Advertising Disclaimer
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Related Collections
Right arrow Office Practice
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

PEDIATRICS Vol. 104 No. 4 October 1999, pp. 982-985

AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS:
Marijuana: A Continuing Concern for Pediatricians

Committee on Substance Abuse


    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Conclusion
References

Marijuana, the common name for products derived from the plant Cannabis sativa, is the most common illicit drug used by children and adolescents in the United States.1 Despite growing concerns by the medical profession about the physical and psychological effects of its active ingredient, Delta -9-tetrahydrocannabinol, survey data continue to show that increasing numbers of young people are using the drug as they become less concerned about its dangers.1

Because the decision of whether to use marijuana is usually made by the time a young person reaches the age of 19 years,2,3 pediatricians must continue to be cognizant of the implications of marijuana use. Widespread debate exists about marijuana and the possibility of legalizing its use or at least decriminalizing its possession.4-7 Furthermore, marijuana is being promoted for medical purposes, such as the treatment of glaucoma and the management of nausea and anorexia related to cancer chemotherapy.4,8,9 Although these topics are beyond the scope of this statement, evidence suggests that pediatricians should continue their vigilant efforts to prevent the use of this drug by young people.

The abuse of marijuana by adolescents is a major health problem with social, academic, developmental, and legal ramifications.10 Marijuana is an addictive, mind-altering drug capable of inducing dependency.11 Pediatricians are obligated to develop a reasoned approach to dealing with its use by children and adolescents so they can provide appropriate care and counsel.12

    EPIDEMIOLOGY

Between 1991 and 1997, the use of marijuana by young people increased dramatically.1 In 1997, 23% of eighth graders reported having used the drug at some time in their lives, an increase in use from 10% in 1991. Among 10th graders, the number nearly doubled from 23% in 1991 to 42% in 1997. In 1997, 50% of high school seniors reported having used marijuana compared with 37% 6 years earlier. The abuse of marijuana among teenagers has increased as the "perceived harmfulness" of regular use has decreased and the perception of "peer acceptance" has increased.1,2

    POTENCY

The potency of marijuana is defined as the percentage of Delta -9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Delta -9-THC) in the dry weight of the sample. Increased sophistication in the selective breeding of marijuana plants has led to a substantial increase in the potency of street samples during the past 2 decades. In 1975, the average potency of THC in confiscated samples was 0.71%; by 1997, the average concentration was 3.71%---a fivefold increase. There is wide variation in the potency of smoked marijuana. Sensimilla (considered by many to be the finest product, produced from the flowering tops of the female hemp plant) had an average potency of 6.6% in 1997. Marijuana sold as loose plant material (leaves, stems, and seeds) had an average potency of 3.2%.13 In addition, the method of consumption (smoking as a rolled cigarette or in a pipe or packed into a hollowed-out cigar), as well as the presence of adulterating substances, affect the potency.

Because of the documented change in potency, pediatricians must be able to address with their patients what seems to be "casual use" of marijuana. Trends suggest that the low-dose, self-experimentation type of use typical of the 1960s may be giving way to the high-potency-high-reward pattern of compulsive marijuana use prevalent during the late 1990s.14

    SOMATIC CONSEQUENCES

Marijuana should not be considered an innocuous drug. Regular use has been associated with cardiovascular, pulmonary, reproductive, and immunologic consequences. The physiologic effects of marijuana use include an accelerated heart rate and a minimal rise in blood pressure.15,16 These effects, which seem to be secondary to Delta -adrenergic vascular mechanisms, are transient and usually not deleterious to the otherwise healthy adolescent. The immediate pulmonary effect of smoking marijuana is bronchodilation, although with long-term use the smoked particles act as an irritant, causing bronchoconstriction and eventual airway obstruction.17-19 The chronic effects are similar to those of smoking tobacco, and there seems to be a relationship between smoking marijuana and neoplastic changes in the lungs.20

Heavy marijuana use may be especially dangerous for adolescents during puberty. Such use has been associated with diminished sperm motility, decreased sperm counts, decreased circulating testosterone levels,21,22 irregular ovulation, and decreased pituitary gonadotropin levels.23,24 The metabolites of marijuana cross the human placenta and are also found in human milk. Although the consequences of the presence of such metabolites in human milk have yet to be identified,25-27 infants born to mothers who smoke marijuana during pregnancy are shorter, weigh less, and have smaller head circumferences at birth.27,28 Marijuana and some of its components influence the immune system and affect the body's antitumor activities. Marijuana receptors have been identified on macrophages and T and B lymphocytes, suggesting a molecular basis for immunosuppression by THC.29-31

