PEDIATRICS Vol. 103 No. 5 May 1999, p. e63
ELECTRONIC ARTICLE:
Early Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery in the Management of
Empyema
,
, and
From the * Department of Surgery, University of Kansas
School of Medicine-Wichita, Wichita, Kansas; and the
Department
of Pediatric Surgery, Arkansas Children's Hospital and University of
Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas.
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Objective. The appropriate timing, as well as the type of intervention, for the treatment of empyema in children is controversial. The advent of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) has changed the way we treat these children. Therefore, we reviewed our experience with the early use of VATS in the treatment of empyema and formulated a treatment algorithm.
Methods. We retrospectively reviewed medical records of all patients undergoing VATS for empyema at Arkansas Children's Hospital from December 1994 to February 1997. All patients were treated by the pediatric surgical service and had the diagnosis of empyema confirmed at surgery. Results are reported as means, unless otherwise noted.
Results. Twenty-five children with empyema were treated with VATS during the review period. Their age was 48.3 months, and the duration of symptoms was 7.4 days. All the patients had parapneumonic empyemas and had received preoperative antibiotics for 10.1 days. Preoperative imaging included chest radiography in 25 (100%), ultrasonography in 20 (80%), and computed tomography in 10 (40%). All patients with documented loculated parapneumonic fluid collections underwent VATS within a mean of 2 days of hospitalization. Chest tubes were removed in 3.2 days, resulting in a postoperative length of stay of 4.9 days. Total length of stay was 7.3 days. One patient required conversion to minithoracotomy and required a transfusion. There were no other complications or deaths. Follow-up was available for 22 (88%) children, and there was resolution of symptoms in all children with no recurrences.
Conclusions. Earlier intervention with VATS in the treatment of empyema in children is safe and may reduce hospital charges by shortening hospital stay. A treatment algorithm based on early use of VATS is also described. Key words: empyema, children, video-assisted thoracic surgery, VATS, thoracoscopy.
The management of empyema in children is controversial.
There is no consensus regarding the ideal treatment or even the ideal timing of the various treatment options available. An array of treatment options exists. They include intravenous antibiotics with
repeated thoracentesis, chest tube drainage, image-directed drainage,
fibrinolytic therapy, video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS),
minithoracotomy, open drainage, and formal thoracotomy with
decortication. The timing and type of surgical intervention are
controversial as well. There are no randomized, controlled trials in
children with empyema that resolve these questions.
The advent of minimally invasive VATS in adults has resulted in the
adoption of these techniques by pediatric surgeons.1-3 Following the description of the use of VATS to treat empyema in
children,4 we have utilized this technique increasingly in
our practice. In addition, we have intervened earlier in the course of
the disease. Therefore we reviewed our experience with VATS to evaluate
its safety and efficacy in the treatment of empyema in children and
formulated a treatment algorithm.
We reviewed retrospectively medical records of all patients
undergoing VATS for empyema at Arkansas Children's Hospital from December 1994 to February 1997. All patients were treated by the pediatric surgical service. The diagnosis of empyema was considered in
all patients with parapneumonic effusions on chest radiography, ultrasonography, or computed tomography (CT). If thoracentesis was
performed, a diagnosis was made if there was frank pus, positive Gram
stain, or culture of pleural fluid. Additional diagnostic criterion
were pleural fluid pH <7.0, pleural fluid glucose <40 mg/dL, and
pleural fluid LDH >1000 IU/dL. All patients had the diagnosis of
loculated empyema confirmed at surgery.
All patients had to have evidence of loculated fluid on a radiographic
or sonographic imaging study before undergoing VATS. We preferred chest
ultrasonography as the imaging modality of choice. It allows adequate
imaging of the pleural space, shows the presence of loculated areas,
and does not expose the child to radiation. If an imaging study
revealed loculated pleural fluid, thoracentesis or chest tube placement
was not required before surgery.
