS are susceptible to lung injury and the subsequent
development of chronic lung disease.
In 1989, Meredith et al15 reported the landmark
observation that lung injury caused by a commonly used but
inappropriate ventilatory strategy (in this case: large tidal volumes
and insufficient positive end-expiratory pressure [PEEP])
contributed to the development of RDS in premature baboons. Use of
high-frequency ventilation (HFV) with small tidal volumes prevented the
development of hyaline membrane disease, the pathologic correlate of
RDS. These experiments in the baboon model of RDS showed striking
pathologic differences between animals supported with conventional
ventilation and those supported with low tidal volume, oscillatory
ventilation.
A sentinel point often missed in Dr Meredith's paper is that tidal
volume was limited but not at the expense of lung
recruitment. The ventilatory strategy used by Meredith et
al15 was to maximally recruit the lung with a high mean
airway pressure and then use oscillatory ventilation to maintain a
normal PaCO2. Although this
approach improved oxygenation and ventilation, there were clinical
signs of cardiac compromise. In a subsequent study, Kinsella et
al14 showed that the problems with cardiac compromise
could be avoided if, after the lung was recruited, the mean airway
pressure was gradually decreased as dictated by chest radiograph and
oxygenation
(PaO2/PAO2).
This strategy exploits the concept of lung pressure-volume hysteresis;
namely once the lung is recruited, surfactant and alveolar
interdependence act to keep it inflated. Mean airway pressure can be
decreased without a great loss of lung volume, so long as the pressure
is not decreased below the critical closing pressure of the lung. This
approach is in accord with the pioneering work of Dr Bryan's group
that demonstrated the protective effects of HFV if the lung was
recruited.13,17
When we consider the possible variables that can be adjusted
(inspiratory time, PEEP, peak inspiratory pressure, volume
limited, pressure limited assist control, synchronized, high-frequency oscillation, high-frequency jet ventilation,
high-frequency flow interruption, rate) and the broad diversity
of the diseases we treat (meconium aspiration syndrome,
pneumonia, RDS, air leak, congenital diaphragmatic hernia, etc),
it may appear that defining a "lung protective strategy" for
the neonate will be extremely difficult. As in the experimental RDS
model, providing lung protection during assisted ventilation for
neonatal lung disease is entirely dependent on strategies that are
individualized to the primary or underlying pathophysiology. For
example, failure to define the mechanisms causing hypoxemia can lead to
unsafe application of what would be life-saving respiratory support
under different conditions. Use of higher levels of end-expiratory
pressure will not help a patient who has idiopathic pulmonary
hypertension and clear lung fields. In fact, the resultant lung
overinflation will make gas exchange and hemodynamics worse. Increasing
peak inspiratory pressures or tidal volumes to recruit the lung in a
patient with RDS while using no end-expiratory pressure to maintain
functional residual capacity is equally incorrect.
The critical issue that is highlighted by our increased understanding
of VILI in the neonate is that each change in ventilatory strategy has
a consequence. Small tidal volume ventilation at low lung volumes, even
in normal lungs, is associated with progressive loss of lung volume and
surfactant dysfunction. Physiologic levels of end-expiratory pressure
must be applied to prevent the development of hypoxemia. This problem
is made worse by diseases that cause surfactant dysfunction and make
the lung prone to collapse. Limiting tidal volume requires higher
levels of end-expiratory pressure and/or fraction of inspired
oxygen (FIO2) to maintain
adequate oxygenation. Higher levels of
FIO2 can contribute to
oxidant-induced lung injury. Defining lung protective strategies
requires compromises between gas exchange goals and potential
toxicities associated with overdistention, recruitment/derecruitment of
lung units, and high oxygen concentrations.
Although the variety of ventilator choices is limitless, the underlying
principles of neonatal lung protection are relatively straightforward.
The most important issue is not the specific mode of ventilation, or
the specific ventilator used, but rather a matching of a ventilatory
strategy to the patient's underlying physiology. Current evidence
strongly supports the following concepts:
increased lung volume (stretch), and not pressure per
se, promotes lung injury.20-25 Compared with adults,
neonates have compliant chest walls, so that at a given airway
pressure, the relative degree of lung distension is greater than in the
adult.
