PEDIATRICS Vol. 99 No. 5 May 1997, pp. 729 (doi:10.1542/peds.99.5.729)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eggleston, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eggleston, P. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Respiratory Tract

PEDIATRICS Vol. 99 No. 5 May 1997, pp. 729-730

COMMENTARY:
Are beta -Adrenergic Bronchodilators Safe?

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

Since the introduction of beta 2-selective adrenergic drugs in the 1960s and the development of the metered-dose inhaler (MDI) delivery system, these agents have rapidly become the most commonly prescribed medications for asthma. In 1993, for example, beta -adrenergic drugs represented 71% of the total prescriptions written by pediatricians for asthma.1

At the same time that the drugs were becoming widely accepted by physicians and patients, reports have appeared suggesting that the drugs have subtle but important toxicity. The first suggestions came from epidemiologic studies in England showing that the timing of a nationwide surge in deaths attributable to asthma coincided with the introduction of a new MDI that delivered a large dose of isoproterenol.2 A similar correlation was found 20 years later in New Zealand when an MDI was introduced that dispensed high doses of a potent new agent, fenoterol.3 More recently, Canadian case-control studies showed that hospitalizations and deaths were more frequent in persons who used two or more canisters per month, ie, who took more than 10 to 15 puffs of the drugs per day.4 Because these were case-control studies, it was not possible to look beyond the relationship and to determine whether the excess use of the drug somehow contributed to the deaths or whether sicker patients both used more inhalers and died more commonly.

A second suggestion of subtle toxic effects came from experiments such as those that Simons . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JWatch GeneralHome page
SALMETEROL TOLERANCE IN KIDS WITH EXERCISE-INDUCED ASTHMA
Journal Watch (General), May 13, 1997; 1997(513): 3 - 3.
[Full Text]