VATS was performed using general anesthesia; a single lumen
endotracheal tube was used in the majority of patients, with selective bronchial intubation if possible. Arterial or central lines were not
used routinely. The patient was positioned in the lateral decubitus
position with the involved side up. Trocar placement was dictated by
the location of the loculated empyema; usually one laparoscopic trocar
(which allows carbon dioxide insufflation if the lung does not
collapse) was used for the telescope, and this was placed in the 6th
intercostal space in the mid- or posterior axillary line. A 5- or 10-mm
0° or 30° telescope was used. Before insufflation, pleural fluid or
pus should be aspirated with a large bore suction aspirator. After
pneumothorax is induced and the lung is collapsed, additional incisions
in the intercostal space are made under thoracoscopic visualization to
allow placement of instruments directly into the thoracic cavity. These
skin incisions should be placed so that they can be incorporated in a
formal thoracotomy incision, if needed. A variety of curved and
straight, ring, stone, and dressing forceps then can be used. The
pleural cavity is debrided of all fibrinous and purulent material. All adhesions are lysed, and the lung is inspected. If the lung is encased
and does not expand, the lung must be decorticated. A plane is
developed between the lung and the pleural peel using a sponge or
peanut, and decortication is performed. If there is excessive bleeding
and visualization is inadequate, VATS should be converted into a formal
thoracotomy. After irrigation and hemostasis, either one or two chest
tubes are placed through the trocar incisions.
For the majority of patients, postoperative recovery was on the
pediatric surgery ward. Chest tubes were removed when they stopped
draining or drainage was <50 mL/day, and chest radiography confirmed
lung expansion. Intravenous antibiotics were continued until the
patient was afebrile (temperature Data collected included preoperative symptoms, antibiotics, imaging,
thoracentesis, and laboratory results. Additionally, operative
findings, cultures, pathology, and length of stay (LOS), as well as
hospital charge data, were collected. Results are reported as
means ± SD, unless noted otherwise.
Twenty-five children with empyema were treated with VATS during
the review period of 27 months. The mean age was 48.3 months (1 month
to 14 years), there were 13 males and 12 females. The most common
symptoms were fever (96%), cough (92%), and respiratory distress
(60%). The duration of symptoms was 7.4 ± 4.2 days before hospitalization. All the patients had parapneumonic empyemas and had
received antibiotics for 10.1 ± 7.5 days before surgery.
Laboratory evaluation revealed a white blood cell count of 17 ± 9.2 thousand/mm3. Thoracentesis was performed in 12 patients. Gram stain was positive in 3, and cultures grew
Streptococcus pneumoniae in all 3. Pleural fluid white blood
cell count was 3826 ± 4105/mm3. Mean pleural fluid pH
was 7.8, LDH was 2769 IU/dL, and glucose was 35 mg/dL. Blood cultures
were positive in 4 of 13 patients (cultures grew Streptococcus
pneumoniae). The bacteriology results, including one
intraoperative culture, thus showed growth in cultures from only 8 patients (32%), all which grew Streptococcus pneumoniae.
Preoperative imaging included chest radiography in 25 (100%); the most
common findings were parapneumonic pleural effusion in 17 (68%),
loculated fluid in 7 (28%), and complete opacification of the
hemithorax in 1 (4%). Ultrasonography was performed in 20 (80%) and
was the most accurate in imaging loculated pleural fluid, identifying
loculations or fibrinous septations in all 20 (100%). Ultrasonography
was not as accurate as computed tomography in imaging the underlying
lung. Computed tomography was performed in 10 (40%) children. It
showed pleural fluid in all 10, but it did not show loculations in 5 (50%). However, it was more accurate, compared with ultrasonography,
in identifying an underlying lung abscess in 1 patient.
Preoperative chest tubes inserted in only 5 patients before surgical
consultation were present for 2 ± 1.6 days. Seven patients were
admitted directly to the intensive care unit for respiratory distress.
All patients with documented loculated parapneumonic fluid collections
underwent VATS. The preoperative LOS was 2.2 ± 2 days (median, 1 day). All patients underwent VATS within 2 weeks of the onset of
symptoms.