Lung injury in the neonate develops rapidly and can begin right from the first breath, in the delivery room where we often ignore the tidal volume and the end-expiratory pressure we use to support gas exchange. In our adrenalin-driven desire to save life, we can easily deliver very large tidal volumes while applying no PEEP. This is the fastest way to create lung injury. Using lung protective strategies in the neonate requires proactive decisions that must be specific for disease pathophysiology, lung maturity and involve compromises between gas exchange goals and potential toxicities. When you make rounds today, see if your walk matches your talk. Look at whether the ventilator strategies you have chosen are protective, because VILI has also come of age for the neonate and it can alter the very frame on which future lung growth and development occur.
Pediatrix Medical Group
Weston, FL 33326
Departments of Medicine, Surgery, and Biomedical
Engineering
Respiratory Division
University of Toronto
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Neonatal Research
Division of Neonatology
Utah Valley Regional Medical Center
Provo, UT
FOOTNOTES
Received for publication Aug 23, 1999; accepted Aug 23, 1999.
Reprint requests to (R.H.C.) Pediatrix Medical Group, 1455 North Park Dr, Weston, FL 33326. E-mail: reese clark{at}mail.pediatrix.com
ABBREVIATIONS
VILI, ventilator-induced lung injury; ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; NIH, National Institutes of Health; RDS, respiratory distress syndrome; PEEP, positive end-expiratory pressure; HFV, high-frequency ventilation; EEP, end-expiratory pressure; FIO2, fraction of inspired oxygen.
REFERENCES
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G Lista, F Castoldi, S Bianchi, M Battaglioli, F Cavigioli, and M A Bosoni Volume guarantee versus high-frequency ventilation: lung inflammation in preterm infants Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., July 1, 2008; 93(4): F252 - F256. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S Hosono, H Mugishima, H Fujita, A Hosono, M Minato, T Okada, S Takahashi, and K Harada Umbilical cord milking reduces the need for red cell transfusions and improves neonatal adaptation in infants born at less than 29 weeks' gestation: a randomised controlled trial Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., January 1, 2008; 93(1): F14 - F19. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Keszler Volume-targeted Ventilation NeoReviews, May 1, 2006; 7(5): e250 - e257. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. R. Polglase, C. J. Morley, K. J. Crossley, P. Dargaville, R. Harding, D. L. Morgan, and S. B. Hooper Positive end-expiratory pressure differentially alters pulmonary hemodynamics and oxygenation in ventilated, very premature lambs J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2005; 99(4): 1453 - 1461. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N McCallion, R Lau, P A Dargaville, and C J Morley Volume guarantee ventilation, interrupted expiration, and expiratory braking Arch. Dis. Child., August 1, 2005; 90(8): 865 - 870. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Berger, E. M. Skuza, C. A. Ramsden, and M. H. Wilkinson Velocity and attenuation of sound in the isolated fetal lung as it is expanded with air J Appl Physiol, June 1, 2005; 98(6): 2235 - 2241. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. B. Copland, F. Martinez, B. P. Kavanagh, D. Engelberts, C. McKerlie, J. Belik, and M. Post High Tidal Volume Ventilation Causes Different Inflammatory Responses in Newborn versus Adult Lung Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., March 15, 2004; 169(6): 739 - 748. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. W. Bollen, C. S. P. M. Uiterwaal, and A. J. van Vught Cumulative Metaanalysis of High-frequency Versus Conventional Ventilation in Premature Neonates Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., November 15, 2003; 168(10): 1150 - 1155. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Sharek, R. Baker, F. Litman, J. Kaempf, K. Burch, E. Schwarz, S. Sun, and N. R. Payne Evaluation and Development of Potentially Better Practices to Prevent Chronic Lung Disease and Reduce Lung Injury in Neonates Pediatrics, April 1, 2003; 111(4): e426 - 431. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. H. Thome, F. Pohlandt, N. S. Kabra, S. E. Courtney, D. J. Durand, and J. M. Asselin High-Frequency Ventilation N. Engl. J. Med., March 20, 2003; 348(12): 1181 - 1182. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. E. Courtney, D. J. Durand, J. M. Asselin, M. L. Hudak, J. L. Aschner, C. T. Shoemaker, and the Neonatal Ventilation Study Group High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation versus Conventional Mechanical Ventilation for Very-Low-Birth-Weight Infants N. Engl. J. Med., August 29, 2002; 347(9): 643 - 652. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kuo, V. Camerini, R. Boyle, M. P. Griffin, D. Kaufman, J. Kattwinkel;, M. Walsh-Sukys, A. Faranoff, J. Verter, and L. Wright Pulmonary Hypertension-Hyperventilation Versus Alkali Infusion Pediatrics, February 1, 2001; 107(2): 452 - 452. [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||