    NEUROPHARMACOLOGY

The psychoactive effects of Delta -9-THC are receptor-mediated. The cannabinoid receptor sites in the brain are particularly dense in the outflow nuclei of the basal ganglia, the hippocampus, and the molecular layers of the cerebellum, implicating roles for cannabinoids in the disruption of cognition and coordination. Sparse densities in the lower brainstem areas controlling cardiovascular and respiratory functions may explain why high doses of Delta -9-THC are not lethal.32

Anandamide, a derivative of arachidonic acid, is an endogenous chemical in the brain that binds with cannabinoid receptors.33 Like Delta -9-THC, it has been shown to affect muscle coordination, produce analgesic and tranquilizing effects, and inhibit secretion of follicle-stimulating hormone, prolactin, and growth hormone.34 The use of anandamide as a marijuana antagonist has substantial effects on rats conditioned to self-treatment with THC33,34 and has helped elucidate the mechanism by which cannabinoids exert their biological and psychologic effects.

The most pervasive common pathway among drugs of abuse, including cocaine, heroin, opiates, and marijuana, is the stimulation of release of the neurotransmitter, dopamine.35-38 This endogenous catecholamine stimulates certain dopaminergic projections of the medial forebrain bundle---the brain's so-called reward circuitry.39 Psychoactive drugs, including marijuana, derive substantial abuse liability from enhancing these circuits; and it is the psychoactive ingredient of marijuana, Delta -9-THC, that stimulates the release of dopamine, mediated through the cannabinoid receptors.40,41

In both animal and human experiments, subjects self-administer marijuana. They predictably select high-potency marijuana over low-potency marijuana,42 supporting the hypothesis that the reinforcing effect and abuse liability of marijuana are positively related to the Delta -9-THC content.

Marijuana is lipophilic and is stored in the brain and other fat-rich areas of the body, forming what has been described as a "depot."43 The slow release of marijuana and its metabolites from lipid stores may explain the carry-over effects of marijuana on driving and other cognitive and behavioral changes,44 as well as the absence of acute signs of withdrawal after abrupt discontinuation of use.45

    BEHAVIORAL AND COGNITIVE CONSEQUENCES

Marijuana affects the brain, resulting in behavioral and cognitive effects. Acutely, marijuana produces euphoria, relaxation, and disinhibition. Persons under the influence of the drug show impaired problem-solving skills and difficulty in organizing thoughts and conversing. Other adverse consequences of marijuana use include interference with coordination; the ability to judge elapsed time, speed, and distance; the ability to track a moving object; and reaction time.46-49 There is little doubt that marijuana intoxication contributes substantially to accidental deaths and injuries among adolescents, especially those associated with motor vehicle crashes, and is frequently involved in incidents related to driving while intoxicated.50,51

Regular use of marijuana also exerts a negative effect on short-term memory, learning, and attention span. Three methodologically strong studies presented compelling evidence that these functions were impaired in frequent users of marijuana (defined as using 20 to 30 days per month), even up to 6 weeks after discontinuation of use,52 and noticeable impairment in attention and memory was evident even after 24 hours of abstinence.53,54 Clearly, young people who are frequent users of marijuana experience residual neuropsychologic effects with an impaired ability to learn.53

An "amotivational syndrome" has been described in chronic heavy marijuana users. This syndrome is characterized by the inability to sustain attention on environmental stimuli and to maintain goal-directed thinking and behavior.55 An additional source of concern is the occasional occurrence of dysphoric reactions that may range from mild fear to depersonalization to frank paranoia.56,57

Finally, marijuana use often precedes the use of other more dangerous drugs. Although marijuana use does not necessarily predict progression to the use of "harder" drugs, adolescents who use marijuana are 104 times as likely to use cocaine compared with peers who never smoked marijuana.4,58 Therefore, the use of marijuana as a risk behavior and its role as a "gateway drug" for some teenagers must be considered.