The operative time was 80 ± 42 minutes. Three patients (12%) had
associated lung resection or biopsy performed. One patient with a lung
abscess had a central line placed. One patient (4%) had conversion of
VATS to thoracotomy secondary to inadequate visualization because of
bleeding along the chest wall; this also was the only patient who
needed a blood transfusion. Only one operative culture result was
positive, and all specimens for which pathology examination was
performed were consistent with inflammatory tissue, peel, or empyema.
Two patients (8%) required postoperative ventilation (for <24 hours)
and were admitted to the intensive care unit for a mean of 1.8 days.
Postoperative supplemental oxygen was required for 2.3 ± 2 days.
Chest tubes were removed in 3.2 ± 2.2 days, resulting in a
postoperative LOS of 4.9 ± 2.7 days (median, 5 days). There were
no postoperative complications, returns to the operating room, or
deaths. All patients were afebrile before discharge, and 24 (96%) were
discharged on oral antibiotics (usually clindamycin). One patient with
a lung abscess was discharged on home intravenous antibiotics for 21 days. Total LOS for the entire group was 7.3 ± 4 days (median, 7 days).
Follow-up data were available for 22 (88%) children. Symptoms had
resolved in all the children followed. Chest radiography also showed
marked resolution of previous radiographic abnormalities. There were no
recurrences and no hospitalizations of discharged patients.
Childhood empyema usually is secondary to direct spread of
infection to a parapneumonic effusion.5 Approximately 0.6% of pneumonias in children are complicated by empyema, and the
incidence of parapneumonic empyema in children ranges from 0.4 to 6 per
1000 admissions.6,7 The definition of empyema is the
presence of pus in the pleural space, and various criterion exist to
define and classify parapneumonic pleural effusions and
empyema.5,8 Traditionally, empyemas have been divided into
three stages: 1) the exudative stage, characterized by a thin, sterile,
pleural exudate; 2) the fibrinopurulent stage in which the fluid is now
turbid and loculated, with a fibrinous, pleural peel; and 3) the
organizing stage, with a thick exudate and an organized, pleural peel,
encasing the lung and rendering it immobile.5,8
The microbiology of childhood empyema dictates appropriate antibiotic
selection. Haemophilus influenzae, Staphylococcus
aureus, and Streptococcus pneumoniae remain the most
common pathogens cultured in empyema.9-13 In our patients, Streptococcus pneumoniae was the only pathogen
isolated. A majority of our patients (68%) did not have any positive
culture results, and this may be explained by the fact that all our
patients had been receiving antibiotics before obtaining cultures. In
our patients, the most commonly chosen antibiotic for empirical
treatment was clindamycin; this gave adequate coverage against the most common pathogens and addressed the problem of drug-resistant
Streptococcus pneumoniae as well.
In addition to using antibiotics to sterilize the pleural cavity, the
goal of treating empyema is to drain and obliterate the pleural space,
thus allowing the lung to expand and function normally. The timing and
method of attaining these goals is controversial. During the initial
exudative stage, the fluid is thin and free-flowing, and its removal by
thoracentesis or chest tube drainage may result in
cure.5,8,1113-15
However, most patients are managed initially with antibiotics by
their primary care physicians and, in our experience, they have treated
them for a mean of 10 days before presenting to us. Thus, by the time
they are admitted to the hospital, the empyema usually has progressed
to the loculated, fibrinopurulent, or organizing stage. It is therefore
crucial to document the presence of free-flowing pleural fluid before
embarking on pleural drainage. We recommend initial chest
ultrasonography rather than CT to image the pleural cavity for the
presence or absence of loculations. Park and associates have shown
sonography to be superior to CT in evaluating the nature of pleural
fluid in their study of 31 patients.16 Another recent
study in children has shown that CT is not specific in diagnosing
empyema.17 Although chest tube drainage may be successful
in some patients in the fibrinopurulent or loculated stage, this
usually results in prolonged hospital stay. Hoff and colleagues
reported a mean hospital LOS of 20.7 days in patients treated with
chest tube drainage.11 McLaughlin and co-workers treated
11 of 16 patients with chest tube drainage and had an average hospital
LOS of 22.6 days.9 A recent report from Montreal
Children's Hospital showed an average hospital LOS of 27 days for
children with acute empyema.13 If there are loculations on
imaging, we proceed to VATS, as outlined in our treatment algorithm
(Fig 1).
