Published online June 29, 2009
PEDIATRICS Vol. 124 No. 1 July 2009, pp. 375-377 (doi:10.1542/peds.2009-0339)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sittig, D. F.
Right arrow Articles by Singh, H.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sittig, D. F.
Right arrow Articles by Singh, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Computers
Right arrowRelated AAP Red Book topics:
Influenza
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

COMMENTARY

Improving Clinical Quality Indicators Through Electronic Health Records: It Takes More Than Just a Reminder

Dean F. Sittig, PhDa, Jonathan M. Teich, MD, PhDb,c, Jerome A. Osheroff, MDd,e and Hardeep Singh, MD, MPHf

a University of Texas School of Health Information Sciences and UT-Memorial Hermann Center for Healthcare Quality and Safety, Houston, Texas
b Elsevier Health Sciences, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
c Department of Medicine, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
d Thomson Reuters, Ann Arbor, Michigan
e Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
f Health Policy and Quality Program, Houston Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Center of Excellence, and Center of Inquiry to Improve Outpatient Safety Through Effective Electronic Communication, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Section of Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

State-of-the-art electronic health record systems with advanced clinical decision support (CDS) capabilities can fundamentally improve quality and reduce costs of health care.1,2 However, these outcomes have not been universally achieved.3,4 As the study by Fiks et al5 in this issue of Pediatrics demonstrates, providing CDS in the form of "alerts" to encourage desired health care activities may not be sufficient to make a substantial impact.6 Maximizing the potential of CDS for improving quality and safety of care requires attention to several factors, not all of which are related to the computer system.7

The goal for the study by Fiks et al was to increase vaccination rates in asthmatic children, so in examining the results one must first consider what caused the low vaccination rate in their population. Several factors could account for the low initial vaccination rates and, hence, could explain the minimal improvements with alerting. Without knowledge about these factors, it may be too much to expect alerts alone to fix the problem. Alerts are helpful when an unusual occurrence must come to a physician's attention or when a necessary process might be overlooked . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Address correspondence to Dean F. Sittig, PhD, University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Houston, School of Health Information Sciences, 6410 Fannin St, Houston, TX 77030. E-mail: dean.f.sittig@uth.tmc.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?