    SUMMARY
Top
Abstract
Conclusion
References

The seriousness of the behavioral consequences of marijuana use is sufficient to cause great concern and should prompt the pediatrician to counsel young people against any use of the drug. Such counsel should be based on health concerns, including the relationship of marijuana use to trauma associated with intoxication and the effect on memory and learning during this important period of development. Additional reasons for concern and counsel include anxieties and uncertainties about the potential harm that marijuana use may cause to adolescents during a period of rapid change in hormonal secretion, possible teratogenicity, and the known consequences of long-term use.

A discussion of drug use, including the use of marijuana, should be a routine part of primary health care clinical preventive services for every child and adolescent. An assessment of potential drug use gives the pediatrician the opportunity to offer anticipatory guidance before the onset of drug use, to intervene and minimize consequences if drug use has begun, and to detect and address issues of long-term or heavy use.

Although all users should be counseled about the dangers of the drug and the illicit nature of its use, marijuana is an addictive drug and is capable of producing dependency. Marijuana-dependent teenagers should be offered treatment options, rather than simply punishment, for their illness.

COMMITTEE ON SUBSTANCE ABUSE, 1998-1999
Richard B. Heyman, MD, Chairperson
Trina M. Anglin, MD
Stuart M. Copperman, MD
Alain Joffe, MD
Catherine A. McDonald, MD
Peter D. Rogers, MD, MPH
Rizwan Z. Shah, MD

LIAISON REPRESENTATIVES
Marie Armentano, MD American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
Gayle M. Boyd, PhD National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism
Dorynne Czechowicz, MD National Institute on Drug Abuse

    FOOTNOTES

The recommendations in this statement do not indicate an exclusive course of treatment or serve as a standard of medical care. Variations, taking into account individual circumstances, may be appropriate.

    ABBREVIATIONS

THC, tetrahydrocannabinol.