![]()
METHODS
Top
Abstract
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
38.5°C). Patients were discharged
from the hospital when they were afebrile and had their chest tubes
removed. Patients were discharged on oral antibiotics (except one child
with a lung abscess who required home intravenous antibiotics for 21 days). Follow-up took place 3 to 4 weeks postoperatively, and all
patients had a follow-up chest radiography.
![]()
RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

View larger version (28K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Treatment algorithm for the management of empyema in children.
In an attempt to improve drainage of the pleural cavity and decrease treatment failures, especially once loculations have developed, intrapleural fibrinolytic agents (streptokinase and urokinase) have been used.18-21 In addition, percutaneous catheters for the instillation of fibrinolytics have been placed under CT or ultrasound guidance to obtain more complete drainage.16,21,22 Despite success in treating 50% to 90% of their patients nonoperatively, the mean hospital LOS in these studies has been ~21 days, with a failure rate of 10% to 50%.20,21
Another approach to hasten recovery is to perform open surgical drainage or decortication earlier in the course of the disease, usually within 3 to 5 days of hospitalization, in children not responding to conventional therapy.23-26 Although most patients improved with this approach, there was significant morbidity, including wound infections, persistent air leaks, recurrent empyema, and bleeding, resulting in postoperative hospital LOS of 9 days to 6 weeks.23-25 Some surgeons have used a minithoracotomy or muscle-sparing thoracotomy to minimize morbidity.27
Kern and Rodgers were among the first to report the use of thoracoscopy and VATS in the management of children with empyema.4 They treated 9 children and had 1 death, unrelated to the procedure; the survivors had a mean postoperative LOS of 13.4 ± 2.9 days and did not require any other intervention. In another study that reported 12 children who had VATS for parapneumonic empyema, there was no mortality and the postoperative LOS was 6 to 8 days, resulting in a total hospital LOS of 10 to 14 days.28 Silen and Weber reported success using VATS in 3 patients who were discharged by postoperative day 8.29 Davidoff et al successfully treated 7 of 9 children using VATS; they removed chest tubes in an average of 8.5 days.30 The data available from published results of VATS in pediatric empyema, including the present study are tabulated for comparison (Table 1).
|
Our experience with 25 patients reported here reflects the success of others using VATS for the treatment of pediatric empyema. We found that earlier intervention (median of 1 preoperative hospital day) resulted in a faster (mean, 80 minutes) and less morbid procedure (no air leaks requiring prolonged chest drainage). We removed chest tubes earlier (3.2 ± 2.2 days), as soon as drainage was <50 mL/d, than reported on other studies428-30 (4 to 8.5 days) without an increase in complications or recurrences. We were able to discharge our patients in a median of 5 days postoperatively, and our total LOS of 7.3 ± 4 days was significantly less than that reported in the literature.4,6,7,9,13,1423-2528-30
Because early intervention depends on an accurate assessment of the pleural space, we have implemented a treatment algorithm based on early imaging using chest ultrasonography (Fig 1). VATS is indicated if imaging shows the presence of loculated pleural fluid. The algorithm does not require preoperative thoracentesis or chest tube placement, unless the pleural fluid is free-flowing and without evidence of loculation. If thoracentesis is performed, the pleural fluid should be analyzed, and a chest tube should be inserted if there is frank pus or positive Gram stain or culture of pleural fluid, or pleural fluid pH <7.0, pleural fluid glucose <40 mg/dL, and pleural fluid LDH >1000 IU/dL. If there is no improvement in 48 hours with chest tube drainage, we recommend proceeding to VATS.
The implementation of this treatment algorithm, based on our experience using VATS, was 100% successful in curing the disease, resulted in a shorter postoperative stay than that reported in the literature, and was accomplished with minimal morbidity and no mortality (Table 1). Early intervention with VATS in the management of pediatric empyema is safe and is efficient in using health care resources. We recommend adoption of this treatment algorithm in the management of pediatric empyema.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Received for publication Jul 6, 1998; accepted Dec 18, 1998.
Address correspondence to Harsh Grewal, MD, UKSM-W, Pediatric Surgery, Wichita Clinic, 3311 E Murdock, Wichita, KS 67208. E-mail: hrgrewal{at}worldnet.att.net
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
VATS, video-assisted thoracic surgery; CT, computed tomography; LOS, length of stay.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
- Rodgers BM, Talbert JL Thoracoscopy for diagnosis of intrathoracic lesions in children. J Pediatr Surg. 1976; 11:703-708 [CrossRef][Medline]
- Ryckman FC, Rodgers BM Thoracoscopy for intrathoracic neoplasia in children. J Pediatr Surg. 1982; 17:521-524 [CrossRef][Medline]
- Rogers DA, Philippe PG, Lobe TG, Thoracoscopy in children: an initial experience with an evolving technique. J Laparoendosc Surg 1992; 2:7-13 [Medline]
- Kern JA, Rodgers BM Thoracoscopy in the management of empyema in children. J Pediatr Surg. 1993; 28:1128-1132 [CrossRef][Medline]
- Wheeler JG, Jacobs RF. Pleural effusions and empyema. In: Feigin RD, Cherry JD, eds. Textbook of Pediatric Infectious Diseases. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1997:292-301
- Chonmaitree T, Powell KR Parapneumonic pleural effusion and empyema in children. Clin Pediatr. 1983; 22:414-419
- Fontanet AL, McCauley RGK, Coyette Y, Incidence, management, and outcome of childhood empyema: a prospective study of children in Cambodian refugee camps. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1993; 49:789-798
- Light RW. Parapneumonic effusions and empyema. In: Light RW, ed. Pleural Diseases. 3rd ed. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins; 1995:129-153
-
McLaughlin JF,
Goldmann DA,
Rosenbaum DM,
Empyema in children: clinical course and long term follow-up.
Pediatrics.
1984;
73:587-593
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Fajardo JE, Chang MJ Pleural empyema in children: a nationwide retrospective study. South Med J. 1987; 80:593-596 [CrossRef][Medline]
- Hoff SJ, Neblett WW III, Heller RM, Postpneumonic empyema in childhood: selecting appropriate therapy. J Pediatr Surg. 1989; 24:659-664 [CrossRef][Medline]
-
Brooks I
Microbiology of empyema in children and adolescents.
Pediatrics
1990;
85:722-726
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Chan W, Keyser-Gauvin E, Davis GM, Empyema thoracis in children: a 25-year review of the Montreal Children's Hospital experience. J Pediatr Surg. 1997; 32:870-872 [CrossRef][Medline]
- Adeyemo AO, Adejuyigbe O, Taiwo OO Pleural empyema in infants and children: analysis of 298 cases. J Natl Med Assoc. 1984; 76:799-805 [Medline]
- Gocmen A, Kiper N, Toppare M, Conservative treatment of empyema in children. Respiration. 1993; 60:182-185 [Medline]
-
Park CS,
Chung WM,
Lim MK,
Transcatheter instillation of urokinase into loculated pleural effusion: analysis of treatment effect.
AJR Am J Roentgenol.
1996;
167:649-652
[Abstract/Free Full Text] -
Donnelly LF,
Klosterman LA
CT appearance of para pneumonic effusions in children: findings are not specific for empyema.
AJR Am J Roentgenol.
1997;
169:179-182
[Abstract/Free Full Text] -
Rosen H,
Nadkarni V,
Theroux M,
Intrapleural streptokinase as adjunctive treatment for persistent empyema in pediatric patients.
Chest.
1993;
103:1190-1193
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Handman HP, Reuman PD The use of urokinase for loculated thoracic empyema in children: a case report and review of the literature. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1993; 12:958-959 [Medline]
-
Chin NK,
Lim TK
Controlled trial of intrapleural streptokinase in the treatment of pleural empyema and complicated parapneumonic effusions.
Chest.
1997;
111:275-279
[Abstract/Free Full Text] -
Moulton JS,
Benkert RE,
Weisiger KH,
Treatment of complicated pleural fluid collections with image-guided drainage and intracavitary urokinase.