    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Conclusion
References
  1. University of Michigan News and Information Services. Monitoring the Future Study [news release]. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan News and Information Services; 1997
  2. Johnson LD. Changing trends, patterns and nature of marijuana use. In: Conference Highlights, National Conference on Marijuana Use: Prevention, Treatment and Research. Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health; 1996. NIH publication 96-4106:17-19
  3. Kandel D. Relationship between marijuana use and the use of other drugs and other antisocial problem behaviors. In: Conference Highlights, National Conference on Marijuana Use: Prevention, Treatment and Research. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health; 1996. NIH publication 96-4106:48-51
  4. Grinspoon L, Bakalar JB Marihuana as medicine: a plea for reconsideration. JAMA 1995; 273:1875-1876 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Kleber HD Deglamorising cannabis. Lancet 1995; 346:1241 [CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Kassirer JP. Federal foolishness and marijuana. N Engl J Med. 1997;336-366-367
  7. Geddes D Decriminalisation of cannabis. Lancet 1995; 346:1709-1710 [Medline]
  8. Smith D. From the president. Am Soc Addict Med News. January-February 1997:4
  9. Workshop on the Medical Utility of Marijuana. Report to the Director. Rockville, MD: National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Drug Abuse; 1997
  10. Jaffe SL, Compton MT Marijuana update for child and adolescent psychiatrists. AACAP News 1997; 28:7-9
  11. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994:216-221
  12. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Adolescence and Committee on Substance Abuse Marijuana: a continuing concern for pediatricians. Pediatrics 1991; 88:1070-1072 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. National Institute on Drug Abuse. Quarterly Report: Potency Monitoring Project. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse; 1997. Report No. 62, April 1 to June 30
  14. Gold M. The pharmacology of marijuana. In: Graham AW, Schultz TK, eds. Principles of Addiction Medicine. Chevy Chase, MD: American Society of Addiction Medicine; 1998:163-171
  15. Beaconsfield P, Ginsburg J, Rainsbury R Marijuana smoking: cardiovascular effects in man and possible mechanisms. N Engl J Med 1972; 287:209-212
  16. Weiss JL, Watanabe AM, Lemberger L, Tamarkin NR, Cardon PV Cardiovascular effects of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in man. Clin Pharmacol Therapy 1972; 13:671-684 [Medline]
  17. Vachon L, FitzGerald MX, Solliday NH, Gould IA, Gaensler EA Single-dose effects of marijuana smoke: bronchial dynamics and respiratory-center sensitivity in normal subjects. N Engl J Med 1973; 288:985-989
  18. Tashkin DP, Shapiro BJ, Frank IM Acute pulmonary physiologic effects of smoked marijuana and oral 9-tetrahydrocannabinol in healthy young men. N Engl J Med 1973; 289:336-341
  19. Wu TC, Tashkin DP, Djahed B, Rose JE Pulmonary hazards of smoking marijuana as compared with tobacco. N Engl J Med 1988; 318:347-351 [Abstract]
  20. Cottrell JC, Sohn SS, Vogel WH Toxic effects of marihuana tar on mouse skin. Arch Environ Health 1973; 26:277-278 [Medline]
  21. Hembree WC, Nahas GG, Zeidenberg P, et al. Changes in human spermatozoa associated with high dose marihuana smoking. In: Nahas GG, Paton WDM, eds. Marijuana Biological Effects: Analyses, Metabolism, Cellular Responses, Reproduction and Brain. New York, NY: Pergamon Press; 1979:429-439
  22. Kolodny RC, Masters WH, Kolodner RM, Toro G Depression of plasma testosterone levels after chronic intensive marijuana use. N Engl J Med 1974; 290:872-874
  23. Asch RH, Smith CG, Siler-Khodr TM, Pauerstern CJ Effects of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol during the follicular phase of the rhesus monkey. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1981; 52:50-55 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Cohen S Marijuana and reproductive functions. Drug Abuse Alcohol News 1985; 13:1
  25. Fried P. Perinatal and developmental effects of marijuana. In: Conference Highlights: National Conference on Marijuana Use: Prevention, Treatment, and Research. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health; 1995. NIH publication 96-4106. 1995:32-34
  26. Fried PA Prenatal exposure to marihuana and tobacco during infancy, early and middle childhood: effects and an attempt on synthesis. Arch Toxicol Suppl 1995; 17:233-260 [Medline]
  27. Zuckerman B, Frank DA, Hingson R, Effects of maternal marijuana and cocaine use on fetal growth. N Engl J Med 1989; 320:762-768 [Abstract]
  28. Shrono PH, Klebanoff MA, Nugent RP, The impact of cocaine and marijuana use on low birth weight and pre-term birth: a multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172:19-27 [CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Cabral G. Effects of marijuana on the brain, endocrine system and immune system. In: Conference Highlights: National Conference on Marijuana Use: Prevention, Treatment and Research. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health; 1996. NIH publication 96-4106; 1996:21-24
  30. Bhargava HN, House RV, Thorat SN, Thomas PT Cellular immune function in mice tolerant to or abstinent from 1-trans-delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol. Pharmacology 1996; 52:271-282 [Medline]
  31. House RV, Thomas PT, Kozak JT, Bhargava HN Suppression of immune function by non-peptide delta opioid receptor antagonists. Neurosci Lett 1995; 198:119-122 [CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Herkenham M, Lynn AB, Little MD, Cannabinoid receptor localization in brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1990; 87:1932-1936 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Devane WA, Hanus L, Breuer A, Isolation and structure of a brain constituent that binds to the cannabinoid receptor. Science 1992; 258:1946-1949 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Musty RE, Reggio P, Consroe P A review of recent advances in cannabinoid research and the 1994 International Symposium on Cannabis and the Cannabinoids. Life Sci 1995; 56:1933-1940 [CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Leshner AI. Drug abuse and addiction are biomedicinal problems. Hosp Pract (Off Ed).-A Special Report. 1997:2-4
  36. Self DW. Neurobiological adaptations to drug use. Hosp Pract-A Special Report. 1997:5-8
  37. Koob GF. Neurochemical explanations for addiction. Hosp Pract-A Special Report. 1997:12-14
  38. Volkow ND, Fowler JS, Gatley SJ, PET evaluation of the human brain dopamine system of the human brain. J Nucl Med 1996; 37:1242-1256 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Self DW, Nestler EJ Molecular mechanisms of drug reinforcement and addiction. Annu Rev Neurosci 1995; 18:463-495 [CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Rodriguez de Fonseca F, Carrera MRA, Navarro M, Koob GF, Weiss F Activation of corticotropin-releasing factor in the limbic system during cannabinoid withdrawal. Science 1997; 276:2050-2054 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Tanda G, Pontieri FE, Di Chiara G Cannabinoid and heroin activation of mesolimbic dopamine transmission by a common mu1 opioid receptor mechanism. Science 1997; 276:2048-2050 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Chait LD, Burke KA Preference for high- versus low-potency marijuana. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1994; 49:643-647 [CrossRef][Medline]
  43. O'Brien CP. Drug addiction and drug abuse. In: Hardman JG, Limbird LE, eds. Goodman and Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. 9th ed. New York, NY: McGraw Hill; 1996:572-573
  44. Leirer VO, Yesavage JA, Morrow DG Marijuana carry-over effects on aircraft pilot performance. Aviat Space Environ Med 1991; 62:221-227 [Medline]
  45. Wickelgren I Marijuana: harder than thought? Science 1997; 176:1967-1968
  46. Lundqvist T Chronic cannabis use and the sense of coherence. Life Sci 1995; 56:2145-2150 [CrossRef][Medline]
  47. Lundqvist T Specific thought patterns in chronic cannabis smokers observed during treatment. Life Sci 1995; 56:2141-2144 [CrossRef][Medline]
  48. Mendelson JH, Meyer RE. Behavioral and biological concomitants of chronic marihuana smoking by heavy and casual users. In: Marijuana: A Signal of Misunderstanding. 1972;1:68-246
  49. Naditch MP Acute adverse reactions to psychoactive drugs, drug usage and psychopathology. J Abnorm Psychol 1974; 83:394-403 [CrossRef][Medline]
  50. Logan BK, Schwilke EW Drug and alcohol use in fatally injured drivers in Washington State. J Forensic Sci 1996; 41:505-510 [Medline]
  51. Crouch DJ, Birky MM, Gust SW, The prevalence of drugs and alcohol in fatally injured truck drivers. J Forensic Sci 1993; 38:1342-1353 [Medline]
  52. Schwartz RH, Gruenewald PJ, Klitzner M, Fedio P Short-term memory impairment in cannabis dependent adolescents. Am J Dis Child 1989; 143:1214-1219 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Block RI, Ghoneim MM Effects of chronic marijuana use on human cognition. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1993; 110:219-228 [CrossRef][Medline]
  54. Pope HG, Yurgelun-Todd, D The residual cognitive effects of heavy marijuana use in college students. JAMA 1996; 275:521-527 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Weller RA Marijuana: effects and motivation. Med Aspects Hum Sexuality 1985; 19:92-104
  56. Keeler MH. Adverse reaction to marijuana: classification and suggested treatment. Am J Psychiatry. 1967;124:674-677
  57. Weil AT Adverse reactions to marihuana: classification and suggested treatment. N Engl J Med 1970; 282:997-1000
  58. National Institute on Drug Abuse. Drug Use Among Racial/Ethnic Minorities. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse; 1995. NIH publication 95-3888