Chest.
1995;
108:1252-1259
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Roupie E, Bouabdallah K, Delclaux C, Intrapleural administration of streptokinase in complicated purulent pleural effusion: a CT-guided strategy. Intensive Care Med. 1996; 22:1351-1353 [Medline]
- Kosloske AM, Cartwright KC The controversial role of decortication in the management of pediatric empyema. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1988; 96:166-170 [Abstract]
- Golladay ES, Wagner CW Management of empyema in children. Am J Surg. 1989; 158:618-621 [CrossRef][Medline]
- Foglia RP, Randolph J Current indications for decortication in the treatment of empyema in children. J Pediatr Surg. 1987; 22:28-33 [CrossRef][Medline]
- Khakoo GA, Goldstraw P, Hansell DM, Surgical treatment of parapneumonic empyema. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1996; 22:348-356 [CrossRef][Medline]
- Raffensperger JG, Luck SR, Shkolnik A, Mini-thoracotomy and chest tube insertion for children with empyema. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1982; 84:497-504 [Abstract]
- Stovroff M, Teague G, Heiss KF, Thoracoscopy in the management of pediatric empyema. J Pediatr Surg. 1995; 30:1211-1215 [CrossRef][Medline]
-
Silen ML,
Weber TR
Thoracoscopic debridement of loculated empyema thoracis in children.
Ann Thorac Surg.
1995;
59:1166-1168
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Davidoff AM, Hebra A, Kerr J, Thoracoscopic management of empyema in children. J Laparoendosc Surg. 1996; 6:S51-S54
Pediatrics (ISSN 0031 4005). Copyright ©1999 by the American Academy of Pediatrics
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. S. Shah, C. M. DiCristina, L. M. Bell, T. Ten Have, and J. P. Metlay Primary Early Thoracoscopy and Reduction in Length of Hospital Stay and Additional Procedures Among Children With Complicated Pneumonia: Results of a Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, July 1, 2008; 162(7): 675 - 681. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-T. T. Li and R. L. Gates Primary Operative Management for Pediatric Empyema: Decreases in Hospital Length of Stay and Charges in a National Sample Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, January 1, 2008; 162(1): 44 - 48. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Sonnappa, G. Cohen, C. M. Owens, C. van Doorn, J. Cairns, S. Stanojevic, M. J. Elliott, and A. Jaffe Comparison of Urokinase and Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery for Treatment of Childhood Empyema Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., July 15, 2006; 174(2): 221 - 227. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I M Balfour-Lynn, E Abrahamson, G Cohen, J Hartley, S King, D Parikh, D Spencer, A H Thomson, D Urquhart, and on behalf of the Paediatric Pleural Diseases Subco BTS guidelines for the management of pleural infection in children Thorax, February 1, 2005; 60(suppl_1): i1 - i21. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. H. Rathore Changing Epidemiology and Management of Empyema AAP Grand Rounds, September 1, 2004; 12(3): 28 - 28. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. L. Ray, J. W. Berkenbosch, P. Russo, and J. D. Tobias Tissue Plasminogen Activator as an Adjuvant Therapy for Pleural Empyema in Pediatric Patients J Intensive Care Med, January 1, 2004; 19(1): 44 - 50. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A K Baranwal, M Singh, R K Marwaha, and L Kumar Empyema thoracis: a 10-year comparative review of hospitalised children from south Asia Arch. Dis. Child., November 1, 2003; 88(11): 1009 - 1014. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T N Hilliard, A J Henderson, and S C L. Hewer Management of parapneumonic effusion and empyema Arch. Dis. Child., October 1, 2003; 88(10): 915 - 917. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S C Sit, G Cohen, A Jaffe, A H Thomson, and J Hull Urokinase in the treatment of childhood empyema Thorax, January 1, 2003; 58(1): 93 - 94. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. King and A. Thomson Radiological perspectives in empyema: Childhood respiratory infections Br. Med. Bull., March 1, 2002; 61(1): 203 - 214. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||