Pediatrics (ISSN 0031 4005). Copyright ©1999 by the American Academy of Pediatrics

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

The following policy statement is a revision:

Legalization of Marijuana: Potential Impact on Youth

Pediatrics 113: 1825-1826. [Full Text]

The following policy statement has been revised:

Marijuana
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and
Pediatrics 65: 652-656.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Mens HealthHome page
M. Pujazon-Zazik and M. J. Park
Marijuana: Use Among Young Males and Health Outcomes
American Journal of Men's Health, September 1, 2009; 3(3): 265 - 274.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
J. W. Kulig and and the Committee on Substance Abuse
Tobacco, Alcohol, and Other Drugs: The Role of the Pediatrician in Prevention, Identification, and Management of Substance Abuse
Pediatrics, March 1, 2005; 115(3): 816 - 821.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
Committee on Substance Abuse and Committee on Adol
Legalization of Marijuana: Potential Impact on Youth
Pediatrics, June 1, 2004; 113(6): 1825 - 1826.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
A. Joffe, W. S. Yancy, and the Committee on Substance Abuse and Committee on
Legalization of Marijuana: Potential Impact on Youth
Pediatrics, June 1, 2004; 113(6): e632 - e638.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
R. H. Schwartz, T. J. Silber, R. B. Heyman, M. J. Sheridan, and D. M. Estabrook
Urine Testing for Drugs of Abuse: A Survey of Suburban Parent-Adolescent Dyads
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, February 1, 2003; 157(2): 158 - 161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Bio.Home page
M. D. Roth, J. A. Marques-Magallanes, M. Yuan, W. Sun, D. P. Tashkin, and O. Hankinson
Induction and Regulation of the Carcinogen-Metabolizing Enzyme CYP1A1 by Marijuana Smoke and Delta 9-Tetrahydrocannabinol
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., March 1, 2001; 24(3): 339 - 344.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Related Collections
Right arrow Office Practice
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?